` uQ).ERkYPhXDmGi9b. =![x4s_撔_#<>7.*n^>7rn,</LE0~0~NA?H^}8e|\,I9ԝڏC;S0*p7=b50ש88ܱ\nf.X)nț[jy|(F"˂V.}һiP мT^GO2~DM*e{~G k\:A⟈M 2,T/i{4FF!9 2ߦ 2<@UcC5"*}}"`,{|JTM~ ۋTn1mKOQ j s5Gg^&qE ߍ U|ـ+ M~\-yGge>weD'F
PƋ#gxMӔ(3S'_~cl7lA4s0E ̟'j~@! pc[ (BOp~(, A~q
rlYZ*ރCF\F
Ե_78z.&M |GrPG3QzZlSR3e. mp?nw {dc~hid`.r{n`P! A@TmՖjNJ iEvhGZPmv/(oɽ QO7}>{X뷡&r?M9}f&?6u&'bWfpUAIOf?c[,S>N]y#R d{FxpK`^#}a_O(C< wSgEϮ#%< KE//ag^$o_M,#)WtD >~9O'u~Xq VHO=$%F%xgOu,ꂋ('ఎ` SCRp _~
E=Jz!6t^s>n]';4Pl=<[66~f{:YbI6Q_Opv O c
h 25-ֿV8y-)uK !yî+"Kw䮌kw>&re7-ˀmElAh{픯n|F4Xٖ@2KG
C-v8\vCtN8,ֿ+;8hjՔUfϪ VmV8[9P4stϫe
.:;=eO_(+4aU>2rݓr\lciG )rh˜ _$sqw*w\^$Gg-<(mJvRYI:rW:v9K\9IɽLTIw cw>$q2s45qrp9|D̨rXA%-rrzM=v"gq}a+(wXuVч̙?V&@9ֻ'c~\DE'NHh.X
S.Ldx !.eR٧kn6mx=ŹxK|_ .ԘpΆ9s5=\4{C
j]xU)y` q"p ">}0Xۘ壂ƏUpDfD-rOzܓI{>ΒriBD
{!
%o{f{+W5'٪͙6
@ߠ_'e0'ˋip'a;ZGu61tN(Ӽ2t՚_9NbOD mB{߯c(Oѵҽdrr/g{0 T>f-0Q5+=LjhP5, 7 dߨo=I 8 !=uΠwi
(w;oܙ9'mh{>_?
}z=[RkMŚ.ߏ+i
.f's Α-|uPE+2 ÿ~/ /B\S[^X'(WR-셈 k?u}vX { gqԢ|bT{$ں$ԫIb+Pvr'Xb~ GbNB}u'MKBnQl$~H'~s~Or/7uQ]w[Kn_muni D9"6r[ᶨ'|jQc?;|ݚ(xfl3V6"s7E[ߎFx>K8p \K, ^F{^k />+#31Wu=bj14ȻC?%~[zD&~GYĊ崟M2~+gy_b2c2qS
9AsS_C >*.'dXfLddV3HףRJޔ;ԧ8MMrwd;z|T
;sVk }-9FUm.V ~ ğZ<ޒ䏻g"J&KM0CF|=vLͥ.ǘ 0YppV 1GeJ3Z}[*tMo|mג騘Pt}O1^o4
YG e/hֿj;ViD͈G0(S[
ؼ&gQfLHOva郎 YSnggvƆZ/ӽ"itu1[TF؞yKvnrnĖy2EՠBj嘭hwJZ]aױ%$w;%E. ȴC!{j{3 S)90^` ]
1TWpߓ> 6Ɓ!q͋n߽g]#ݝ 3*lm_ߺ
x͢y/{x > jWW z%59Vo3Vm✏T(IāĨ;{
Vk9~:7
}6?el`8sQlTjPjPhV T>*X Uq1&lۂa`l!u2cQAlq!Lę@=eM~yι9瞯<':2z6̥`# tKzGer -w*
'V(g[M1{m0>vvU?b-~d{_xȻ:{Ϻog \ߩwc u[(bO`7m5ŰF8Fc밼;%~]w5TQ;T
imf]lX*5+psJ3oEyKc6@
