͗28ckk8RRBO#]WI ]@ܵ
jF ɕ ?;wnmPށ\v*21QeTqJXN8M. з3h`x]bX2X٭-- ςgj 4w EAtH%5ч+]./ t:4I)h8=-Sg*8ZI˂PN F\!%ZDzd9ѷ'! Hn!DpD(u7$}diBM v̑cAٌy'8+BI;-Z:k AAer z?'](69)Ҩyz j}H(}b.w[t0(~o7:JmVa+N qH3ǜɆt_ٓ՜~f_syIn^V6] 3W. V$
!FZ
=<7
εS8. d6S)9klyAS۩݅_ Q*-߉"5TPpyG/ JNxu+ؙz?
8pUs^AQ]Ww/vy
,-*J@wƯ4jcNImjfjJNm1t8mԶAMkk8(}i s<9ޠ3,vő)U93}kk\k嬉>ly*۵;;9Eg'\FD\|Q!Ŏ@0XQ@h$" 2t) :5#
=QzpI%\c ]%%rK]jup
pns R%r#|oW_ZUʣ5Q5fCMxQYwY/xS QH2ArokWe#D8b8CnI#\ǃ|=l'TUY1p^)Y߭ ;6t d;/V [=kRE(>ƕ7h;F(W%%u1tϙ";^sojeY%ۣnL 3>QshZiOS~_LLG˵KYÞbEF]yZWWmf(+
jT.GP?|| xNIiy֩%b~F2D;Yf]+0{(=r'
o Ywh <ڗӣi h^]2m7T u\=m^z+&ڎN|=i #Q 8o͐]^y!w!gZY(}
Aj| S7#:}W>*ż n1Ky%G9@tLOrݧ)kM o(Iꗶ}0<.*Y}7W3*^3oB/eP ~k@\[E{ l|H?A %xWi"}*GDO}rmab/a Eh7O_EyU
BO0 %Qo} s1q~ ~_{, 8n ~Կ(9Agϑ<J= f!u>,$\nq>v<Üan2?,&
s,3?UW @L m9 <6s9cIxɜ" [ sk,e R0g{mIiC #%-{?@{nIk/kF,CE=)fI؟oh? u.,w_&3ʷ0^X;CH٭h݊ 1?Տ$aCp(]:uk~VCL6M^ aR[ǁ@#w(oz
Z'hE5Z0`JgMBb 爹s LJl p}KRZ|d XRTyId HJ̹$c1[C9CY~ .Sc)dqPs;n .wPaU3x _0Λs smT4KΓ]7ͷ`N
S,˂V.}Ш<9x| ̣#e2Ť{%>Gnk\:A⟈
&{e DD=UR# @roOYYqG DNUXsXk
8x d+ !R$&,| C"%g
٧s(S˹b}y]+|$NSЃJ/ q 7o4|n(VJZ!VXql e~7s|F~U 4}m9 FsN C՟TZi!d:9
/BwBWgix zOFf*qbkE3;"[4E֊.. Bfe@-MW~F- jU!'WgK$!]NMAj~6o>J[6>iƕF>]7 \Uuu9BAhFQJQ-T)3jڪ-Վ-L+:BiZb*Zڎ/j` _P g{ޙo}:oCMds3~XMs۩L el叕Mp#O>EeY
ͼ{ ါ~RV3Y P}LpsFr
>7+2
f{ 铽Fxè @D9ӟ8QxʧW I]G}Kzy53>엊h_ _NHX
GRp։;L}b+sOU9̉A~?FşH{HK$JϞXQVOa tkA,qߋ| zvr1䟏%Cl^zn}ܺ$Nwiءzyll&tŒBmg;?J {zѨdj09[ȩi郭 /pZȫ/R&Vab 5-9C]WE]mFh}L˖oF[ۊ2k D )_N]-o}ni2->/eT Q[q3p莝pX]íW%
X3 Ow g?qժ)UG͠U?ۚqLsjgկ1hWNuy# [S
]@uv{ʈ}P(Wh^ê|e'
v*'.!vӎt9Sі9 ;h9SIUԹHZvyQ(pԥ t@tnwIrBrϓ{J̓8wE6|Hyehj sQ専wKZ22y5{DϰR nV7Q0m/j?'s3K Lr-,tkwO~3sOЀ]ڱr\FX
*B\Z!ΟOX l4{si8\1 ʃ+
sjʃi{4h ,պ:yR+1.E^>9>E|a 1G =Ŀ +ى0[&'{sSD' v|,%҄=|CJ㥧W&jNtU?3m.k7'5GAeq]Oȥ`gO<6u.uO\
2}l"3c霚Qye隫5g`}sōŞۉ2ڄ_ǚՅuQk{H_.3`A&y?|g}Z|ani+j EWz` РwKkXj9=Po|9ȾQz@Lq>jCzA?-{KQwbҹ3s:O{۰2c} Ν X8.{^|#5] {W/1ml]O$#[렊Wб+d M5M^@FI_(⧶ȭ齰N~[QدZ )uA< U#7ϱ^0,0>?x sEuy?7ĨLIB_uIW[W&^$O.Gv(V?4 C [Ni<IBN87 & >^o;Pd s6~.shÝ7 EmmQ 7N
;ǢvL5Q fl5m6qE~Vaoڷ }鷭Ѓ/| 3p dvY ; #(%
d_.3}&7VdF gbzr"b~9iwJqmCM~|QKi?2d&3*W d0e]g
r05&oK~9}U] OȰI )lgn~Gӧ)wOqlv&驥9w J? ZjAsnێ]z#d -b(0f ' K}/<m3%C+ͣ_7{g]Ϻ.G;=gUxھJ!u7E0K_<|dyΠq w> AN.45,D$ώae_c W(`4}>4#^Gy]q9J kl)s2g9 zeQ&s[Q!w-+;r ~u ol
]kzfUq BBЂ%8|T:"$cL,( A]B !2d2Ƣl 0$q"C3CL{{νoyy-ٛss=_yOuhemnKFo pˈ=[6UO"Qb#$bo,%ދahA_}-X~RZ:&4F 3twu2"u+ X"X%:@yϳS) =PŞn
F]Yka)tp>payw
[ Kl'GDZq1j|
v09̺&TjW`Kn甔
rg5 Zߊ5PmiTDpW 54f3d1r"
/i?f^VF0Sr;Ç.˶ N}̖ɶd{4~g)\)n0 YbSw>UXM̷Z#
X- $SޫX dvo\#IÇ6ȸϘ2ZqΆkn]?
eY%X G;=^FQ=b- .SD+oAue>ػVܾΚuwTYBꮵ~ ZMԇ[g-ܣp
ѿZuT~|{hx:WOOV{?ì C'Z #6hnv yb}Q ;_C]p/kb L%U
0-Cñ|ouMظ4,:TQV-\AdZGZ():ڎ4aZ.מ>{RN Soթ3lf|[.k|{>zjm =Ƨd+ij*-Ѹ>?QNtC&Ku8MnyyC|/xd%RSm0>\ex*2Ty˥;,Ez}ę (Oo^dǶek=uw 6cJ{=[˻7OH[w{<$Rlz1&2VΪBYĜJG%&` fyg=.EnK |eaNv>iDnLj.y~K`:)v/a_ p:5/__عXeS^f{N辧cםsh=3wHr횵"^ATؾ{@|;/}"o*}#S紵gw{4{a;n/:O~w˼!vY>71F4{s1Ss6S2Wh_j~L{ʃD}{A.0
]ѳ JqO>g3gyTVe; 2@~ C f0
}b
Yp]Rӭpw֪kv2FJdCy/lĞ®4+j~ Խ&|^ht:W;M64FIxx2qTfr!ɗyPm<;҂ٯ}uҙX0 ߟ!KܻHYc%Ǽ"]G e|j53
K<~ر1xĭmRW #E. RmFJox'KOb`ݶ-l2 1y,ӸqLf"W"aR=IV)ҞMئϷl;hYMyNjW]$i r 9V\9ic9 c]8g?(;J_O^YW۹EԿM#Ο$;(>\j_G+o e~/©PQ/wkt_O|)@^o(ȁJd$j ~ ^V9 g;[wK)gP2f;N|]2/>)֏ճ /&m,OEE9g22}io{|rE9zKu٩KAʹ;ٖOAHx)oOڜI(t;;mܸ3s&ϸ; c,!=;(rI}0Ednʼg dNg>u&R'8}dF[#SlO=?OHc.c'+{X/c>df|#YD+yn.(7NKѵrO-/@;giQⳜ5^ l6q3 ;3TN"sN5r<r?%r%(W~{iˤ{F{M9TǾN NRY?ih)\yLps{(߰_Bc1 ߤY,3 p~Õm> O-o+xsWqCrYf
6k>3/\u1`i? }떾e9kó/K{Y {)Kǖe4g^r͝` o[Sm Op{xQ,{y 8 _~Dh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4= ۜX'
y;
tdv2Py8/ٲi+c˜g@:c!%?a1mC 1F dsI7jQ˚&D/mFJ,[oH s,˒
J{㎍J}C=zFrruq@r<5jjH#unn 15&iZGRhf54,qzJA^^M
) ZIZ'Ŕmja!1CW3k+Ty%~ XOsaL
~JQG`*K+f)DHAbZos_]BD[<O%,"Lēt8 MoND;Pk:Vؐb~٧5IH|[8(D_RR}]$EK wt];&ZzB)9;[tœ9 a6q*Rdbҕ
$- YIXKYEʲB!+$"RRd8!Y@8]\Gz#
7\U$ d dE "uw{CB 8f ڹ[g\! ,)H3 7. Z[~iuJ++k\p`)e`s-ub P-%, Ӻꘆ.` "u~EZ ecԍ=@+gn<=sGnzMD < 1yvY }1tCī -t> 3{h/[wF[诊lH,$/^| h NSJsFbF.Hlvn;7B H
? /|^Dz%`i:bV}yG 2D˰ʻ ؊m+ qT/=s|eFWRNZjx kmzՑmk meMG9;(5tYc7A̲ # \Ā>̂9n@ h@ z\,s">!sLop^-=Dz" .ʸ+mEs>L=E@ @ v㽻[@?0 8 fK\dQS[%Kj/_}\TcͲíoj?ݪĉRo* 4=qr\kkq
=ODSKVӿJ&9j.
j_A~P;ԾДE=i[%0=\=vskqN%WILMx:$0ZW6fȿm _qߠ_Rׂ>bw!9BfĠaǶg\i&vU U߱=iGO@~iGA찘AxZ VLZA7:'WAVYޠ:i席EV]r$,z570z9|Ӹ.NA9
o[ǫbl~++u/W7hm5mS jbSz>\_S?:>G%mn 5ƌ c()onl/4 MfCHM_1Blw" đLA+Cb!]u}|m%}l1Y=6e%WCMIXz[WKjjjگ SI=;NO瘇<O{Jm {44Taj{J) v%ؾLd(ҒH)s:[π > |DձLDI1װqm ڵ {
VP#&{c.G~`Sa<ķbVf#f#ᥐ<YPS"K FP))f aPv'RmF\X\P\ L]@
,Z V
a (2E z
