14xlAh"e$LS(h*M4fR6};;;;+Y9ͦ9ͥy4? : OW - xDg v8X_w6N] lwբbZi)-崂V*ZMkh-6D|B[i}I+ wN{E h7xrh tQ. #t(q*B*b*tNi*2:Ct*蜮kyH?y{fH?%LW.@ױJzmMW `1D\p9fr꺺:XPH:\GFQ:UN:RGhxMb@6VUmZmdf
[ִlm[ֵ|:F7ձ:N{x{κvks> !k#ͳ=n l-ŶĞ'){ږ2{Ɩ۳Zm= _OԘ½9 rr稓;D8!NS(e(gE8'⚸.nQ)nWDBOK
dC,C P&F73/!=fH'Yu_T1ORU0EƩj#eQ̕L2S2Y0Y3ihلTȦ2Vx ̋'@=T11QřLLQ"D(kUiLiM3̤ꆺɜdڄ3mU{o7am"UYjfYiVfYk֙fh6fjDB[> dG*d'05et$() 7Mj0E@u~P LP^??a0 X]0N )Z$:!A
v uHcEY=l31 R ܻ0pɻw`2Cg^3 ZjXAЀ P*{s+)CPq[Ra4L5o%~ Dx b VVb = Ŀ^ hO{7H; tЌm4lc\(B4A cG˹ L%MK u"X]T)PkΑ̐c/?
U I`6|ϕ;V1= c~ސm
Ϡ?qH*L7s#(c2D e"+#[ ^f÷8jG 5xcag1A
_Æ [rf7XQ~}K-p' !{e #3 C9܄kXޙLX(ʙ[*Ogg癲긿O ta `}`p /k܇%xg#/E/搬';r,{.yxy=n3w>|y u㓠-wH/kGk/ ^Z Qb8$01c1w*+WabŘ&>|*S$ZLV l;Uz Rl~wy? K[ư5 vC.R}9\+/}aw&sTXUq|3m[PW8װM[<~"x6qݝq}NG$bMB!_
$Np lH@٨V-ctT+V`]3I F56u
]7
mJ9 f[Ͽ>{ OBBt?=+:VX01>FaT îb/طMji?^~]n
'#-| g
>gxZσGC $9s;i)AlY,2 lTg*v ބK5}h L=/:'c{KXuv/cgk(qI)DSЦqgr~#]8F;Q%P _>#1WcH[v,L
N:`h@
:/w/d\g `o"H-%d;κm|px{j̠0,&vQn',Bw:ʽ^X_ZQ3UD;pTރ9flfA|
{pY> ϯv؊s A=ԓnQ4Aen;j~kQ(9}.y
YClK^Na`|%` ^& N'qM vWuxlX_ì=^k$;| aB-}&!eЏ5p.0ڠ=W
0cw@69x3ǁyN3w ϒHJvz@̤:{t>ʑ$KçZ.uB2ؓ_ v(s >jac8/a
p
uz9K
UmWP c ld=, W;;Fmv=dW+y2bp{[q@K [ha;Z9宲Rn]Rl,Y#oXxJT=)MM~
5RE$gʨbJgJP %CSDĘ,% :ku!,I8A9JRbL)T"rAT`!BCJkP0Rj rT@eܱ 5$)$Uêū@DF5DT^Fܪ߈r +@w;GڜPՋFUӷP\8;bsWT&s%mL&q
Kǭ7ݓLdn)j'N?_ (mZ >e[
]Sat,4 e1QiKȒ蒓]lP6:]Kgr`6cL S< 5yÔeB"jL[J $8KAlU ")Eh|s y㙔 -
d*Ԑ? ^:"|}:~@HDCA ڶ+P$!FD lMq] TM4qF&9v38ə1 =S?`/5?ؽy~F#!ƔԄmf`y~oRK" E' bt.)a
IRY7 zPdy#FN!b\RM1isR6wW=6/Po ¬6u(i/HQWRJW67- ᝦF鏥&=
wI >/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-14995.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-14995.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:57:43 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 714.75 591.75 50.999 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(8-9 n.3.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(18. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-02195 \(April 9, 2004\) at pp. 5-6; ISCR Case No. 99-\
0424 \(February 8, 2001\) at p. 11.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-14995.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-14995.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:57:43 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 753.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings in favor of Applicant w\
ith respect to Guideline C \(Foreign)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 740.25 Tm
(Preference\). )Tj
5.107 0 Td
(Those favorable formal findings are not at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.133 0 Td
(issue on appeal.)Tj
-22.24 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Applicant's appeal brief contains some factual assertions that seek to s\
upplement the record evidence. )Tj
41.86 0 Td
(Such assertions)Tj
-41.86 -1.125 Td
(constitute new evidence, which the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.967 0 Td
(cannot consider on appeal. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.913 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance,)Tj
-27.879 -1.125 Td
(Item E3.1.29.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Adams v. Laird)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 420 F.2d 230, 238-239 \(D.C. Cir. 1969\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(cert. denied)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
28.832 0 Td
(, 397 U.S. 1039 \(1970\).)Tj
-28.832 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 02-06928 \(September 17, 2003\) at p. 4; ISCR Case No. 00\
-0516 \(December 7, 2001\) at p. 5.)Tj
-4.582 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-00305 \(February 12, 2003\) at p. 6.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(6. )Tj
(A witness's opinion or belief about what another person or entity knows \
-- if not based on the witness's personal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(knowledge or experience, or supported by other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.382 0 Td
(credible evidence -- )Tj
8.189 0 Td
(is nothing more than speculation or surmise about)Tj
-27.572 -1.125 Td
(what another person or entity knows, and as such, is entitled to no weig\
ht.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-02892 \(June 28, 2004\) at p. 7.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(8. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Smith v. Schlesinger)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.137 0 Td
(, 513 F.2d 462, 476 n.48 \(D.C. Cir. 1975\).)Tj
-9.137 -2.125 Td
(9. )Tj
("A determination that the immediate family member\(s\) \(spouse, father,\
mother, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters\),)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(cohabitant, or associate\(s\) in question are not agents)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.132 0 Td
