͗28ckk8RRBO#]WI ]@ܵ
jF ɕ ?;wnmPށ\v*21QeTqJXN8M. з3h`x]bX2X٭-- ςgj 4w EAtH%5ч+]./ t:4I)h8=-Sg*8ZI˂PN F\!%ZDzd9ѷ'! Hn!DpD(u7$}diBM v̑cAٌy'8+BI;-Z:k AAer z?'](69)Ҩyz j}H(}b.w[t0(~o7:JmVa+N qH3ǜɆt_ٓ՜~f_syIn^V6] 3W. V$
!FZ
=<7
εS8. d6S)9klyAS۩݅_ Q*-߉"5TPpyG/ JNxu+ؙz?
8pUs^AQ]Ww/vy
, ®ح
J@4jc$DMmjgjJNm1t8mԶAMkk8 ;wJL[ߞ9ь`W,~EMʙ[\ZX|$gm 6`{ݮ݁I:3 7h4VZR"ϐXeR 4E-EҠSs9bs H1tX[\^`*9/\*WK:;W:s*5##O{qeL)XjO#5E1o}@X!Ccؽҗ^>(8$ *qBݎcC? くK `MX]UϪ"JWዧG Q42.|Ȃ)s'W\
e^h_ * T9X=h\)% 5]wѕ'uI_zVg(톲hFe$t띞KiJaRrӴt(ZHS5Cq=<֤+zm4BQ]IISk1u`ieM y'X ,mLZ5ziy5Tcfxl).7SBz,3晄YETGc{ *̊Yqm\Odĵ6 ?kٙ~t"!գiDe9o33Umz|ۦOW]I%C($% + T QEKڽ ::Gg4p@i\7MS @AȽ
by_fىw϶ҘzЯX}p,`/m'
Y:7WưZ>QG;4I
8A
_E@jR7{!^5N峁π,/ jS՛)
@Lf
CooW%BT
= u%ڞ2p=v跙A}
}@h1kl3 6ռq 3ak \χ>
T5n>}i؛Q@=>hQob^dŘ%✒ W9:- S5[kb٦/Lo8I}<*Y};֗&^1o@/eP=~r@\[M{6> Iv <˴SSuQ>f5ըP1ɼ>I![fao*˘{B!-WSv pGI4@_s)Ƙ8F?/=sWcm6#$; L9@^ATZH4 r;% ?0y'F m0n3MsC |s܌a%}z b6)>G}fn1g,:Sd sK dn
%}"!P4lr-)mgdeHJy-iŐ|"O D@o9(}CSwjΒ}r?ޫ|`/j֫zޥ>#$X2ԳzkZ/s_JgI J QeU/&/xlU=A 2EPcWi8^J鐭&^#Rҳ mG#9E.Ii>}cISqүEqs0)i*2?ͣ,T$nH- O's
_fO2Ρ~ IjWOC_#8o {VE6[]77bPNPe*\1Cy4BS,T{
9 v^ rpdiD̝MgWƠz1HD>سl]1z A qH.cmɱ8++.(֯Q5 ;Z#2Bw
ƲGɧM>}AbఽH !Tw >3T#rSl^
5ST!h,.G@\Mo[j)2?-[/%>u6ʵPC+@*/c o F(=AG-g cda{o퇰.g<)V]}j.e@o{ ? x )ᳱWghxz>Nfjq *Q׆~1!3v7h = \;-ˁ:ZjFNn.8xw)7iټ
w+m n'x WCM#tܗ{pUs ! DHEL@E*GP8 jT;V0 Nk-#EYNkW2'B"!Y.4*S<{cU\FY>u,e ڇ3Uж/%UŐ>y ꭎq\ ;)abٲ3:K
Ibgx +%U
FNX4l!Ek!K[]%Դ# v_~Y
#weԷu \1C/[oYo+ʬeB}{n|v;3w
ȶ1^R=R zDmZwp ;vavw
]Yw(`8xlM},k7vmpI)#~B\y
Y6 bkEN;OSG[$(VL%KWS"9:?kyGiVJRv]ҹ-'uG ]I:ÎK-' [)Dô2ܷύ>dL /u0ᷰЭ="z/
?wBBviUrebux( dq.k8B>]c}piij&)[Rpt(Kt6)䢑rlTljKcxŌXyUۇq̇&/ L4~3&0g'oͥ/O{TNz=tTgK"jx8
i(y;܃66_9VdnδLmpߜ LJu?!^/=\^Lׅۤx=Qs 4l:r\<ysjF
Y&k֜q7{ro'Zh~ kV=Fy%#}9ۻXIP6k1_aR '@-
ah@ F}M2_h
sCLS/Gމ}K̟OpLoᛯ*_AǮ045{ %} r抟": lGajg/Dץ|/\cWE/; >z]سx8f_$ϥt3% }%^mM[_zP? X$=~{ou;oZuÏb<$ C:$ԟx{鿱Bے]r{"o˯vK_$Ρ
wp/p g
E}8V+ 61M_D/l3cհڶd[)jv߶6BXycZ g,<6+Z[\~X YBUUA )gĵ_$p5=E-"V,lʐD̼x_9{`ÔwMm 6 (טJ-hWw >!2 d$mTd
>< #REO MRdޡ>-ǹo
nSGd%;䛠RFn ߙ/ǶZ+ ^xh5j4o;v@e yW $%=U2Yj2Lcn.w?Ƅy2s7 9*Pʽ,[wTkzk5NG4ꤳ{%zY&xWH:ꨤ>&3z6X#`Rf+wˬihZ_z>#ǚ4GgnG?'=Y4yX a=lXs/k,Mh GY-[hyFW۱J#roF?Aq8Tu~W6?Z0{dzLGz K t\Htt;8Í36|wl}5Iۦ٢5[R_'l^_s;v;-'u{'Γ-uT+lESꚌüe/O_$93t),v@
