%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:25:47-04:00
2021-07-02T14:25:47-04:00
2021-07-02T14:25:47-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-20700.a1
uuid:d5c9be71-964f-4a1d-990a-13fed0d60c0a
uuid:bcd2e6c9-41d2-4f2c-8732-070213e21492
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-20700.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-20700.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:25:47 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 19, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-20700)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.262 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn D. MacKinnon, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.04 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.736 -2.2 Td
(Barry P. Steinberg, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Burt Smith issued a decision, dated May 29, 2002, i\
n which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the decision of the Administr\
ative Judge.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6, dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge's decision is flawed because it)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(does not indicate what standard of proof)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.356 0 Td
(is required of Applicant to meet his burden in the case; \(2\) whether t\
here is)Tj
-16.356 -1.125 Td
(sufficient evidence in support of the Administrative Judge's decision; \(\
3\) whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.811 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge committed)Tj
-32.811 -1.125 Td
(error by not applying Personal Conduct Mitigating Factor 6; \(4\) whethe\
r the Administrative Judge improperly)Tj
T*
(introduced a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.22 0 Td
(new element into Question 26 of Applicant's personnel security questionn\
aire to bolster the government's)Tj
-5.22 -1.125 Td
(case; \(5\) whether the Administrative Judge ignored)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.744 0 Td
(relevant precedent in deciding this case adverse to Applicant; and)Tj
-20.744 -1.125 Td
(\(6\) whether the DOHA appeal process penalizes the Applicant by extendi\
ng the time period)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.988 0 Td
(during which he is)Tj
-36.988 -1.125 Td
(precluded from making a subsequent application for a security clearance.\
)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued a Statement o\
f Reasons \(SOR\) to Applicant dated)Tj
T*
(November 30, 2001. )Tj
(The SOR was based on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Personal Conduct \(Guideline E\) and Sexual Behavior \(Guideline D\).)Tj
T*
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR dated January 3, 2002, in which\
he requested a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.325 0 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(The hearing was)Tj
-39.823 -1.125 Td
(held on April 23, 2002. )Tj
9.583 0 Td
(On May 29, 2002, the Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he \
concluded it was not)Tj
-9.583 -1.125 Td
(clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.97 0 Td
(consistent with the national interest to grant Applicant a security clea\
rance. )Tj
30.323 0 Td
(This case is before the Board on)Tj
-33.293 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal of that decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(\)g,0Lv)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
CemJiatH#@EMRVw3$a5v[v^m3p}3e|;<䃜X=kWX}6?أ! -ziצGHbڦreC9ˈV>E
ϴ
g]ZgdK$|""!%f1dT˹RGs-u4ZX3a|>0̢YW鲹Ʉ3f5kD˰dQph𘇽@3w8@Y_
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\X\b
h$K^c" ETPTbKT(h,XwElX+2#؟w@JZ{oorH#$z
_L+6iaqiK6(p[1(anEmP% pj3vhto,@1Qϑa2._L\&=_D89u2~>$ ly!M}N=
rMo`BqGSKDůx#PR*\% uH/9RY\kqtUJx.Lrf*.T&u g3eҹm7䌪Jsz[PCnPUK\˻{TXWժ{h&OFZ|X^
5nҴY-[(Mv;t'~ֹ!_˯7v?t
GȨ1z/ ?bd_F';.y&OI:mf͙y,L_xe3V\]~Mlݖ=k]dݷC9=vSsq.^V۵|JHOuFPdjX˾̃y$OOKQN+Pe2AV(/{{>}̻gBZE[uѾѺjݴvNjZ)44ϔmzbnmN14,NKEKUfimd D||:t^Vw=u/z'D}H_ow ~E???ڿ:#V6Ü1.c]FfFprTv4q:Z;8;|KL;:Id^¹JU W+JCA"$<Ӽ4Iy!TKԶi9EL{i)ڔ`J5K0̩8KU,>o9Y"K9C;zceɡ;Q%Q9Ò!ގfCcC-y%*Z7WWx)gp
s
u=P[x@V,}s{S{c{C{{m{M{
]w݁f-KW*yAyy~@[s[[bfjޱ,yʚcͶf!2zkk[kb5[}ndwFQӼHRο:ufxZB^@JJW!TWEp>ƫJxPӌaAUp~eWyJ=\x7Oep?keZK%HC]d`>Vb)0ABxH~ٗcV9c
kHE$!
qp'p38\CO