͗28ckk8RRBO#]WI ]@ܵ
jF ɕ ?;wnmPށ\v*21QeTqJXN8M. з3h`x]bX2X٭-- ςgj 4w EAtH%5ч+]./ t:4I)h8=-Sg*8ZI˂PN F\!%ZDzd9ѷ'! Hn!DpD(u7$}diBM v̑cAٌy'8+BI;-Z:k AAer z?'](69)Ҩyz j}H(}b.w[t0(~o7:JmVa+N qH3ǜɆt_ٓ՜~f_syIn^V6] 3W. V$
!FZ
=<7
εS8. d6S)9klyAS۩݅_ Q*-߉"5TPpyG/ JNxu+ؙz?
8pUs^AQ]gܻ/v
, ®ح"w ib}DqRt5Nj;SkTuhc56immьwvDgy~}ь`W,~EMș[\ZX|$gu V`[]]} :5 7h4VZR"ϐXeR 4E-EҠSs9bs H1tX[\^`*9/]
Upmqq.w
6"U"=m)F^{R @7F jbvҍ}K jfEB ǐ{$^(9$ *1B]kC? くz
&gUUJn3svG~T)v_>b< | ?cXž OW_H@"j( 1_Q)|ԕCh{Ҽh/-DM ;
wSDy6C6wxUÎ߆[k!g|)}&q#Oތ&A{l\ |z s-,g e?&m>eut^7Z63ؾH'_%𨨒gZ_Q{hxռAu .qm%!c~&dKO Em{4U -I
"4~S1l_
n쿒rK` =J g9 ~Agc: x]Y8؉n ~Կ 9Agϑ<J=B|,Y! ϻ84!nq>v<Ŝan2?,&
s,3?VW@Hm9 <6s9cIxɜ" [ sk,a 0g{mIiC #%-{?@V{nIk/W)Y4SGĻ fȉ؟jߧ>u;n,w_ &170^7H롗U^E;ON$,} ;Yǒ1-;iO^z{#R*{- ƚ#z\kD}T nF^X(46相/@ <Ǵ=(9k>U- Uc&9T/4{I4zP~'rT e=# .7-sMܭ"y:Jn0z7MSF#xnHOJ#Ʋ
2߰=?hΉCy3
R-ΧeCo{ -? x]I
ثSX= qk#C3hvۀ~= ; 4Eֈn. fȥ@-MW~BMjU#'OJh3H Dꛂ½lފ=앶m}+}:o=s B B
"$"& ZRf RU[ +ZVtbEĢU NkA- _:@rO7''&D?3߬uc߆f6ȷS4
0 +F} ʲ^yW%=n
gܳ8:N8vH} nVe ͊.9%'{Q?~r?qn $ߕO>6=pk\g|/ Bz}5(\ӭwWD=S
ѻZ`ed[n}^/ )p=pg8 ;l[Kf A̟N8βJ㠥USV-A?~[5[al@Ϊ_3c=6v F<>5[6$S?~PмU,uOjUO\NsC" rwsȩ-sw|rݥsy ӟQF+If%K;.].q$ '3R'q-mٴiY-eqPc:åW:ՔhrH
96Xuu6W5g1Wb],*}r|z8bmcC
&?zRWR WaLNҗV=rO*'= X:K˥ 5<{ 4 A KOL^՜g27g\&6oNj~~ٟKϞx./m](ׇd6j 9Dg<95s{L,5Wk~n8=-d }5 nuvF}sEc옦uk6F㙱jXmlnέo};Fo[_@,g<1p-?wxFP Kx-.n\fzLn?\!E*r 3n/ g+~6eL"fKU=}ɌaMͻ&6wakLN%ޖ~
r4@da26?*R2 Z)"J'_OK)yS2P77)#2ْ MP)#SK7Hsc[~@P/Rˢx'M&ҷBqo['+,[VZw8((ƻ ͪ:s?}G-RAB嫅"C[iKpP`uTEIƘXPn ) BedE?`HE0g{[79{Xoy2"냍3
. ᎗{ m)ԟD[E~ Gh[OIPo5X߶YJЂ&N$Z "?UTuM@i=:?g".dE>V/"EJ
up6gRzl\=H;g`R|ޏ.&CN9cv
bPE` P%Fsދ7uMb$Csr/+))
δk?-kh7 Ҩ0nbkiWg}?F6cf3D
_~ܟ3^$%`vڇ]mYw;`-mhLR7R`8:j }>okG: VN [8}Iҧ6~kYOW|QqL}+ު{GGm8q1;e