SÝȘJ1C%Rd/,`g_G0dYhw7n^w;u ? 8Wek*=Th=,}3 9-{`ft9քh4<;1i& ^Sp~v_ T{ už+Q,D|o|%ENL%o%F NVX\1
qQQ)w=/eUu~b[T W EB ҖQꨊ1d#0t-Sd ː "~e a" 29-[dos}9|?ס d.E1f ]2; /#xo(WS?Gж>jmox/MI`D~I}k$ۛ{t 4E]܋|֭,`_Dx`8mĸ5JoHk3bRIއ^-^VSR7i(h}+[ZP Co;Qa.-^1诒~.#mWOf+?g8zI8[KL J,6v:3[&ےј4npptdN?,W}b561j!t*b?pOmֲzb .^W۽Us('
p">cvh9U껕w_N0*(Wse1k"c zsGNwLK,"Ծ ݗ`Zq:kVQ+g v%j6S np=*G6jZ}RJ oH֗_>=m [~ h} ڏh$ָIg(!WRs4|~EJ-YE=&K/G|
uZ~Mֿ}T3mίÖW]CL*pô
*ZN56/cҰOSGY~Ěrٓi i%X8k;҄i>\{4-I :M59$Wr.lkmH멵q|#Ϫ̷$G f#gG1:
L,ձ l(6A
T g oTD Ռ; B[7=3 2jcp;cl6OsݢWo9\h3Z['WRzOkÝ p#SSiH
0OsV>QE?|wR-2y?ogrL <ſQ{VC3 nݯ%N?*a+}/،+I
l-ľ>%#F;l= |{JŘO[9
) жges* ,$iҋslQAϻ/Q~\u9a=3CNN/|2ߧؽH}&<oԼx~~cb1cϗ=L{m:]w
Ρ
@ľ;z!ɵk6Ίx]=:ScF}=hg(L'O֞aNv֦wo߽ixFeo'D;? e b,*χ=gen]L]ېO$_}1y+m90
(t՟F
v6+A
à77 gu]JM.[گ9~ڑ)
{罰{
2ήMuPyih^4h`/ ?׆'ĝRfޗ2bRɕ;燰'_BH f> Igbdr"N7/qNr"S;g t V3
/$ga^$'(.9Rb"4#TI:_Mp h1~L.H)Ei.=yt۶OPglx䅲LƙN3ɊpW_$Il%{:[ jgB @\J{6!cz>ڳCȢAKd5y:q_%O vU~.-XI-G?~MO7wK%~2Ҁ <
ηY=+yL 2Q_#
_ DgyҔn)z4KĜsPU:Ï\xulP(y~=q{ Fg]^nBo璧Q6qd;제pѺ q+< BDܭJ"~>} Mo{s# +e)lubVtOfI^<|M
Kx$Ws>HʷV0Or)}zF>u^))4}o ~Ws+!Y=a WY$I^>"#ę|}F$Bq-;rwq7_yeLb Oh_-\d^\96=4><{|Ųz{Y s o8Ve.l{:/>{wmG - X)mmRZ
Е _{o隑Rf1 lC"dEPh+&8$hTs- Di9o99eO6
* fa*̔}Tg_/0nٕ lxؽi1v ,[Yϲ)O= \6'h7,\lI%?'4{veV`Ӏ<##܃QL8ۼɷ,rSf%"F!?9^{ ֣.z-|
*<;;4e { wmTr{x\_3ɹ֫f2% _~wV&%)簎es=y>JR4{Ey*+9+>xW7.盟Tځ5YClqS.()zL i9.\W_0˳56oHY2~<5W"Tp[Hl/WtKA r'+^KX?Gwsig/ؗ gOc\jANd|e^f SɶxBK|d}y'fMBۉb'oݩ7y ߕןXU$3Kx7s0 U|'5s) rk#
/Iޖm<_ARV BDw0VOG wVAmTs6 9~sh s+_Td_K$*8B~cّ~H|M$Ob }ASbF[#lO=0yB /Z]k˜gBb!vtbڂ$>U
察!բ5
_e?YL-ߠj&:Yj%( zƨ3 8נRxn! g[q G`v s,=cr|M!=ӥl!|'kd_Y5f
5Jkj2EݽP%=lT, ۏNH*.V-BcJKկg4V$K;8Y,B왤)ET Z6,9.<A5j]y:*|5 E{%ZbX/nD* 1F A>4$:'3r .Čsd &q!`jc986&ɱ}cHjGa,|Ć3: Z
JXu2
u]h +I?!5EC# L4o?Fԩ[cğI{h/[wA[诊clP(뷫/^ N4SJ葂b]^5L`KcccRC=CO g!x"G~- ~a"n;20!ZZ$;dpds͆
v [me
O[F+=2ۓs/ўʂju
Y $ 붫:NYʇa6.q'h-@\d#\Y6LGX>` p`Y% }bR/!N- p%hyEԋQ6+f'} -E~ mhihihipQ }`?0 @8gWfd\-jD- 7APYYhL˭-lKop kp}`H'
Fe3˂ǁ?ppCsݢ@ h@ z\,s">.sLopް5=Dz"cpfdߓ֢B9q &w"s d>f{#s l/~=e\R.^ҥx-r>e!.F/H~WI1f667۴nVD7FOKv%Ƶڸў')K$_%o 1/Ày@{?