(of a foreign power or in a position to be exploited by a foreign)Tj
-21.132 -1.125 Td
(power in a way that could force the individual to choose between loyalty\
to the person\(s\) involved and the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.738 0 Td
(United)Tj
-42.738 -1.125 Td
(States" \(Directive, Adjudicative Guidelines, Item E2.A2.1.3.1\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(10. )Tj
("A determination that the immediate family member\(s\), cohabitant, or a\
ssociate\(s\) in question would not constitute)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(an unacceptable security risk.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(11. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 02-24254 \(June 29, 2004\) at p. 7; ISCR Case No. 99-0480 \
\(November 28, 2000\) at p. 5.)Tj
T*
(12. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-02195 \(April 9, 2004\) at p. 6; ISCR Case No. 02-268\
26 \(November 12, 2003\) at pp. 4-)Tj
-4.832 -1.125 Td
(5; ISCR Case No. 01-03120 \(February)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(20, 2002\) at p. 4; ISCR Case No. 99-0511 \(December 19, 2000\) at p. 10\
.)Tj
T*
(13. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-24254 \(June 29, 2004\) at p. 8.)Tj
-4.832 -2.125 Td
(14. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0511 \(December 19, 2000\) at pp. 13-14. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
24.551 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 02-05110 \(March 22,)Tj
-29.383 -1.125 Td
(2004\) at pp. 4-6 \(explaining why security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.83 0 Td
(clearance decisions are not left to the unfettered discretion of securit\
y)Tj
-16.83 -1.125 Td
(clearance adjudicators\))Tj
T*
(15. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-08032 \(May 14, 2004\) at p. 6.)Tj
-4.832 -2.125 Td
(16. )Tj
(A witness may truthfully testify as to what the witness believes to be t\
he facts, yet cross-examination or other record)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evidence may show, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.386 0 Td
(inter alia)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.694 0 Td
(, that: \(a\) the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.359 0 Td
(witness did not actually see, hear, or otherwise perceive the event or t\
hing)Tj
-17.439 -1.125 Td
(about which the witness testified; \(b\) the witness did not have a good\
opportunity to see, hear,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.853 0 Td
(or otherwise perceive the)Tj
-37.853 -1.125 Td
(event or thing about which the witness testified; \(c\) the witness saw,\
heard or otherwise perceived only part of the event)Tj
T*
(or thing about which the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.026 0 Td
(witness testified; \(d\) the witness misperceived or misunderstood what \
the witness saw, heard,)Tj
-10.026 -1.125 Td
(or otherwise perceived; \(e\) the witness's testimony is based on assump\
tions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.369 0 Td
(or conclusions about the meaning or)Tj
-30.369 -1.125 Td
(significance of what the witness saw, heard or otherwise perceived; \(f\)\
the witness is not a good observer, has a poor)Tj
T*
(memory, or has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.499 0 Td
(difficulty in accurately communicating about the events or things the wi\
tness saw, heard, other)Tj
-6.499 -1.125 Td
(otherwise perceived; \(g\) the witness has a tendency to exaggerate or b\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.71 0 Td
(careless in describing events or things they see,)Tj
-28.71 -1.125 Td
(hear or otherwise perceive; \(h\) the witness is innocently mistaken abo\
ut what the witness saw, heard or otherwise)Tj
T*
(perceived; or \(i\) the witness's testimony is inconsistent with, or con\
tradicted by, other credible or reliable evidence.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(17. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-02195 \(April 9, 2004\) at pp. 6-7; ISCR Case No. 99-\
0511 \(December 19, 2000\) at pp.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
50 0 obj
[52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R]
endobj
51 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-14995.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-14995.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:57:43 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 753 Tm
(in a manner that is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.637 0 Td
(consonant with the "clearly consistent with the national interest" stand\
ard.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 463.3457 757.5 Tm
( \(14\))Tj
ET
Q
