%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:44:52-04:00
2021-06-24T10:44:51-04:00
2021-06-24T10:44:52-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-26689.a1
uuid:0401467c-f6ed-4444-8415-62f427db9afd
uuid:86764118-3f6d-43e4-b841-d07bec9ac1f1
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-26689.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/01-26689.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:44:52 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 9, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-26689)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson issued a decision, dated Apr\
il 11, 2003, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.19 0 Td
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: whether the Administrat\
ive Judge's adverse conclusions are arbitrary,)Tj
T*
(capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
12.246 0 Td
(For the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.787 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated December 13,)Tj
T*
(2002. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline F)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.082 0 Td
(\(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
11.137 0 Td
(In his response to the SOR, Applicant specifically)Tj
-28.218 -1.125 Td
(admitted to each of several subparagraphs in the SOR \(each listing a pa\
rticular)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.684 0 Td
(overdue debt\), and he also stated that "I)Tj
-31.684 -1.125 Td
(wish to have a decision without a Hearing." Department Counsel forwarded\
the government's )Tj
37.634 0 Td
(File of Relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.693 0 Td
(aterial)Tj
-44.327 -1.125 Td
(\(FORM\) to Applicant on February 7, 2003. )Tj
17.582 0 Td
(Applicant was instructed to submit information in rebuttal, extenuation \
or)Tj
-17.582 -1.125 Td
(mitigation within 30 days of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.583 0 Td
(receipt. )Tj
3.22 0 Td
(Applicant received the FORM on February 11, 2003, but he submitted no re\
ply. )Tj
32.216 0 Td
(In)Tj
-47.019 -1.125 Td
(reaching her decision, the Judge found against Applicant on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.215 0 Td
(Guideline F and each subparagraph noting that Applicant's)Tj
-24.215 -1.125 Td
(history of not meeting financial obligations and inability or unwillingn\
ess to satisfy debts raise)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.105 0 Td
(security concerns.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-17.42 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-27.435 -1.125 Td
(pp.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(ȫ:[&>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\n E|,E KH^ )R&}RHx&