%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:57:57-04:00
2021-06-24T10:57:56-04:00
2021-06-24T10:57:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-15233.a1
uuid:dadd038f-c46e-4175-b29a-6dc3f3e3b027
uuid:2092cff2-ff59-462b-b56a-1637490162bd
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-15233.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-15233.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:57:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 30, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-15233)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated April)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(24, 2003, which stated the reasons why DOHA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classified information.\
)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based upon Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) and Guideline E \
\(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
38.521 0 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
-38.521 -1.125 Td
(Wilford H. Ross issued an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated\
March 16, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.853 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-20.853 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding the Applicant's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(falsification of his security clearance questionnaire)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.603 0 Td
(was deliberate, and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge erred in the)Tj
-20.603 -1.125 Td
(application of the "whole person" concept. )Tj
17.283 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.995 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's)Tj
-37.278 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-21.074 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.073 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
-41.073 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(party must raise claims of error with specificity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
19.881 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, the Board will review the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.14 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-42.14 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its conclusions, including a rational)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.442 0 Td
(connection between the facts found and the choice made; it does not cons\
ider)Tj
-14.442 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.708 0 Td
(of the case; it offers an)Tj
-36.708 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
T*
(a mere difference of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.328 0 Td
(opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.887 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(k68dtB7)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\N0y
ҟdM (<@lK$Dnz۳A /xoڬ7]fwzϱQC̵]3XYn4q}VU./wz/Xm]=×5nKތ>˓fz7^nL~aP7pЬسtգ=LCo}):f͓c!ؓ=xE^yb+ S;`O$[-5y
^*gӳgI%-L[1f_SShg]#gA^`fdfdfdG]D=Y<#g6lid`bS=3~ٷ
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅
kL%1F)E#*"v4+ED6,.vW!E/97wΜ3ww9zA_nW,'dže .'k?WZ WF
]4@$ c&Eek@: ftdXģ)Kf,s[POtl|B:RW tČ ]qElXBbP|kFFBi>oSƌᵮǍ) u QGLDaP(n(( LP
ζ@H̫y{kLcjUXak m>xp~|9+b/PswMbtSs}W7w
=5nT4ZY-[}ۺMv~;wԹK׀n{ջO~"(|?AaА05 &M)S%NeFY礤Ν6?}E,]|\zMu7ldڼe+m۾cg{۟s`G;dgΞ;.^|j5qhe.VUGphShɛh"MKk^z,Hh-|#apJx"RTRPli5RI%JJiW*.KFJDhj4+5yJPmv6K9t
tu.Lv +亲!{Me^cD9INʋ6y+sr|C~{C((V|=}{نmkK:X= kwkOkkPf=3
Ph+vdJh=PsfB[a& RC@Uu:SB4R))Q/J-Z(M&]96DMshS9˙8C"#9P_2xtdCjkVhmWsW?o{%jF^|ւ+0P? TT-|q~2--,~v6֖-,---,zY7e-5/537w0e,4sqqǨ3j;y3fF[Uɕ]-u\1EV+k@h(DO
8pjY3 -J (+pZ