h ~+Xhb mW k{ȵFST'M$W_\&}~AF-+D
8?o8m7TWkkR]"{f9\ySċ\.O K)&jHjWN;uj~z_dв)ٕ-*B#VYs4:vС3Io=jJkMdXylӢϠ" M֙T{^{beSj8OY[הJo2qMI_)G;E<1[iNZ
k0
OVa}4 ,UMlJcU+U0-$+.$r4
lcPLO?Mt2$$hF֡P(.xϣ0\ =١'{c/['wEo ]/ = kvv?#-ҝzbt'wg͞iv&D&75ܜFOj5?ca1X5zF:%SVJJZS攬DSmYi4+hN,cQ4-m@ <ጵPo4@uqC*R{7* ŔEzI+Ox?/hp0 ,>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 6/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-23356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:27:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 530.25 591.75 235.499 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Investigation \(Hearing Transcript at p. 27\) is not sufficient to meet \
the requirement for an authenticating witness.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Department Counsel is an advocate, not an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.384 0 Td
(authenticating witness.)Tj
-17.384 -2.125 Td
(13. )Tj
("The Federal Rules of Evidence shall serve as a guide. )Tj
23.54 0 Td
(Relevant and material evidence may be received subject to)Tj
-23.54 -1.125 Td
(rebuttal, and technical rules of evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.187 0 Td
(may be relaxed, except as otherwise provided herein, to permit the devel\
opment)Tj
-16.187 -1.125 Td
(of a full and complete record" \(citation omitted\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(14. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Cf)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. ISCR Case No. 00-0433 \(August 8, 2002\) at p. 6 n.3 \(a general legal\
rule cannot be relied on without considering)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(whether specific language in pertinent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.521 0 Td
(provision of the Directive is applicable to the particular facts and cir\
cumstances)Tj
-15.521 -1.125 Td
(of a case\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(15. )Tj
(On remand, the Administrative Judge and the parties should consider whet\
her, or how, Rule 901 \("Requirement of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Authentication or Identification"\) of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.208 0 Td
(Federal Rules of Evidence affects or interacts with Rule 803\(8\) in con\
nection)Tj
-16.208 -1.125 Td
(with the admissibility of a Report of Investigation.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(16. )Tj
(Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, a statement is not hearsay if it is\
an admission by a party-opponent. )Tj
43.961 0 Td
(Rule)Tj
-43.961 -1.125 Td
(801\(d\)\(2\). )Tj
(For purposes of these)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(proceedings, an applicant is a party-opponent within the meaning of Rule\
801\(d\)\(2\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-23356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:27:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 747 Tm
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge entered favorable formal findings with respect \
to SOR subparagraphs 1.a through 1.c, 2.a,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and 3a through 3.c. )Tj
7.942 0 Td
(Those favorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.719 0 Td
(formal findings are not at issue on appeal.)Tj
-14.662 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
("As far in advance as practical, Department Counsel and the applicant sh\
all serve one another with a copy of any)Tj
T*
(pleading, proposed documentary evidence,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.383 0 Td
(or other written communication to be submitted to the Administrative)Tj
-17.383 -1.125 Td
(Judge.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
("An ROI [Report of Investigation] may be received with an authenticating\
witness provided it is otherwise admissible)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under the Federal Rules of Evidence.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
("The Federal Rules of Evidence shall serve as a guide. )Tj
23.04 0 Td
(Relevant and material evidence may be received subject to)Tj
-23.04 -1.125 Td
(rebuttal, and technical rules of evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.187 0 Td
(may be relaxed, except as otherwise provided herein, to permit the devel\
opment)Tj
-16.187 -1.125 Td
(of a full and complete record" \(citation omitted\).)Tj
T*
(5. )Tj
(Even if a party gives a reasonable explanation for its failure to provid\
e the other party with a copy of documents at an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(earlier time, the Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.384 0 Td
(should ascertain whether the other party is unduly surprised or hampered\
in its)Tj
-15.384 -1.125 Td
(ability to proceed with the hearing.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(6. )Tj
(Given the procedural posture of this case, it is not possible to determi\
ne whether Department Counsel could have)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(provided a reasonable explanation for its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.55 0 Td
(failure to give Applicant a copy of the Report of Investigation before t\
he)Tj
-16.55 -1.125 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(The Board will not speculate as to the reason\(s\) why Department Counse\
l did)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.298 0 Td
(not provide Applicant with a)Tj
-34.796 -1.125 Td
(copy of the Report of Investigation before the hearing.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
(When a party has been unfairly surprised, the party's ability to adequat\
ely prepare for a hearing may be prejudiced,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and a continuance may be required to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.244 0 Td
(avoid prejudicing the surprised party's right to have a reasonable oppor\
tunity to)Tj
-15.244 -1.125 Td
(present its case. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Whether a continuance would be necessary or appropriate will)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.24 0 Td
(depend, of course, on the Administrative)Tj
-31.793 -1.125 Td
(Judge's exercise of sound judgment and discretion after careful consider\
ation of the situation. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
37.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(91-)Tj
-37.558 -1.125 Td
(0036 \(January 27, 1993\) at pp. 3-4 \(discussing factors that Administr\
ative Judge should consider in deciding whether to)Tj
T*
(grant a continuance\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(8. )Tj
(Department Counsel did not cross-appeal the Administrative Judge's findi\
ngs and conclusions concerning the rest of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the SOR allegations. )Tj
8.499 0 Td