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-15339.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-15339.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:58:01 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 130.5 591.75 635.25 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 747 Tm
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 746.25 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 721.5 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings in favor of Applicant w\
ith respect to Guideline C \(Foreign)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Preference\). )Tj
5.107 0 Td
(Those favorable formal findings)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.163 0 Td
(are not at issue on appeal.)Tj
-18.27 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Department Counsel's appeal arguments focus on the Administrative Judge'\
s findings and conclusions about)Tj
T*
(Applicant's parents and one sister, and do not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.371 0 Td
(refer to the Judge's findings and conclusions about Applicant's father-i\
n-)Tj
-18.371 -1.125 Td
(law \(deceased\) and mother-in-law \(living in the United States\). )Tj
25.492 0 Td
(Because there is no)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.997 0 Td
(presumption of error below and the)Tj
-33.489 -1.125 Td
(appealing party has the burden of raising claims of error with specifici\
ty, the Board construes Department Counsel's)Tj
T*
(brief as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not challenging the Administrative Judge's favorable formal finding with\
respect to SOR paragraph 2.c.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 01-20906 \(January 10, 2003\) at pp. 6-7 \(elaborating on \
the constraints under which an adjudicator)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(acts when applying the Adjudicative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.857 0 Td
(Guidelines\).)Tj
-14.857 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
("A determination that the immediate family member\(s\) \(spouse, father,\
mother, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters\),)Tj
T*
(cohabitant, or associate\(s\) in question are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.8 0 Td
(nor agents of a foreign power or in a position to be exploited by a fore\
ign)Tj
-16.8 -1.125 Td
(power in a way that could force the individual to choose between loyalty\
to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.852 0 Td
(person\(s\) involved and the United)Tj
-31.852 -1.125 Td
(States" \(Directive, Enclosure 2, Item E2.A2.1.3.1\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-26826 \(November 12, 2003\) at pp. 4-5; ISCR Case No.\
99-0511 \(December 19, 2000\) at)Tj
-4.332 -1.125 Td
(p. 10.)Tj
T*
(6. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0424 \(February 8, 2001\) at p. 11 \("Furthermore, by\
considering only how Applicant's)Tj
-4.332 -1.125 Td
(relatives in [a foreign country] might)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.051 0 Td
(exercise influence on him, the Judge failed to give any consideration to\
whether)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-15.051 -1.125 Td
(other)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( persons or entities might be able to seek to exercise pressure, influen\
ce or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.073 0 Td
(coercion over Applicant through his)Tj
-32.073 -1.125 Td
(immediate family members in [a foreign country]. )Tj
20.327 0 Td
(The Judge's failure to do so reflects an arbitrary and capricious)Tj
-20.327 -1.125 Td
(approach to this case."\)\(italics in original\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.291 0 Td
(Accord)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 02-02195 \(April 9, 2004\) at pp. 5-6.)Tj
-17.291 -2.125 Td
(7. )Tj
("Contact and correspondence with foreign citizens are casual and infrequ\
ent" \(Directive, Enclosure 2, Item)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(E2.A2.1.3.3\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(8. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0484 \(February 1, 2002\) at p. 5.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(9. )Tj
(As discussed earlier in this decision, an Administrative Judge's decisio\
