%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:48:07-04:00
2021-06-24T10:48:07-04:00
2021-06-24T10:48:07-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-03186.a1
uuid:394d74e8-89ad-44d5-b8ea-8311254c8ea4
uuid:6669b81f-0387-4f23-af83-0135bff94e1a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-03186.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-03186.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:48:07 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 16, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-03186)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
3.818 -2.2 Td
(Eric Borgstrom, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.374 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 394.5 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On July 21,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2004, DOHA issued a statement of reasons )Tj
(\(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline G \(Alcohol Consumption\), pursuant to Department\
of )Tj
31.132 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as)Tj
-31.132 -1.125 Td
(amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(Applicant requested the case be decided on the written record. )Tj
25.128 0 Td
(On June 30, 2005, after)Tj
-34.207 -1.125 Td
(considering the record, Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax granted Applic\
ant's request for a security clearance.)Tj
T*
(Department Counsel timely appealed pursuant )Tj
18.8 0 Td
(to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-18.8 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel raised the following issues on appeal: \(a\) whether \
record evidence supports the Administrative)Tj
T*
(Judge's finding that Applicant's supervisor )Tj
17.219 0 Td
(was aware of the government's security concerns; \(b\) whether record)Tj
-17.219 -1.125 Td
(evidence supports the Administrative Judge's finding that Applicant stop\
ped his alcohol )Tj
35.368 0 Td
(consumption completely after)Tj
-35.368 -1.125 Td
(about July 2003; \(c\) whether record evidence supports the Administrati\
ve Judge's conclusions that Alcohol)Tj
T*
(Consumption )Tj
(itigating Conditions 2 and 3 apply; and \(d\) whether the Administrative\
Judge's mitigation of Guideline G)Tj
T*
(security concerns as a whole is arbitrary and )Tj
17.993 0 Td
(capricious. )Tj
4.609 0 Td
(We remand the case to the Administrative Judge.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-14.474 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-8.128 -2.125 Td
(A. Facts)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge made the following dispositive findings of fact\
that, with specific exceptions noted,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Department Counsel adopted for purposes of the )Tj
19.689 0 Td
(appeal:)Tj
-19.689 -2.125 Td
(Applicant is a 34-year-old engineer. )Tj
14.661 0 Td
(The July 21, 2004 SOR contains seven allegations under Guideline G \(Alc\
ohol)Tj
-14.661 -1.125 Td
(Consumption\). )Tj
(In his August 2, 2004 )Tj
(response to the SOR, Applicant)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.749 0 Td
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(admits all seven allegations, SOR 1.a. - 1.f.)Tj
-27.749 -2.125 Td
(Applicant consumed alcohol, at times to excess and to the point of intox\
ication, from 1993 to at least July 12, 2003.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant was arrested on November 20, 1993 and charged with \(1\) Opera\
ting While Intoxicated, )Tj
39.376 0 Td
(and \(2\) having a)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 40.5 Tm
(Blood Alcohol Content above the legal limit )Tj
18.025 0 Td
(of .10%. )Tj
(The court found him guilty of Count 1 and fined him)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(y7A-^/)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\n E|,EAR7Cu6S#R`1wlàr8O=a~;8u86f?(9{欦9Nlv]
襳݈l(kHWZ}Ɍζ:sC&2Z+Q]sLCqQ`Cd
Lyd
ħu:%%51eYe&n]*