vs3^a4s| "OOkS33#.<gq|\
."Κۊrv ]Z5Ý$ko_ƿ /٧iωE4H.HWU|
s溗\.r[Q̳9.}۰fCapS cǐaM.*4ɞ$0[|[L wytwiEf,á;IDz҈ GL\ \sۋIM]U_S* ֎BOOss $UU˙$Nc1qȉǝY&w5wKy /x< /óv>4Lm|``
Ľ|\ LW)bAY{WN@Z8Kʏ)[fum'P UEmm68JåmO
{S^;mŗPyOg3'~6* *E 0pc>$ѤKnMx uUjbGQA05ӗ:88 VfrMIkKk=Z|UEF_m[<؝\j-xmL[mQڋ[6譙(vɵ%ah6|?6iأK#cXܠo6ހ=gcCgu)8b6oGɑ+7b5, YhUG2z=kzbcbF{$HH2l1R&oVXyRENH42FJkM 均Q#{I
4XBHjV[LXnоi 翟dKE[cbJM;UKO' z<n 'ZJE84o`U^k
Gnu>b^WKGuL]H0K&&B-pփ<:Y_nGh{$} EϳWXD=]:~@g3zE@b;Wz-u}]c2
3
3-.Q6v
A, BTCXjB̢,#XYf;hVڌŌc 9eLW`T0}(%jh-A
b !a9rrȀkn[JW&%Oi O` 4gռByA
U0ª5Z|`8~/Nl/>;+V KYЊ'"*fM0T(:N[et]ۅe"F5IeM *u^He}~ &l~e&q]< L.P80&B
G M6 x{^nm9Ix)٩̵Ǔ.m%(_#:V{5N)A栣=ad{*
FZAKU6&ʁ5m#ZUD&͟9a^59s`1=t0w ͘膍_]ܷl .̖-*:W%dK3 _\OyrIyj ݨ{P!2NK,$F@Enf +PMnȧ8`M{=ռT lsFC=6 M,d
xx]I,+LEG&N> {iz45ӯˋrQ{~k/66Ƣ-e,zC/c{ 4s(Un
0;avYQľJ֠ sR7ZaѺ9 %5RCk\XK Z.Җd
Bc (NK#M.F=%&R:'rH(1,!j-q#bSZZ
&J8YdXFPvΠLY6jd6j`X4@,kk| E8ٵ =z``r[~u؞x;m [v'j;_݈ #={M-V,+sr 88(e5z qX\>=ɖrnuDesffV`h0< =0l vu#( "8c"T*_ q%υr\tAaAq}izEJ*qej CpQn_[_XӶ.}!nSjC3H~08Jn$;21q5<
` h)ۋGZ98CA?IZ FјvX[T"DoT#P
$A-Yeႈ놋s!C$!|̄Msb|pȌ92-%XJ|3g )ܮN>U!2Ԧ A9?MJ2 @ "ب;nl= }ξ\mk-%i ]$Ht<em !IjV H2mUUc4~߅6 ߺ}f%-WR `{B)BzFJ RXOEhg|5HB
=o]gpm _SQ/~(~2 tS3Fu*,6a eX
*/q57EA֟c{)pU]";Υfb:G%
י XE䙆s`lhg7z|W@if]WSFsF^դO%P_[ayp`xv %-9?q>4ܜQ g~S,4'nFG/}&:6sֹЎÅps͒O&ʤ5Ws){a~Cy
)hp+ױ`-c׳fREѰMFޠh,DrT I!hv
ߓͭ J $.87nRN $ հ,à^GJ_9+V/y)8كڔ- 6'Aԋ
52 P֕<Լq˓Lز,&lhYc^Y m'S:ow`BLo!l}><L/jY4l/K` vxui?xT!GTwTZ(#lت 7vMl AI^~UԬ _~4g߆K <[d\`,JVt^|} +~v p@zw0 VG*].+[ڛޭevjDƽ9h t^v7cwc)n ӧәI{Lrί]ܪa{3 ꨶUJ; l@߫zlzP]kq}4 "f5S] 2Su -45VV8 F6[ m|&|0=q "cl%ՒB)VTMPmMocr!AhVj:`!(ffǎ9 3Dž,yA ~ط\Xs~E4ԉ'T w{
