?1wxYC;α ,8p\7;ڻϧ]Ql = C]پ~+Q,Jx -1yL|3-B#u?-etCFLs7hP1HqHa
er
*Rj aw>ƝOJ'Vhqs\
/N# eJ^?[ x!ߺ2.< d)tvu9.cja7G1sOyO g ; g~-=O}ESgMHYǢ9"r5Q
D($B$z$
Y=L&kYނ4%-upIr"N!2 L"Ak5K%:Du+!ר/bP"fVCQ#\HEˉi4,'H7^
^ &Gf-f0J5mLi\>\n hɦ ߉gKMᎫ{csuQd- .r1 g&)31hƩm2l܅Jh )Jv]1qVAN0 z6XH+ئwVۭ22nXӾpQ^XF_/;3L[
ZW-E
;5=JM}\ג^ xeG4Eje !l[[pk$CpF0hXaUhev8SMߕ͇# d\MN= x3֚b?3+x&m|#N#~94ҦJ3&w?~SU?J?K1ʦֱeHfB
~ q# JLNSL|*1c~`}I{%RG/W_6n_Sށ|l߶sF싁/K j$+ΛȊsf2z:, +GڧL\9·ԃVH7B?I.D2* *LAs13˫ pѲ|߿^s_$2 v
TVJ2^HE7 zκpgyytz<:=N ! hϊ%Mؒ(ѝ
yF=!C\C9ʗu@ƜASl,%cŨ3ƬWE`\e?&$ڳZOB,^QL%!&[mA. W+(lj7js;CGOlٙJ
CmT#b]}RM?m2G+}揄m*kv\v;v'
7*-4DIl cCk`bV,@JHEH 0Cٲ)j%2~!UcL?cs=8 131'_h LD=q
=SN`aI# cHL ~'%4 #|jEdl !0N$JfmM&mgUYVA BW0@6noRzcIҽ2E_bei6ؖDO$YUD x&F$L.L86k
jyeZWTP^=|(ЪZD]=2|{^>az&Z/A
^ɬdKFF Q -@'L-Z3kV-~D1$!> 7L,c *s¼}2}2#P<^~s37`ן$D%D:/RK:2=WOKV4lÃ]ID& bC5ezEb%`T˩wSJ1:i MHҬHu3 (vr+,8hvjc; y _m&oS:@.G}\qClW(gg&$FB!X WtJuYArv&m>4HOs=J*=\ >d
8Z' (a/n|GU 3t h^`BYs֚u8 G14.e_J6\>g\6gQpMv -BW
Iq2vrI0 EMB-Zk-*l[IL\F>!}B0B <1ҼMM3VB/[87PK$nSdG순K+e,@ugwTӟYsGT#Jo{ˊy} wL>:L | {O:/rE6dlS!%<Ġy1F(RGTÜJl~A|&r)ՑH!?pڕFfSJ jFG\
mx7a0ִDBC+v -[r@Y¯, =>)aVh"1AZ"YW]V冼R"'0XBpAw t%1E_ՍF`!h_p_h<8 L,&p^DLtS&F>tr]XoQb
6r8B> PMC&kge7ͯMu|Ԭ EU҄첅bR0)7M!ne ܆|D!9~qJjcuMAp[Du)hk\Ip} =iگ =>Y $ʬ1,}pbqƵh@IfdTjUݯjt
i
~ ֊@u T)YiAO@-5V\RdŒq*-F[)0NԹTXPp Z+P
brI)tƑѽ hX%=̩ ;J=_Cs[,] :a: XV MM!/j2q?/X ]pO3֫ypAhbZw; ]~301Hb=cG+:N+ӭ($z P3hfaGAaPwS c3iM$5ʲ*(IZ
iغal ifxZ\| H]nq\e ?gosΙ^fw;7vwٛ=4@VA-Tl)TX6B /y@N +)/-yT)QD893;37*Qy
ÂwDŽU|rc'ny]grΡ~Dp#E&vkU2GѸ*$;ejj3+]#!8#i -mk`y5