*i/' +9˲K5h?vJzrιzP'Ŋ[;z]%Wj߂}w}5U+mޕ]knn~wZM~[G k
w->
%7$J]xu~˯P6խ~ Y?N>GlyjXkܤe{z+9XL}v% Nv#G
b-?s&_>6EaK쫮!&aZ쇆cp-\HqiX'uܩz_[bM~ɴP R u i´~]=w}@ S9g6H`}\$|8{O |WgU[q}H곣L&q6Tݠni^*y_*M
u"^nj S z!gej^ 16{B^'9nQ7 n|[.S- +})5NC8ߑ)
})4J `|l|+ ("U e;KwX 739&P(sݽr+!k{mm{ 박>lzwob_^# >}yHwbM܍e觭Uh۳29JM4W9( z]|(?.:|Ұ \ڡH'ؗu>S^þD{ 7tj^v^EճNUGik0';kӻ7^m4R7ʽQԋُ2ɔI:ybT+Y$/k |&%o9E [xI+w'n¾@[=#:M>g})!֏u
wT(;9!2,1-zyKR5 YWȳhꮖXNL+ogʺ?/MXJ3%A I̒5iTX%9k*ѩxoib~gw.^Y`TTq>aD?tܫ,0+ҬTy
_/s YHla>>#X!8[ ́;ï &'a.~2/ ZM y=|>by=ڽr9v^x 2b{6ͽOrze [U}+- !Rҵ㥴Bwvuާ}۽tftsYe3`Ɉt֡nh"`4ȋ 8$hTs`;osw~g,hc 3ge^FMQ(
sò,݅11, ZX6_߮ >,D; Yɲ}io{xrYFK X=V9^@Ҟ-{
<M. qBz^AxY槾b"`[xbgŨķ(z3_WA3 t'+n X?_wsag/ؗ eOc\: AJD|_f SζD{D $OlȚ| ܃ Wƍ;S1o⌋=#}yr< büÏ!YdzfOG{}/?,I>cQgL/ws0 |'5s)q
rc3
7I&ҭ<_ARv" @w0hOG ἷVIub>?
5Lo OFϣ}h AK1MH
Xg>Gu&鈈'}Aәbf[lO=;OHcnc;+7{Y/c>dn\"ZJkxnij'e%'=dmߨ+Yc6 *?9'G@9jm+e}=iP璉ke_zIM ,I$4%*]O3Y6uLu7ipѝtg܉ \?t5a\ٸN YEc
Em7 (!0`Y >r
6AY`r8Pg`q
aa!|ɏG eĺgXsi>ځ{E^^r; _>M3|E`+u `{'ԝd} mM0} F/~ w~m*BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
(l`9~* U3ů]ɜMa˱dfiX%;)diȢRa6:WZ Ψ%k,eoXYK|\pMȒ^
J,؏
NHJ.MDc
Kah!˓,O:D}gVQ>6ZkmDZrb]~9Kq&rb;zt-1|=RqX Kc *
mI%
4;`lv%>cS܌DV7ecB#'D C7E
;XͽJ[tFS+
Æ5"8&&T?aѠ0Rb |Fk(`F2#i2A3h3FLX #hpf}o/1>o,⏶onk,0Xb"1gJfğaĺnȖ( #֣ӆ-Sޢ 9?m}X^{O<^&N 5fç}hsQ^ƸL6[v\ *sU fp8ϒ|J
$N9M ڵUǙVtb绢bh ϻEX2 Q"k
55YÏdŞ9|H9<*2+j<sX`v#fC^~ _
/( 0J{_;%n'r
{h/[wA[诊clP(뷫/^ N4SJ葂b]^5L`KcccRC=CO g!x"G~- ~a"n;20!ZZ$;dpds͆
v [me
O[F+=2ۓs/ўʂju
Y $ 붫:NYʇa6.q'h-@\d#\Y6LGX>` p`Y% }bR/!N- p%hyEԋQ6+f'} -E~ mhihihipQ }`?0 @8gWfd\-jD- 7APYYhL˭-lKop kp}`H'
Fe3˂ǁ?ppCsݢ@ h@ z\,s">.sLopް5=Dz"cpfdߓ֢B9q &w"s d>f{#s l/~=e\R.^ҥx-r>e!.F/H~WI1f667۴nVD7FOKv%Ƶڸў')K$_%o 1/Ày@{?