(Nor did)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Department Counsel argue on appeal that the Judge's adverse decision sho\
uld be affirmed)Tj
-8.499 -1.125 Td
(on alternate grounds. )Tj
8.664 0 Td
(Since there is no presumption of error below)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.106 0 Td
(and the Judge's findings and conclusions about the)Tj
-26.771 -1.125 Td
(SOR paragraphs other than 1.d through 1.f were not challenged on appeal,\
the Judge need not allow the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.627 0 Td
(parties to)Tj
-41.627 -1.125 Td
(relitigate the other SOR paragraphs on remand.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(9. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.7.)Tj
T*
(10. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Adams v. Laird)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 420 F.2d 230, 237-238 \(D.C. Cir. 1969\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(cert. denied)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
29.332 0 Td
(, 397 U.S. 1039 \(1970\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Accord)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No.)Tj
-29.332 -1.125 Td
(96-0277 \(July 11, 1997\) at p. 3.)Tj
T*
(11. )Tj
(The Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution contains important constitut\
ional rights which the federal courts have)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(indicated can be waived by the persons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.911 0 Td
(entitled to invoke those rights, even though the Bill of Rights is silen\
t on the)Tj
-15.911 -1.125 Td
(matter of waiving constitutional rights. )Tj
15.831 0 Td
(Since a person can choose to waive his or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.912 0 Td
(her constitutional rights even though)Tj
-32.742 -1.125 Td
(there is no )Tj
4.416 0 Td
(constitutional provision expressly providing for such a waiver, it would\
be unwarranted to conclude that a)Tj
-4.416 -1.125 Td
(party cannot waive his or her rights under Executive Order 10865 or the \
Directive just because neither document)Tj
T*
(expressly provides for such a waiver.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(12. )Tj
(In pertinent part, Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.\
20 states: "An ROI may be received with an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(authenticating witness provided it is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.692 0 Td
(otherwise admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence." )Tj
24.151 0 Td
(Although Item E3.1.20)Tj
-38.843 -1.125 Td
(requires an authenticating witness, the Board need not decide, for purpo\
ses)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.241 0 Td
(of addressing this appeal, who can qualify as)Tj
-30.241 -1.125 Td
(such an authenticating witness. )Tj
12.691 0 Td
(However, the Board notes that Department Counsel's proffer about the Rep\
ort of)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
[50 0 R 51 0 R]
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-23356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:27:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Applicant also argues: \(a\) that a Report of Investigation is not a bus\
iness record, but a public record; and \(b\) therefore, a)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Report of Investigation would be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.47 0 Td
(admissible, if at all, under Rule 803\(8\) of the Federal Rules of Evide\
nce, not Rule)Tj
-13.47 -1.125 Td
(803\(6\). )Tj
(Department Counsel counters by arguing that a Report of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.354 0 Td
(Investigation is admissible as a business record,)Tj
-26.354 -1.125 Td
(analogizing a Report of Investigation to an adverse information report. \
)Tj
28.519 0 Td
(Applicant's argument is the better one. )Tj
15.648 0 Td
(A Report)Tj
-44.167 -1.125 Td
(of Investigation by a federal investigator is a government report and he\
nce, a public record. )Tj
36.792 0 Td
(An adverse information)Tj
-36.792 -1.125 Td
(report, which is submitted by a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.637 0 Td
(defense contractor to the federal government, is a business record of a \
nongovernmental)Tj
-12.637 -1.125 Td
(entity. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
2.777 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 93-1234 \(May 19, 1995\) at pp. 3-4)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing admissibility of an adverse information)Tj
-2.777 -1.125 Td
(report as a business record\). )Tj
11.44 0 Td
(Accordingly, if Department Counsel wishes to have an Administrative Judg\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.021 0 Td
(admit a)Tj
-42.461 -1.125 Td
(Report of Investigation prepared by a federal investigator into evidence\
over the objection of an applicant, Department)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Counsel must seek to do so)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.166 0 Td
(under Rule 803\(8\), not Rule 803\(6\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 322.9668 635.25 Tm
( \(15\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 322.9668 634.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 605.25 Tm
(Finally, the Board rejects Department Counsel's alternate argument that \
the Report of Investigation is not hearsay)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(because it is a statement by the Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.828 0 Td
(and, therefore, is admissible under Rule 801\(d\)\(2\) of the Federal Ru\
les of)Tj
-16.828 -1.375 Td
(Evidence.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 63.6426 579.75 Tm
( \(16\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 63.6426 579 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 549.75 Tm
(There is not a scintilla of record evidence to indicate or suggest that \
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.823 0 Td
(Report of Investigation satisfies any of the)Tj
-28.823 -1.125 Td
(requirements of Rule 801\(d\)\(2\). )Tj
13.024 0 Td
(Accordingly, it is untenable for Department Counsel to rely on Rule 801\(\
d\)\(2\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
8.743 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has met his burden of demonstrating error below that warrants \
remand. )Tj
32.852 0 Td
(Pursuant to Item E3.1.33.2 of the)Tj
-32.852 -1.125 Td
(Directive's Additional Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.648 0 Td
(Guidance, the Board remands the case to the Administrative Judge with th\
e following)Tj
-13.648 -1.125 Td
(instructions: \(a\) the Judge should conduct a supplemental hearing that\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.215 0 Td