gIggɗ2C}7 rU퐴[!|aK``Ƴ4\%"hILQt|7Ж +YN &bp뺡"~#oXoKltkT%ag̢
^$04VsBTBz߂^p,]
=_]ՃtU1 Q#Nِ#B
o6%ނm֑+rK2;ײ΅b y
k&6Fl7} V D/OZ¦s%R5d_k}b> 1zr w3WmzWPbBS|Eghu8'엫GIk'OEsњN^kd][7߶oj7[vCL$ 8183bu'dijt,ʯ*VE}ޖW=8=/ bSi artRsl;ki%
i>`( [bB!K\ڻ3Cϋ8= {x5C vC4 Sfh3Q$TjbHB{˒ѐz>d34qQ-Q[ˋh&]v`O&Ơ`9s@>} yX~ۑ~LMI.{?; PHǿZAM JJ~+%Հ
7!J B B!yNׄH4VQC}05J^E'ʃK₾й -19y-Z -~O7)rJ< ן2Otimr<3#s\fNzD.W
]"BHbn w79 Ucx>i !>j
m; l6R kL?AR&ct:]>0wvWK,e"`3¬2bT*K\Q4vڍO-hOn8h
TZbiRv f_bRДXS`tu┐"IӦ&Ao7Jto
U-10o[[zUO=%D躯lzm OVP7 Ni9عCvkbv ܯWA6/-۵/Urmwm'As # ܅ÒBLnmѰn1X}4<3P[0A(
(K78G*>?^ry?H_СMJ~MD UƩh=۽UJ5X @pZV`ǐ7
G/"H3$ ?=
9^Er!#Bi's%]LNzn2شc f ;YƱ\JiWաп_C7_}
/띐 Pջ9B1 )
VΩ6OFcPSFF)dtۢAA{Qjr
\fpذ{GGf9M6Ϟl4ޯ3W?Kr ·@N vHZM%i
Q6j8UQP]lh>p:9pѵ
l JQ̉^S̀ fkN.w P!%^nNL!Rm:,ׇ-s=|Ur♯r =e'c#ik[dG>9d,⃐1 aK _
V^upv$^ NGމ!z
&OgUVJnhKݣR Pul~p|+wVpCJ83̓Ev8ކJ+iK7N(p{ݜK׃9f|вvӞ֩ǿ3j -1e ͟>X=h\)% 5]w7ʓ2O_zVg(mhFe$t띞KiJaBOrӴt(ZHS5Cq=<6OWr]i(F4J'M eB;6aG)$<<,=!m2LZ}6{iz5cfxl).RBz,3لYEGc{ *̊SYqm\NeĵM>Vwײ3YT&TCǍ ҈KsJKsgfn~zM5:ퟜXKPNJ89VP T QŲ{U=5Ng@ X _ owy b/-3[( h^]Rm 77!*{mϘW eBϠ~ }/@h1kl3dxjހ8x ]șr6B
xg7 >
T(n p ըm12bq^Qҫ< R\Ju5lӗ`&7 I$Vs۾ u Zj7m72a?OX5 =d~ Od|;l e%(m?xQ1W-B^7=p)WJA 8ܣ$pM3 d~1f00/ߏxܕh1[ G ;y s *,B Y xiq) sܐ$g `ocI2hW
h+ϑmf_ౙ[K(kN0Y[d sH5]49kKJ ',i)}Rh;>wKZ{1$_f,m"-ˠσ >xC;IwQ gɾyaQEZ7$e(~X?>#t%X2sQZ4 >r ϒ(?<:Gi_D^ب%z.2EPcWj8 J(M=8G̥g<>! $H%OͿKO)8>@26: Q5#x:5 ˑ2[ ^ rpd>iDm6q'cP"
F_YЇx~~r,h7ʊ|~ u#z\kDT nE^X(46相/@ <Ǵ=(9k>fGq~0D@58-uyQ8C墁BJF*Al@~`&eҼ#22Z,\g\[ M`h[Eihύ T/Dx1A 9~{"WϒRAj5Uߧu!.s z+_h1C 7 7b.| ݯ ͠2UnucègBoT[Z'p?w
