%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:49:05-04:00
2021-06-24T10:49:04-04:00
2021-06-24T10:49:05-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-04455.a2
uuid:eed3f989-86d0-4bc5-8388-49f8c5f8228d
uuid:1a8637f9-ec99-4862-9efa-90e283dd7611
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[33 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-04455.a2)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-04455.a2.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:49:05 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 7, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-04455)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.609 -2.2 Td
(James Norman, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.387 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.401 -2.2 Td
(Elizabeth L. Newman, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On April 10,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2002, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-security conce\
rns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline C \(Foreign Preference\) and Guideline B \(Foreign Influ\
ence\) )Tj
31.045 0 Td
(of Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-31.045 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
18.578 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On December 5, 2002, after the hearing,)Tj
-31.045 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr. denied Applicant's request for a \
security clearance. )Tj
36.585 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed)Tj
-36.585 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and )Tj
16.375 0 Td
(E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.375 -2.125 Td
(After considering Applicant's assertions of error, in a decision dated J\
uly 31, 2003, the Appeal Board remanded the case)Tj
T*
(to the Administrative Judge with )Tj
13.359 0 Td
(instructions to issue a new decision that was consistent with the requir\
ements of)Tj
-13.359 -1.125 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.35 and E3.1.25. )Tj
28.798 0 Td
(On )Tj
(October 6, 2005, the Administrative Judge)Tj
-28.798 -1.125 Td
(issued his remand decision. )Tj
11.248 0 Td
(Applicant appealed that remand decision.)Tj
-11.248 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: \(1\) whether it was ar\
bitrary and capricious for the Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(to conclude that Foreign Influence )Tj
14.023 0 Td
(itigating Condition 1 was not applicable; and \(2\) whether it was arbit\
rary and)Tj
-14.023 -1.125 Td
(capricious for the Administrative Judge to conclude that Applicant's for\
eign )Tj
30.616 0 Td
(contacts were not mitigated by Foreign)Tj
-30.616 -1.125 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 3. )Tj
13.748 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes that Applicant has fail\
ed to)Tj
-13.748 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate error on the part of the Administrative Judge.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant contends it was arbitrary and capricious for the Administrativ\
e Judge to conclude the facts and circumstances)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(of Applicant's ties to his father in )Tj
13.539 0 Td
(South Korea preclude application of Foreign Influence Mitigating Conditi\
on 1.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 557.7109 168.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 557.7109 168 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 571.5171 164.25 Tm
( )Tj
(In)Tj
-46.293 -1.125 Td
(support of this argument, Applicant asserts that :\(a\) Applicant's fath\
er is )Tj
29.062 0 Td
(not in a position to influence Applicant; and \(b\))Tj
-29.062 -1.125 Td
(the Judge did not weigh Government Exhibit 3 in a reasonable manner.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's argument that his father is not in a position to influence h\
im does not establish that the Administrative Judge)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(erred by not applying Foreign )Tj
12.192 0 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 1 in Applicant's favor. )Tj
21.898 0 Td
(The issue is not merely whether)Tj
-34.09 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's father can influence him, but whether Applicant has )Tj
25.783 0 Td
(presented evidence showing that his father is not in a)Tj
-25.783 -1.125 Td
(position to be exploited by a foreign power in a coercive or noncorceive\
manner. )Tj
32.572 0 Td
(Department Counsel )Tj
8.498 0 Td
(does not have to)Tj
-41.07 -1.125 Td
(disprove the applicability of Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1. \
)Tj
28.606 0 Td
(Rather, Applicant has the burden of presenting)Tj
-28.606 -1.125 Td
(evidence to warrant its )Tj
9.33 0 Td
(application. )Tj
4.943 0 Td
(The points raised by Applicant on appeal about his father's background a\
nd lifestyle)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(FLɨp}ko)
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EqDLMZȢ{("_]B
ь}bYoB75VGBԟcv.iiۮ9փ)Rr T-i{u;6Kl5v`>Vk[lG
ҶOzm76w&U_e~2LӷzFcjIzLhhl:DdS2Ti$.%xF9ؑXd%߂ykHNRcf̎9fs!c