͗28ckk8RRBO#]WI ]@ܵ
jF ɕ ?;wnmPށ\v*21QeTqJXN8M. з3h`x]bX2X٭-- ςgj 4w EAtH%5ч+]./ t:4I)h8=-Sg*8ZI˂PN F\!%ZDzd9ѷ'! Hn!DpD(u7$}diBM v̑cAٌy'8+BI;-Z:k AAer z?'](69)Ҩyz j}H(}b.w[t0(~o7:JmVa+N qH3ǜɆt_ٓ՜~f_syIn^V6] 3W. V$
!FZ
=<7
εS8. d6S)9klyAS۩݅_ Q*-߉"5TPpyG/ JNxu+ؙz?
8p7Uu}q8$vbDZM|gI8'A]K!@ tVeIP"Z(H
MHhjHӘJJ-$1zs{sϽǢ|F[oȷ}UPnk4z[6ZԻ,;ma( Ua=WnIyx#^B|VZ֠Wm~% >/vZUZGi{2o>)&
-rlл퐚T֫ռzOUխU{vߔKܑ\.P5~o)-{bQ,6=;5laCmY>;K"z
(iXz5᛫FJrTv]I*c8`\{.ԁ%mOL X IyNwyYEi99OגQӢEWJx],e_/ :B uvc~aћKuǠ0r<ܲ@[)Wwprz-= dCƛe|8`P
Y0I{O#f3WAfm9-C^'o
We<=7g2&j[DH"'RLˤ[*srSC,e'!U^_k8yuFH|^0k8A&4~Ehi%}L E@~Ԋt$ u0ט[ͼY[)pL[C+6mtL%fkZL@9V!PP-?3$'2q$璡)GxG9q8)* &(_yx[?K2lGaM{Ŭy%y<s| MbLpv~S#tW5;wG_$zLf=ԂX}%r%019 + 6PĚWa70LD9w.6ީ3WnuZ/o FNDDG vd,19
AУ0Dv/"À]], ¨cƋɷx\q| Q9ۇNdOg,,ddhI /MFIICuZ'TtɮЩ-N_)>]`[e"橷T 'ҾoGʎu [wx{hUA(Gvaod]3ְvWicMgd..n~}s|s5"[ʃ]/ \[ @ǓG%_woϾ_
cV_J ˤyj\
a '&)-xc3",?,߂+Q Bcy3s CD ۞A*eЋhF=O 8PoR^ԝXWcˉ[ 9YUo ^j| `C)#2܊KmFH皸hG(#hk=eXފR,BPOG})M:ZD:Ѷ] Jmc o}0y_4:o:ԜԦ' B[} V۾1lK^q
'B=O2Bd"BBXħhcT<Dd11?aIG7=Z<5%4|q mC.cd z9QMuTB QG!7t
ɪQl{v"#_c >
;I?qA(Ia?)hR`!aFT"w ."b;mfblc/ &?qq ׆r,g6 ŶlP?R^cSnQΤ$ֻyΓrjlRn-Ta6BnR&:%
t?=){d{%2Qdj- ºe
ha5{ZPV/`bKw=&R(&& o-\cLNrNah8M"/L$먤XX?Q؈gd"!L "rS"^Ax>rT+AAlJajw.,oDZKI pR2~` e# =ιos_{@lOe*d(1c8-Z- Jb+J7V Z0AUd0c& Gm M& 1T8@:E 3