vmx{ӂz!-\rD/P ts4d?o& ʳ 3<5y 2@
n>:17c T8c54 8IIhe` x'M&IJ7*"p@ b4#Xy[o~2b{(bYF
7\< S)D- P]M\ww|sr$%ug'$NB}[B
ЬZKhhV0h6SM@U!8`DeU LeE ɾ{}}YL:H2|5GgG<4%*<6RT < %.'ߏ{Z &W- $915KH0Dª43V I)Ό3E-2 9`Oaʜ;jj 6-5M-=}H'5']n͐#m k 2Wf/iUJ{s_J"Tr2a4Vޡ^ИvT#ڑ)5@ xGt໕,+uvNYN&? GԂL42fќ4Y\4IĦB' XL7+6 BQ`/
x߲8V_:kUHYpJ%@p]jƪij1ʎV`1&}C{z{ /:j 7Bz))#އӇC~.CSII)>\S ?C ^~0p *
QDT #\;i6$5]J{Q7KതtO+mkVVLFwF, όr<@4Vv8Kcq (;1VFj&J &1kC=JtwhՄ:֝Xq{P]ݴik!Ֆu{h?̘7ߧxq`|W Iݽ[O0ydzJIW*~pnYVq礓-i ԝq:o:'Ǖ3gz 4,-T7-d\GS;ZtF":qsCM$ pd
7I^ ^ QС=v B$ Ke4Ճ,TJ$Pj(ʿd 3rQbv =;tͷw$O?sT#t== bwBKxO8 抨hoo7ڈoo8|Iפ.>O./_;|Xfu:ЋŰ+H#| 3AbưAqM)cָip nO7ici )xL䘂B94&EHPf2܌le,[": -CWMB~[%[/ yzhR bA]
Ú~P(Ooo/B
#.!E5"1I
ًJUV1-f+uua0,+/;|c*!Z]pb HRIdgCU,g>Ƹt]?oW:$o0m\H,x8[ vHˁQ)|/EbatThS~-nIB/ u;ws۱ii6J
a
xnR$*Vu"e(R"ۺvcOkiamLlm4SR{u}{w|zC'6s`B?0P Gu
זnׇp̩T \xM Se . a\lq Q̴0\L2Y]L&) ( ˀ IQNlOO.Cj{%7yVxqLȜT3Ld81 i y[M 痜/ 5ʐjf%Yb 6\;:>1+kZyr(y7o`n E]QR۵h
RQEۢG7 Gi3o50׳ o-j gu @.SU" kL
҆xd [ّbPk [La A3bKWߙ*㞇
L
t߱Mkܻ7?7 v%밖`Jر?347RzOy }?~25{W~O=@ 09OH&0fÊ p8`Cӂi+"*}LGЏ;W(\yFbpC?xr @fzO t
@IԾ(я
Ub9#2 q¼OXF>_4EX-]-ŤM|Q<$~(].'gsҰP}90}WyG
M;Y9;9)J'\1cͻ[rA1 z 3KeȒa<$Nr/G# q?? zՇɰ4
AOR 4Db}n@~&++ΊtNsIK#D1jMæ|KiЩz>d 2f 00В@嵗kN=OALO/`c!s>߄Ҵe)#W%[HsMIN+&_)[*үHQKWЙȰJgsM3Aһ:FX2(*qRq ' 0 OԦ
h;D9nl/Klev:_Dy,'5Cd>XkjZYɬf+rPb c/
B\*/F å60P#{x7~*6R ;O w$ 5[zKGO j`?o&0-
o#Pg}8^@InP!f|)m
$VKJh pFu؊ "RRCH6
[3L#wwGI MdVO'oCCI.$) }x!B*dGGf##\Dkq_jID8U
uv*9Y]hºGS{<: [lP
P,7`CʨRUQ ."Ojz\sepyPttkr ª/F0~|fchk5VTB>HD3TpG4! hG$'u pMM6p6m}[+d,eZ& 5Z
j(uꍦ
nEh}?}Dܾ o Jožn|@ ~2Ch/JnqGi=n5--t`Ҕ08~; nߋg*yǂrRfi\gj=Zr& Adb:uM(unS^,Mı pAދc .U_
>yn09i%th_}6v&v10 Cb.
