%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:13:55-04:00
2021-06-24T11:13:54-04:00
2021-06-24T11:13:55-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-28917.a1
uuid:b95c5e6a-4559-432e-bd76-d625bd83d051
uuid:58c7a18e-d010-41fc-96fa-3029834d9686
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-28917.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-28917.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:13:54 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 10, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-28917)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated March)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(10, 2004, which stated the reasons why )Tj
15.969 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.969 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) and )Tj
27.162 0 Td
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
-31.605 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax issued an unfavorable security clearan\
ce decision, dated February 2, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense )Tj
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issue has been raised on appeal: Whether the Administrativ\
e Judge erred by finding that Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(falsified a security clearance application. )Tj
16.603 0 Td
(For )Tj
(the reasons that follow, the Board reverses the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-16.603 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court )Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
-43.935 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(\)-"i&E)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
C%i%4V?tH#@l\u"Q>QQKNV8Azpo"\zIvAE\]^eDt8Nag_p0
O_E
v'!aCzCu輝5)>!Y1c{P[bZ9dgZB'Z.1B`> w)' VxK
ZZZ4zw̩pʬ56{=A,5{G#_ of؛oc؏R+%IG-j2.Kϸ[D
ŏ` K۪
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xg,]{/,EcQ%/ Klb^b+Į˽bK
%}gϜ3o@ !N_רS)9FإEF_Q>@![ uQDtϨ#rKݞ}G۞
軁Jdxh#ڧ|#@Z!2~.cȨ/t8U IT蒳K/4*|oë^
FF48c@+e
(R
(*4uZ(9'*T[(ú,^fu֫ߠaM6yZiy/we7;Х݂CB=GxD^?zA2t?2r1cŎ01n)SMO1s9s_/YlV'Yn=oظi۶ع+yH=xpZǎ8y8wKuFM3H_uFQbV:+ٗ;P͓y
/Fj:QNWxy^Jwzg>RߡtL{S-,,95Vb-a֪vPkk1`(FQ2
?Q01FgL1fˌ
6#g5s!a}W]LIIׇ"3)7?7?$*P,& 4^# Y
U'SjC_t<$fC3
sy9(9l$|!9bQ>pH0u8J?p-9TGIeIqI[rה,v6;[98ߕ%QJ҇+^FH%ͥ+{2[6!^
u55:9:*;*9Rs7n?bͨRXfR
bs 0
XX wLabpXKϰ
/˱ǐ0$N Gqgpps8LlBO<\y\@$!Q~HD@4b~`P80#0?c$~A2a4Fr \G
1 RD.ͧ~şȓJi-%iȍPQZN+9VjJ5z@im-v%Lv.JTJN[M%ɋ>*Ei
J2TQyJt@ɛ|ew;K:BV:J8tN%?2ȟR&t.">JT%[yowq2={yS _͇0q:>8|O+Og|F|ȗ2_|+ϕlc;,ɷ6|~~ď9os~/1JSCi#$)bHt",|JO_PH(3e%(+e!$erQnCy)ODi*(P!*LE( *N;[_NU)PI*ErJ 0
(@)&dTz^JUo;^}P'Ldk6-}N8#g̜r69̟sqny9/i:pDIn2B|7].\r1w8rs \KKܥ4-wWp.8]rWk7&sn9*45sȝ3wi߸
=='܇r?x~ lMI6MYCx(D;ǜi0Hl#=@dD&}9b"";!r"r#:%BD!FE18`@JJʢBMGTD%TFTE5TG
D-FE=4@C4Bc4AS4Cs@KBkhvhN.芯
ߠ;Et2M=}1@҅uGDyQ:P`˛M4u@sܳq 6T 1C8"