0:-2 9rR쟽'= {99rjgbcsh_TӌYE})}ޞ'x}ܶoNy& kyJG|oՎ3_bf JI)1ϴjj cY~N&ߪ29gŪ&4<< ȕɓ6
93XN+AOs^w Źz}ebY3Gm ur[/kveґH i֩XPGoe9%R.N6Zl`.BW+U&#eabg ]b`Z ٛ=jkYKwO 6wrn s72ηWxj*tnLJ =/k2LϘ`FY~/TSXnC.g6}AV9S0Gij Y|e; ދ6VX?4w σ_J#sܣλkb
W ϻحR.rw Az3F%6\+p|eӲxw4b}h؎Ƶhy: ŁMOq)x9D[&E .H|Fsk/AY;wc\g,K:XoD2yګ$캠Gfo-J.'RZ, +'v`W̙|*2q̥KEϮRqL߸pF=Dny[x ^D,(E}' ^]x} m2+h 2JF deם0 e ,i['K |Ù~*h[ۿz zvg;Z G!c]+u]ݵD%}:o| ;[=,[yf{:^ŒFEGc?y ^J{zQ AY/hj D{cN^3&wAQ
KiNSo'Y^m9
K1Z/! ͏ ߷̬y;lPChG)߃}MX< 0~Ag3ۚsǥ6wتK5ߙX~?D t攚Gk.$꽭ڼpjkzrWq t#3&>uv.mrG!=PS]j %mm\=iZ[N4r@S̊Q}BnVZU:O htNr٣dcv)M I|YLWY>$f@.f!k ǎ9[h 6-S5ٶBtVs f6Xr\xEZ}yADts S;B-s(>
ﭑ埄Vbx
ۦw5^{R9^3Oc:I4 BG*֙CKЁWY^W&[fOTԐD3w:}s?RzeuU51zN67Z&s<'P7i9o/3 r `֛t }ՈF6X9vmDTZMWV~3=\/\ɅlnB{+盕3(o{4ғ/3&m1Y |ami+/Dp5T+ޯo ҋ=Pa}9ǾQߺALy>3 swX> [u ̠E8p1SΓ~ Da/~>iF + |vnֆm ^] oy?ߞn ,p;
XB竰7a(» re{jc^j@`Js떡Uh@1 !/
1̍_x&!&3-7Uwm&VժaoNҋk&$9WF"Ya KInr~
~ޑltS PH?22Y7~ %Nfo: YϷ Zf)~#h.^.Yg sJ)T
m RFB;[t*-(2)ljD'lNeM ApKdt0'F2emiT68og=8Z-%<_xUb>|/bs )2-)FX-yRS'e4KL}pPn.?ƆǼuH͒[h Y n,%:8]scmeXG%4K>K矰 FLpo~+DuTc
I?z6X #zVfzkefMI3bOc
G4yX 7B \ewfR5pm߷klFeyWD?#{aHRz>wa3^ߓ֟aHSBGzK t\H~mglxw|=k+I]}*{Ji`{2-[_gٌ;Xr:ۻv%4Z9auȟaѱ%3#Wt;%;BzbGzwG@Tr-ew}I TFǺÌuI4` @Ǝ c.~}eͻ'Nvո Mh喁a/|dcP99w:A\ih4<=>F.L~u(+ك^|P-9bxC[j'T/~d.|THNxUZ,{-kk G
S!lzľCb,>%*b9 z~':r7{V0wa?egQg*2ƽv
04K)Q?}1^
/Qmx
]6r.