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 463.3457 756.75 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 482.0269 753 Tm
( In this case, the Judge)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 739.5 Tm
(failed to articulate a basis for his favorable conclusions under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.825 0 Td
(Guideline B that is supported by the record evidence and)Tj
-24.825 -1.125 Td
(reasonable inferences drawn from it.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel also challenges the Administrative Judge's reliance o\
n his conclusion that Applicant was a credible)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(witness. )Tj
(That challenge has merit. )Tj
13.857 0 Td
(A credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.332 0 Td
(determination is not a substitute for record evidence,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 498.8535 688.5 Tm
( \(15\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 498.8535 687.75 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 517.5347 684 Tm
( and it does not)Tj
-41.795 -1.125 Td
(relieve an Administrative Judge from the obligation to consider what inf\
erences or conclusions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.239 0 Td
(reasonably could be)Tj
-38.239 -1.125 Td
(reached in light of the record evidence as a whole. )Tj
20.352 0 Td
(The sincerity and veracity of a witness's testimony are separate and)Tj
-20.352 -1.375 Td
(distinct from what weight)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.554 0 Td
(reasonably can be given to that testimony,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 344.9219 645 Tm
( \(16\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 344.9219 644.25 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 363.603 640.5 Tm
( and what inferences and conclusions)Tj
-28.967 -1.375 Td
(reasonably can be reached based on considering that testimony in light o\
f the evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.877 0 Td
(as a whole.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 488.1719 628.5 Tm
( \(17\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 488.1719 627.75 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 506.853 624 Tm
( )Tj
(Accordingly,)Tj
-40.904 -1.125 Td
(although the Judge found Applicant's testimony to be credible, such a cr\
edibility determination did not relieve the Judge)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of the obligation to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.888 0 Td
(consider the substance of Applicant's testimony in light of the record e\
vidence as a whole and weigh)Tj
-7.888 -1.125 Td
(it in a reasonable manner in evaluating the security significance of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.795 0 Td
(Applicant's ties to immediate family members living)Tj
-26.795 -1.125 Td
(in Iran. )Tj
(The Judge's conclusion that Applicant was a truthful witness is not a su\
bstitute for record evidence that might)Tj
T*
(provide a rational basis for the Judge's favorable conclusions under Gui\
deline B.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's argument that her family members living in Iran would not as\
k her to betray U.S. classified information for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the benefit of the Iranian government does not have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.909 0 Td
(the significance Applicant places on it. )Tj
15.8 0 Td
(There is no record evidence)Tj
-36.709 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant's family members living in Iran have asked her to disclos\
e classified information. )Tj
38.698 0 Td
(However, the security)Tj
-38.698 -1.125 Td
(concerns under Guideline B are not limited to situations where an applic\
ant's family members seek to obtain)Tj
T*
(unauthorized access to classified)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(Rather, the typical security concerns under Guideline B include the)Tj
-18.549 -1.125 Td
(security risks posed by the vulnerability of an applicant to coercion, p\
ressure, or influence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.267 0 Td
(brought to bear on an)Tj
-36.267 -1.125 Td
(applicant, directly or indirectly, by a foreign government or entity bec\
ause of the applicant's ties with family members)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(living abroad.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 82.6504 438 Tm
( \(18\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 82.6504 437.25 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 277.1992 408 Tm
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel has met its burden of demonstrating harmful error bel\
ow. )Tj
31.659 0 Td
(Pursuant to Directive, Additional)Tj