w4*ee}+ؚ@UryeQi B vW/ g+sI#)CieFX>zfd[=S
7,کGO&Z-CUSGr_Z_U_T2S
wj`Q~NdgN8gõJZ} FBuβ,s
Zd⏣Ҁ\}s I^?"yEڷ2~ ]+n_gMJۺ;w,!u[[&yíVӳQGZ]O*B
b?R}A4<^+ԧ}Ausa֏Cm?7iY %?Jj/2֯(b ] 7\ 7Һ&e{l\I w*(XS {2#D?kb`mG0gk]=)A'7Tř
xm6X_3-5= r=6o S2sߕzYhb lc(F'!:v
&U7<⼡[ZlJSq^|c&gYZFmn~ƞм |N[T8ߖ tFk9J_JiwwdBu
{y<
)6 [|.ʇ2~sHGNR "r=>L7\wJyzf2ZcD Ge`:l廿O}%齁ݛקdH}=Or_ b])6swci+gU!~LbNwd0Mz~m3<ȳ yߢ}%ʏK0';4|"Gx&5v1,ZE}PakU5O;`Z#A2ۡS~6bOaWRi^>/
4Vu: ͫ&zm#< 5k%q ?GJXfj<6U] "O 6#ȿ7vBX)mmRZ
P.W>kF0*!KFtuDUAA^Q~ϹO[s9s9L"2ϦYÌ5Ly! A m]pk]9a1&]06O
W4lb:dN2>KIgP2f;N%|]6.>)֏ͽ /&mh32=Tލ| Bm7ŽUȾ0jK9Z36a<ޤ=T
;;4 { wmp{xX_3Y[xUGn)bv/@33RK"~F7y^ÔGP 87( RȲO'
rGG1sX˲➖0)fr&P 4tl7S%r'of7جjqg9_*@iGG? 떼e Vó7K{Y6ŷN6}4\s!:'훁(疠{in\s /0~e/s. 9C\kW(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BO @q69Pe` 7hůɜC^e WlIyؖ]OٲKlpPgӴe]KmYC+f:wٲ|֖9 $ /рŴ qH}HȒ%) òE k ˶)Zl!2uB/KK1;6NQw0KcϾ *s P+ۚ 7q vm2RQ9$s>]&Zd(
HKܹƬRSڠ\uQw/&eI[LIX',Ťmla!1C״g4֔)%wpb >Y3E+)Ee 6*-98!9 r]y:jznl龄e.'d HuSJYɝVk:V>aO[/ޓ6#m')7"YPkD ,]= NtœfK3"="9$to i=4b kf[8hR"3eYB!+dFfJX #dH[ڱ ZuV/
:6\,1esL'!+H0]?J>Z:5y o#r%?qE}9~CMD{:
kfqڐ^]\ӯ0cĉBRj" bdNV.;δNUgx/jo`.*Xp~pJ97b >{7!syTe{
Uyo4FÁ
o
_
ͩ 0J_?%n'T8b.; 5CE^4:'3r Nd &q`jc986&ɱ}cHjGa,|Ć3: Z
JXu2
u]h +I?!5EC# L4o?Fԩ[cğI{h/[wA[诊clP(뷫/^ N4SJ葂b]^5L`KcccRC=CO g!x"G~- ~a"n;20!ZZ$;dpds͆
v [me
O[F+=2ۓs/ўʂju
Y $ 붫:NYʇa6.q'h-@\d#\Y6LGX>` p`Y% }bR/!N- p%hyEԋQ6+f'} -E~ mhihihipQ }`?0 @8gWfd\-jD- 7APYYhL˭-lKop kp}`H'
Fe3˂ǁ?ppCsݢ@ h@ z\,s">.sLopް5=Dz"cpfdߓ֢B9q &w"s d>f{#s l/~=e\R.^ҥx-r>e!.F/H~WI1f667۴nVD7FOKv%Ƶڸў')K$_%o 1/Ày@{?
