%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:58:27-04:00
2021-06-24T10:58:27-04:00
2021-06-24T10:58:27-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-15872.a1
uuid:78a642f2-5b47-417f-b64a-ef9d780133cd
uuid:2dbafad7-aef6-4f6f-b0d1-4935d8fe167b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-15872.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-15872.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:58:27 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 23, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-15872)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated August)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(7, 2003, which stated the reasons why DOHA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for Applican\
t.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) and Guidel\
ine E \(Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.243 0 Td
(Conduct\). )Tj
(Administrative)Tj
-36.243 -1.125 Td
(Judge Kathryn Moen Braeman issued an unfavorable security clearance deci\
sion, dated April 27, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense Directive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.993 0 Td
(5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-17.993 -2.125 Td
(The issue raised on appeal is whether the Administrative Judge's decisio\
n is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
46.75 0 Td
(For)Tj
-46.75 -1.125 Td
(the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.356 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
2.329 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-21.074 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.073 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
-41.073 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(party must raise claims of error with specificity\).)Tj
T*
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
19.881 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, the Board will review the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.14 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-42.14 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its conclusions, including a rational)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.442 0 Td
(connection between the facts found and the choice made; it does not cons\
ider)Tj
-14.442 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.708 0 Td
(of the case; it offers an)Tj
-36.708 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
T*
(a mere difference of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.328 0 Td
(opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.887 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
-15.215 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.006 0 Td
(to law, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
-27.006 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
([\\)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CIҵ6(Y9e{V='[$sc ٻttbf~K=vNd.s$r/:ky~WX}hPU`^:ڍYJ4CX68m\ή;{EQt*(t*.(18uxyO,dw̻#SbV̇Ȭ%d-䙙/צbmkPZ*j),Sb۴xTq9 [vʊ` (%
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H| TnC7")@4q.(5&р/yI,E#*"h\pqEqAQq}qpwE\a{S]>{!_i_GG$d ͑cy+ L b.q*Mqc9 {ZeltDÉcC;p[{'%gvЙQ@"$>"9esp'GFGZW ĄQc,.O H'Nl Q f T֨~1*gT*&Hn%*Vuj>S[j>g (~
DTWΏϰ 7wET*kIL%z8:96lIfZV|>jޢeiۮ_;w =zӾ}E_W_o~C"c>".~䨄c~;.y8irʔ_N>#mfzƬٙsΛ`K²+VZf
7-[m߱s={?pP#EG?q3gϕ/]rnˁ5g%l`ZTj@G)f*:GY}"B0G8.<^yqԣ9ss!ADy\,_3\R'3ԅ*`TMf&Whh
M6Br({QqUܕfZ)qJ)*eC)P(ir]y'''gϨ֓}|{4|eSK4ۘ s7sws/sHb;39*PiT߫7J2i
Q5s`B;a!fs288bZOL|!jC"K+MZ
u:K9&Lzsh|!\UABsRr9r89D}]tyMm90=̝8`sOsZ.
x}+Q;b泖\IۄT* u Ҹ4:LMLmMmLZZZ|LʇfzP[ȸȸژ`ja;_ߦkBk3FECWqnUKl.ͶsT=
u0 QHW7a{;=;!fKXiT gwjvE_鿇<Y3>p?VJRa ,02!X!MPa6,4(}^+X
QP
pNY8<8Pp .EGP3a8q0r`$B1$X&H 0~*x EUHP 3`6. \lQ.WbB j\:\:
7f܂[qv܁;
\t]`> #:3܂肮`Cl B*t!ʥB~*TLǨ :ItNU}H2]t
U9@7HtnK>=dG* =JzFU^KzEהBSWvMF3yz;+7;Z0`TcaLdc=PsdN̙0WW^;1:@֙uaA+>aY֓bY)+.bGP4bD|*VϤR4M.͐ҤR!͒fK)}>g_~?P66AbWX0l1c ݊ VvvƜKv$UB5UMS5SrsVnv;~跺jګ:::Nkof 7K6I/+qCo[^|"I|',RD(G.IR&CDISH((EY()erQnCy)_~}?(#RQ
R!*LE( *nꮺ~?DJPI*ETPY*GUJ?&QSMPBSiM4SY4[RVSGI%>Â]c͆ӱe_pz9g,qv'ss+CsenHw9nƸ\s.ƹ\8\4
w*M5\su
\+sո:\ks>7܈sqsn-664ܑ;qg]wiߺ܇r?x 坽>xv8ggsҙ
tN, _KGdԷ$E"2#"s9좂$!r"r#sy_kGD!FE18J$J!QeQQMgTBeTAUTCu@MBmA]C}4@C4F4E34GD+FE; ]
ߠ'E/|ަj/?` a.;.J.9Gtq]Bu%^vbG6&!a"#1
1c111 AFX阁٘,|,Bg%!Xe1"B4b8cVbjZzlFlf$`bcvbh6a7`/+ppGT<xxhy9ᢖ&qbKxց&l1[60;.1{>\l;\1W5s4a;γ.av1c@lv")UFO