%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:19:51-04:00
2021-07-02T14:19:50-04:00
2021-07-02T14:19:51-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-11501.a1
uuid:d506e5d2-02d9-47cd-b57a-dc3f15d77c20
uuid:b2aea6fa-4781-45ad-9fe3-9e46c956576c
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-11501.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-11501.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:19:51 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 25, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-11501)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated Au\
gust 15, 2002, 2002, in which she concluded)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(it is not clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.97 0 Td
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
28.766 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-42.736 -1.125 Td
(appealed.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant)Tj
T*
(engaged in deliberate falsification; and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.799 0 Td
(\(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance deci\
sion is)Tj
-15.799 -1.125 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.386 0 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-31.574 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated February 14,)Tj
T*
(2002. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline H)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Drug Involvement\), Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\), and Guideline E)Tj
T*
(\(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which she indicated she did\
not want a hearing. )Tj
37.853 0 Td
(A File of Relevant)Tj
-37.853 -1.125 Td
(Material \(FORM\) was prepared. )Tj
13.19 0 Td
(A copy of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the FORM was given to Applicant, who submitted a response to the FORM.)Tj
-13.19 -2.125 Td
(The case was assigned to the Administrative Judge for determination afte\
r receipt of Applicant's response to the FORM.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The Judge issued a written decision,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.747 0 Td
(dated August 15, 2002, in which she concluded it is not clearly consiste\
nt with the)Tj
-14.747 -1.125 Td
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
28.766 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(case is before the Board on Applicant's)Tj
-28.766 -1.125 Td
(appeal from the Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(ݢ%B2qw/\\n)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]