rs4] +(xnQ2=<<veN%2co۠OD;&,}y6FRwbͶ byGN|m/-?'Q'ˤoheќp{Li(h9[_]s Fx"
c@-k@r!yodA " I$~#E,I61l9|(rL:}3d[9jSYqcБF;Q'FcM|,)
똧zvq^r3)̧LϕՁ)M2[ui+_r(
/_%qZIoWwqPsuwa_QRN|@F{$SJ x_"Ӌ+nQV>V9MV2{ Y˜S_MJFO+"| VvVs_`b?R}5A4mi|mn5s^Xi:8 IָPϚ#97~Ej}f%|·a~mh>js?Íƿg}*S[*&&9 `pw=mReY[bDɌ1N0'MaW939'7n9+ιسuL"V!Sk1>%;' E
SA2t L_m}[׳[Z/ֳKjKD V١QܡHJ0 ?k8rv1q([yG ˵c7YN^jLWz T?_e>%*ŧϘ7*ع`#/F QUPmZ`0:MS& 4;s~bCrL6v?ηqsg?~K>^7/ 63اǛ-Er~ht ~rgsi_b $ھCz)2qU'|eHno^=i_~h6m8 wAZ8_T<_7oj!|sx}=a]n0F
Q9t^㻄Tq<ܤ%+ؼǰCWVj%}?eiLs+|ۚVsǥNu<Woim/}Q+T.a=v2Xc6ORW0R{Ta8^,Ez 6w<~]lפJ"
96=c8v7} o"5&߉wUI٠]nץ;K T
W>afO4I]Z" EypGqt.ocYpXQMwӼ[}'f?Yn[ĸ5SYZ:gUC_WƥV0+^d'wuzi#i{aK&Ӑ K!`hM N &hJEFC*Jת(*\ŖT ;}L%]hiU`ǣjhPClو9u/41. ']cƲ*] e 縌u iX#<
ɸSEJľ$ڥjjolVߴА {6Lw-̸tp's6&ؑKxZ/ gnl}Jڭ}laRCUƊS/_'A=ڂ/ uV!A* =-N"WS
|f- 7g< }rs~}˹hA~G?(̝=qj%@4K3OjF NHC']jZnXk
& h 6ֽm z[A@ckf-|s{pNH߸MP~i9eF3Ơ`U+z;O75?8QkIISPt!}O- [ 6q=W^ޜ1l4%5soONoZ͙-W[ =G Ĩ3tk8xcOrJ'?k2`*
3i0gnR=>OBgRTwSʞ&30 ;\w N~DRGsAv}İ4>KĤO)] ܣK6l`INkín_
9bg.CO{| F3χ{Q(]ثN؉Hrҗs~]z])ݮbs$L '9ؿf ~G/a5R^?dCR:>a
_K%r֞ys$+wTu4]4 %D/|(]ΧJ
#fz홬
p}:\$viZͭ;` ]פ{{n$~%Y=>/9 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 "!UyT)%ON) _ g~M6`XU?I " 唦iH1fi2 MgƲ!aK,o$c9D>ˬ'5H{U&\SjAUڪhj%mC6o-&R3G[ϪoW56&~l/"WGind y{Y2vdw+cnT=r=r+uz~ MZFhmyknjQq%6Pjj;Xc[ 6}l4Y]d5| 5j=4kg頶fn% jRs YFۯvh[49o6^QO۬-o诵aYFzf'kTӶjg_vN45]lml_AQ]g{vE/x., ZmE6
@l'^]utLiIN&FHav2i;t۱JZt4$i>L?3]ysy=^[um{/8k[H8 < Ӛ =jMꇴ"j|~- hppThbJ! tk}p`?u>m@0&fjij=?g'IXx !{6ԣZGm }1}uMԃA=RQ-ўؠ#{B;mڲ^=C?56ooyܸ hh2${y,+wN%
\K 1RŃۢ4c}-[Cr'[Wn{!s Oia)I]wpY Wy `"9UDО2; NBJ5JJS"a,[{G@V cq6ӍlL58xm )IU%J:g=*}X)%_87exs:?eocˢmC]Ā?a'2 c3
0p L
@9 "lc
.q=~
Y}tUW@_A_h*g_ }1/ =oـO+xgP0Nu
GwJ<)`ʾBrIڛR אQhP≥1 ~'7"&{S5lAx,b]h ùp" O7e+C8R(gp+VD4 @$$sFgEXl6 xV:TTTn* c9`
h s|)s?nǪR/cD)uVNeNEv˜Vfe+kw F8 I sn@ (~`Ή̉+g
ځQEϧ \w5!q7c2kwǞ4s
h"@v-s L &n".(í[ŸsZr<9|*}CJ\ήSթ?SZBC);JOI.tsk"X MKID-rA6 )dtk ) M(6%n]֩ЭK :9{=tOv]ww-݈:VsxKgCYSĚzȞ"'by"ԙ&W
'K4\Ip70[`#%7/؎V@Ӯw ݉ a>,mB{"ZVMYʗ
z^/'%hN̾S=}l+ 3Hu86=6~J"(-7] UF\ =@uU-Q!:.n.V`5KU
V #szIK&*)tH #(=8CWi:C=-!9>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-21060.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-21060.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:02:22 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 596.25 591.75 169.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Decisions by a Hearing Office Administrative Judge are not legally bindi\
ng precedent on another Hearing Office)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge or the Board. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.082 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-22606)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(June 30, 2003\) at pp. 3-5 \(discussing precedential value of decision\
s)Tj
-8.082 -1.125 Td
(by Hearing Office Judges\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Applicant also argues that construing 10 U.S.C. \247986 to cover his sit\
uation would allow the Department of Defense to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(invoke that statute to deny or revoke a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.966 0 Td
(clearance if the aggregate of each and every sentence in an applicant's)Tj
-18.966 -1.125 Td
(life exceeds one year. )Tj
8.912 0 Td
(Applicant's case does not present that situation, and the Board's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.604 0 Td
(interpretation of 10 U.S.C. \247986)Tj
-34.516 -1.125 Td
(does not open the door for that situation.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(Nothing in the legislative history of 10 U.S.C. \247986 sheds any light \
on the issue raised by this appeal.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
[45 0 R 46 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-21060.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-21060.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:02:22 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 752.25 Tm
(Nothing in 10 U.S.C. \247986 indicates or suggests that Congress intende\
d its application to turn on whether there was a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(single crime or multiple crimes covered by a given)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.577 0 Td
(conviction, or whether there was a single term or multiple terms of)Tj
-20.577 -1.375 Td
(imprisonment imposed in connection with a given conviction.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 313.2812 726.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 313.2812 726 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 327.0874 722.25 Tm
( )Tj
(In this case, Applicant's consecutive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.981 0 Td
(sentences of)Tj
-40.905 -1.125 Td
