NyѢZbTc.B_QW[ wB1Q ӌ e#S}(9 ~d(
E-7!
Gu -11
~އ.q-%ug [~[р?6y#]Ŀ/߰Zag7B0in;ó|fn3 mn
N;鷵߁K;\
I8)x KyP. {|9arcda`&
.'-W'z:?.O_?% w= OXI!1/=;ÔwM$VE(J:M ?ʅҏ6nɺ ~RO,.ٿ&/F%)Cd m6&}c7JWZ+~ h
ԖbW5
@*юB)ğR9R#<,Nsebo{윪E菁ic L p
t,K̓|'e4KVo1
5ZމPGi
Isc,3|4XoT0鞨!ZwZ~Vz/̕9_r2%9MJ3rOstAt.۠
oO|7zM
2ٞIGض߅g aǿ9h}\gNemuiz}lTfaȤ4= V,}q=ktjY)1Xl}5Q۠3ٌ5՟z}ݼD7l9[vn]5hh!OrM~e/Og\o
qoB
pNKxdL%1o٭CEI8c}3ROozh o)@Ƅ c.{~yz|O36img9uz a 4Eu8feиΟ{wi}샔\g gh$"yr sޯ5xف倢#s?R{4JvWXKcK3^n9Vmyy?K;218s'{[nyjs W8e2(-5Vo2~ _zD
&f C@/0L^IU?YMks\c4Ά2i7ifCgiԹx$s_GpR.rf_'/㽕[yBGz Sv
m
2
`
; \ahN V`m针1<bKa$t?limnhh\"As/Ö/Gce;]:Mޒ+ec6z
2Sc܃09g{I0@r#m @ )MB<
!@TDieЂkϷe38_ye!udGڙR5c$ $ιqk%9/)gJNp(bvl: Mg-iLYR#Z^cz'Vcm~K٧֏-}`θ ~z
u/JuǜVsg'j;6xu6G~EF]>zamβ$ 7HW8,N8d)T8]ڏIJj+!5*}N>}
:FS,D~09~!<5z_
!WCNsvc+~#M[uq{%eI_#]m 7ߠ#sބ[t!qU
|t '}i#-]I"%*;
kkX#_b2 T_{*쾓 A L; g ,~ùw*v.c 0'YX=Fo湇X>yX{M^?{ݷip]iN9;; f.:k ݡX8̋٘۳sFFT=Suͤ:z_'
1w_%,AL[ mA)wO}8=.%| ~&gy^6
'@ t7w؎>mKuV[X9kUՇOZ`Z#AǡS^tήYvRњ_-4Ь WK )1oK 9Ȉw6<_DLn*~?GRrd$L, fH/3^zP|)9io!gn nE \kI"hע4CT㑷8uj5pr4ޒ*3L
5[^Pdk'e@ddpUN63+$%ܳwKo9 %:Ǽ)䥔d
kon tMX4@v^N y?CzzpK 0x/O\qKl:KyD*h eμ.5 3l|{܃ɣ%[0Ѧgb=bYpb ~4ɪȴ}\`_oDF<;Hܫ%oYu _#wv?J;`ֶׇyyeދ;n0K?eNXڹ
2
+r+yhOQv.#M2єH;uytT)4-__/
pl}o':qH4UnzS$ixR2B0>a`''thpLҞ#/ateP fhHC1c/`I]/Z=+,4I9c-ie-lUʳƇnG@֩c LAP`byDVSHs8ْ*'뽦5ur XĀQSSY-cpx>YYYleG^TdK} yL$2# Htԇ o ̖KVc >qJ08sԹ = @& $ 9^ gݩwnvs$s'nud q=/{ I0.hNǔq19b 7
(a/Ӓd=~Nx/#̻ ڀsbk 1ݜJSc5:zl M7rlz4Gs0ffZ9 ;d!F{ 0mν{ pyW* mx;0 1q灃ìwd' `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `0 `xWʚ'p~#dLj-8 g[ö{َd Ezzcȱbr,c 7~Tat9e72I9)?DNJUM=ޔ%:aNI:R5_LV)|l
z:ec( Nhݘވz
vFmDRGbp(& Y&NM-T_(ixJʔGSPnmeI͊D2bdGMPRḫinؼa`۲7[}PeksڵA"I9$SP%d/sFhٰ^ځ[Ny1~Z`+wp1=wZ?]r ;ͯÂ_Q\cҾYՌX_SW.~O+8<RjkH,fO k2=A*#=cfi?