n is arbitrary and capricious if: it does not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(examine relevant evidence; it fails to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.994 0 Td
(articulate a satisfactory explanation for its conclusions, including a r\
ational)Tj
-14.994 -1.125 Td
(connection between the facts found and the choice made; it does not cons\
ider)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.184 0 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
-31.184 -1.125 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an explanation for the decision that runs)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.32 0 Td
(contrary)Tj
-44.32 -1.125 Td
(to the record evidence; or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascrib\
ed to a mere difference of opinion.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(10. )Tj
(As noted earlier in this decision, the nonappealing party can argue that\
the decision below should be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
41 0 obj
[43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R]
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-15339.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-15339.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:58:01 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(substantial likelihood that Applicant's parents and one sister in the Pe\
ople's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.271 0 Td
(Republic of China would exercise foreign)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(influence over her \(Decision at p. 7\). )Tj
14.966 0 Td
(The Judge's reasons are inadequate, individually and cumulatively, to su\
pport)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.283 0 Td
(her)Tj
-46.25 -1.125 Td
(application of Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On its face, Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1 is bifurcated in n\
ature. )Tj
30.937 0 Td
(Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1)Tj
-30.937 -1.125 Td
(can be applied if the record evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.964 0 Td
(supports a determination that an applicant's immediate family members in\
a)Tj
-14.964 -1.375 Td
(foreign country are neither \(a\) agents of a foreign power, nor \(ii\) \
in a position to be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.488 0 Td
(exploited by a foreign power.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 559.4805 677.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 559.4805 676.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 659.25 Tm
(Accordingly, although the Administrative Judge reasonably could find tha\
t Applicant's immediate family members in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(People's Republic of China do not have ties with that country's governme\
nt, that finding is not sufficient to support)Tj
T*
(the Judge's application of Foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.761 0 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 1. )Tj
13.748 0 Td
(The Judge's finding does not address or satisfy the)Tj
-27.509 -1.125 Td
(second prong of Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 1.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge's second reason for applying Foreign Influence \
Mitigating Condition 1 also is insufficient to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(warrant its application. )Tj
9.441 0 Td
(Indeed, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.692 0 Td
(Judge's second reason reflects an arbitrary and capricious analysis beca\
use it offers a)Tj
-14.134 -1.125 Td
(justification that is not consistent with the Judge's findings and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.344 0 Td
(conclusions concerning the security risks posed by the)Tj
-25.344 -1.125 Td
(government of the People's Republic of China \(Decision at p. 7\). )Tj
26.146 0 Td
(Given those security concerns, it was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.135 0 Td
(arbitrary and)Tj
-41.281 -1.125 Td
(capricious for the Judge to focus on the absence of evidence that Applic\
ant's immediate family members would exert)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(pressure on her and ignore)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.857 0 Td