(imprisonment were imposed in connection with a given conviction, and the\
practical effect of the imposition of)Tj
T*
(consecutive sentences resulted in Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.688 0 Td
(being sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding one year.)Tj
-17.688 -2.125 Td
(The reasons why courts decide to sentence a defendant to concurrent or c\
onsecutive terms of imprisonment are)Tj
T*
(irrelevant. )Tj
4.331 0 Td
(Nothing in 10 U.S.C. \247986 indicates or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.888 0 Td
(suggests that the reasons why a court imposes a particular sentence)Tj
-20.219 -1.125 Td
(are relevant to its application.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Applicant correctly notes that \(a\) there is very little legislative hi\
story concerning the enactment of 10 U.S.C. \247986,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 570.1738 618.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 570.1738 618 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 600.75 Tm
(and \(b\) Congress enacted 10 U.S.C. \247986 after)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.912 0 Td
(publication of a newspaper article entitled "How Felons Gain Access to)Tj
-18.912 -1.125 Td
(the Nation's Secrets." )Tj
(However, the paucity of legislative history does not warrant relying on \
a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.05 0 Td
(newspaper article to)Tj
-38.05 -1.125 Td
(discern Congressional intent, especially when the article was published \
before any legislation was introduced or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(enacted.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's reliance on the statutory definition of a federal felony is \
misplaced. Congress did not enact 10 U.S.C. \247986)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(with any language referring to a statutory definition of "felony." )Tj
25.892 0 Td
(Nor did Congress use the words "felon" or "felony" in)Tj
-25.892 -1.125 Td
(10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
(If Congress had wanted to distinguish between felony convictions and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.023 0 Td
(misdemeanor convictions, then)Tj
-35.023 -1.125 Td
(Congress easily could have done so by wording 10 U.S.C. \247986 differen\
tly. )Tj
30.496 0 Td
(The application of 10 U.S.C. \247986 does not)Tj
-30.496 -1.125 Td
(turn on whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.582 0 Td
(an applicant's conviction is labeled or characterized as a "misdemeanor"\
or a "felony.")Tj
-6.582 -2.125 Td
(For all the foregoing reasons, taken cumulatively, the Board concludes t\
he Administrative Judge did not err by deciding)Tj
T*
(Applicant's case falls under 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
17.927 0 Td
(Accordingly, Applicant's conviction falls within the scope of 10 U.S.C.)Tj
-17.927 -1.125 Td
(\247986. )Tj
(Because the Judge correctly held that 10 U.S.C. \247986 applies to Appli\
cant's case, it was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.811 0 Td
(not arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
-37.811 -1.125 Td
(or contrary to law for the Judge to conclude that application of that st\
atute precluded a favorable security clearance)Tj
T*
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate the Administrative Judge erred by ap\
plying 10 U.S.C. \247986 to his case. )Tj
43.186 0 Td
(Therefore,)Tj
-43.186 -1.125 Td
(the Board affirms the Judge's unfavorable security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.368 0 Td
(clearance decision.)Tj
-20.368 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 310.5 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 285.75 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 208.5 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 183.75 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 106.5 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 81.75 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[313.0 724.0 327.0 735.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[570.0 616.0 584.0 627.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
47 0 obj
[49 0 R]
endobj
48 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-21060.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-21060.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:02:22 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 745.5 Tm
(\(2\) courts have a variety of reasons for imposing consecutive sentence\
s, rather than concurrent sentences, some of which)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(do not imply anything about the seriousness of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.942 0 Td
