%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:52:35-04:00
2021-06-24T10:52:34-04:00
2021-06-24T10:52:35-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-09209.a1
uuid:c714fff9-a298-4328-a78e-26cea0a1f500
uuid:2cd69598-1027-48cc-9ec5-5f62e2c0e0d0
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-09209.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-09209.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:52:35 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 9, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-09209)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(September 29, 2003, which stated the reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.496 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classified)Tj
-20.496 -1.125 Td
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
26.718 0 Td
(Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.249 0 Td
(Judge James A. Young)Tj
-38.188 -1.125 Td
(issued an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated April 8, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.853 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-20.853 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge failed to consider evidence)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(submitted by the Applicant, \(2\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.718 0 Td
(Administrative Judge failed to consider other relevant information, and \
\(3\))Tj
-17.718 -1.125 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge erred by failing to give sufficient wei\
ght to applicable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.573 0 Td
(mitigating conditions. )Tj
9.027 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.6 -1.125 Td
(reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-21.074 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.073 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
-41.073 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(party must raise claims of error with specificity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
19.881 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, the Board will review the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.14 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-42.14 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its conclusions, including a rational)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.442 0 Td
(connection between the facts found and the choice made; it does not cons\
ider)Tj
-14.442 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.708 0 Td
(of the case; it offers an)Tj
-36.708 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
T*
(a mere difference of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.328 0 Td
(opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.887 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(/Eo\r!)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0\/Jkm
!0r it1NzdfHٲ߿~ݰ@ـt
/SYv,*fkO( 伄tƍJނ0<|UH,bOX-eRߎ#qn8к"QBqQ*t_>;Hٹ۠7)Jb>
)Bg)˺;^xϬ56WK_}I.RiXɅsf`X
5KMݖW59>m_O?+ :'
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTs.ebC$K^c"
{IT(%kޱ]*ĸY{}sf朹sΙ(D0}]V^D0kqP >NsnlBw&
U|3mLDu7t( U. 42K?k|A^~3WtM8_U%&523*>y>ԡ +(e{?OLª
5_ s]JU*酺
!K"#(^:,nmso(B;2r q
o'IIxĝ`p,OUh%}|K*]ƿlLb
҃?XrW^fuB֫ߠaXƟ4iڬy>m_ie7ǟ:FDFSt.]u߳WB>}0p!?2tL5zLq)'L:yig̜5{Λ mK.-_r^v
7m5};wޓw_>r'O_x Wײs JLqGQlhoXÁpy!既hTWU"18erXy0u7073XT+Z[;AImh4X{;{'3O,-#-)VZk-e-gլUQ֘@CwEnЋWЃzm=L$=YO}~@?֯wÂ7
ܫje5Ylclkm鶂U1*
uZ)((3i,k9y'Iy1gq(.J{%JLP&+Y$8S~ iYk%j[CEL{i9ϜjN`$YRsZqv.`9iI%9w"jK孪!9UerՓZ
n'QJގWRG}
KiUGGGG7YoJ;-8qrtpVw~v#ʤ2uXOeT* xEBV:LG(tN)
)NStc}DUmܡ7Fěyoty]rΐ7|L |1>'1} Y>_K|USq6u7;|ﱓ;?3~/_y#eţy'XuRd +$W
\ H!!<*KEe*.Jo#|EIG]+tj=*zh 0H4h.ZTV
ԆjzOujP]}>64&GGc) ƉIT\|!ڈKNx6Ŀ (;wg0RܥCwww( 8kqwys5r\'
r$7-r&r%w=r'9<\ayDqyBI\t.9kyE*?/<-ȳ/ȋ꺆kںnƺn/}RT5@
T(U
VCP5L
W#H5JVcj7NWa*\EH&*ZMR5ͩn[6ng~_vjڭjگ::n{؞NNXg|x"gx.^x#R[N(>48F8rI"&4J'ȧe2SQR6"JRvA9)/otCzO;ۜ4}$: qtN3Ns̙
tX >d@FdםS,戹, +!s9/!'r!7 s _+@ABaAQC #AF $J4ʠ,!t@yT@ETBeTAUTCu@MBmA]C4D#4F4E34GD+Fh耎肮
[0M't1]}t!]Xq^tQ]L8u9u֡tK^w;4w=kSQO@`PaQ1q0#BC$h&`"1 1S1
13٘٘,\`bx$HD1)XXXX+k[۰ݬ5;]ו؇8x(zm]N8M8Q݉5h+D:l0&l1[60;.1T;N7Es5~sΰ3,;αsmp/?oAs6Gus4ms3wes\5X?9 ~'_/Kewr_kuzo[s9j>OPFw?OgUwGEqwfE<YPyDv%4kELS1bxx7R,}qTŧLⴺyOΣ("ޫl>T4.iãf" ˱tDR0UB@\J4%B[
ܾ FyQ8s6,8K+#Vs!8me:c͌0R/:U;Ȁ<#!;jI
xM4z֪`N+i?f|?G|"]^z)n7(_9vcIGIbxu 3i3Nڪ16R0O4e,8&AWh3