k[!u4C)wV\f.8xw97iټ w+m n'x WCM#tܗ{pUs ! DHEL@E*GP8 jT;V0 Nk-#EYNkW2'B"!Y.4*S<{cU\FY>u,e ڇ3Uж/%UŐ>y ꭎq\ ;)abٲ3:K
Ibgx +%U
FNX4l!Ek!K[]%Դ# v_~Y
#weԷu \1C/[oYo+ʬeB}{n|v;3w
ȶ1^R=R zDmZwp ;vavw
]Yw(`8xlM},k7vmpI)#~B\y
Y6 bkEN;OSG[$(VL%KWS"9:?kyGiVJRv]ҹ-'uG ]I:ÎK-' [)Dô2ܷύ>dL /u0ᷰЭ="z/
?wBBviUrebux( dq.k8B>]c}piij&)[Rpt(Kt6)䢑rlTljKcxŌXyUۇq̇&/ L4~3&0g'oͥ/O{TNz=tTgK"jx8
i(y;܃66_9VdnδLmpߜ LJu?!^/=\^Lׅۤx=Qs 4l:r\<ysjF
Y&k֜q7{ro'Zh~ kV=Fy%#}9ۻXIP6k1_aR '@-
ah@ F}M2_h
sCLS/Gމ}K̟OpLoᛯ*_AǮ045{ %} r抟": lGajg/Dץ|/\cWE/; >z]سx8f_$ϥt3% }%^mM[_zP? X$=~{ou;oZuÏb<$ C:$ԟx{鿱Bے]r{"o˯vK_$Ρ
wp/p g
E}8V+ 61M_D/l3cհڶd[)jv߶6BXycZ g,<6+Z[\~X YBUUA )gĵ_$p5=E-"V,lʐD̼x_9{`ÔwMm 6 (טJ-hWw >!2 d$mTd
>< #REO MRdޡ>-ǹo
nSGd%;䛠RFn ߙ/ǶZ+ ^xh5j4o;v@e yW $%=U2Yj2Lcn.w?Ƅy2s7 9*Pʽ,[wTkzk5NG4ꤳ{%zY&xWH:ꨤ>&3z6X#`Rf+wˬihZ_z>#ǚ4GgnG?'=Y4yX a=lXs/k,Mh GY-[hyFW۱J#roF?Aq8Tu~W6?Z0{dzLGz K t\Htt;8Í36|wl}5Iۦ٢5[R_'l^_s;v;-'u{'Γ-uT+lESꚌüe/O_$93t),v@
SÝȘJ1C%Rd/,`g_G0dYhw7n^w;u ? 8Wek*=Th=,}3 9-{`ft9քh4<;1i& ^Sp~v_ T{ už+Q,D|o|%ENL%o%F NVX\1
qQQ)w=/eUu~b[T W EB ҖQꨊ1d#0t-Sd ː "~e a" 29-[dos}9|?ס d.E1f ]2; /#xo(WS?Gж>jmox/MI`D~I}k$ۛ{t 4E]܋|֭,`_Dx`8mĸ5JoHk3bRIއ^-^VSR7i(h}+[ZP Co;Qa.-^1诒~.#mWOf+?g8zI8[KL J,6v:3[&ےј4npptdN?,W}b561j!t*b?pOmֲzb .^W۽Us('
p">cvh9U껕w_N0*(Wse1k"c zsGNwLK,"Ծ ݗ`Zq:kVQ+g v%j6S np=*G6jZ}RJ oH֗_>=m [~ h} ڏh$ָIg(!WRs4|~EJ-YE=&K/G|
uZ~Mֿ}T3mίÖW]CL*pô
*ZN56/cҰOSGY~Ěrٓi i%X8k;҄i>\{4-I :M59$Wr.lkmH멵q|#Ϫ̷$G f#gG1:
L,ձ l(6A
T g oTD Ռ; B[7=3 2jcp;cl6OsݢWo9\h3Z['WRzOkÝ p#SSiH
0OsV>QE?|wR-2y?ogrL <ſQ{VC3 nݯ%N?*a+}/،+I
l-ľ>%#F;l= |{JŘO[9
) жges* ,$iҋslQAϻ/Q~\u9a=3CNN/|2ߧؽH}&<oԼx~~cb1cϗ=L{m:]w