h ~+Xhb mW k{ȵFST'M$W_\&}~AF-+D
8?o8m7TWkkR]"{f9\ySċ\.O K)&jHjWN;uj~z_dв)ٕ-*B#VYs4:vС3Io=jJkMdXylӢϠ" M֙T{^{beSj8OY[הJo2qMI_)G;E<1[iNZ
k0
OVa}4 ,UMlJcU+U0-$+.$r4
lcPLO?Mt2$$hF֡P(.xϣ0\ =١'{c/['wEo ]/ = kvv?#-ҝzbt'wg͞iv&D&75ܜFOj5?ca1X5zF:%SVJJZS攬DSmYi4+hN,cQ4-m@ <ጵPo4@uqC*R{7* ŔEzI+Ox?/hp0 ,>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-09892.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-09892.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:52:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 583.5 591.75 182.25 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 756 Tm
(overruled or superseded prior Board decisions that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.466 0 Td
(held an applicant's possession and use of a foreign passport could be)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 742.5 Tm
(extenuated or mitigated when it was based on legal necessity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-07625 \(May 24, 2004\) at pp. 3-4; ISCR Case No. 01-0\
1331 \(February 27, 2002\) at p. 4.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
("The applicant is responsible for presenting witnesses and other evidenc\
e to rebut, explain, extenuate, or mitigate)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(facts admitted by the applicant or proven by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.883 0 Td
(Department Counsel, and has the ultimate burden of persuasion as to)Tj
-17.883 -1.125 Td
(obtaining a favorable clearance decision.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(6. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-22693 \(September 22, 2003\) at p. 7 \(rejecting argu\
ment that an Administrative Judge)Tj
-4.332 -1.125 Td
(should analyze the security significance of each of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.436 0 Td
(the applicant's family members living abroad on an individual,)Tj
-20.436 -1.125 Td
(piecemeal basis\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.136 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 02-01093 \(December 11, 2003\) at p. 4 \(a Judge must not\
evaluate the facts)Tj
-7.136 -1.125 Td
(and circumstances of an applicant's case in an artificial, piecemeal man\
ner\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
[45 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-09892.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-09892.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:52:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(with family members living in Iran, one family member at a time. )Tj
26.548 0 Td
(To the contrary, the Judge had to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.44 0 Td
(consider the totality)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 738.75 Tm
(of Applicant's ties with family members living in Iran.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 277.1113 743.25 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 277.1113 742.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 290.9175 738.75 Tm
( Accordingly, even if a plausible argument could be made that)Tj
-22.91 -1.125 Td
(the facts and circumstances of Applicant's ties with a particular family\
member living in Iran, standing alone, would not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(be sufficient to support adverse conclusions under Guideline B \(Foreign\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.104 0 Td
(Influence\), such an argument would not)Tj
-29.104 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate the Judge erred in this case.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Finally, given the record evidence in this case, the Administrative Judg\
e had a rational basis for concluding that the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(totality of the facts and circumstances of Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.229 0 Td
(ties with family members living in Iran raises security concerns)Tj
-21.229 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\). )Tj
15.939 0 Td
(Applicant's disagreement with that conclusion is not sufficient to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.203 0 Td
(demonstrate)Tj
-42.142 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's conclusion is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(Whether the Board should remand the case to the Administrative Judge for\
further proceedings)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 606 cm
0 0 m
456.187 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 484.1875 606.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant asks the)Tj
-39.016 -1.125 Td
(Board to reverse the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.731 0 Td
(decision. )Tj
3.833 0 Td
(In the alternative, Applicant asks the Board to remand the case to)Tj
-21.564 -1.125 Td
(the Judge "to determine the exact grounds for the Administrative Judge's\
decision pertaining)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.218 0 Td
(to Guideline B allegations)Tj
-37.218 -1.125 Td