(Applicant's vulnerabilities through her relatives in the People's Republ\
ic of China.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 540.8594 527.25 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 540.8594 526.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 494.25 Tm
(The Administrative Judge's application of Foreign Influence Mitigating C\
ondition 3)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 419.0898 498.75 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 419.0898 498 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 432.896 494.25 Tm
( is arbitrary and capricious. )Tj
11.163 0 Td
(There)Tj
-45.904 -1.375 Td
(is a rebuttable presumption that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.858 0 Td
(contacts with immediate family members are not casual.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 440.8691 482.25 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 440.8691 481.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 454.6753 477.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Given the record evidence)Tj
-36.556 -1.125 Td
(in this case concerning Applicant's contacts with her immediate family)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.561 0 Td
(members in the People's Republic of China, and)Tj
-28.561 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's own findings of fact about those contacts \(Decision at p. 3\
\), the Judge's perfunctory conclusion)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.878 0 Td
(that Foreign)Tj
-42.878 -1.375 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 3 applies \(Decision at p. 7\) is arbitra\
ry and capricious.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 429.2266 438.75 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 429.2266 438 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 443.0327 434.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Given the record evidence in)Tj
-35.586 -1.125 Td
(this case, and the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.233 0 Td
(own findings about Applicant's contacts with her immediate family member\
s in the People's)Tj
-10.233 -1.125 Td
(Republic of China, there is no rational basis for the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.842 0 Td
(application of Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 3.)Tj
-23.842 -2.125 Td
(Besides arguing in support of the Administrative Judge's application of \
Foreign Influence Mitigating Conditions 1 and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(3, Applicant also urges the Board to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.664 0 Td
(affirm the Judge's favorable decision based on \(a\) "the Applicant's te\
stimony that)Tj
-14.664 -1.125 Td
(she would not succumb to any attempt by a foreign government to induce h\
er)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.214 0 Td
(to act contrary to U.S. Government)Tj
-31.214 -1.125 Td
(interests"; and \(b\) the corroboration of that testimony by other recor\
d evidence \(Reply Brief at pp. 2-3\). )Tj
41.645 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
-41.645 -1.375 Td
(argument for affirming on alternate grounds is a legally permissible one\
.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 364.2285 329.25 Tm
( \(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 364.2285 328.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 382.9097 324.75 Tm
( )Tj
(However, considering the record as a)Tj
-30.576 -1.125 Td
(whole, the Board is not persuaded that it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.413 0 Td
(should affirm the decision below on alternate grounds.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.354 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel has demonstrated harmful error below. )Tj
24.271 0 Td
(Pursuant to Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance,)Tj
-24.271 -1.125 Td
(Item E3.1.33.3, the Board reverses the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.606 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's favorable security clearance decision.)Tj