(the crimes involved or about the defendant;)Tj
-18.942 -2.125 Td
(\(3\) in enacting 10 U.S.C. \247986, Congress was concerned about convic\
ted felons being granted security clearances, and)Tj
T*
(that concern does not extend to persons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.023 0 Td
(convicted only of misdemeanors;)Tj
-16.023 -2.125 Td
(\(4\) 10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\) should be interpreted and construed in\
light of the definition of "felony offense" set forth under)Tj
T*
(18 U.S.C. \2473559, 18 U.S.C. \2473581, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\2474A1.2 of the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual;)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(5\) the two decisions by DOHA Hearing Office Administrative Judges rel\
ied on by Department Counsel in support of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(its argument that 10 U.S.C. \247986 applies to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.526 0 Td
(Applicant's case are not legally binding precedent and should not be)Tj
-17.526 -1.125 Td
(considered persuasive authority;)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(6\) the decision in )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.498 0 Td
(United States v. Brown)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.221 0 Td
(, 333 U.S. 18 \(1948\), relied on by Department Counsel in support of it\
s)Tj
-16.719 -1.125 Td
(argument that 10 U.S.C. \247986 applies to Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.094 0 Td
(case, is distinguishable and does not support the Administrative)Tj
-21.094 -1.125 Td
(Judge's conclusion about the applicability of 10 U.S.C. \247986; and)Tj
T*
(\(7\) a decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, relied on by Department \
Counsel in support of its argument that 10)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(U.S.C. \247986 applies to Applicant's case, is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.206 0 Td
(distinguishable and does not support the Administrative Judge's conclusi\
on)Tj
-17.206 -1.125 Td
(about the applicability of 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Although Applicant's appeal raises a serious, novel legal issue, Departm\
ent Counsel elected to not file a reply brief.)Tj
T*
(As a preliminary matter, Applicant correctly notes that his appeal raise\
s a question of law that the Board has not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(previously addressed. )Tj
(Because this appeal involves a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.383 0 Td
(question of law, the Board's scope of review is plenary and )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.84 0 Td
(de)Tj
-45.223 -1.125 Td
(novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's last three arguments can be disposed of quickly. )Tj
24.229 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge in this case correctly noted that)Tj
-24.229 -1.125 Td
(the two decisions by Hearing Office Judges cited)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.883 0 Td
(by Department Counsel during the proceedings below were not legally)Tj
-19.883 -1.375 Td
(binding on her. )Tj
6.333 0 Td
(Furthermore, the Board does not rely on them to reach its decision in th\
is case.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 469.8965 367.5 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 469.8965 366.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 483.7026 363 Tm
( )Tj
(oreover, the Board)Tj
-38.975 -1.125 Td
(concludes the decisions in )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.72 0 Td
(United States v. Brown)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
9.221 0 Td
(, 333 U.S. 18 \(1948\) \(involving the imposition of a sentence under th\
e)Tj
-19.941 -1.125 Td
(Federal Escape Act\) and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/TT1 1 Tf
10.051 0 Td
(Spoto v. Colorado State Department of Corrections)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
20.638 0 Td
(, 883 P.2d 11 \(Colo. 1994\)\(involving parole)Tj
-30.688 -1.125 Td
(eligibility under Colorado law\) are distinguishable and not particularl\
y)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.521 0 Td
(helpful in deciding this appeal. )Tj
12.608 0 Td
(The Board will)Tj
-41.128 -1.125 Td
(now turn to Applicant's remaining arguments.)Tj
T*
(Applicant correctly notes that "a crime" and "a term" are singular, not \
plural, in nature. )Tj
35.009 0 Td
(However, that observation does)Tj
-35.009 -1.125 Td
(not have the significance Applicant places on it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.216 0 Td