(allows the parties too fully relitigate the matters)Tj
-28.215 -1.125 Td
(covered by SOR paragraphs 1.d through 1.f; \(b\) unless the parties elec\
t to waive their rights under Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.544 0 Td
(E3.1.13, the)Tj
-41.544 -1.125 Td
(Judge should ensure that the parties have received copies of any pleadin\
g, proposed documentary evidence, or other)Tj
T*
(written communication in a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.275 0 Td
(timely manner, consistent with the requirements of Directive, Additional\
Procedural)Tj
-11.275 -1.125 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.13; \(c\) the Judge should allow Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.354 0 Td
(the opportunity to offer the Report of)Tj
-29.354 -1.125 Td
(Investigation as evidence, subject to Applicant's right to object to its\
admissibility or waive any objection to its)Tj
T*
(admissibility; \(d\) if Applicant objects to the admissibility of the Re\
port of Investigation, the Judge should rule on the)Tj
T*
(admissibility of the Report of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.026 0 Td
(Investigation after the parties have had a reasonable opportunity to pre\
sent evidence)Tj
-12.026 -1.125 Td
(pertinent to the admissibility of the Report of Investigation under Dire\
ctive,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.548 0 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
-30.548 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.20; and \(e\) after completing the supplemental hearing, the Admini\
strative Judge should issue a new written)Tj
T*
(decision)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.583 0 Td
(consistent with the requirements of Directive, Additional Procedural Gui\
dance, Items E3.1.25 and E3.1.35.)Tj
-3.583 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 297 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 272.25 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 195 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 170.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 93 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 68.25 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[323.0 633.0 341.0 644.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[63.0 577.0 81.0 588.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
52 0 obj
[54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R]
endobj
53 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-23356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:27:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(particular facts and circumstances of this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.604 0 Td
(case; and \(b\) given the record evidence in this case, the Board does n\
ot)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(conclude that the Administrative Judge's findings and conclusions about \
SOR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.342 0 Td
(paragraphs 1.d through 1.f can be)Tj
-31.342 -1.125 Td
(affirmed on the basis of record evidence apart from the Report of Invest\
igation. )Tj
32.044 0 Td
(Our reading of the decision below)Tj
-32.044 -1.125 Td
(persuades)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(us that the Administrative Judge's findings and conclusions about Applic\
ant's credibility and SOR paragraphs)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(1.d through 1.f relied heavily on the Report of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.69 0 Td
(Investigation. )Tj
5.721 0 Td
(The Board declines to speculate as to what findings the)Tj
-24.411 -1.125 Td
(Judge might have made, or what conclusions the Judge might have reached,\
if the Report)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.907 0 Td
(of Investigation had not been)Tj
-35.907 -1.125 Td
(admitted into evidence.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Having decided that Applicant's rights under Directive, Additional Proce\
dural Guidance, )Tj
35.781 0 Td
(Item E3.1.13 were violated,)Tj
-35.781 -1.125 Td
(the Board must decide whether the error)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.355 0 Td
(identified by Applicant warrants remand or reversal. )Tj
21.214 0 Td
(Considering the record as)Tj
-37.569 -1.125 Td
(a whole, the Board concludes that reversal would not be an appropriate r\
emedy. )Tj
32.183 0 Td
(Rather, the appropriate remedy would)Tj
-32.183 -1.125 Td
(be to remand the case to the Administrative Judge with instructions to r\
eopen the record and allow the parties to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(relitigate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.804 0 Td
(those portions of the SOR that were affected by Department Counsel's fai\
lure to comply with Item E3.1.13,)Tj
-3.804 -1.375 Td
(that is SOR paragraphs 1.d through 1.f.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 204.3086 582.75 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 204.3086 582 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 552.75 Tm
(On remand, the admissibility of Government Exhibit 13 will be again at i\
ssue. )Tj
31.522 0 Td
(Although the parties have made)Tj
-31.522 -1.125 Td
(arguments on appeal concerning the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.689 0 Td
(admissibility of that document, the )Tj
14.165 0 Td
(procedural posture of the proceedings below has)Tj
-28.854 -1.125 Td
(left the record insufficiently developed to allow the Board to reach a f\
inal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.683 0 Td
(conclusion as to the admissibility of that)Tj
-29.683 -1.125 Td
(document. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(However, as a matter of judicial economy, the Board will address those a\
ppeal arguments raised by the)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(parties which raise legal questions that can be disposed of now and do n\
ot require the further development of the record)Tj
T*
(on remand.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(The right to object to a Report of Investigation can be waived by either\
party. Just as either party can waive a hearing,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 581.8047 461.25 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 581.8047 460.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 431.25 Tm
(and just as an applicant can waive the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.328 0 Td
(right to cross-examine the author of a written statement adverse to the \
applicant)Tj
-15.328 -1.375 Td
(that is offered as evidence against the applicant,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 245.9043 419.25 Tm
( \(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 245.9043 418.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 389.25 Tm