h ~+Xhb mW k{ȵFST'M$W_\&}~AF-+D
8?o8m7TWkkR]"{f9\ySċ\.O K)&jHjWN;uj~z_dв)ٕ-*B#VYs4:vС3Io=jJkMdXylӢϠ" M֙T{^{beSj8OY[הJo2qMI_)G;E<1[iNZ
k0
OVa}4 ,UMlJcU+U0-$+.$r4
lcPLO?Mt2$$hF֡P(.xϣ0\ =١'{c/['wEo ]/ = kvv?#-ҝzbt'wg͞iv&D&75ܜFOj5?ca1X5zF:%SVJJZS攬DSmYi4+hN,cQ4-m@ <ጵPo4@uqC*R{7* ŔEzI+Ox?/hp0 ,>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-29279.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-29279.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:14:48 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 537.75 591.75 228 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 746.25 Tm
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 720 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 695.25 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge made a favorable finding with respect to SOR pa\
ragraph 1.a and SOR paragraph 3.a had)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(previously been)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.609 0 Td
(withdrawn by the Government. )Tj
12.747 0 Td
(Those favorable findings are not at issue in this appeal.)Tj
-19.356 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(In this case, the Judge specifically noted that Applicant was a United S\
tates citizen, owned a home, maintained bank)Tj
T*
(accounts and was registered to vote in the United States, and had "expre\
ssed great affection and loyalty for the United)Tj
T*
(States . . . [and] a demonstrated history of being a trusted and valued \
employee." Decision at p. 3.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
41 0 obj
[43 0 R]
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-29279.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-29279.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:14:48 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(that the Judge's weighing of the evidence was arbitrary, capricious, or \
contrary to law.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729 Tm
(Applicant also argues the Administrative Judge's adverse decision under \
Guideline B is erroneous because the Judge)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(failed to consider)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.192 0 Td
(significant evidence demonstrating Applicant's preference for the United\
States--including the fact)Tj
-7.192 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant is now a United States)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.136 0 Td
(citizen, he has lived permanently in the United States for many years wi\
th no)Tj
-15.136 -1.125 Td
(intention of returning to China, he has significant property)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.606 0 Td
(interests in the United States, he is an outstanding employee,)Tj
-23.606 -1.125 Td
(and he has never engaged in any misconduct. )Tj
18.355 0 Td
(There is a rebuttable presumption)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.69 0 Td
(that an Administrative Judge considered)Tj
-32.045 -1.125 Td
(all the record evidence unless he or she specifically states otherwise. \
)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
27.656 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(99-9020 \(June 4, 2001\) at)Tj
-30.988 -1.125 Td
(p. 2. )Tj
(Applicant's ability to cite to record evidence that he contends the Judg\
e should have given greater weight is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
45.167 0 Td
(not)Tj
-45.167 -1.375 Td
(sufficient to overcome that rebuttable presumption.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 261.9238 636 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.9238 635.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 275.73 631.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Merely because a Judge does not give greater weight to record)Tj
-21.644 -1.125 Td
(evidence cited by the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.718 0 Td
(appealing party, it does not follow that the Judge simply ignored that e\
vidence. Moreover, to the)Tj
-8.718 -1.125 Td
(extent Applicant's argument can be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.314 0 Td
(construed as challenging the Judge's weighing of the record evidence, it\
fails to)Tj
-14.314 -1.125 Td
(establish that the Judge weighed the record evidence in a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.992 0 Td
(manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
-22.992 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's decision is the product of discrimina\
tion against the Applicant.)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 564.75 cm
0 0 m
476.385 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 504.3848 565.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant also)Tj
-40.699 -1.125 Td
(asserts that the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.137 0 Td
(Administrative Judge')Tj
8.762 0 Td
(s decision is an example of discrimination and that the sole basis for d\
enial is that)Tj
-14.899 -1.125 Td
(Applicant is Chinese. There is no)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.581 0 Td
(merit to Applicant's assertion.)Tj
-13.581 -2.125 Td
(There is a rebuttable presumption that federal officials and employees c\
arry out their duties in good faith. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
42.375 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
-45.706 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 00-0030)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(September 20, 2001\) at p. 5. )Tj
21.886 0 Td
(Furthermore, there is a rebuttable presumption that an)Tj