Ρ
@ľ;z!ɵk6Ίx]=:ScF}=hg(L'O֞aNv֦wo߽ixFeo'D;? e b,*χ=gen]L]ېO$_}1y+m90
(t՟F
v6+A
à77 gu]JM.[گ9~ڑ)
{罰{
2ήMuPyih^4h`/ ?׆'ĝRfޗ2bRɕ;燰'_BH f> Igbdr"N7/qNr"S;g t V3
/$ga^$'(.9Rb"4#TI:_Mp h1~L.H)Ei.=yt۶OPglx䅲LƙN3ɊpW_$Il%{:[ jgB @\J{6!cz>ڳCȢAKd5y:q_%O vU~.-XI-G?~MO7wK%~2Ҁ <
ηY=+yL 2Q_#
_ DgyҔn)z4KĜsPU:Ï\xulP(y~=q{ Fg]^nBo璧Q6qd;제pѺ q+< BDܭJ"~>} Mo{s# +e)lubVtOfI^<|M
Kx$Ws>HʷV0Or)}zF>u^))4}o ~Ws+!Y=a WY$I^>"#ę|}F$Bq-;rwq7_yeLb Oh_-\d^\96=4><{|Ųz{Y s o8Ve.l{:/>ʫ<ڇJiKncXrm z{Sz[fdftsYe3`Ɉt֡nh"`4ȋ ]4*9i Cb0Qcr|9w;iYF4tF3^2G!ϓ"R}}=$cޯøn'7Y,g4k c >.pgYQ/a+xcYw%"dk u1onDk>18fng[o?j )|Q^J>U9E 2tjҽüCX~qwF縇[}:8*Mқ8v+?{3~jR`ѧ ըwEr k47S
{ʸƶD
D $O͚|!`;oƝ7q ߑ c9ǮG=I>X$ۉ3Ky7s0 |'5s)qrs#
I&ҭ<_AR" @w0Z'#s~6a1?
﹖ &7'nc> t}EftӇҧ3c|ĺr~tDw_qt'YXSN?XXCcVc~ӇMߠ+BDK*2RD ]#߲W
s]u>˹_samARџsЯy)4=\_)=/d1)fr& ,tl73f%r;od7ؼJqg_ʹc@埁)ڇ%? }VaS|u ó7C{ )C2i3/[t훀$id7#g^`T"^zp~׆?Q(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
Bq8vms! 0Wi8^ԢK( i;b%%(_?CE
k濉Nmc2g1z'e[f~lڣ wb6j >17F!((Y ǜ}-)O斠ZO
q59 ۮcsLNI!$|z-L41Qꗖ}=1{ ^~MȒ>
J˙,؏NHJ.-Bc
Kih)˓,O:D}gVQ>&kdۈĺrL *v;魭[bz-= Kc *֛֘JVJ촂5fNN՝
q+}m @,>}L,ɒj h uިL|UOO,a6á?l#MX_"`1I
Z 3%ֱgV4i-3eZn+f8Sjd 1V
'k:7ohn"Vr }Z. LHo'v %G.o3w-cdŔF'w}g +<' job.w׆]sˎWGʲb~##N$RSN#}\0zw1U52 X=~A{ QƂs3Jd&[x0R{1[?ϡ"k{1i9 (ëѰJȂr \vb8Kc( (S3:[EcR bs?#uDL>Oo'[֫6 ssmcnlR 7v Nl8#PA%aZ.P%#"\Sd>4NHC+clLe96J4;99~"¦49^pFv"
f!Dߟd -vJ~b TnQAzm*Ao߮x~ `8:غJS&;,+BG
:nty_0-=?;;N H
= m ZZTlOνPD{r+
RM~ (d1 ۮl;9"f) VٰcQeXis\e.rg
82 a]M1f,%I8| ߃ Q/^D XdڀUd "BR 8uG
3@d ~/; U H)*_UsԪtF,`Aeee#-3-Zn8---1??