(because statutory construction is not based on interpreting or construin\
g)Tj
-19.216 -1.125 Td
(single words or brief phrases in the abstract. )Tj
17.912 0 Td
(According to the Supreme Court:)Tj
-17.912 -2.125 Td
("Over and over we have stressed that '[i]n expounding a statute, we must\
not be guided by a single sentence or member)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of a sentence, but look to the provisions of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.746 0 Td
(whole law, and to its object and policy.' )Tj
16.121 0 Td
(No more than isolated words or)Tj
-34.867 -1.125 Td
(sentences is punctuation alone a reliable guide for discovery of a statu\
te's meaning. )Tj
33.502 0 Td
(Statutory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.917 0 Td
(construction 'is a holistic)Tj
-37.419 -1.125 Td
(endeavor,' and, at a minimum, must account for a statute's full text, la\
nguage as well as punctuation, structure, and)Tj
T*
(subject matter." )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.545 0 Td
(United)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(States National Bank of Oregon v. Independent Insurance Agents of Americ\
a, Inc)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
35.548 0 Td
(., 508 U.S.)Tj
-42.093 -1.125 Td
(439, 455 \(1993\)\(citations omitted\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Moreover, in 1 U.S.C. \2471, Congress has provided some guidance for con\
struing federal statutes that is pertinent to the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(construction and interpretation of 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
20.302 0 Td
(The following language from 1 U.S.C. \2471 is pertinent to this appeal:)Tj
-20.302 -2.125 Td
("In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context i\
ndicates otherwise -)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(words importing the singular include and apply to several persons, parti\
es, or things;)Tj
T*
(words importing the plural include the singular; . . . .")Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
49 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[470.0 365.0 484.0 376.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-21060.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-21060.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:02:22 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.006 0 Td
(to law, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.69 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by such)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.758 0 Td
(relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-24.758 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In making this review,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.248 0 Td
(the)Tj
-44.764 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence supporting\
a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.475 0 Td
(evidence supporting those)Tj
-37.475 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a Judge's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.234 0 Td
(determination is not immune from review, the party challenging a Judge's\
credibility)Tj
-12.234 -1.125 Td
(determination has a heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.883 0 Td
(cases\).)Tj
-18.883 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
T*
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.717 0 Td
(E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.297 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant's case fa\
lls under 10 U.S.C. \247986 despite the fact that)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 334.5 cm
0 0 m
572.672 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 321.75 Tm
(Applicant was sentenced to three one-year)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 321 cm
0 0 m
206.578 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 222.5781 321.75 Tm
(sentences, to run consecutively, instead of being sentenced to a single \
term of)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 222.5781 321 cm
0 0 m
372.551 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 308.25 Tm
(imprisonment exceeding one year)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 307.5 cm
0 0 m
162.275 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 178.2754 308.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(On appeal, there is no challenge to the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.327 0 Td
(Judge's findings that: \(a\))Tj
-35.85 -1.125 Td
(Applicant had sexual relations with his 15-year-old stepdaughter over a \
three-year period, beginning in 1979; \(b\))Tj
T*
(Applicant had sexual contact)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.829 0 Td