-21.886 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge is impartial and unbiased. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.357 0 Td
(See,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 99-0710 \(March 19, 2001\) at p. 5. )Tj
(A party)Tj
-19.357 -1.125 Td
(seeking to rebut either of those presumptions has a heavy burden of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.271 0 Td
(persuasion on appeal. )Tj
8.886 0 Td
(The issue is not whether)Tj
-36.157 -1.125 Td
(Applicant personally believes that he has been discriminated against. )Tj
27.825 0 Td
(Rather, the issue is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.804 0 Td
(whether the record of the)Tj
-35.629 -1.125 Td
(proceedings below contains any indication that the Judge acted in a mann\
er that would lead a reasonable person to)Tj
T*
(question the fairness and impartiality of the Judge. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.467 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 00-0248 \(March 21, 2001\) at p. 5.)Tj
-20.467 -1.125 Td
(Applicant fails to identify)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.553 0 Td
(anything in the record below that indicated or suggests a basis for a re\
asonable person to)Tj
-10.553 -1.125 Td
(question the fairness or impartiality of the Judge in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.634 0 Td
(this case.)Tj
-20.634 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge's adverse conclusions under Guideline B were no\
t based merely upon Applicant's status as a)Tj
T*
(former citizen of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.969 0 Td
(China. )Tj
(Rather, they were based on the record evidence that Applicant's ties wit\
h his foreign family)Tj
-6.969 -1.125 Td
(members pose a security risk under the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.856 0 Td
(particular facts of this case. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.217 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 99-0457 \(January 3, 2001\))Tj
-30.905 -1.125 Td
(at p. 6. )Tj
(The Board notes that this program has adjudicated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.355 0 Td
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) and Guideline C \(Foreign)Tj
-23.355 -1.125 Td
(Preference\) cases involving applicants with ties to a wide variety of c\
ountries. )Tj
31.462 0 Td
(To)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the extent that Applicant asserts that)Tj
-31.462 -1.125 Td
(the components of Guideline B discriminate against him, the Board does n\
ot have the jurisdiction or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.353 0 Td
(authority to)Tj
-40.353 -1.125 Td
(entertain challenges to the wisdom or authority of provisions of the Dir\
ective. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
31.353 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, DISCR Case No. 90-0208)Tj
-34.685 -1.125 Td
(\(October 24,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1991\) at p. 6.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate harmful error below. )Tj
23.02 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-23.02 -1.125 Td
(adverse security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.719 0 Td
(clearance decision.)Tj
-6.719 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 194.25 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 169.5 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 92.25 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 67.5 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[261.0 633.0 275.0 644.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
[46 0 R]
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-29279.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-29279.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:14:48 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(a mere)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.942 0 Td
(difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.941 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In deciding whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.719 0 Td
(Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to law, the Board will consi\
der whether they are)Tj
-9.719 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.939 0 Td
(the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
18.408 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.903 0 Td
(conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-28.903 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.012 0 Td
(fact are supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might \
accept as)Tj
-14.012 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.854 0 Td
(evidence in the same record. )Tj
11.661 0 Td
(In making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.684 0 Td
(Administrative Judge." )Tj
9.49 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.523 0 Td
(record evidence supporting a)Tj
-35.879 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.278 0 Td
(supporting those)Tj
-41.278 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, the party c\
hallenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a heavy burden on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.995 0 Td
(appeal.)Tj
-14.995 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.914 0 Td
(pp. 4-5 \(citing federal cases\).)Tj
-9.914 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal ca\
ses\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.109 0 Td
(Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