R!˖74z, 0Q et1%qYܳ`^̉̉#WgX%{Ú '
]8q |O[ }# {́rsw ́>`pa{^R.^ҥx-r>e!NF/H~WI1f667۴nV@;FOKv%Ƶڸў')K$_%o 1/Ày@{?
h ~+p[hb mW k{ȵFST'M$W_\&}~ ]MQ
Bm#ml6CeM%]}Ǘпӭ~XV2
} ="
A?7#?$H7N~#]zΎUϒ );rK;r2j < $Պv"fR]|9iGD(ͶJ&I,m].rD !+'TQ+
pnb} jO?^eۑ<
]oUnE.$nE
b-xzD˺NTuBoDni#Xn3MŘCyio#.O꼘J=Ƙ_@ŕ:r}Z⤃f9rvpntq9J
bW*u-t-p\R\ĵ8? ܇U!!}`x+ԥc)%DIjés~.\mOR Z<%ҸDEh*kN_#FGޮ:4v&CS\7IuGXɂ {,=+mZ~sQOy&L=mx)c5y -}kQ7 ɤהɝ"N_KdHP郍B-GF4'm-҆5Lӧt0:TƪF &6T˱*aÅQꕃy9
a
`e1lQPa:uB4#PSSb(z<秧0\ =١'{c/['wEo ]/ = kvv?#-ҝzbt'wg͞iv&D&75ܜFOj5?ca1X5zF:%SVJJZS攬DSmYi4+hN,mQ4-m@ _pZ7Y RuH&RTbʇ" '_I< 48 n@{ڼco2,#i ƴ
ek^7[;h[C5 jb
EkᓎA4M-㶡ƨ1n%p٭
LP}髦1 [
J$rPXH?fWsp3w6wI/fqe1ʲQsYݰf3>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30304.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30304.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:04 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 331.5 591.75 434.25 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 745.5 Tm
(Administrative Judge)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 693.75 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 669 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 591.75 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 567 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found in favor of the Applicant with respect to\
the Guideline J allegations. )Tj
41.629 0 Td
(Those favorable)Tj
-41.629 -1.125 Td
(findings are not at issue on appeal.)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
("The conditions that resulted in the behavior were largely beyond the pe\
rson's control \(e.g., loss of employment, a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(business downturn, unexpected medical)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.19 0 Td
(emergency, or a death, divorce or separation\)" \(Directive, Enclosure 2\
,)Tj
-16.19 -1.125 Td
(E2.A6.1.3.3\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
("The person has received or is receiving counseling for the problem and \
there are clear indications that the problem is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(being resolved or is under control")Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.127 0 Td
(\(Directive, Enclosure 2, E2.A6.1.3.4\).)Tj
-14.127 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
("The individual initiated a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors\
or otherwise resolve debts" \(Directive,)Tj
T*
(Enclosure 2, E2.A6.1.3.6\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30304.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30304.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:04 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Similarly, because the debts at issue had been incurred years earlier an\
d had still not been satisfied, it was not arbitrary)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(or capricious for the Judge to conclude)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.8 0 Td
(that Applicant had failed to demonstrate that there was insufficient evi\
dence for)Tj
-15.8 -1.125 Td
(him to conclude that there were clear indications that the problem was u\
nder)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.85 0 Td
(control. )Tj
3.333 0 Td
(Given the record evidence in this)Tj
-34.183 -1.125 Td
(case, the possibility that the Applicant might achieve resolution of his\
outstanding indebtedness at some future date)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
46.378 0 Td
(was)Tj
-46.378 -1.125 Td
(not a substitute for a worthy track record of remedial action.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Likewise, the Board has previously discussed what constitutes a "good-fa\
ith" effort to repay overdue creditors or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(otherwise resolve debts:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("In order to qualify for application of Financial Considerations Mitigat\
ing Condition 6, an applicant must present)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evidence showing either a good-faith effort to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.577 0 Td
(repay overdue creditors or some other good-faith action aimed at)Tj
-18.577 -1.125 Td
(resolving the applicant's debts. )Tj
12.539 0 Td
(The Directive does not define the term 'good-faith.' However,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.879 0 Td
(the Board has indicated)Tj
-37.418 -1.125 Td
(that the concept of good-faith 'requires a showing that a person acts in\
a way that shows reasonableness, prudence,)Tj
T*
(honesty, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adherence to duty or obligation.' )Tj
18.481 0 Td
(ISCR Case No. 99-0201 \(October 12, 1999\) at p. 4 \(discussing concept \
of)Tj
-18.481 -1.125 Td
(good-faith in connection with another provision of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.468 0 Td
(the Adjudicative Guidelines\). )Tj
12.052 0 Td
(Accordingly, an applicant must do)Tj
-32.52 -1.125 Td
(more than merely show that he or she relied on a legally available optio\
n \(such as bankruptcy\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.96 0 Td
