%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:24:20-04:00
2021-07-02T14:24:19-04:00
2021-07-02T14:24:20-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-17936.a1
uuid:756f1026-5735-4976-ab97-8bbb5967431a
uuid:909f18c0-e390-41c0-b149-ae30d4443321
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-17936.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-17936.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:24:20 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 24, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-17936)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision dated Mar\
ch 20, 2002, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national )Tj
14.19 0 Td
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(For the reasons set)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(forth below the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's decision is arbitrary, capricious or contrary)Tj
T*
(to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated October)Tj
T*
(12, 2001. )Tj
(The SOR was based on )Tj
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\) and Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant declined a hearing. )Tj
12.023 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued an opinion based on the administrative r\
ecord consisting)Tj
-12.023 -1.125 Td
(of a File of a Relevant Material )Tj
12.801 0 Td
(\(FORM\). )Tj
(The Administrative Judge's decision, dated March 20, 2002, was unfavorab\
le.)Tj
-12.801 -1.125 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal of that decision.)Tj
T*
(Applicant submitted two appeal briefs. )Tj
15.774 0 Td
(The Board rejected the second brief on the grounds that there was not go\
od)Tj
-15.774 -1.125 Td
(cause for the second brief.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp. )Tj
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(WoA>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wId/(.?4$:Iƈ1}G]0~}n";0j$6,/@ioU[Iǹ5 AջOjS贙tGfhwP:OfpDכ (jWQyd({Dg%&qB\>DDq|N|UVdFȔ`^9=>w9L
.H` ,
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HSwwnXPlh$ȋ/1"*(*QԨQ`cVQbwX,}s朹s ԅ$ uM[XD\x|:G p1.A-]b_?4.( vNk: @NjDG>x@!_pjL%$fuQp`@@zWƅ'ƻ-b +3xzdx\XY\ qr V' [Don_q@@3@ QX.AKk}ʂh+
@n5*60 j!/k@ `ak -}
DTwΏϰ7El
[ILu:svqusóaMTZu4mּEV۴mNt
={~eC7waЏ?
!QCc
7rT1c~7>qIL25iگӓg̜2;5my,\xeaU֬]~C~㦜ʹe;vڽgo
*<|h'N:}28WMS9zl$ڃLABJLi*ZC˂·B0KH DžK^#zzYUSUUϤG
JnX(KFNWP455iŚZN[O몭mʹ-(oFY!;β)7}r{9@d9E#/[r\ ˧su.@Eu#tZNgQ/bg[,-=,-5jd)@QF>B)sHuTF
pa0W/ U^9z{ը@R=<%O
y!TJJ%\zu:A@Id|94ԪsFrP2,9R(p!|=z>E
7he[qW>?oxw%j^W|֜+0Pv?TUbQ^
~v6VffYx7/1-15m;ѦP1L>ƾ> cg̨566Pa02
y|v̰c4B[3Z
,j|ݦ/_fxVa 4"'
\]__xN-v08e@YC>3"gJm}#gNwn/`$E%,0!
V&Xΐ!MP`.,(})x%-pJ`+ȀH((8',pB4sP`(