-15.606 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 220.5 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 195.75 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 118.5 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 93.75 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[559.0 675.0 573.0 686.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[540.0 525.0 554.0 536.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[419.0 496.0 433.0 507.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[441.0 480.0 455.0 491.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[429.0 436.0 443.0 447.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[364.0 327.0 382.0 338.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
49 0 obj
[51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R]
endobj
50 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-15339.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-15339.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:58:01 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(contrary to provisions of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(or local law is not required because security clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
4.932 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 331.8137 375.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 331.8137 375 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 345.75 Tm
(Whether the Administrative Judge's favorable conclusions under Guideline\
B \(Foreign Influence\) are not supported by)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 345 cm
0 0 m
569.332 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 332.25 Tm
(the record evidence, or are otherwise)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 331.5 cm
0 0 m
180.24 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 196.2402 332.25 Tm
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 196.2402 331.5 cm
0 0 m
188.256 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 384.4961 332.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge concluded that)Tj
-30.708 -1.125 Td
(Applicant had mitigated the security concerns raised under Guideline B)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.88 0 Td
(because of her ties with: \(a\) her parents and one)Tj
-28.88 -1.125 Td
(sister, who are citizens of the People's Republic of China and who live \
in that country; and \(b\) her husband's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.6 0 Td
(mother,)Tj
-43.6 -1.125 Td
(who is a citizen of the People's Republic of China but who currently liv\
es in the United States.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Department Counsel challenges the Administrative Judge's favo\
rable conclusions about Applicant's parents)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(and one sister.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 84.9824 254.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 84.9824 253.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 98.7886 249.75 Tm
( )Tj
(In support of that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.416 0 Td
(challenge, Department Counsel argues: \(1\) the Judge's application of F\
oreign)Tj
-14.315 -1.125 Td
(Influence Mitigating Condition 1 is not supported by the record evidence\
, and is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.326 0 Td
(arbitrary and capricious; and \(2\) the)Tj
-32.326 -1.125 Td
(Judge's application of Foreign Influence Mitigating Condition 3 is not s\
upported by the record evidence, and is arbitrary)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and capricious. )Tj
6.303 0 Td
(Applicant counters by arguing the Judge's favorable conclusions are supp\
orted by the record evidence)Tj
-6.303 -1.125 Td
(and the Judge's favorable credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.703 0 Td
(determination. )Tj
6.054 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes Department)Tj
-20.757 -1.125 Td
(Counsel has demonstrated harmful error by the Judge.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(An Administrative Judge does not have unfettered discretion when decidin\
g whether )Tj
34.129 0 Td
(particular provisions of the)Tj
-34.129 -1.125 Td
(Adjudicative Guidelines are applicable. )Tj
16.077 0 Td
(Rather, a Judge must exercise sound judgment within the parameters set b\
y the)Tj