(in order to claim the)Tj
-37.96 -1.125 Td
(benefit of Financial Considerations Mitigating Condition 6. [Footnote 12\
]" ISCR Case No. 99-9020 \(June 4, 2001\) at)Tj
T*
(pp. 5-6.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Given the Applicant's history of financial problems, the sizable nature \
of his indebtedness, and the fact that he had)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(submitted neither documentation of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.497 0 Td
(repayment efforts nor a definitive plan to address his child support obl\
igations)Tj
-14.497 -1.125 Td
(absent the reinstatement of his visitation rights, it was not arbitrary \
or capricious)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.437 0 Td
(for the Judge to decide that the)Tj
-32.437 -1.125 Td
(evidence was insufficient for him to conclude that Applicant's efforts t\
o repay or otherwise resolve his debts had been)Tj
T*
(made in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.443 0 Td
("good-faith.")Tj
-3.443 -2.125 Td
(Finally, the favorable record evidence cited by Applicant is not suffici\
ent to demonstrate the Judge's decision is)Tj
T*
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(As the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(trier of fact, the Judge had to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide\
)Tj
-16.188 -1.125 Td
(whether the favorable evidence outweighed the unfavorable evidence or )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
29.07 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(Applicant's disagreement with the)Tj
-33.095 -1.125 Td
(Judge's weighing of the record evidence is not sufficient to demonstrate\
the Judge weighed the evidence in a manner)Tj
T*
(that is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.667 0 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(There is sufficient record evidence to support the Judge's conclusions.)Tj
-18.854 -2.125 Td
(The Judge made findings of fact and reached conclusions about Applicant'\
s history of financial difficulties that reflect a)Tj
T*
(plausible, legally permissible)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.942 0 Td
(interpretation of the record evidence. )Tj
15.048 0 Td
(Given the Judge's findings and conclusions, he had a)Tj
-26.99 -1.125 Td
(rational basis to conclude Applicant's overall history of financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.089 0 Td
(difficulties raised security concerns under Guideline F,)Tj
-26.089 -1.125 Td
(and to conclude that Applicant had failed to present sufficient evidence\
to overcome those security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.736 0 Td
(concerns.)Tj
-39.736 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's decision is erroneous because it is c\
ontrary to other Hearing Office decisions)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 277.5 cm
0 0 m
543.662 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 571.6621 278.25 Tm
(.)Tj
-46.305 -1.125 Td
(Applicant challenges the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.384 0 Td
(Judge's decision based in part on the argument that it is contrary to fo\
ur)Tj
-16.384 -1.125 Td
(Hearing Office decisions. )Tj
10.496 0 Td
(A decision as to whether or not to grant an applicant access)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.992 0 Td
(to classified information must be)Tj
-34.488 -1.125 Td
(adjudicated in light of the particular facts and circumstances of that a\
pplicant's case. )Tj
33.889 0 Td
(As counsel acknowledges in his)Tj
-33.889 -1.125 Td
(brief,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decisions by Hearing Office administrative judges are not legally bindin\
g precedent on other Hearing Office)Tj
T*
(judges or the Board. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.359 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-22606)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(June 30, 2003\) at pp.3-5. )Tj
(Accordingly, Applicant's ability to cite)Tj
-8.359 -1.125 Td
(Hearing Office decisions in other cases that appear to support his posit\
ion does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.381 0 Td
(demonstrate the Judge's decision in)Tj
-33.381 -1.125 Td
(this case is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
20.771 0 Td
(Furthermore, the Board has no obligation to follow the Hearing)Tj
-20.771 -1.125 Td
(Office)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decisions cited by Applicant, and no obligation to reconcile the Judge's\
decision below with the Hearing Office)Tj
T*
(decisions cited by Applicant.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate error below. )Tj
19.605 0 Td
(Therefore, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's adverse)Tj
-19.605 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 66 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 41.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
[44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R]