(the parties can choose to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.08 0 Td
(waive any objection they might have to the admission of a Report of Inve\
stigation into)Tj
-10.08 -1.375 Td
(evidence.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 61.6387 377.25 Tm
( \(11\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 61.6387 376.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 347.25 Tm
(However, since this case involves Applicant objecting to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.966 0 Td
(the admissibility of a Report of Investigation, there was no)Tj
-22.966 -1.125 Td
(waiver. )Tj
(Accordingly, the admissibility of Government Exhibit 13 was an issue bef\
ore the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.908 0 Td
(Administrative Judge in this)Tj
-35.908 -1.125 Td
(case and is an issue before the Board in this appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant argues that a Report of Investigation is admissible only under\
Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance,)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Item E3.1.20)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 78.3203 282.75 Tm
( \(12\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 78.3203 282 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 252.75 Tm
(and that an Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.886 0 Td
(Judge cannot rule a Report of Investigation is admissible under Directiv\
e, Additional)Tj
-10.886 -1.375 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.19.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 188.2773 240.75 Tm
( \(13\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 188.2773 240 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 210.75 Tm
(That argument is persuasive for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.913 0 Td
(several reasons. )Tj
(First, as a general principle, a specific legal rule takes precedence ov\
er)Tj
-12.913 -1.375 Td
(a general legal rule.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 110.6113 198.75 Tm
( \(14\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 110.6113 198 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 168.75 Tm
(Second, Item E3.1.19 expressly indicates that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.468 0 Td
(the technical rules of evidence may be relaxed "except as otherwise)Tj
-18.468 -1.125 Td
(provided herein." )Tj
7.211 0 Td
(Given the wording of Item E3.1.20, it is an exception to Item E3.1.19)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.05 0 Td
(with respect to Reports of)Tj
-35.261 -1.125 Td
(Investigation. )Tj
5.721 0 Td
(Third, if a Judge were to apply Item E3.1.19 to avoid or circumvent the \
stricture of Item E3.1.20)Tj
-5.721 -1.125 Td
(concerning Reports)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.053 0 Td
(of Investigation, the Judge would be acting inconsistently with Section \
5.\(a\) of Executive Order)Tj
-8.053 -1.125 Td
(10865. )Tj
(Fourth, allowing a Judge to use Item E3.1.19 to admit a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.497 0 Td
(Report of Investigation not admissible under Item)Tj
-25.497 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.20 would render Item E3.1.20 meaningless, and Board has declined to\
interpret or construe the Directive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.237 0 Td
(in a way)Tj
-44.237 -1.125 Td
(that renders any of its provisions meaningless. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.774 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 01-24356 \(February 26, 2003\) at pp. 4-5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See)Tj
-18.774 -1.125 Td
(also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0104)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(March 21, 2001\) at p.7 \("Provisions of the Directive should not be i\
nterpreted and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(construed in isolation from other pertinent provisions of the Directive.\
"\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[204.0 580.0 218.0 591.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[582.0 459.0 596.0 470.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[246.0 417.0 264.0 428.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[61.0 375.0 79.0 386.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[78.0 280.0 96.0 291.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[188.0 238.0 206.0 249.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[111.0 196.0 129.0 207.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
61 0 obj
[63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R]
endobj
62 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-23356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:27:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 742.5 Tm
(\(d\) by erroneously admitting the Report of Investigation under the bus\
iness record exception of the Federal Rules of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Evidence, the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.093 0 Td
(ruling was contrary to law; and)Tj
-15.093 -2.125 Td
(\(e\) the Administrative Judge's erroneous admission of the Report of In\
vestigation cannot be validated by the exercise of)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(discretion under Directive, Additional)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.468 0 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.19.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 373.8906 691.5 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 373.8906 690.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 661.5 Tm
(In response, Department Counsel argues:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(i\) the Administrative Judge properly admitted the Report of Investiga\
tion under Directive, Additional Procedural)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guidance, Item E3.1.20 because \(a\) the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.021 0 Td
(Special Agent who wrote the Report of Investigation was cross-examined a\
t the)Tj
-16.021 -1.125 Td
(hearing; \(b\) the Report of Investigation was properly admitted under t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.13 0 Td
(business record exception to the Federal Rules)Tj
-29.13 -1.125 Td
(of Evidence, and \(c\) in the alternative, the Report of Investigation i\
s not hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
45.29 0 Td
(801\(d\))Tj
-45.29 -1.125 Td
(\(2\); and)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(ii\) in the alternative, if the Board concludes that the Administrativ\
e Judge erred by admitting the Report of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Investigation into evidence, the error was harmless)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.604 0 Td