(enumerated in [SOR paragraph] 2\(c\).)Tj
T*
(As discussed earlier in this decision, the Board concludes Applicant's c\
laims of error are not persuasive. )Tj
41.835 0 Td
(Accordingly,)Tj
-41.835 -1.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate any basis upon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.662 0 Td
(which the Board would be justified in reversing the Administrative)Tj
-20.662 -1.125 Td
(Judge's decision. )Tj
(Furthermore, since Applicant has failed to demonstrate error below, she \
is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.42 0 Td
(entitled to have her case)Tj
-38.42 -1.125 Td
(remanded to the Judge for further explanation of his decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(The Board affirms the Administrative Judge's security clearance decision\
because Applicant has failed to demonstrate)Tj
-0 -1.125 Td
(error below.)Tj
0 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 409.5 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 384.75 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael D. Hipple)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 307.5 cm
0 0 m
129.311 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 282.75 Tm
(Michael D. Hipple)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 205.5 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 180.75 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-00318 \(February 25, 2004\) at p. 4.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Under the ASDC3I memorandum, clearance must be denied or revoked unless \
an applicant surrenders his or her)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(foreign passport, or he or she obtains official)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.189 0 Td
(approval for its use from the appropriate U.S. government agency.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(3. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0511 \(December 19, 2000\) at p. 12 \(ASDC3I memorand\
um on foreign passports)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[277.0 741.0 291.0 752.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
[48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-09892.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-09892.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:52:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Applicant correctly notes that the record evidence shows she used an Ira\
nian passport to travel to Iran before she)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(became a naturalized U.S. citizen. )Tj
13.882 0 Td
(The Board has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(specifically noted that an applicant cannot be faulted for using a)Tj
-13.882 -1.125 Td
(passport of the country of which he or she is a citizen, and that an app\
licant cannot be expected to obtain)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.097 0 Td
(and use a U.S.)Tj
-42.097 -1.375 Td
(passport before the applicant becomes a naturalized U.S. citizen.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 326.2129 716.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 326.2129 715.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 340.019 711.75 Tm
( )Tj
(However, the Board does not read the decision)Tj
-27.002 -1.125 Td
(below as indicating or suggesting that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.386 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge was drawing adverse conclusions under Guideline\
C)Tj
-15.386 -1.125 Td
(based on Applicant's use of an Iranian passport before she became a natu\
ralized U.S.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.168 0 Td
(citizen.)Tj
-34.168 -2.125 Td
(Given the record evidence in this case, the Administrative Judge reasona\
bly found that Applicant possesses a current)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Iranian passport. )Tj
(Indeed, Applicant does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.939 0 Td
(challenge that finding on appeal. )Tj
13.329 0 Td
(Under the terms of the ASDC3I)Tj
-31.268 -1.125 Td
(memorandum on foreign passports, Applicant's possession of a current Ira\
nian passport is disqualifying)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.672 0 Td
(conduct that)Tj
-41.672 -1.375 Td
(provides a rational basis for the )Tj
12.83 0 Td
(Judge's adverse conclusions under Guideline C.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 398.7344 620.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 398.7344 619.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 412.5405 615.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant's arguments raise a form)Tj
-33.045 -1.375 Td
(of "legal necessity" defense. )Tj
11.562 0 Td
(However, such a defense is precluded by the terms of the ASDC3I memorand\
um.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 546.6367 603.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 546.6367 603 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 585.75 Tm