11.541 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 348.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 348 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 318.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by holding against the Applicant \
with respect to the Guideline B allegations.)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 318 cm
0 0 m
562.852 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 305.25 Tm
(Applicant contends)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.998 0 Td
(that he should not be denied a security clearance merely because he has \
relatives in a foreign)Tj
-7.998 -1.125 Td
(country \(including immediate family members)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.912 0 Td
(and in-laws\). )Tj
(This contention is without merit.)Tj
-18.912 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made sustainable findings that: \(1\) Applicant\
had a brother, sister, mother-in-law, and father-)Tj
T*
(in-law who were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(citizens of the People's Republic of China \(China\), residing in China,\
\(2\) Applicant had traveled to)Tj
T*
(China in 1995 and 2000 to visit and care)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.469 0 Td
(for his mother, \(3\) Applicant maintained contact with his brother and \
sister, by)Tj
-16.469 -1.125 Td
(way of annual telephone calls, and \(4\) Applicant's family had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.811 0 Td
(previously been targeted for mistreatment by the Chinese)Tj
-24.811 -1.125 Td
(government during the Cultural Revolution. )Tj
17.831 0 Td
(Given those findings, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.304 0 Td
(Administrative Judge concluded that Applicant's)Tj
-28.135 -1.125 Td
(ties with those immediate family members raised security concerns under \
Guideline B and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.462 0 Td
(that Foreign Influence)Tj
-36.462 -1.125 Td
(Disqualifying Condition 1 applied. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.193 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-22606 \(June 30, 2003\) at p. 6. )Tj
(That conclusion shifted the)Tj
-14.193 -1.125 Td
(burden of persuasion to Applicant. )Tj
14.108 0 Td
(If there are admitted or proven facts and circumstances that raise secur\
ity concerns, ")Tj
-14.108 -1.125 Td
([t]he applicant is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.97 0 Td
(responsible for presenting witnesses and other evidence to rebut, explai\
n, extenuate, or mitigate facts)Tj
-6.97 -1.125 Td
(admitted by the applicant or proven by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.746 0 Td
(Department Counsel, and has the ultimate burden of persuasion as to obta\
ining a)Tj
-15.746 -1.125 Td
(favorable clearance decision." Directive, Additional)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.038 0 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.15.)Tj
-21.038 -2.125 Td
(Applicant argues that the Administrative Judge gave insufficient weight \
to evidence that Applicant was not close to his)Tj
T*
(relatives in China, that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.303 0 Td
(those relatives were not agents of the Chinese government, and that Appl\
icant is a loyal)Tj
-9.303 -1.125 Td
(American. )Tj
4.442 0 Td
(Applicant's argument does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.4 0 Td
(demonstrate that it was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law for th\
e Judge)Tj
-16.842 -1.125 Td
(to conclude that Applicant had not met his burden of establishing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.355 0 Td
(that his relatives were not in a position to be exploited)Tj
-26.355 -1.125 Td
(by a foreign power in a way that could force him to choose between loyal\
ty to those)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.851 0 Td
(relatives and the United States.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(Mere disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence is not suffi\
cient to demonstrate error without a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.751 0 Td
(showing)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[334.0 346.0 348.0 357.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
51 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-29279.a1.html)
endobj
50 0 obj
<>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 629.0 null]
endobj
49 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 590.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 53
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000138591 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003731 00000 n
0000003758 00000 n
0000137978 00000 n
0000138062 00000 n
0000138104 00000 n
0000137788 00000 n
0000004394 00000 n
0000128337 00000 n
0000120109 00000 n
0000118359 00000 n
0000003861 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003956 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004605 00000 n
0000010555 00000 n
0000010604 00000 n
0000010639 00000 n
0000011149 00000 n
0000011578 00000 n
0000064976 00000 n
0000065243 00000 n
0000033133 00000 n
0000033406 00000 n
0000011965 00000 n
0000012241 00000 n
0000012601 00000 n
0000033860 00000 n
0000065857 00000 n
0000118548 00000 n
0000120334 00000 n
0000120359 00000 n
0000128013 00000 n
0000128562 00000 n
0000128587 00000 n
0000137464 00000 n
0000137873 00000 n
0000138507 00000 n
0000138549 00000 n
0000138312 00000 n
0000138146 00000 n
0000138454 00000 n
trailer
<<7D1CA2B43B7F2B44B23C823C0DD6EB8C>]>>
startxref
138764
%%EOF