%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:49:23-04:00
2021-06-24T10:49:23-04:00
2021-06-24T10:49:23-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-04949.a1
uuid:52119739-cba9-45c6-a6d5-87b32429d4fd
uuid:3a25a38f-ee52-42ac-b795-13237ba75540
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-04949.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-04949.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:49:23 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 5, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-04949)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated October 23, 2\
002, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to )Tj
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-36.515 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Applican\
t was denied the right to present witnesses on his)Tj
T*
(behalf; and \(2\) whether the Board )Tj
13.772 0 Td
(should recommend consideration of Applicant's case for a waiver under 10\
U.S.C.)Tj
-13.772 -1.125 Td
(\247986. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative )Tj
28.744 0 Td
(Judge's decision, and does not recommend that)Tj
-28.744 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's case be considered for a waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated April 11, 2002.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline J )Tj
(\(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
22.774 0 Td
(A hearing was held on August 13, 2002. )Tj
(The Administrative)Tj
-22.774 -1.125 Td
(Judge issued a written decision, dated October 23, 2002, in which he )Tj
27.744 0 Td
(concluded it is not clearly consistent with the)Tj
-27.744 -1.125 Td
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
28.766 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on )Tj
12.912 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
-41.678 -1.125 Td
(appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted a timely notice of appeal. )Tj
18.772 0 Td
(The November 4, 2002 letter acknowledging receipt of Applicant's notice)Tj
-18.772 -1.125 Td
(of appeal informed him that an appeal )Tj
15.466 0 Td
(brief had to be submitted by no later than December 9, 2002, and that th\
e)Tj
-15.466 -1.125 Td
(Chairman could enter a default if he failed to submit a timely appeal br\
ief. )Tj
29.961 0 Td
(Although )Tj
(Applicant failed to submit an)Tj
-29.961 -1.125 Td
(appeal brief, the Chairman did not enter a default. )Tj
20.187 0 Td
(The Chairman treated Applicant's notice of appeal as an appeal brief)Tj
-20.187 -1.125 Td
(because it )Tj
4.22 0 Td
(contained statements that could be construed as appeal arguments. )Tj
26.769 0 Td
(On December 19, 2002, Department)Tj
-30.989 -1.125 Td
(Counsel submitted a notice indicating that it did not )Tj
20.969 0 Td
(intend to submit a reply brief. )Tj
12.136 0 Td
(On the same day, the Chairman sent a)Tj
-33.105 -1.125 Td
(letter to the parties indicating the Board would issue a written decisio\
n after considering )Tj
35.49 0 Td
(the appeal issues.)Tj
-35.49 -2.125 Td
(On December 31, 2002, the Board received from Applicant a letter, dated \
December 27, 2002. )Tj
38.042 0 Td
(On the same day, the)Tj
-38.042 -1.125 Td
(Chairman sent a letter to Applicant, )Tj
14.523 0 Td
(informing him that his December 27, 2002 letter would not be accepted as\
an appeal)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(O~e)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg{/*u.ܵvCϘHEccX`EbuQ,ϒ5l%̙3s @%4|o>߱q Y^ xlkN{ O6#2fPt Z) E֥(ܿipDh% Z
}<ùmѱq#r #jDX(ۏCbzQ6To1n7=H1#FǺHRSrۉ ń"HRZ{Q*D
UP-iDQ&v] ?R F0ފJ{ֈ;f_@S^eo»xy, NbF+n*VrYūj5j֪]N&o\~ۤi~-Zjݦm:~کsݺ,_e`W~!00,<"r!CEE3rƌ7 ?M?)SM