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30304.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30304.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:04 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(contrary to provisions of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
4.737 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 362.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 361.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 332.25 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by failing to give sufficient wei\
ght to applicable mitigating conditions)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 331.5 cm
0 0 m
531.861 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 559.8613 332.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(On)Tj
-45.322 -1.125 Td
(appeal, Applicant does not dispute the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.524 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact with respect to the Applicant's \
business,)Tj
-15.524 -1.125 Td
(personal, and financial history. )Tj
12.607 0 Td
(Further, Applicant does not dispute that his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.553 0 Td
(prior history of not meeting his financial)Tj
-30.161 -1.125 Td
(obligations constitutes conduct rising to the level of security concern.\
)Tj
28.021 0 Td
(Rather, Applicant contends the Judge should)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.135 0 Td
(have)Tj
-46.156 -1.125 Td
(concluded that the security concerns raised by his debts were mitigated \
by application of Financial Considerations)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Mitigating Conditions 3,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 134.3418 266.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 134.3418 265.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 148.1479 261.75 Tm
( 4,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 160.1479 266.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 160.1479 265.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 173.9541 261.75 Tm
( and 6.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 206.2803 266.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 206.2803 265.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 220.0864 261.75 Tm
( )Tj
(For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the Judge's decision.)Tj
-17.007 -2.125 Td
(The application of Adjudicative Guidelines disqualifying and mitigating \
conditions does not turn simply on a finding)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that one or more of them apply to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.135 0 Td
(particular facts of a case. )Tj
10.216 0 Td
(Rather, the application of a disqualifying or mitigating)Tj
-25.351 -1.125 Td
(condition requires the exercise of sound discretion in light of the reco\
rd)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.88 0 Td
(evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.524 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
-37.404 -1.125 Td
(01-14740 \(January 15, 2003\) at p. 7 \(discussing various consideration\
s that must be taken into account by an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.713 0 Td
(adjudicator)Tj
-43.713 -1.125 Td
(when )Tj
(applying Adjudicative Guidelines disqualifying or mitigating conditions\)\
. )Tj
32.134 0 Td
(Accordingly, even if Applicant's)Tj
-32.134 -1.125 Td
(financial difficulties initially)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.691 0 Td
(arose due to circumstances outside his control, the Judge reasonably cou\
ld consider)Tj
-11.691 -1.125 Td
(whether Applicant acted in a reasonable manner when dealing with those)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.517 0 Td
(financial difficulties. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.58 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
-41.429 -1.125 Td
(99-0462 \(May 25, 2000\) at p. 4 \("Even if an applicant gets into finan\
cial difficulties because of circumstances)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.228 0 Td
(beyond)Tj
-44.228 -1.125 Td
(the applicant's control, the Judge must consider whether the applicant d\
ealt with his or her financial difficulties in a)Tj
T*
(reasonable manner."\); ISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.71 0 Td
(No. 99-0012 \(December 1, 1999\) at p. 4 \("It was not arbitrary or capr\
icious for the)Tj
-13.71 -1.125 Td
(Judge to consider whether Applicant made timely, reasonable efforts to d\
eal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.712 0 Td
(with the financial setbacks that resulted)Tj
-30.712 -1.125 Td
(from conditions beyond his control."\). )Tj
15.545 0 Td
(In this case, it was not arbitrary or capricious for the Judge to it con\
sider)Tj
-15.545 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's failure to resolve the debts after the conditions which had \
contributed to them becoming delinquent had)Tj
T*
(passed and his financial situation had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.163 0 Td
(begun to stabilize.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
44 0 obj
<>/BS<