E)r~ Ud{H
^#3o݁3 x
!({QkG,>fl=R-O :r(\YP}Y8&p]n*jb)!$ ^P:A-٥S rs%eD7V=k ʝ g1
),s_\ -˚b:\OLNQ"{ '>5t̞<}}X7 es)wW dZP¸pGV1o6E-W13X4{I>*f!X!xd2% #7X{`qbp vYl@tt'x-3ať7Vp,FgOexK9&0s 0C 0 (,R $:K,Yg5
^cd~)h50znMftHd[(
>.sJ$E WtUMe7s2s`pK5E@Ң}hڇAfmmr{#?k%m9͑EM5i fu}[CC튨vۈ+g hJ EI2{Q IEڒ" 6`۴)qa.Ľ tbv1}> wM uv
Aj[ yP_ς5^ g xBS655F qzKcوYh##O8~7C9Nӻm ކ+ p2!I\=8{,m \81,߭j'k[ b^Zx*l2pg6?&{Pmח:yƻ]HhA}uz*0u;m PqG}h7XʚtbЂ9_n(SQȔBE,+UY _;PoXnp05I 6%X ̸M3Jxf##~ c-ÉDqєa =m& (&[v poҼbx3=;l6amGůx>
O
vg[ K DK x 0~-KkiT;&x)mބn;>{ Q̺
TN
}ݮekDdnSFb1/N _;m Uf$sETb9E;;}- vV4"jd^[5)ZÅ'h+ A' 3Y< ,NJ{??cDмRK|ͿPY/(A-icbW
ĮH@T$GFZ HlՎ)W}W mj[_9%s,da1?"(-~c}/+Ov N ?
l3's tmX>f?lԜAt OaRrJJ/ KT1)OIam@eH,%YDN_=߀[rY;Jnz՜ +QeIib6m6݄: Xb5VkbA-ܼD-BeGyA,|EM Iht!Om4MKG4KH!3Cd_.Evm۾8 2"ɤ$[mіi9cV%VKXN\1eC!) Cv0IV(,v(v(.M`Kh96A$ $}!CϦٓq-F@L$>φJ,LK$?Jޅ=qy]22CX;@J#2 11z8ӓT&YTʏ*⡌K
73wB( *hme,iqDf V6ƂyQSt=T^+J?L(j_C?qqrLK5VRI(ŝnn1\dEqe wH. ݾ_ek G G_X )&
{ {9E]| >5؟˗օ/-a J &UYvK8 8ބV15/њ__]vx*ӭ@ +@wJx,epwR2lno-wv< Òj Y 3^ i./~-{_ %YlAUX(C7 m}|0hYbq_)Ef1sܻv4l;#_ 9͡F=F
d=PX/Lb6Ԇ0
6}}(5`|r +2 ScqҖ 4xLc N N>FSFi 1.Fa(UG`3%K gw]0ꋳxgŹey油an[0PNF:=ʜL8L%) {pB(w~ve6&o<1 _xB:bL$+I{Dn Jr٫H6hGB'M|Lr¹| 3k &5ߢ RW/[<
~@
bbx#8jlиP\ъ㯵Z/ Ɨ^Ƕ\U^«Tl8
?TW ƅšUE\5F¼JkXeJ' kXSq%?u,#Y>y
ejt< S3v:f%16J S! A :]>=c!
