%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:15:18-04:00
2021-06-24T11:15:18-04:00
2021-06-24T11:15:18-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-29665.a1
uuid:b90d61a8-cd84-4ef8-a2e7-68f2711f37cb
uuid:d7e65a6b-df1a-4ecb-b6e5-0bd6ce8732d8
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-29665.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-29665.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:15:18 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 10, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-29665)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 24, 2004, which stated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.108 0 Td
(reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classi\
fied)Tj
-14.108 -1.125 Td
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guideline B \(Foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.386 0 Td
(Influence\). )Tj
4.608 0 Td
(Administrative Judge James A. Young issued)Tj
-29.216 -1.125 Td
(an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated June 18, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.274 0 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1\
992, as amended.)Tj
-11.274 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: whether the Administrat\
ive Judge erred in concluding that Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(had not successfully rebutted,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.136 0 Td
(mitigated or extenuated the security concerns raised under Guideline B \(\
Foreign)Tj
-12.136 -1.125 Td
(Influence\). )Tj
4.608 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.995 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-3.919 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.271 0 Td
(how the Administrative Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-24.271 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.912 0 Td
(\(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
7.969 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.034 0 Td
(or capricious, the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-26.034 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.54 0 Td
(explanation for)Tj
-41.54 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.524 0 Td
(reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to consider an important as\
pect of the case; it offers an)Tj
-7.524 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.188 0 Td
(record evidence; or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-21.188 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decision\).)Tj
-15.215 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.057 0 Td
(they are)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(1@z)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mk0:%JB`~@j+aq'[=F~_[Rִϭda.0Xg-h^E K=^d$yu$
JKXas4"{uW|5ȡ@F/G,v]iN|L'5]QT93Z3de}U9↹|b>S,S .{}!bV_F233=R쩢{UWJ2TདྷX*M}Էilwkc~@_ U
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| XTG
"1Gx
d51&r
JMTxsEETQb۠~I_ꮮuU@}H [lWL|FĦ~ v[CiŷY V+"bG.Q"R {8yU