(Furthermore, to the extent that Applicant's arguments could be construed\
as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.505 0 Td
(questioning the wisdom or desirability of)Tj
-30.505 -1.375 Td
(the ASDC3I memorandum, they cannot be addressed in these proceedings.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 375.5723 573.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 375.5723 573 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 389.3784 569.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant's possession of an Iranian)Tj
-31.115 -1.125 Td
(passport is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(sufficient to support the Judge's adverse conclusions under Guideline C.\
)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by reaching adverse conclusions u\
nder Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\))Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 529.5 cm
0 0 m
539.484 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 567.4844 530.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The)Tj
-45.957 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge concluded that Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.704 0 Td
(mother, a dual United States-Iranian citizen who lives in the United)Tj
-19.704 -1.125 Td
(States, does not pose any security concerns under Guideline B. )Tj
25.383 0 Td
(However, the Judge entered formal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.328 0 Td
(findings against)Tj
-39.71 -1.125 Td
(Applicant under Guideline B based on the facts and circumstances of her \
ties to her father, maternal aunt, and mother-)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(in-law, who are citizens and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.496 0 Td
(residents of Iran. )Tj
(Applicant challenges the Judge's adverse conclusions under Guideline B.)Tj
-11.496 -1.125 Td
(In support of that challenge, Applicant argues: \(a\) the Judge erred by\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.796 0 Td
(overruling counsel's objection to a hypothetical)Tj
-27.796 -1.125 Td
(question Department Counsel asked her sisters at the hearing; )Tj
24.91 0 Td
(\(b\) the record evidence shows that she does not have)Tj
-24.91 -1.125 Td
(strong ties with her father in Iran; \(c\) the Judge gave undue weight t\
o the evidence that her father had given her and her)Tj
T*
(sisters financial assistance; \(d\) the record evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.519 0 Td
(shows that she has ties or a relationship with her stepmother and her)Tj
-20.519 -1.125 Td
(stepsisters living in Iran; and \(e\) the record evidence does not suppo\
rt a finding that she has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.851 0 Td
(connections or a)Tj
-36.851 -1.125 Td
(relationship with her mother-in-law, who lives in Iran.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Under the Directive, DOHA proceedings are not required to be conducted i\
n strict compliance with formal rules of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(Furthermore, when faced with an objection)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.522 0 Td
(to a question posed to a witness, an Administrative Judge has)Tj
-21.575 -1.125 Td
(broad discretion to decide whether to sustain or overrule the objection,\
subject to review for abuse of that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.348 0 Td
(discretion.)Tj
-42.348 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's objection to the Department Counsel's question was an unders\
tandable one, but the Board does not have to)Tj
T*
(agree with the Judge's ruling to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.733 0 Td
(conclude he did not abuse his discretion by allowing the question to be \
answered.)Tj
-12.733 -1.125 Td
(Moreover, even if the Board were to assume -- solely for purposes of dec\
iding this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.269 0 Td
(appeal -- that the Judge erred by)Tj
-33.269 -1.125 Td
(overruling Applicant's objection, Applicant does not identify any partic\
ular harm or prejudice that she suffered as a)Tj
T*
(result of the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(challenged ruling.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's disagreement with the Administrative Judge's weighing of the\
record evidence fails to demonstrate the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge erred. )Tj
(There is no simple formula or rule of law)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.882 0 Td
(on how a )Tj
(Judge must weigh record evidence. )Tj
18.245 0 Td
(Subject to review)Tj
-40.126 -1.125 Td
(for action that is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law, the Judge \
has discretion to weigh the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.792 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(A Judge)Tj
-44.845 -1.125 Td
(is not always faced )Tj
7.886 0 Td
(with a case where the record evidence points all in one direction. )Tj
26.184 0 Td
(To the contrary, it is not unusual)Tj