tj~L,*Ϊ4 Q+H (P[ڠ5Z (,,<4d(0Ar6j YN<@|^GXZ9agI8Jp|v;H&dvxVw#p
|mp0ט%[N& :
:r2ӣQ'cv[)wr
'|o7V2Sm{5gB9|1cS\Qp0$5+儩Q{lMk.s= rmVwbیjemZ{-
m-!7fKHt 1TK`<Կ,l Ꮯ:}۔ `s=U(P8 600ha }C^`İʪtr4BMw/UMe,ЕTpJLUW(~
?ѸKL?5Ae OgY
K\a o,}ukP-GL%8_ucJF̹g$+Kt;xAQז:Ǯ^Ymz.~YSjt^_) A
7 ?Ld^sD
IriۑIdRTD6lfF_ y849M i% Bxd"*8ELRz2=kH: paRjJ$* c= TGGj;\(5Nl}͖)ˤ/2ildP!caBF!MizPlu"qg9\#FMQv
wvCG# +lv@Z6
h^tq2QDNN&sdr3v.i4li[f;2MMwrP{CLڞ:Ά9Ύ C ,` i(ccZm_ ('pp,0Y(_aS@ߞ4ELue*J@ uISl:jݏ =>5f?Zdr7 f`+jC7XѲ}eö ΰW_~/n!6OO(2EH ރԄx@lSrJ UΩ FvŰ1HÂ昬c=N B/LqCA
4 ]mw |gg 9ĉuA4ЄUI[P*ڌ$:hbЍ)`K[ґe#nʋi/PYhI~9 sb%kG:&_ #:mbO9.t :a5Ak 1
+ lDcbBwxit o!z>LǂԳnW67
_T**{O7IsR{y,5Cnॶ{හBPya>r[XnDbOhK2)7HQ{2 {AG
6;ali'8EoO{ 8(n+*JxIt꓄0~65L4{Ӎlb @paMF30R@jD }O:v}왇 jsO~U{Go]O}AzX463]`8 &t*SݯmIZF;u Y-TiQޅRԒ;ְss@@/d6 =3#D/p.u\UQO Pɸl0 eǗqC%֒ᙐ,SX mw#7Q5OGFcd-;]9bCkлT윭.ʵ UJRR=&^w
d{ʓjMv `Stuݢ
c
1V6bighjaiü;VűK%--ksk,KT1bG0hXǒlHI3ícϏ3]z*/ qUNvM;5КOPG{ ~qۼ8`QM&Qݶ>*o l|_6"
47&鸍}%eGoJ
Ab"y.&&Gag34~x& l#UxRf2beΜ C6Hd1,fV*
5UAfj5<}nUZcjO+֗]oxA?9 +c#٧1e\ z_R^U_4{|#[{0fVoޝܝ90n&'QY eTƈGdQq%mœ22|$Bh1:!TCBN|ZM%wE% ԝ pӬ`A M̯XZ9NI:2* jDL5B{tVr|>5,bf<5,.e+&
MVQuV!qNj\ܰXn [9gx4ZcGyvwm&|dM&w t} (<{?3SWo -xHLo03B>iC&gbӖM\[vh
#0-pA$Pr0T&R)geYCAA,7gϣsq|kE23G2 Ϧ0x |NӲOssX#PSH ZY-4M:7 j%8wD5r RB ALEY4MG5NgKC ʼ
J~2VI _@+B,
a3K{wQz0\VPX6ds;ѽZߞ? Rs;o69GC\ I vũ= >(LD W`ySFfha$A2fy#F̻ i^yo41Z4 h
;#Ge*zXEjRWА2
h: wF`@ÙH+ h6sr}m'2Oo'F=gJ%U<"42Og[b>QMA7O&|Wkl W;y11zױqNJ*!A F2m"BD.D7Vh$ΦQ DDcU(
2QEXޱS+ݙ{s̈́OQʶ
]̞z4^~SAHemf6 S":&Ns"#юzElcΔ303+Ȣu:ؙY%ֺnok Ig:fpEd @9>a! g"bts\ : oL .-.6 iNR?6;J؋{|(= |q4CA:Mti
/bsƜ9q _DӘ^`PT+Ϟ/XKw:L9-5y JqnHJ+;-%Aw 4ZB4[KB-d)7E.#a0^ེ}0&F8)i0M
#^ mv˓ۂJ[ f6(2O$bG\F ]>K p=B~nϧ Փcm'ؑ;ɒb^^xB_y Ӽ>OcuL$!F4|;}S&]Rr/UeMiC1U2T ESO0
lIG}md( ^tnn2ʇa>e oe"6:VQ< (v"Gٮ @_pd |R¬0UbTf-^n{X
.rr y
v 4AӵԼ<߈݈{zBg
t(t(<[hL<p5_DLl` M@ {g曔F% h\I]L)
!ϟ VѬ(UR/mj@=MS5bXUҁ겓uW0)K j1SD'n B 6+ &چ|DȶY5)n`u
iv("/_3 #ݻCI. ȗ}'