-31.659 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.33.3, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.522 0 Td
(reverses the Administrative Judge's favorable security clearance)Tj
-19.522 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 329.25 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 304.5 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 227.25 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 202.5 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 125.25 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 100.5 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<ep x C{< uq) wa1`r ?h͊*.zw|V>g l!ߒ9r6k/
՟JT珳~v/V(KFdtu0=&9ua vEĸWDāY+0 Qq;q.hQltߌ\ iг_GU9V%7psD\ ,l@ǵu]eqTk4< 9pko0cv δZ^;E݀ SZ1MPF pj fA\5Y8RM%jEkjYՠIE 6?jVcw DQiLV&l]fvX g ,U.UQ
"LM$"Y+bM\7Ex)x71 6Z lMhCn ~ Rdd8
t{($m1]o "zyF
z"۵;;9Ig&]FDKK]|QL>C
`ԕHD>@"Rtj.G2{#?)p
kc$?J. yΕN@gGۙ澸2Gj4P5gۿ|SG>D,⃐1 aׄ/&+ /8qv8^ E=c
~: } `VOgTUJn;}c쎼R.t^92vPؕ3`F(WEECb3ŃEf( 7DK2[^7gd`|r /9LSthNoLi%FKcڃEaO2X a{<+-*]+ܶC0FC5*T"( >>X,+^ JQ
╺~ܕF҄D;Y]+
e/hֿj;ViD͈G0(S[
ؼ&gQfLHOva郎 YSnggvƆZ/ӽ"itu1[TF؞yKvnrnĖy2EՠBj嘭hwJZ]aױ%$w;%E. ȴC!{j{3 S)90^` ]
1TWpߓ> 6Ɓ!q͋n߽g]#ݝ 3*lm_ߺ
x͢y/{x >
0ValD Fv"
f!Bߟd -vJ~b TnQA zm*Ao߮X%`8;غNS&;,+BG
:nuy_8-=?;;N H
= >/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[463.0 755.0 481.0 766.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
53 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[498.0 686.0 516.0 697.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[345.0 642.0 363.0 653.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[488.0 626.0 506.0 637.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[82.0 435.0 100.0 446.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
57 0 obj
[59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R]
endobj
58 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-14995.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-14995.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:57:43 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(from considering )Tj
7.109 0 Td
(whether the totality of the facts and circumstances of Applicant's ties \
with immediate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.309 0 Td
(family members)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(living in Iran raises security concerns. )Tj
15.467 0 Td
(The federal government is not required to wait until an applicant has mi\
shandled)Tj
-15.467 -1.125 Td
(or failed to protect classified)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.69 0 Td
(information before it can decide whether the facts and circumstances of \
an applicant's case)Tj
-11.69 -1.375 Td
(raises security concerns.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 132.9531 716.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 132.9531 715.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 686.25 Tm
(Second, Applicant's lack of awareness that the federal government could \
consider her ties with immediate family)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(members in Iran as raising security concerns did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.133 0 Td
(preclude the federal government from considering the security)Tj
-21.133 -1.125 Td
(significance of those family ties. )Tj
13.274 0 Td
(The objective of a security clearance adjudication is not to control or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.767 0 Td
(regulate an)Tj
-41.041 -1.125 Td
(applicant's conduct or circumstances, but rather to decide whether an ap\
plicant's conduct or circumstances pose a)Tj
T*
(security risk that precludes a determination)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.494 0 Td
(that it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or con\
tinue a)Tj
-17.494 -1.375 Td
(security clearance for a particular applicant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 226.5449 620.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.5449 619.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 240.3511 615.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Furthermore, the federal government is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.717 0 Td
(required to formally advise)Tj
-36.413 -1.125 Td
(an applicant that certain conduct or circumstances raise security concer\
ns and then allow an applicant the opportunity to)Tj
T*
(stop such conduct or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.499 0 Td
(change his or her circumstances before the federal government can seek t\
o deny or revoke access)Tj
-8.499 -1.125 Td
(to classified information. )Tj
10.275 0 Td
(The federal government can deny or revoke)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.742 0 Td
(access to classified information without first)Tj
-28.017 -1.125 Td
