%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:00:22-04:00
2021-06-24T11:00:21-04:00
2021-06-24T11:00:22-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-18663.a1
uuid:a59561ed-804e-448e-8116-92d505060475
uuid:b605fc59-2b4f-445d-b0dc-fc6afdaa1a55
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-18663.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-18663.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:00:21 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 7, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-18663)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.114 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REMAND ORDER)Tj
8.32 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.302 -2.2 Td
(--------------, Personal Representative)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge James A. Young issued a decision, dated March 25, 2\
003, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-36.515 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: whether the Administra\
tive Judge failed to adhere to the Directive by)Tj
T*
(failing to notify Applicant at least 15)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.024 0 Td
(days in advance of the time and place of the hearing; and whether certai\
n of the)Tj
-15.024 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's conclusions with respect to Applicant's personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.911 0 Td
(conduct were arbitrary, capricious or contrary to)Tj
-28.911 -1.125 Td
(law. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, the Board remands the case to the Administr\
ative Judge for further processing)Tj
T*
(consistent with the rulings and instructions set forth in this Decision \
and )Tj
29.163 0 Td
(Remand Order.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-9.131 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 20,)Tj
T*
(2002. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.275 0 Td
(H \(Drug Involvement\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
24.244 0 Td
(The case was)Tj
-40.52 -1.125 Td
(assigned to the Administrative Judge on January 7, 2003. )Tj
23.135 0 Td
(On February 11, 2003, a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(notice of hearing was issued,)Tj
-23.135 -1.125 Td
(scheduling a February 21, 2003, hearing date. )Tj
18.55 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated March 25,)Tj
-18.55 -1.125 Td
(2003, in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(which he concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national intere\
st to grant or continue a security)Tj
T*
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
9.883 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.912 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-2.11 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-27.435 -1.125 Td
(pp.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(j*B dqX?)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mn b"N KH^Gu{ )R&߾DT${>4s61h נx;0V.4xIܯKĩs̔A%|
o`_m_ ]
d2aBYm\;z]e=\1LUP'Z
Cg}G=vpUQ!nćTuf*ćIJL\