-34.07 -1.125 Td
(for a Judge to be faced with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.357 0 Td
(conflicting record evidence, or with a record that contains some evidenc\
e that favors one)Tj
-11.357 -1.125 Td
(side and different evidence that favors the other side. )Tj
21.436 0 Td
(In such situations, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.971 0 Td
(Judge must consider the record evidence as)Tj
-30.407 -1.125 Td
(a whole, decide whether the favorable evidence outweighs the unfavorable\
evidence or )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
35.012 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(, and reach a)Tj
-39.038 -1.125 Td
(conclusion as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.666 0 Td
(to whether the applicant has met his or her burden of persuasion under D\
irective, Additional Procedural)Tj
-5.666 -1.375 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.15.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 133.2988 143.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 133.2988 142.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 147.105 138.75 Tm
( )Tj
(If an appealing party challenges the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.744 0 Td
(Judge's weighing of the record evidence, that party must)Tj
-25.669 -1.125 Td
(not simply disagree with the Judge's weighing of the record evidence, bu\
t rather must articulate a cogent reason)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.86 0 Td
(or)Tj
-44.86 -1.125 Td
(argument for how the Judge erred in weighing the record evidence. )Tj
27.101 0 Td
(Similarly, if an appealing party challenges a Judge's)Tj
-27.101 -1.125 Td
(conclusions, that party must not simply disagree)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.553 0 Td
(with the Judge's conclusions, but rather must articulate a cogent reason\
)Tj
-19.553 -1.125 Td
(or argument for how the Judge's conclusions are arbitrary, capricious, o\
r contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Moreover, some of Applicant's arguments are not persuasive because they \
are based on a piecemeal analysis of the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(record evidence. )Tj
6.857 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge was not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.97 0 Td
(required to consider the facts and circumstances of Applicant's ties)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[326.0 714.0 340.0 725.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[399.0 618.0 413.0 629.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[546.0 601.0 560.0 612.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[375.0 571.0 389.0 582.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[133.0 141.0 147.0 152.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
53 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-09892.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-09892.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:52:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(a mere difference of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.328 0 Td
(opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.887 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.006 0 Td
(to law, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
-27.006 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.69 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by such)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.758 0 Td
(relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-24.758 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In making this review,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.248 0 Td
(the)Tj
-44.764 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence supporting\
a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.475 0 Td
(evidence supporting those)Tj
-37.475 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a Judge's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.234 0 Td
(determination is not immune from review, the party challenging a Judge's\
credibility)Tj
-12.234 -1.125 Td
(determination has a heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.883 0 Td
(cases\).)Tj
-18.883 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
T*
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.717 0 Td
(E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.492 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by reaching adverse conclusions u\
nder Guideline C \(Foreign Preference\))Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 321 cm
0 0 m
545.473 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 573.4727 321.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-46.456 -1.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.272 0 Td
(against Applicant under Guideline C based on her possession of a)Tj
-20.272 -1.125 Td
(current Iranian passport, which she renewed at the insistence of Iranian\
authorities so that her children)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.124 0 Td