(because there is record evidence \(other than the Report of)Tj
-20.604 -1.125 Td
(Investigation\) that supports the Administrative Judge's findings and co\
nclusions under SOR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.981 0 Td
(paragraphs 1.d through 1.f.)Tj
-36.981 -2.125 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes Applicant has demonstra\
ted harmful error below.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant correctly notes that Department Counsel was legally obligated \
to provide Applicant with a copy of any)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(proposed documentary evidence "[a]s far in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.734 0 Td
(advance as practical." )Tj
8.958 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
-26.693 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.13. )Tj
(Absent unusual or unforeseen circumstances, neither party should fail to\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.797 0 Td
(provide the other party with a copy of)Tj
-32.797 -1.125 Td
(a proposed exhibit in a timely manner. )Tj
15.663 0 Td
(Although DOHA proceedings are adversarial in nature, they are not suppos\
ed to)Tj
-15.663 -1.125 Td
(be "hearing by ambush." )Tj
(When a party fails to provide the other party with a copy of a proposed \
exhibit before the)Tj
T*
(hearing, and there is an objection to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.022 0 Td
(proposed exhibit based on lateness, the Administrative Judge should requ\
ire the)Tj
-16.022 -1.125 Td
(party offering the proposed exhibit to make an explanation for the party\
's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.504 0 Td
(failure to make the proposed exhibit available)Tj
-29.504 -1.125 Td
(sooner. )Tj
(The Judge has an obligation to "conduct all proceedings in a fair, timel\
y, and orderly manner." )Tj
41.221 0 Td
(Directive,)Tj
-41.221 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.10. )Tj
19.134 0 Td
(When a party raises an objection that raises a serious question as to)Tj
-19.134 -1.125 Td
(whether the other party failed to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.106 0 Td
(fulfill its legal obligations under Directive, Additional Procedural Gui\
dance, Item)Tj
-13.106 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.13, the Judge has a duty to require the nonobjecting party to expla\
in why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.521 0 Td
(its action or inaction is not a violation of)Tj
-31.521 -1.375 Td
(Item E3.1.13. )Tj
5.693 0 Td
(A Judge should not allow "hearing by ambush" or the appearance of "heari\
ng by ambush.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 518.8047 331.5 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 518.8047 330.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 301.5 Tm
(In this case, Department Counsel did not offer an explanation for why sh\
e did not provide Applicant with a copy of the)Tj
T*
(Report of Investigation before the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.801 0 Td
(hearing, and the Administrative Judge did not require Department Counsel\
to give an)Tj
-13.801 -1.125 Td
(explanation even though Applicant objected that the Report of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.187 0 Td
(Investigation had not been given to him before the)Tj
-25.187 -1.125 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(Given Applicant's objection, the Judge's failure to require Department C\
ounsel to give an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.962 0 Td
(explanation was)Tj
-39.46 -1.375 Td
(arbitrary and capricious and a violation of Item E3.1.10.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 285.5781 249 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 285.5781 248.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 219 Tm
(The purpose of Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.13 i\
s not to ensure that only admissible)Tj
T*
(documents are entered into evidence. )Tj
15.104 0 Td
(Rather, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.637 0 Td
(purpose of Item E3.1.13 is to provide the parties with a reasonable)Tj
-19.742 -1.375 Td
(opportunity to prepare for a hearing, and to avoid undue surprise and ne\
edless delay.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 422.207 193.5 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 422.207 192.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 163.5 Tm
(A)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(party's right to have a reasonable opportunity to prepare for a hearing \
does not turn on whether the documentary)Tj
T*
(evidence presented by the other party is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.133 0 Td
(determined to be admissible. )Tj
11.747 0 Td
(Accordingly, a violation of Item E3.1.13 is not)Tj
-27.88 -1.125 Td
(cured by a subsequent ruling \(by an Administrative Judge or the Board\)\
that a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.381 0 Td
(document not provided to a party in a)Tj
-31.381 -1.125 Td
(timely manner is otherwise admissible.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel argues that even if the Board were to conclude that t\
he Administrative Judge erred by admitting)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(into evidence the Report of Investigation,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.856 0 Td
(the Board should conclude such an error was harmless. )Tj
22.271 0 Td
(The Board rejects that)Tj
-39.128 -1.125 Td
(argument for two reasons: \(a\) although Department Counsel's reliance o\
n record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.364 0 Td
(evidence apart from the Report of)Tj
-32.364 -1.125 Td
(Investigation is pertinent to its argument about the evidentiary value o\
f that document, it is not relevant to the prejudice)Tj
T*
(Applicant suffered as a result of the violation of Directive, Additional\
Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.13 under the)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
63 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[374.0 689.0 388.0 700.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
64 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[519.0 329.0 533.0 340.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
65 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[285.0 246.0 299.0 257.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[422.0 191.0 436.0 202.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
67 0 obj
[69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R]
endobj
68 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-23356.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:27:40 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to provisions of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\))Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