-16.077 -1.125 Td
(Directive when deciding which Adjudicative Guidelines disqualifying or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.381 0 Td
(mitigating conditions are applicable to the)Tj
-29.381 -1.375 Td
(particular facts of a given case.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 165.2559 117.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 165.2559 117 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 179.062 113.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Accordingly, when a Judge's application of the Adjudicative Guidelines i\
s)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.173 0 Td
(challenged)Tj
-43.761 -1.125 Td
(on appeal, the Board must consider whether the appealing party has shown\
the Judge's application is \(a\) not supported)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(by the record evidence; \(b\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.022 0 Td
(arbitrary or capricious; or \(d\) contrary to law.)Tj
-11.022 -2.375 Td
(The Administrative Judge gave two reasons for applying Foreign Influence\
Mitigating Condition 1)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 490.5742 62.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 490.5742 61.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 504.3804 57.75 Tm
(: \(i\) Applicant's)Tj
-40.698 -1.125 Td
(parents and one sister in the People's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.927 0 Td
(Republic of China have no ties to the government of that country; \(ii\)\
there is not a)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[332.0 373.0 346.0 384.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[84.0 252.0 98.0 263.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
53 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[165.0 115.0 179.0 126.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[490.0 60.0 504.0 71.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
55 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
67 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-15339.a1.html)
endobj
66 0 obj
<>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>
endobj
56 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 169.0 null]
endobj
57 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 655.0 null]
endobj
58 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 616.0 null]
endobj
59 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 536.0 null]
endobj
60 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 497.0 null]
endobj
61 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 431.0 null]
endobj
62 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 392.0 null]
endobj
63 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 313.0 null]
endobj
64 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 274.0 null]
endobj
65 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 248.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 69
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000146649 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003731 00000 n
0000003758 00000 n
0000145465 00000 n
0000145784 00000 n
0000145826 00000 n
0000145275 00000 n
0000004394 00000 n
0000135106 00000 n
0000125407 00000 n
0000119793 00000 n
0000003861 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003956 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004605 00000 n
0000010731 00000 n
0000010780 00000 n
0000010816 00000 n
0000011326 00000 n
0000011749 00000 n
0000066411 00000 n
0000066678 00000 n
0000034940 00000 n
0000035213 00000 n
0000012146 00000 n
0000012422 00000 n
0000012805 00000 n
0000035652 00000 n
0000067292 00000 n
0000119993 00000 n
0000125621 00000 n
0000125681 00000 n
0000133154 00000 n
0000133479 00000 n
0000133804 00000 n
0000134129 00000 n
0000134454 00000 n
0000134779 00000 n
0000135331 00000 n
0000135377 00000 n
0000143979 00000 n
0000144304 00000 n
0000144627 00000 n
0000144952 00000 n
0000145360 00000 n
0000146229 00000 n
0000146271 00000 n
0000146313 00000 n
0000146355 00000 n
0000146397 00000 n
0000146439 00000 n
0000146481 00000 n
0000146523 00000 n
0000146565 00000 n
0000146607 00000 n
0000146034 00000 n
0000145868 00000 n
0000146176 00000 n
trailer
<<2B42FCC41970454689A5FF1BD5DEDFC7>]>>
startxref
146822
%%EOF