(giving an applicant the functional equivalent of a warning with an oppor\
tunity to change his or her conduct or)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(circumstances.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 86.9688 549.75 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 86.9688 549 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 519.75 Tm
(Third, Applicant's belief about whether the Iranian government knows abo\
ut her access to classified information,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(however sincere, is not very probative as to whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.576 0 Td
(Iranian government does or does not know about her access to)Tj
-22.576 -1.375 Td
(classified information.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 123.9707 494.25 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 123.9707 493.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 137.7769 489.75 Tm
( )Tj
(And, even if Applicant's belief were correct, it does not prove that the\
Iranian)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.474 0 Td
(government)Tj
-41.622 -1.125 Td
(cannot or will not become aware of her access in the future. )Tj
24.129 0 Td
(Moreover, the federal government is entitled to evaluate)Tj
-24.129 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's security eligibility without)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.623 0 Td
(having to prove that the Iranian government currently is aware of her ac\
cess to)Tj
-15.623 -1.125 Td
(classified information. )Tj
9.248 0 Td
(As Department Counsel correctly notes, the federal government is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.714 0 Td
(not required to wait until it has)Tj
-35.961 -1.125 Td
(proof that an applicant has been specifically targeted by a foreign gove\
rnment before it can decide whether the)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(applicant's conduct and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.594 0 Td
(circumstances pose a security risk.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 297.4023 423.75 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 297.4023 423 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 311.2085 419.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Security clearance decisions can be based on predictive)Tj
-24.601 -1.125 Td
(judgments about the security concerns raised by an applicant's conduct a\
nd)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.254 0 Td
(circumstances, and are not limited to)Tj
-30.254 -1.375 Td
(situations where there is an imminent threat to national security.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 323.916 393.75 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 323.916 393 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 360.75 Tm
(The Administrative Judge's application of Foreign Influence Mitigating C\
ondition 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 419.0898 365.25 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 419.0898 364.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 432.896 360.75 Tm
( was problematic for two reasons.)Tj
-34.741 -1.375 Td
(First, when referring to that mitigating condition,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.913 0 Td
(the Judge used language from an earlier version of it,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 510.2031 348.75 Tm
( \(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 510.2031 348 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 528.8843 344.25 Tm
( not the)Tj
-42.74 -1.125 Td
(current version. )Tj
6.525 0 Td
(It was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law for the Judge to rely \
on an earlier version)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.959 0 Td
(of the)Tj
-42.484 -1.375 Td
(mitigating condition.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 116.6582 318.75 Tm
( \(11\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 116.6582 318 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 135.3394 314.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Second, Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1 is bifurcated in nature\
and cannot be applied)Tj
-9.945 -1.125 Td
(unless there is sufficient credible record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.216 0 Td
(evidence that an applicant's family members, cohabitant or associates in\
)Tj
-16.216 -1.125 Td
(question are \(a\) not agents of a foreign power, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.715 0 Td
(and)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( \(b\) not in a position to be exploited by a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.025 0 Td
(foreign power in a way that)Tj
