%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:48:42-04:002021-06-24T10:48:42-04:002021-06-24T10:48:42-04:00Adobe Acrobat 17.0application/pdf02-04005.a1uuid:92165749-b759-4c74-ac7c-c336c02e7e6auuid:91f2fc1d-4cf4-466c-bc75-5dceda593e6bAcrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-04005.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-04005.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:48:42 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 31, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-04005)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(November 26, 2002 which stated the reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.218 0 Td
(why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information)Tj
-18.218 -1.125 Td
(for Applicant. )Tj
5.859 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.412 0 Td
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
-33.271 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Martin H. Mogul issued an unfavorable security clea\
rance decision dated September 23, 2003.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Board\
should reverse the Administrative Judge's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(decision based on new evidence submitted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.273 0 Td
(by Applicant; and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge failed to consi\
der)Tj
-17.273 -1.125 Td
(favorable evidence submitted by Applicant. )Tj
17.716 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.386 0 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-33.102 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(0oh<.q>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI6XrR[cfH3>ձ$8&vE[ /pئuv Lq \&9NqOnJ$oAU>}J&-Or#B:hQ M2Y֕nט9;8Cc!6
"(d~QviwERfr\Ona3xϼ'k*T)sJ:tfĬHGo 5k>WӹZ1+bѤ
!fMh\H5gfp-j1\Z{3Ͱ7C{3Ͱ7C{Ér}j"载ňm_ot$f'~ 8
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTϹg.EEwcc4h
JMTX](bwX,a3>}{_2w̙9s滿o $AhW[ngL##W @ Mc5 \- Kb .^
CqbF/ ` x||¹k8{q76>1){ehk!I {4kGG~ #F'8]f_O^6
-fXfT)b7A$*b7Iy;OW
ilbfUw 4Rm?
$ƃGXû$d`ʩFZε]\=WACo||G7ic-Zo&m:vIPݺg>狐/~38vaqG$5:1cƍ '%OeJiSgȜ5{y,^,]_z}Ļۦ^~&בr[_A Q~*4QLMB;P;E]t:7]]}kk멋E>.>ZA(PU)@%NIVRTe2WYlR+~H9U) }>\ӏh6/ؠ5L7l1l_i
Z;[XYC|l6[@
[ȗBi
!5J2!!a ʓ/Wn6K+KKKKsǖfƖFE, eWk+e00;@S{Sؤ350yXnowƃ<>:j\cjn6v1uFQ}cgƨat9^\9WŎ\gZ`~ b]1J(&\]ŗ_8KYcU1
B UӞkNtϙ9q~71jtB VA
L a)i2`!B!KOal^Jǡ6 ,cpI898
<\Xx0!FHHQ0~DcI0O0~