%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:28:57-04:00
2021-07-02T14:28:57-04:00
2021-07-02T14:28:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-25571.a1
uuid:10eeebe9-1d92-4b3e-9f9b-31ad0b8100e5
uuid:478de63d-a676-4ed7-8b35-6c83c67c9534
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-25571.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-25571.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:28:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 10, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-25571)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated October)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(23, 2002 which stated the reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.719 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.719 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.412 0 Td
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
-31.855 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Roger E. Willmeth issued an unfavorable security cl\
earance decision dated November 28, 2003.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the infer\
ence that the Administrative Judge drew that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant was not a credible witness is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.857 0 Td
(supported by substantial record evidence; \(2\) whether the Administrati\
ve Judge)Tj
-15.857 -1.125 Td
(erred in finding that it was not clear from the record that the past due\
debt in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.795 0 Td
(SOR subparagraph 1.a, which the)Tj
-30.795 -1.125 Td
(Applicant eventually satisfied, involved the same debt as the underlying\
debt in the judgment in SOR subparagraph 1.j.;)Tj
T*
(and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(3\) whether the Administrative Judge erred in finding that Applicant f\
alsified her security clearance application. )Tj
46.733 0 Td
(For)Tj
-46.733 -1.125 Td
(the reasons that follow, the Board affirms)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.884 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.801 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(n>a\n)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CqY9 t1{OJ3$$ٴϭw?55/yfvK=NHwpj0A%|ƍoޠn: 5K^ A&ٶ5ú%ߋ!鞳=\\P8(7M#xTyyϼ\2̇\_X_pU2)"2{(R1*msWiimivqjfT '
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H| Tnݨ
.L45h%1&
J5*FTEѸ:"ˌ(Fqyb2y{S]>{!_nW<7Eąg ["&h?rV8lG]@d u!/? ps
|8it __k{%$fqkؑwXx[?Ow^\ yvDx\ 8)~!^;gA~<P)c
_hJGYrBAH`DY q RCgZk^}mtx 0
F j"g]b*UmILPۈm
]6rukܤi3w=<{hcmڶm?c]~ԭ{zڧgEpȗ~wÏBapDdTÆƍ?jƎK?aϓ&OI˴3fJM='}nƼ.Z$s2Xb媬k֮[qfڲu;w7w?rX'O>s\I)p+W
fY90$ڀ&UU
Pm%
q4Ri6z`*R }pcV*s.$y\(_3\ԎҦkkAi4"]^WN&zYoGy<