-36.74 -1.375 Td
(could force the applicant to choose between the person\(s\) involved and\
the United States.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 445.1992 275.25 Tm
( \(12\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 445.1992 274.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 463.8804 270.75 Tm
( )Tj
(By applying Foreign)Tj
-37.323 -1.125 Td
(Influence Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.498 0 Td
(Condition 1 based solely on a finding that Applicant's immediate family \
members in Iran are not)Tj
-8.498 -1.125 Td
(agents of the Iranian government, the Judge ignored the plain meaning of\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.574 0 Td
(that mitigating condition.)Tj
-29.574 -2.125 Td
(Given the record evidence in this case, the Administrative Judge failed \
to articulate a rational basis for his conclusion)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that Applicant is likely to successfully resist any effort)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.078 0 Td
(by the Iranian government to pressure her through her immediate)Tj
-22.078 -1.125 Td
(family members in Iran. )Tj
9.914 0 Td
(The record evidence cited by the Judge concerning the travails of Applic\
ant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.113 0 Td
(brother, cousin)Tj
-41.026 -1.125 Td
(and niece at the hands of Iranian authorities does not have probative va\
lue concerning Applicant's conduct, in the past or)Tj
T*
(in the future. )Tj
5.387 0 Td
(There is no record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.552 0 Td
(evidence: \(a\) that the travails of Applicant's brother, cousin, and ni\
ece placed Applicant)Tj
-12.939 -1.125 Td
(in a position of having to make a choice of any kind; \(b\) about how Ap\
plicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.381 0 Td
(acted, reacted, or otherwise dealt with the)Tj
-31.381 -1.125 Td
(travails of her brother, cousin, and niece; \(c\) whether the travails o\
f Applicant's brother, cousin, and niece had any)Tj
T*
(particular)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.081 0 Td
(effect on, or consequence for, Applicant; or \(d\) that would otherwise \
shed light on how Applicant might react)Tj
-4.081 -1.125 Td
(to actions of the Iranian government taken to pressure or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.881 0 Td
(influence her, directly or indirectly, because of her ties with)Tj
-22.881 -1.125 Td
(immediate family members living in Iran. )Tj
16.968 0 Td
(Although a Judge must make predictive judgments in these cases,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.522 0 Td
(such)Tj
-43.49 -1.375 Td
(predictive judgments must have a rational basis in the record evidence.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 356.2187 84.75 Tm
( \(13\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 356.2187 84 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 374.8999 80.25 Tm
( )Tj
(A Judge's responsibility to weigh the record)Tj
-29.908 -1.125 Td
(evidence does not mean that the Judge is at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.522 0 Td
(liberty to draw whatever inferences or conclusions the Judge wants to dr\
aw;)Tj
-17.522 -1.125 Td
(rather, the Judge must draw reasonable inferences and reach reasonable c\
onclusions that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.569 0 Td
(fairly take into account the)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(totality of the record evidence and evaluate the security significance o\
f the facts and circumstances of an applicant's case)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[132.0 714.0 146.0 725.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[226.0 618.0 240.0 629.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
61 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[87.0 547.0 101.0 558.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
62 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[123.0 492.0 137.0 503.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
63 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[297.0 421.0 311.0 432.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
64 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[324.0 391.0 338.0 402.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
65 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[419.0 363.0 433.0 374.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[510.0 346.0 528.0 357.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[117.0 316.0 135.0 327.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[445.0 273.0 463.0 284.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[356.0 82.0 374.0 93.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
70 0 obj
[72 0 R 73 0 R]
