%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:16:10-04:00
2021-06-24T11:16:10-04:00
2021-06-24T11:16:10-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-30369.a1
uuid:1ca1a2ca-2263-4bcd-a6ac-7178bf8f4127
uuid:5bdeeb25-256e-4339-87b4-9fc6f8fc8798
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30369.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30369.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:10 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 27, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------)Tj
T*
(SSN:----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-30369)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-8.22 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn D. MacKinnon, Esq., Deputy Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.998 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.014 -2.2 Td
(August Bequai, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On February 2,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision-security conce\
rns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guidelines C \(Foreign Preference\), B \(Foreign Influence\), E \(\
Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.935 0 Td
(Conduct\) and J \(Criminal Conduct\))Tj
-30.935 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as am\
ended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
37.099 0 Td
(Applicant requested a)Tj
-37.099 -1.125 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(On February 27, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Joan Caton\
Anthony denied Applicant's request)Tj
-3.499 -1.125 Td
(for a security clearance. )Tj
9.799 0 Td
(Applicant timely)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.999 0 Td
(appealed pursuant to the Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.798 -2.125 Td
(Applicant contends that the Administrative Judge erred as follows: \(a\)\
some of the Judge's findings of fact were)Tj
T*
(insufficient or erroneous; \(b\) the Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.829 0 Td
(erroneously admitted or took administrative notice of some documents; an\
d \(c\))Tj
-15.829 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's conclusions about mitigation and the "whole person" concept \
were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.572 0 Td
(arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
-31.572 -1.125 Td
(After careful consideration of the issues, the Board affirms the Adminis\
trative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The Appeal Board's review of the Administrative Judge's finding of facts\
is limited to determining if they are supported)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(by substantial evidence--such relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.55 0 Td
(evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support such a\
)Tj
-15.55 -1.125 Td
(conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence in the record." Directi\
ve \266 E3.1.32.1.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.878 0 Td
("This is something less than the)Tj
-33.878 -1.125 Td
(weight of the evidence, and the possibility of drawing two inconsistent \
conclusions from the evidence does not prevent)Tj
T*
(an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(administrative agency's finding from being supported by substantial evid\
ence . . ." )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
34.302 0 Td
(Consolo v. Federal Maritime)Tj
-34.302 -1.125 Td
(Comm'n)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 383 U.S. 607, 620-21 \(1966\). )Tj
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board accepts a Judge's findings of fact that are supported by such rele\
vant)Tj
T*
(evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conc\
lusion in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.266 0 Td
(light of all contrary evidence in the)Tj
-33.266 -1.125 Td
(same record, and we are required to give deference to the Administrative\
Judge's credibility determinations. )Tj
43.359 0 Td
(Directive \266)Tj
-43.359 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.32.1.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant contends that the Administrative Judge erred by not making the\
following favorable findings of fact for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant with respect to Guidelines B and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.524 0 Td
(C: \(1\) that Applicant did not have any financial interests or business\
ties in)Tj
-17.524 -1.125 Td
(the Palestinian West Bank; \(2\) that Applicant properly reported his fo\
reign travels)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.102 0 Td
(and business dealings; \(3\) that U.S.)Tj
-33.102 -1.125 Td
(government agencies were fully aware of Applicant's classified work perf\
ormed overseas; \(4\) that Applicant never)Tj
T*
(participated in foreign elections or politics; and \(5\) that Applicant \
had no contact with foreign groups or agents. )Tj
44.904 0 Td
(There is)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
(tf_09}w)
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CqZL $-{(!oOi[jV|Yob75VGbԟSn.fµ]3s,7r>*iLwl^gKj5u>VkoGµDO\f~7^nL~zN3MiMu}cuWsJ&SkNvTo q
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H| TnC*)=3-,טDyɋ1&
JMTqA\qqAAqCܝqpw<1wAwI9u߹/@ h @uNUr[HXLhl `-lBFz`22vx %Xu=)unt!'*"4%3GzQ|}3ypE >1a<