%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:47:37-04:00
2021-06-24T10:47:36-04:00
2021-06-24T10:47:37-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-02195.a1
uuid:de6c1a3a-75aa-40d9-92d0-88cb63b1afcf
uuid:3d7b9667-ce40-44ca-b090-9e13edb877bc
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-02195.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-02195.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:47:36 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 9, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-02195)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.721 -2.2 Td
(Eric Borgstrom, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.499 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.958 -2.2 Td
(V. Rock Grundman, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated January)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(16, 2003 which stated the reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.719 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.719 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\). )Tj
22.995 0 Td
(Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.249 0 Td
(Judge Claude R. Heiny issued a)Tj
-33.687 -1.125 Td
(favorable security clearance decision dated September 12, 2003.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel appealed the Administrative Judge's favorable decisio\
n. )Tj
31.032 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under)Tj
-31.032 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.327 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-17.327 -2.125 Td
(The following issue is raised on appeal: whether the Administrative Judg\
e articulated a rational basis for his favorable)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(conclusions under Guideline B \(Foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.303 0 Td
(Influence\). )Tj
4.608 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board reverses the Administrative)Tj
-20.911 -1.125 Td
(Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
-43.935 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
( tTg!)
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <"Z4e>l!-z@ICmYY`4V{\Wg
QvK8u 8uv?ȹÓϸak^7s?8
P@ӀƑuxm;M~-i^|J2F7( VRdyT߃gq||$?&&ä(!eEgG3בs|_┙>,*1✷y뜫jYoRi"pzO-LcK]3uR~ .
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅{Q`a%V,(X`#&@^)E*"v4-bÊbAQa/.vW1xgOޗ;gΙ; @#H/:tnUWBc6@ 4 +G&Y
M1t ފx8e ,^7/wr~gy
_p3ąa<<~( KyfLXldd{ )q Ǐrd-3A QX.@;T ʆ(
*@$b. *V~>cE 4Vd3\8?>lS9;&1V4ld٥ISWf[tWSU6m۵бSg.]}uӿW@G?A?
_|ϯfȷC~XHh=r1qcǍOaIiiINN1sV9s3e_p%K-+WYv
܍yhعk
8x%J8Yv._
o7M/j60T H(P:_ !,!M'Gv?^^^~.7`ky