endobj
71 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-14995.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-14995.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:57:43 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.69 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by such)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.758 0 Td
(relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-24.758 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In making this review,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.248 0 Td
(the)Tj
-44.764 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence supporting\
a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.475 0 Td
(evidence supporting those)Tj
-37.475 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a Judge's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.234 0 Td
(determination is not immune from review, the party challenging a Judge's\
credibility)Tj
-12.234 -1.125 Td
(determination has a heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.883 0 Td
(cases\).)Tj
-18.883 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
T*
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.717 0 Td
(E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.873 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 331.8137 375.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 331.8137 375 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 345.75 Tm
(Whether the Administrative Judge's favorable conclusions under Guideline\
B \(Foreign Influence\) are arbitrary,)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 345 cm
0 0 m
532.98 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 332.25 Tm
(capricious, or contrary to law)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 331.5 cm
0 0 m
140.947 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 156.9473 332.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.137 0 Td
(concluded that the facts and circumstances of Applicant's)Tj
-22.882 -1.125 Td
(immediate family members living in Iran raised security concerns under G\
uideline B, but then concluded that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.07 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-44.07 -1.125 Td
(had mitigated those security concerns because: \(1\) Applicant's immedia\
te family members living in Iran \(a brother and)Tj
T*
(sister\) are not agents of the Iranian)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.133 0 Td
(government; \(2\) Applicant's immediate family members living in Iran do\
not)Tj
-14.133 -1.125 Td
(constitute an unacceptable security risk; \(3\) Applicant is likely to s\
uccessfully resist any effort)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.989 0 Td
(by the Iranian)Tj
-37.989 -1.125 Td
(government to pressure her through her immediate family members living i\
n Iran; \(4\) Applicant's immediate family)Tj
T*
(members in Iran do not know about her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.052 0 Td
(employment or her access to classified information; and \(5\) Applicant'\
s)Tj
-16.052 -1.125 Td
(testimony was credible.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel contends the Administrative Judge's favorable conclus\
ions under Guideline B are arbitrary,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(capricious, or contrary to law because: \(a\) the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.323 0 Td
(evidence in this case does not support the Judge's application of)Tj
-21.323 -1.125 Td
(Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1; and \(b\) the Judge failed to \
articulate a rational basis for his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.906 0 Td
(conclusion that)Tj
-40.906 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's immediate family members living in Iran do not pose a securi\
ty risk. )Tj
32.451 0 Td
(Applicant argues the Board should)Tj
-32.451 -1.125 Td
(affirm the Judge's favorable security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.813 0 Td
(clearance decision because: \(i\) she has held a security clearance for \
many years)Tj
-14.813 -1.125 Td
(without violating security; \(ii\) the U.S. government did not tell her \
before this proceeding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.103 0 Td
(that her contacts with family)Tj
-36.103 -1.125 Td
(members in Iran posed a security risk; \(iii\) there is no evidence that\
the Iranian government is aware of her access to)Tj
T*
(classified information;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.275 0 Td
(\(iv\) her family members living in Iran would not ask her to betray U.S\
. classified information for)Tj
-9.275 -1.125 Td
(the benefit of the Iranian government; \(v\) )Tj
16.855 0 Td