S*tιt}ܽ"d.+:qsIFw%|EYS)[_ #C K=ŷ.aω(G(gP L+yIR p_fz
E+(`Zǝnѫ yHJi]%%%~jj"{z2@ٝt@z\F~aVh\ŢeYeU(lgXR"m]ُy R)G?.>#v:2+ּ(굢=3}V`dWooO,;a#;_RG?GZ9πL
KZ3<ڀ87F\gj11q鱸5\pvw'X >m8֒U ??#11Tcā<0M(Gy~0&%%sT>*]tAYڎlڄG{z5Hj]?|Fp\pU߫~ի}WێԌw*Hp%K ?$4d M(XL&!}adXJیcI87
f[ eZ=GQ$oș~|ɟ51~|5:f HD 8~;9O ,N?ׂwF{5!waO.t\ƿ/HD1n۵q?sb#6Ibꏝ x:30?tb/87 iXOO&kG!*~__ vb|TnG:ɀ( ],r EDn$/&Fq˼NI9u="~ v3Ve{MS qJ"p#VlC+l)v]Et^G_҇O
v:vO A8EϨP-Ŭ:[{]ڳv4UTڑc2{%gJ;g399zB-͞
jPujR%*kV nP(..HAA.QU鱟3Rf0I N]Lųv׳eJ_ϡgK߯Pr8-]ӍvCw
mFn3Z.G3(ɌXI!ۭ'd`ag@G ]Ff0|-ɜ!kkhgc+Ii<"Mp^H'Ӈ=41e2B'dدt TE .>@NTs5r
p4\MV.ƨ&>:B" 6sQ0 \R2 (]"(!4'PH\`34
My%1] }|4= zz (?x}j$* ![V}1>Pyx Q Se2>-Zc)gNéTwZg zB)Z(U)튥 (eB9*2
) |>7s3%X[Tj %|u)&K)US߾\&"d)@:AM~
#!pp #ʭ )~rQ$
;;vU`QCU>Pf#;~Sr;O_O!wI1J,$btFѠ|LQ+Q)&X""Hx|X>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-13566.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-13566.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:21:37 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 528.75 591.75 237 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(Applicant also argues that he no longer has a problem with alcohol or dr\
ug abuse. )Tj
33.936 0 Td
(The SOR did not allege that)Tj
-33.936 -1.125 Td
(Applicant had a substance abuse problem)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.828 0 Td
(under Guideline G \(Alcohol Consumption\) or Guideline H \(Drug)Tj
-16.828 -1.125 Td
(Involvement\). )Tj
5.887 0 Td
(Furthermore, the Administrative Judge's adverse decision does not rely o\
n)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.923 0 Td
(findings against Applicant)Tj
-35.811 -1.125 Td
(based on past substance abuse. )Tj
12.552 0 Td
(Applicant's reform with respect to alcohol and drugs is irrelevant to wh\
ether he falsified)Tj
-12.552 -1.125 Td
(a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.109 0 Td
(clearance questionnaire in September 1999 by failing to disclose three a\
lcohol-related incidents, whether)Tj
-4.109 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's 1989 conviction falls under 10 U.S.C.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.178 0 Td
(\247986, and whether Applicant failed to satisfy the debt covered by)Tj
-20.178 -1.125 Td
(SOR subparagraph 3.a.)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
(On appeal, Applicant also contends that the SOR is incorrect to the exte\
nt that it alleges that he was charged with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(distribution of a dangerous drug. The Administrative Judge specifically \
found that Applicant was charged with)Tj
T*
(possession of a cocaine and accepted Applicant's denial that he had ever\
been charged with distribution of a dangerous)Tj
T*
(drug \(Decision at p. 2\). Given the Judge's finding, Applicant's argume\
nt about the accuracy of the SOR allegation is)Tj
T*
(moot.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-13566.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-13566.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:21:37 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(U.S.C. 986 by the Secretary of Defense together with such rationale as m\
ay be requested by the Deputy General)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741 Tm
(Counsel \(Legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.387 0 Td
(Counsel\)." )Tj
(\(Operating Instruction, paragraph 3.g.\))Tj
-6.387 -2.125 Td
(Under paragraph 2.f. of the Operating Instruction, the Board is responsi\
ble for resolving any appeal as to the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(applicability of 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
13.027 0 Td
(However,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(paragraph 2.f. of the Operating Instruction cannot enlarge the Board's)Tj
-13.027 -1.125 Td
(jurisdiction and authority beyond the terms of the Directive. )Tj
24.271 0 Td
(Accordingly, Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.192 0 Td
(construes paragraph 2.f. as meaning)Tj
-32.464 -1.125 Td
(the Board is responsible for resolving any appeal as to the applicabilit\
y of 10 U.S.C. \247986 as long as the appeal issue)Tj
T*
(raised)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(falls within the scope of the Board's jurisdiction and authority under t\
he Directive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Under the terms of the Department of Defense memorandum implementing 10 \
U.S.C. \247986, Applicant's case falls under)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\): "The person has been convicted in any court\
of the United States of a crime and sentenced to)Tj
T*
(imprisonment for a term exceeding one year." The Administrative Judge's \
application of 10 U.S.C. \247986 was not made)Tj
T*
(erroneous by the fact that Applicant's sentence of four years imprisonme\
nt was suspended and he served no time in)Tj
T*
(prison or jail. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.61 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-00407 \(September 18, 2002\) at p. 3 \(the language o\
f the Deputy Secretary of)Tj
-8.942 -1.125 Td
(Defense's June 7, 2001 memorandum)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.232 0 Td
(implementing 10 U.S.C. \247986 precludes acceptance of the argument that\
10)Tj
-15.232 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. \247986 does not apply when an applicant's sentence of imprisonme\
nt was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.758 0 Td
(suspended\). )Tj
(Similarly, the fact that)Tj
-31.758 -1.125 Td
(Applicant completed his probation successfully does not take his case ou\