(could travel to)Tj
-41.124 -1.125 Td
(Iran with their father to visit their )Tj
13.635 0 Td
(paternal grandmother. )Tj
9.08 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that Applicant's possession of the Iranian)Tj
-22.714 -1.125 Td
(passport falls under the terms of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.108 0 Td
(the memorandum on foreign passports issued by the Assistant Secretary of\
Defense for)Tj
-13.108 -1.125 Td
(Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence \(ASDC3I\) on August \
16,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.524 0 Td
(2000, and that Applicant's reason for)Tj
-32.524 -1.125 Td
(renewing her Iranian passport was not extenuating or mitigating under Gu\
ideline C. )Tj
33.741 0 Td
(Applicant challenges the Judge's)Tj
-33.741 -1.125 Td
(adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions under Guideline C. )Tj
16.163 0 Td
(In support of that challenge, Applicant argues: \(a\) her situation is s\
imilar to)Tj
-16.163 -1.125 Td
(other cases in which DOHA Judges have made favorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.076 0 Td
(security clearance decisions; \(b\) the Judge failed to take into)Tj
-23.076 -1.125 Td
(account the facts and circumstances of her trips to Iran before she beca\
me a naturalized U.S. citizen; \(c\) she)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.342 0 Td
(has not used)Tj
-43.342 -1.125 Td
(her Iranian passport since she became a naturalized U.S. citizen; \(d\) \
she does not have a preference for Iran over the)Tj
T*
(United States; \(e\) she does not intend)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.191 0 Td
(to travel to Iran; \(f\) she tried to surrender her Iranian passport but\
was not allowed)Tj
-15.191 -1.125 Td
(to do so by Iranian officials; and \(g\) she did not voluntarily renew h\
er Iranian passport,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.074 0 Td
(but rather had it renewed under)Tj
-35.074 -1.125 Td
(duress. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes Applicant has failed to\
demonstrate the Judge erred.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The decisions by Hearing Office Administrative Judges in other cases cit\
ed by Applicant do not demonstrate the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge erred in this case. )Tj
16.079 0 Td
(A decision by a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.499 0 Td
(Hearing Office Judge )Tj
8.857 0 Td
(is not legally binding precedent on)Tj
-31.435 -1.125 Td
(another Hearing Office Judge or the Board. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.604 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-22606 \(June 30, 2003\) AT PP. 3-5. )Tj
(The Judge)Tj
-20.936 -1.125 Td
(in this case was not required to follow the decisions of his colleagues \
in other cases, distinguish this case from the)Tj
T*
(decisions of his colleagues in other cases, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.967 0 Td
(reconcile his decision in this case with decisions by his colleagues in \
other)Tj
-17.967 -1.125 Td
(cases.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
62 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-09892.a1.html)
endobj
61 0 obj
<>
endobj
63 0 obj
<>
endobj
55 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 114.0 null]
endobj
56 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 89.0 null]
endobj
57 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 50.0 null]
endobj
58 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 727.0 null]
endobj
59 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 701.0 null]
endobj
60 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 649.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 64
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000148134 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003738 00000 n
0000003765 00000 n
0000147236 00000 n
0000147432 00000 n
0000147474 00000 n
0000147046 00000 n
0000004502 00000 n
0000138541 00000 n
0000126694 00000 n
0000121085 00000 n
0000118706 00000 n
0000003868 00000 n
0000003914 00000 n
0000003963 00000 n
0000004195 00000 n
0000004035 00000 n
0000004067 00000 n
0000004099 00000 n
0000004131 00000 n
0000004163 00000 n
0000004713 00000 n
0000010341 00000 n
0000010390 00000 n
0000010425 00000 n
0000010935 00000 n
0000011358 00000 n
0000065320 00000 n
0000065587 00000 n
0000033850 00000 n
0000034123 00000 n
0000011751 00000 n
0000012027 00000 n
0000012400 00000 n
0000034562 00000 n
0000066201 00000 n
0000118906 00000 n
0000121310 00000 n
0000121335 00000 n
0000126370 00000 n
0000126908 00000 n
0000126961 00000 n
0000136921 00000 n
0000137245 00000 n
0000137569 00000 n
0000137893 00000 n
0000138217 00000 n
0000138752 00000 n
0000147131 00000 n
0000147884 00000 n
0000147926 00000 n
0000147967 00000 n
0000148008 00000 n
0000148050 00000 n
0000148092 00000 n
0000147682 00000 n
0000147516 00000 n
0000147831 00000 n
trailer
<<8E572B9C40610C4AAA0F1428B78DE85D>]>>
startxref
148307
%%EOF