(the Judge's decision is based on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.9 0 Td
(a reasonable interpretation of the record)Tj
-29.755 -1.375 Td
(evidence; and \(vi\) the Judge properly considered and evaluated all the\
factors in this case.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 446.834 92.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 446.834 91.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 62.25 Tm
(Three of Applicant's arguments raise threshold issues that warrant preli\
minary discussion. )Tj
36.227 0 Td
(First, the absence of any)Tj
-36.227 -1.125 Td
(allegation or evidence that Applicant has engaged in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.214 0 Td
(any security violations does not preclude the federal government)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
72 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[332.0 373.0 346.0 384.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
73 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[447.0 90.0 461.0 101.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
74 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
94 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-14995.a1.html)
endobj
93 0 obj
<>
endobj
95 0 obj
<>
endobj
75 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 426.0 null]
endobj
76 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 387.0 null]
endobj
77 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 362.0 null]
endobj
78 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 323.0 null]
endobj
79 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 297.0 null]
endobj
80 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 245.0 null]
endobj
81 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 219.0 null]
endobj
82 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 59.0 null]
endobj
83 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 740.0 null]
endobj
84 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 764.0 null]
endobj
85 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 725.0 null]
endobj
86 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 672.0 null]
endobj
87 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 647.0 null]
endobj
88 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 621.0 null]
endobj
89 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 596.0 null]
endobj
90 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 543.0 null]
endobj
91 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 518.0 null]
endobj
92 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 492.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 96
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000181860 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003745 00000 n
0000003772 00000 n
0000180087 00000 n
0000180646 00000 n
0000180688 00000 n
0000179897 00000 n
0000004610 00000 n
0000170760 00000 n
0000156102 00000 n
0000148184 00000 n
0000141176 00000 n
0000140113 00000 n
0000003875 00000 n
0000003921 00000 n
0000003970 00000 n
0000004243 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004179 00000 n
0000004211 00000 n
0000004832 00000 n
0000010719 00000 n
0000010768 00000 n
0000010804 00000 n
0000011314 00000 n
0000011737 00000 n
0000012106 00000 n
0000086728 00000 n
0000086995 00000 n
0000055262 00000 n
0000055535 00000 n
0000036506 00000 n
0000036787 00000 n
0000012509 00000 n
0000012785 00000 n
0000013182 00000 n
0000037113 00000 n
0000055974 00000 n
0000087609 00000 n
0000140313 00000 n
0000141376 00000 n
0000148398 00000 n
0000148451 00000 n
0000154468 00000 n
0000154795 00000 n
0000155122 00000 n
0000155449 00000 n
0000155776 00000 n
0000156316 00000 n
0000156411 00000 n
0000167180 00000 n
0000167505 00000 n
0000167830 00000 n
0000168154 00000 n
0000168479 00000 n
0000168804 00000 n
0000169129 00000 n
0000169454 00000 n
0000169781 00000 n
0000170108 00000 n
0000170435 00000 n
0000170985 00000 n
0000171017 00000 n
0000179248 00000 n
0000179573 00000 n
0000179982 00000 n
0000181105 00000 n
0000181147 00000 n
0000181189 00000 n
0000181231 00000 n
0000181273 00000 n
0000181315 00000 n
0000181357 00000 n
0000181399 00000 n
0000181440 00000 n
0000181482 00000 n
0000181524 00000 n
0000181566 00000 n
0000181608 00000 n
0000181650 00000 n
0000181692 00000 n
0000181734 00000 n
0000181776 00000 n
0000181818 00000 n
0000180896 00000 n
0000180730 00000 n
0000181052 00000 n
trailer
<myZRTlOγPD{r+
M~ (d1
ۮvrM> aǰѐX#isܒnrg
42a]K1f,%I8 ߃:χQ ,2m@W̪O2V![h Vy@ຣ|
`2v?5 *q}ȪjЉ:VCM#k4Cґі[-[ ٖޖ֔ٵ
RCa˖76b, 0@ VDV 8xfqg"|#ϰK5=O=8
wlF-=o-'d axw-2@6ۃ 1>} `{Q.rELmN.ūt + qQ5zAOJJ2Kii٦t
'J54zZrƴ+154< MY"YL*y䈹8} σAhPNP[BSK
g$or\õ&4z:K\.~qŗ
I`$j5<)t6bȿm<_qߤ_Rׂ>w!9JSĠaǶgiVv Uّ YU߱#=eGNB~iGCF!xуJnVLZC:'WCVYޤ:i席EV]r$,570z%|Ӹ!NA}yMo7[ikbl~;