(with his younger stepdaughter on one occasion during that period; \(c\) \
Applicant was)Tj
-11.829 -1.125 Td
(indicted on one felony count of statutory rape and three counts of sodom\
y, all the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.769 0 Td
(counts arising from his sexual conduct)Tj
-32.769 -1.125 Td
(with his stepdaughters; \(d\) Applicant pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor \
charge of contributing to the delinquency of a)Tj
T*
(minor and was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(sentenced to 90 days of confinement; \(e\) Applicant was convicted later\
of one misdemeanor count of)Tj
T*
(indecent exposure and two counts of misdemeanor sexual battery;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.631 0 Td
(\(f\) Applicant was sentenced to 12 months)Tj
-26.631 -1.125 Td
(imprisonment on each of the counts, the sentences to run consecutively; \
\(g\) the court suspended execution of)Tj
T*
(imprisonment and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.499 0 Td
(placed Applicant on supervised probation for four years; and \(h\) Appli\
cant successfully completed)Tj
-7.499 -1.125 Td
(probation and has not been charged with any other crime or off-duty)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.602 0 Td
(misconduct since then.)Tj
-27.602 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded Applicant's case falls under 10 U.S.C\
. \247986, which provides that the Department)Tj
T*
(of Defense may not grant or renew a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.298 0 Td
(clearance for a defense contractor official or employee that falls under\
any)Tj
-18.298 -1.125 Td
(of four statutory categories [10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\) through \(c\)\(\
4\)]. )Tj
26.576 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.497 0 Td
(Applicant's case falls under)Tj
-37.072 -1.125 Td
(10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\), which )Tj
(reads: "The person has been convicted in any court of the United States \
of a crime and)Tj
T*
(sentenced to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.22 0 Td
(imprisonment for a term exceeding one year." )Tj
18.624 0 Td
(On appeal, Applicant challenges the Judge's conclusion that)Tj
-23.844 -1.125 Td
(his case falls under 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
14.582 0 Td
(In support of that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.166 0 Td
(challenge, Applicant argues the following:)Tj
-21.747 -2.125 Td
(\(1\) 10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\) refers to "a crime" and "a term," both\
of which are singular in nature, not plural, and therefore)Tj
T*
(10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\) does not apply to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.832 0 Td
(Applicant because the state court imposed on him three, consecutive, 12-\
month)Tj
-15.832 -1.125 Td
(sentences for three separate crimes, not a single term of imprisonment e\
xceeding one)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.265 0 Td
(year;)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
56 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-21060.a1.html)
endobj
55 0 obj
<>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>
endobj
52 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 740.0 null]
endobj
53 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 687.0 null]
endobj
54 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 621.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 58
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000150628 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003738 00000 n
0000003765 00000 n
0000149938 00000 n
0000150050 00000 n
0000150092 00000 n
0000149748 00000 n
0000004502 00000 n
0000141100 00000 n
0000133716 00000 n
0000127503 00000 n
0000125420 00000 n
0000003868 00000 n
0000003914 00000 n
0000003963 00000 n
0000004195 00000 n
0000004035 00000 n
0000004067 00000 n
0000004099 00000 n
0000004131 00000 n
0000004163 00000 n
0000004713 00000 n
0000010541 00000 n
0000010590 00000 n
0000010625 00000 n
0000011227 00000 n
0000011650 00000 n
0000071447 00000 n
0000071714 00000 n
0000039979 00000 n
0000040252 00000 n
0000012075 00000 n
0000012351 00000 n
0000012791 00000 n
0000040691 00000 n
0000072331 00000 n
0000125620 00000 n
0000127717 00000 n
0000127749 00000 n
0000133068 00000 n
0000133392 00000 n
0000133930 00000 n
0000133955 00000 n
0000140776 00000 n
0000141311 00000 n
0000149833 00000 n
0000150502 00000 n
0000150544 00000 n
0000150586 00000 n
0000150300 00000 n
0000150134 00000 n
0000150449 00000 n
trailer
<<1BC6586A620BCB4D8C68E677274BFCAE>]>>
startxref
150801
%%EOF