PF]KtUF醢RddrEݥ{t C#zL~*9E)/4Wؙ4fS2]'4^qQJ'ՐC`sd"S2'V ʙg.̕1wW*^xb':N3º ֍ug=XOf}X_֏}.bW@|(ZGcB|"&>)g(39er2M`l Ⱦ`A,}I օbGF3wg[ܥCݝRk@<@qww-u)RC%r(7r*r)wr+<\pnC%yX G1y\')yZ OgsŹp.:/W]!ɿYyNEyI^WU]]5u-][uu=]_7
u#X7Mu3fS(UW@5H
d5D
Up5BTh5FMx5APD5IMVjnBԭtkFt{\/+Zw u'SR WSuP RuT S m uR}m?u,2&kߋgx!x-ފw"Y D(>*š4K1yP:Q,|2R&,JR*D)F)\P^ʗi/J2T@T
S*JTmYww]}Oo;Rq*A%)JQi*Ce
ShP(Q8MI4"h
Mi9Mz^zީd^}P 'RgvX0˒3{p: N8#g̜r6n sqny9 E3i]_s~7ڍ\Ѝux7 qa.ED7rq.%9Kqi..u]e
*w]\+qeUW\kqmu ܐ܄r3n-%iYm-܁;r']+wKSDwn iɽ7 ȃ{DkL<a]SWԷ9g'MM
ոEԀY<,1ٝk TSc;y#+-*!w8c-m4F#HQ͵QעXJVLe*`kw/vDM5p]]`ף'"9+qW5ܫnc]p#yD_5*\+S&҄[ ?Ť#ċv"~9k(FAgb'C
8{&7Iwt=F 4$wid ;2\;u^:m)IBo8@ %e1027hH> r ӨJ;,EC4p@M ċxw>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[252.0 714.0 266.0 725.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
48 0 obj
<P0پ?\\0N_4_)/S/GoTo>>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[532.0 577.0 546.0 588.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<P0پ?\\0N_5_)/S/GoTo>>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[456.0 375.0 470.0 386.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
50 0 obj
[52 0 R 53 0 R]
endobj
51 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-21282.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-21282.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:02:44 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.69 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by such)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.758 0 Td
(relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-24.758 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In making this review,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.248 0 Td
(the)Tj
-44.764 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence supporting\
a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.475 0 Td
(evidence supporting those)Tj
-37.475 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a Judge's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.234 0 Td
(determination is not immune from review, the party challenging a Judge's\
credibility)Tj
-12.234 -1.125 Td
(determination has a heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.883 0 Td
(cases\).)Tj
-18.883 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
T*
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.717 0 Td
(E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-1.067 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 389.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 388.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 359.25 Tm
(Whether the Administrative Judge's decision is arbitrary, capricious, or\
contrary to law.)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 358.5 cm
0 0 m
420.035 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 436.0352 359.25 Tm
( )Tj
(On appeal, Applicant argues)Tj
-35.003 -1.125 Td
(that the Judge's decision is not sustainable because:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.787 0 Td
(\(1\) the Judge made several errors in calculating the amounts still)Tj
-20.787 -1.125 Td
(owed by the Applicant on his various debts, which resulted in the indebt\
edness appearing to be somewhat)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.546 0 Td
(higher than it)Tj
-42.546 -1.125 Td
(actually was, \(2\) the Judge should have held in Applicant's favor with\
respect to debts which Applicant disputes or)Tj
T*
(which no longer appear on his credit)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.856 0 Td
(report, \(3\) the Judge did not give sufficient positive weight to the a\
mount of)Tj
-14.856 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's current income, his projected Cost of Living Allowance \(COL\
A\) increases, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.836 0 Td
(the fact Applicant hasn't)Tj
-36.836 -1.125 Td
(acquired any new arrearage on his debts, \(4\) Department Counsel did no\
t properly question witnesses for the purposes)Tj
T*
(of resolving)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(discrepancies in the evidence or otherwise eliciting evidence favorable \
to the Applicant, and did not tell)Tj
T*
(Applicant what additional documentation Applicant needed in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.132 0 Td
(order to establish that certain of his debts had been)Tj
-25.132 -1.125 Td
(resolved, and \(5\) Applicant has held a security clearance for many yea\
rs without incidents or problems. )Tj
41.597 0 Td
(While)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.693 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-44.291 -1.125 Td
