%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:59:34-04:00
2021-06-24T10:59:33-04:00
2021-06-24T10:59:34-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-17522.a1
uuid:cb0de456-42a5-40b3-a50a-7a3ab9d072c4
uuid:0fc9e9b6-47d5-4e81-81f9-bda2f0527081
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-17522.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-17522.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:59:33 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 29, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-17522)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(October 23, 2003, which stated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.219 0 Td
(reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified informa\
tion for)Tj
-14.219 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.886 0 Td
(Considerations\), Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\), and)Tj
-23.329 -1.125 Td
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
13.303 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Michael H. Leonard issued an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.106 0 Td
(unfavorable security clearance)Tj
-34.409 -1.125 Td
(decision dated August 18, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.497 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-10.497 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge erred by proceeding with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's hearing and issuing a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.483 0 Td
(written decision despite the issuance of a Letter of Consent to Applican\
t's employer in)Tj
-13.483 -1.125 Td
(April 2004; and \(2\) whether Applicant can be allowed to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.937 0 Td
(present his case before the Board. )Tj
13.745 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow,)Tj
-36.682 -1.125 Td
(the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.271 0 Td
(how the Administrative Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-24.271 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.912 0 Td
(\(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
7.969 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.034 0 Td
(or capricious, the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-26.034 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.54 0 Td
(explanation for)Tj
-41.54 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.524 0 Td
(reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to consider an important as\
pect of the case; it offers an)Tj
-7.524 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.188 0 Td
(record evidence; or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(\n=G5Y!)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
CemJia4F@xqIE?$eu|7C[m]ipk6o7JH\/ӌ}A9$t8aճ.V[p:WY!o=R(
p҇^(Tλyِ/sߊ;8bhU* ?*z2K-͵Y~07߰ gǰ#{0Rp]s>F;-c"?y|ܐqT_ z
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
wf[]bDyKbLE%ƂA{+("vgĮx{䬵>}][b^ir&-($28jM\ׅ6o6-Q#~T?<<ؚzԬ@Yi\(۠|7'"2:fR2 92~Uapajo8PGE
]TaQ`oaQkdf2_i:p)P,nlQUynMrf**P
;Q#g3nʸ kנʧm>%?9Ҝ).f0,'gRt\˻UpXɣrժ{zi&GFZ|\^
5nҴY-[}6m۵бS.}En_|}?30(BB{Gۯ䀁Qy谘#~9jر?abS&O>csΛ-NYt+SW^߰q-[mߑsW={e?y#G?q38spv-:D$: `2t7goa<x2/3JJ=[%P$(S#Cg_~={yZLyjnwZw6JۦiVR+4LLqD,*d)gqTThږ.`K۬C7uW]W}:zcOqz>Y/[t}~H?ѯ||
;ΘuۥS'nHMK-ZNGSÿл̤`0~0l`'9$2|QV(
J2ILS{,WWsfҺh8j-K]ӞkL0Mɦ@s9=C;ACypYrhCo_!.VNHƧnJ_[_r\rhhTh*Pt[^t>(Sr1^Y-$z:dȓ>of K^^j{͞Ug]k {
Q6r}llm~F6FVlQ+nFaW~*JZ:|a#|q>' } r|/%W[8
ɷ6|ﳝCG;?'s~/_cy, RWOq Ɖx$c188ŘdjL&"@|ūU?RP(sw/]Z<$!hpwwRkkwH)8[#ur 7Mr"mr!w]r#}rJSCi#$)bHt",|JO_PH(3e%(+e!$erQnCy)ODi*(P!*LE( *N;[_NU)PI*ErJ 0
(@)&dTz^JUo;^}P'Ldk6-}N8#g̜r69̟sqny9/i:pDIn2B|7].\r1w8rs \KKܥ4-wWp.8]rWk7&sn9*45sȝ3wi߸
=='܇r?x~ lMI6MYCx(D;ǜi0Hl#=@dD&}9b"";!r"r#:%BD!FE18`@JJʢBMGTD%TFTE5TG
D-FE=4@C4Bc4AS4Cs@KBkhvhN.芯
ߠ;Et2M=}1@҅uGDyQ:P`˛M4u@sܳq 6T 1C8"