4.932 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 331.8137 348.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 331.8137 348 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 318.75 Tm
(At the hearing, Department Counsel offered as evidence a copy of a 1986 \
Report of Investigation. )Tj
39.432 0 Td
(Applicant objected to)Tj
-39.432 -1.125 Td
(that document on the grounds that \(1\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.302 0 Td
(Department Counsel had failed to provided Applicant with a copy of it be\
fore the)Tj
-15.302 -1.125 Td
(hearing; and \(2\) an insufficient foundation had been established for i\
ts)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.353 0 Td
(admission in evidence. )Tj
9.387 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
-37.739 -1.125 Td
(overruled Applicant's objections and admitted the Report of Investigatio\
n into evidence as Government)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.585 0 Td
(Exhibit 13.)Tj
-41.585 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, Applicant contends the Administrative Judge erred by admittin\
g the Report of Investigation into evidence)Tj
T*
(over his objection. )Tj
7.665 0 Td
(In support of that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.166 0 Td
(contention, Applicant makes several, interrelated arguments:)Tj
-14.831 -2.375 Td
(\(a\) the Administrative Judge's ruling is not consistent with Directive\
, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.13)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 573.373 215.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 573.373 214.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 185.25 Tm
(because Department Counsel did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.968 0 Td
(give Applicant a copy of the Report of Investigation until the hearing a\
nd failed to)Tj
-14.968 -1.125 Td
(explain why a copy of that document was not provided to Applicant sooner\
;)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(b\) by allowing Department Counsel to offer the Report of Investigatio\
n under such circumstances, the Administrative)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge acted contrary to law because he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.854 0 Td
(failed to adhere to the procedures required by Executive Order 10865 and\
the)Tj
-15.854 -1.125 Td
(Directive;)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(c\) by admitting the Report of Investigation into evidence as a busine\
ss record under the business records exception of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the Federal Rules of Evidence, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.023 0 Td
(Administrative Judge violated Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance,\
Item)Tj
-14.023 -1.375 Td
(E3.1.20)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 53.3301 68.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 53.3301 67.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(because the Report of Investigation is not a business record, but)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.771 0 Td
(rather a public record;)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
69 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[332.0 346.0 346.0 357.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
70 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[573.0 213.0 587.0 224.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
71 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[53.0 66.0 67.0 77.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
72 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
90 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/01-23356.a1.html)
endobj
89 0 obj
<>
endobj
91 0 obj
<>
endobj
73 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 232.0 null]
endobj
74 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 193.0 null]
endobj
75 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 100.0 null]
endobj
76 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 726.0 null]
endobj
77 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 674.0 null]
endobj
78 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 621.0 null]
endobj
79 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 569.0 null]
endobj
80 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 731.0 null]
endobj
81 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 692.0 null]
endobj
82 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 640.0 null]
endobj
83 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 601.0 null]
endobj
84 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 548.0 null]
endobj
85 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 496.0 null]
endobj
86 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 430.0 null]
endobj
87 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 337.0 null]
endobj
88 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 257.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 92
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000169529 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003752 00000 n
0000003779 00000 n
0000167908 00000 n
0000168391 00000 n
0000168433 00000 n
0000167718 00000 n
0000004718 00000 n
0000158784 00000 n
0000149156 00000 n
0000138558 00000 n
0000131271 00000 n
0000124311 00000 n
0000121539 00000 n
0000003882 00000 n
0000003928 00000 n
0000003977 00000 n
0000004291 00000 n
0000004067 00000 n
0000004099 00000 n
0000004131 00000 n
0000004163 00000 n
0000004195 00000 n
0000004227 00000 n
0000004259 00000 n
0000004929 00000 n
0000010813 00000 n
0000010862 00000 n
0000010897 00000 n
0000011407 00000 n
0000011830 00000 n
0000068153 00000 n
0000068420 00000 n
0000036685 00000 n
0000036958 00000 n
0000012235 00000 n
0000012511 00000 n
0000012910 00000 n
0000037397 00000 n
0000069034 00000 n
0000121739 00000 n
0000124511 00000 n
0000131496 00000 n
0000131528 00000 n
0000137908 00000 n
0000138234 00000 n
0000138772 00000 n
0000138839 00000 n
0000146882 00000 n
0000147206 00000 n
0000147530 00000 n
0000147856 00000 n
0000148180 00000 n
0000148504 00000 n
0000148830 00000 n
0000149359 00000 n
0000149405 00000 n
0000157488 00000 n
0000157812 00000 n
0000158136 00000 n
0000158460 00000 n
0000159009 00000 n
0000159048 00000 n
0000166750 00000 n
0000167074 00000 n
0000167398 00000 n
0000167803 00000 n
0000168857 00000 n
0000168899 00000 n
0000168941 00000 n
0000168983 00000 n
0000169025 00000 n
0000169067 00000 n
0000169109 00000 n
0000169151 00000 n
0000169193 00000 n
0000169235 00000 n
0000169277 00000 n
0000169319 00000 n
0000169361 00000 n
0000169403 00000 n
0000169445 00000 n
0000169487 00000 n
0000168641 00000 n
0000168475 00000 n
0000168804 00000 n
trailer
<<23370A3266EFB94FBDA7161F5D6EE707>]>>
startxref
169702
%%EOF