(acknowledges that the debts at issue are still outstanding or unresolved\
, it is his position that the Judge should have)Tj
T*
(concluded that the security concerns raised)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.437 0 Td
(by those debts were mitigated by application of Financial Considerations\
)Tj
-17.437 -1.375 Td
(Mitigating Conditions 3, )Tj
10.112 0 Td
(4 and 6, and the "whole person" concept.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.082 198.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 334.082 198 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 168.75 Tm
(The Board interprets)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.525 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal brief as raising the issue of whether the Judge's dec\
ision )Tj
30.296 0 Td
(is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
-38.821 -1.125 Td
(or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The application of Adjudicative Guidelines disqualifying and mitigating \
conditions does not turn simply on whether)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(there is some record evidence that might warrant their)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.853 0 Td
(application to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
17.409 0 Td
(Rather, the)Tj
-39.261 -1.125 Td
(application of a disqualifying or mitigating condition requires the exer\
cise of sound discretion in light of the record)Tj
T*
(evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.524 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 \(January 15, 2003\) at p. 7. )Tj
(Accordingly, even if Applicant's)Tj
-11.855 -1.125 Td
(financial difficulties initially arose due to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.772 0 Td
(circumstances outside his control, the Judge reasonably could consider)Tj
-16.772 -1.125 Td
(whether Applicant acted in a reasonable manner when dealing with those f\
inancial difficulties. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
38.097 0 Td
(See,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
-38.097 -1.125 Td
(99-0462 \(May 25, 2000\) at p. 4; ISCR Case No. 99-0012 \(December 1, 19\
99\) at p. 4. )Tj
34.3 0 Td
(In this case, it was not arbitrary or)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
52 0 obj
<P0پ?\\0N_1_)/S/GoTo>>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[334.0 387.0 348.0 398.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
53 0 obj
<P0پ?\\0N_2_)/S/GoTo>>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[334.0 196.0 348.0 207.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<P0پ?\\0N_1_)55 0 R(۔>P0پ?\\0N_2_)56 0 R(۔>P0پ?\\0N_3_)57 0 R(۔>P0پ?\\0N_4_)58 0 R(۔>P0پ?\\0N_5_)59 0 R]>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
61 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-21282.a1.html)
endobj
60 0 obj
<>
endobj
62 0 obj
<>
endobj
55 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 315.0 null]
endobj
56 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 276.0 null]
endobj
57 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 251.0 null]
endobj
58 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 198.0 null]
endobj
59 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 159.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 63
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000163610 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003731 00000 n
0000003758 00000 n
0000162777 00000 n
0000162955 00000 n
0000162997 00000 n
0000162587 00000 n
0000004394 00000 n
0000153451 00000 n
0000143029 00000 n
0000139195 00000 n
0000003861 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003956 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004616 00000 n
0000010571 00000 n
0000010620 00000 n
0000010655 00000 n
0000011163 00000 n
0000011586 00000 n
0000011955 00000 n
0000086290 00000 n
0000086557 00000 n
0000054818 00000 n
0000055091 00000 n
0000036060 00000 n
0000036341 00000 n
0000012356 00000 n
0000012632 00000 n
0000013025 00000 n
0000036667 00000 n
0000055530 00000 n
0000087168 00000 n
0000139406 00000 n
0000143243 00000 n
0000143282 00000 n
0000152473 00000 n
0000152799 00000 n
0000153125 00000 n
0000153676 00000 n
0000153708 00000 n
0000161935 00000 n
0000162261 00000 n
0000162672 00000 n
0000163400 00000 n
0000163442 00000 n
0000163484 00000 n
0000163526 00000 n
0000163568 00000 n
0000163205 00000 n
0000163039 00000 n
0000163347 00000 n
trailer
<᪦ࢤl[ẃe$q9FÈlW B y@_pd |R¬0Ubdf-^n{X
.rr C
8hkyAmt3PPp20i֘hD
. 1iAF@ :z+6Q{φoRBݯLr%y1I')< o6|XEs*TI.տ>XWg7MMRc
TIN]Ť,uUL}l
q+ج,6!Dr)]1eHF&nt|UTw /w'e;3|t_ {^_Ӟ'/