tside the scope of 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
T*
(Accordingly,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.499 0 Td
(the Board affirms the Judge's conclusion that 10 U.S.C. \247986 preclude\
d him from making a favorable)Tj
-5.499 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision in Applicant's case.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Having addressed the issue of the applicability of 10 U.S.C. \247986, al\
l that remains for the Board to do is consider)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's request that it recommend further)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.396 0 Td
(consideration of his case for a waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986\(d\). )Tj
25.577 0 Td
(Because)Tj
-43.973 -1.125 Td
(the Board concludes that the Administrative Judge's adverse security cle\
arance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.78 0 Td
(decision can be affirmed based on the)Tj
-31.78 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings and conclusions under Guideline E and Guideline F, inde\
pendent of the Judge's application of 10)Tj
T*
(U.S.C.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\247986 to the )Tj
7.695 0 Td
(case, the Board need not make a recommendation as to whether this case s\
hould be considered for a)Tj
-7.695 -1.125 Td
(waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Operating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.079 0 Td
(Instruction, paragraph 3.f. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.663 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-12452 \(January 27,)Tj
-28.742 -1.125 Td
(2003\) at p. 6.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.572 -2.125 Td
(Conclusions)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.572 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate the Administrative Judge committed f\
actual or legal error. )Tj
37.988 0 Td
(The Administrative)Tj
-37.988 -1.125 Td
(Judge properly concluded that Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.092 0 Td
(1989 conviction requires application of 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
22.663 0 Td
(Because the Judge's)Tj
-39.755 -1.125 Td
(adverse decision is being affirmed on grounds independent of the applica\
tion of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.157 0 Td
(10 U.S.C. \247986, the Board does not)Tj
-32.157 -1.125 Td
(make a recommendation as to whether this case should be considered for a\
waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 290.25 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 265.5 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 188.25 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 163.5 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael D. Hipple)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 86.25 cm
0 0 m
129.311 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 61.5 Tm
(Michael D. Hipple)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
[50 0 R]
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-13566.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-13566.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:21:37 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(SOR subparagraphs based on the Judge's findings and conclusions about th\
e matters covered by those SOR)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(subparagraphs. )Tj
(The Judge's favorable formal findings with respect to eleven SOR subpara\
graphs do not negate or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(diminish the negative security significance of the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.063 0 Td
(adverse formal findings with respect to six other SOR)Tj
-23.063 -1.125 Td
(subparagraphs. )Tj
(Furthermore, the Judge's adverse formal findings do not reflect arbitrar\
y or capricious)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.861 0 Td
(action by the)Tj
-40.861 -1.125 Td
(Judge. )Tj
(Finally, the Judge's adverse formal findings with respect to those six S\
OR subparagraphs provide a rational basis)Tj
T*
(for the Judge's adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions about Applicant's security eligibility and the Judge's overa\
ll unfavorable security)Tj
T*
(clearance decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(Whether the Board should recommend Applicant's case be considered for a \
waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 648 cm
0 0 m
504.68 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 532.6797 648.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(The)Tj
-43.057 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge concluded that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.941 0 Td
(Applicant's 1989 drug-related conviction )Tj
16.62 0 Td
(falls under the terms of 10 U.S.C. \247986)Tj
-31.561 -1.125 Td
(and application of that statute precluded a favorable security clearance\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.431 0 Td
(decision. )Tj
3.833 0 Td
(The Judge also stated "I do not)Tj
-32.263 -1.125 Td
(recommend further consideration of this case for a waiver of Title 10 U.\
S.C. 986." )Tj
33.232 0 Td
(On appeal, Applicant asks for a)Tj
-33.232 -1.125 Td
(waiver in his case because his conviction is 14 years old, his jail sent\
ence was suspended, and he successfully completed)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(probation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 64.9902 582.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 64.9902 582 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 552.75 Tm
(Under 10 U.S.C. \247986, the Department of Defense may not grant or rene\
w a security clearance for a defense contractor)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(official or employee that falls under any)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.299 0 Td
(of four statutory categories [10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\) through \(c\)\(\
4\)]. )Tj
26.576 0 Td
(Pursuant to)Tj
-42.875 -1.125 Td
(10 U.S.C. \247986\(d\), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the\
military)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.518 0 Td
(department concerned may authorize an)Tj
-30.518 -1.125 Td
(exception to the statutory prohibition against granting or renewing a se\
curity clearance for cases covered by 10 U.S.C.)Tj
T*
(\247986\(c\)\(1\) or 10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(4\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In a June 7, 2001 memorandum implementing the provisions of 10 U.S.C. \247\
986, the Deputy Secretary of Defense)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(indicated: "The decision as to whether a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.264 0 Td
(particular case involves a meritorious case that would justify pursuing \
a request)Tj
-16.264 -1.125 Td
(for waiver shall be the province of the DoD Component concerned \(i.e. a\
ll)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.018 0 Td
(Components authorized to grant, deny or)Tj
-30.018 -1.125 Td
(revoke access to classified information\) beginning with the Director of\
the Component Central Adjudication Facility)Tj
T*
(\(CAF\), the Component appellate authority or other appropriate senior C\
omponent official." )Tj
36.815 0 Td
(For purposes of the June 7,)Tj
-36.815 -1.125 Td
(2001 memorandum, the Director,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.607 0 Td
(DOHA is the Director of the Component Central Adjudication Facility for \
industrial)Tj
-13.607 -1.125 Td
(security clearance cases.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(To implement the June 7, 2001 memorandum, the Director, DOHA issued an o\
perating instruction \(dated July 10, 2001\))Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(which indicates the following:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("Administrative Judges are responsible for initial resolution as to whet\
her or not 10 U.S.C. 986 applies to the facts of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the case." )Tj
(\(Operating Instruction,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.515 0 Td
(paragraph 2.e.\))Tj
-13.515 -2.125 Td
("In the event of an appeal raising an issue as to the applicability of 1\
0 U.S.C. 986, the Appeal Board is responsible for)Tj
T*
(final resolution of the issue." )Tj
11.795 0 Td
(\(Operating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.582 0 Td
(Instruction, paragraph 2.f.\))Tj
-16.376 -2.125 Td
("In the event of a final determination that 10 U.S.C. 986 applies to the\
facts of a case, the Director is solely responsible)Tj
T*
(for the discretionary decision as to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.051 0 Td
(whether to recommend to the Deputy General Counsel \(Legal Counsel\) tha\
t 10)Tj
-14.051 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. 986 should be waived by the Secretary of Defense." )Tj
23.958 0 Td
(\(Operating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.582 0 Td
(Instruction, paragraph 2.g.\))Tj
-28.54 -2.125 Td
("If an Administrative Judge issues a decision denying or revoking a clea\
rance solely as a result of 10 U.S.C. 986, the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge shall include)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.164 0 Td
(without explanation either the statement 'I recommend further considerat\
ion of this)Tj
-14.164 -1.125 Td
(case for a waiver of 10 U.S.C. 986' or 'I do not recommend further)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.825 0 Td
(consideration of this case for a waiver of 10 U.S.C.)Tj
-26.825 -1.125 Td
(986.'" )Tj
(\(Operating Instruction, paragraph 3.e.\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("If the Appeal Board issues a decision denying or revoking a clearance s\
olely as a result of 10 U.S.C. 986, the Appeal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Board shall include without explanation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.247 0 Td
(either the statement 'The Appeal Board recommends consideration of this \
case)Tj
-16.247 -1.125 Td
(for a waiver of 10 U.S.C. 986' or 'The Appeal Board does not recommend)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.77 0 Td
(consideration of this case for a waiver of 10)Tj
-29.77 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. 986.'" \(Operating Instruction, paragraph 3.f.\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("In any case in which the Administrative Judge, or the Appeal Board in t\
he event of an appeal, recommends)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consideration of a waiver of 10 U.S.C. 986, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.135 0 Td
(Director shall within his sole discretion determine whether or not to)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(forward the case to the Deputy General Counsel \(Legal Counsel\) for fur\
ther consideration)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.237 0 Td
(of a possible waiver of 10)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<