8NؗG0] n_ܩcVB
zɬ4+u2DCIy&0OHc$IQNFdSJ%"voi`ȶZI0IPk2!c28gp + xY{ScKɑ}hx0w{rfُ?7w
(=?{xG `Y,w qdh4%
bs~Tϙ,;!8x[Y T ,R?hL^?|?}Vgj
Uzp-[JVt\~Tq>j `s1mLo`s?3^0^b]//W~Ab\7{h#!o
Xtx1,Xa5f))[o?Fa~XswQiE*eZiJ4dw%-M8>qiY }>|.hm7#M~3Os&TT^d,?'Ȥ,0ϭHl
VqR"X6 ^i, DuƥZ+FW{GV3ZdzQ$'p>ɺ3FEw $-n큣=Lo*"E4:
o5(rB䲠Z!ye-KАqXI0K2y֚An%R혧aTjPNޑI/vnzQq8I][/ȃ̹\ '
ONƿ"q,y^__*1-yr.q-
QU* WކF偹wJ% "=8;H%<
dP:C9doR߶:Ukrl&DyI)c8'kոcIsD7U~7nRGwǶqq{{α}wvVr9[r+mtZ::VPHv"JlI5P$`0O'XmB_&:SJ D#!9'[
~ܝ~[λHWm>]O*J:öגZAs1tF>u0?vf'=M 1Ff
ORgs.9Y]/U 㺝Lw/q*sFY ]2GSY<#RNfmʖiGqKJ*c
j>2,M#b>r@)o2Cr':/upg3m
-L9JLO"Tp$$Vjb/!Jґ6 +%G%!E;![1q>lUjyZUJR uP!N:y(뀧MA_UUc
4#a }l|ھ j ta'
)SUsn=ӛU{w^;+=H 4w7֠U_Jp#^LAUL 0JJW Y(Ntx+f{fC6]!oV8x5 Wfmቺnv5qS ҚS R;Ʈ;O٧?L&8^fNyAK,B!b`TD}tؿAO!r#_)UeO Rv2R-!Ξ4e)ӫ + lFѪjgc%5Ʊ`rBMTI}67s9STv*MSZW* ZM
t}T*AX} J]UC%M}*S#P-pܧDŽ>ԗ5)dA@$"v1CXL|DϞ^BA\s O&HW:U5[QTYߢ j ^ԶZW5 ^-kvѲhlIސmM&:J:H;%6^j=*`{CcX5C1H"@`av?VȂqj 2 إ#eR&21
fMDW
5pȰ0=MC ߶rApԌ@!(2 =pǛqeHaN$ׁ<p' yq0< GVpNo+Nbu0r{N:@1l/9+B:e%ďF=p,Zoz?"\HlB#)'H#y)&IcŤhV&N@A"
3 ڵc& GJwW~Iro:|x4 7 =Ӿtr/$9Q|+<~ޑAȺ`{pLm hGБg ̉^W$]Ҥ[KZnçYZwRE%#"|AwRݹoH%[s=y,gߤI)W8 : Y/toՎ=]z 4uYsV$qp>YC %sgǟJ .`O'cS)Y 9PDU(bC
5% #pB<b%qϳ
6fEt[sBU
*Y Wx eohr{`TnҺ!d93
ThR($pp#K;;PW zh{Tsdu갈, vnH2#i V:Y`qIXcǐ/Gy sݹMZZX <Ҽ DGk"nPjȜ~O :ڞ}Q*Xk'2i@ 9j 3[
鹴 P w BJxcO{a
hLz SwIov>ңۏ}gqU|%&$)@hK!`L M @- RkdFc)5LӇ Ƒ:V eje@@
J ML[: :t$o7
;s{s9+jY$+Vey.}a 띇%![b>
0a! \kM$9{@2: 3);oQ\u7Γ1GWc3nWǼFyJWAVI!3 \٢:#g/R=fPțiMy
3偔7)9OGzs[:#X,Ć6S̗ c7EϠZ
+I
IUV؛S QGd;24 g{z 1OTW=K5Ru2e a 7̯qɥ\`5{}?&X&u~/20 { Fld( [Ɔʫ:ܨHd=( '[
`0L}y:u1~zܯ6a {26ި%erY09ztm-P?:w;զRd[lmV,TWiWo(ZdlrCitw">z? A
{ p/&IwLw&ʭ~ 9O:ߓcj-RY}""7(ؗY FY#nO۬T%֒Srdmc#MkCI I+mHk= _ iөOU2i%h_ړκMX2+&dvO-d 6o2=e|[WY%GDlc#sI3e^o|P)"0sٳ!%j 1}/Y~Y;/P29n5ߚ0~|}0s&VH K1 3 bs}l3?%yWTh?i,> ZrĨBe-췡LM6?g&p˭&>OFx2NqMϰΝy;|nڧ /e2V`{;$hLofK\oO?h&u
k+r~)ًod}Hڛ rdH}q%`^+kl_YÜ7;d|n!?89\܍,TM KuN2brE_d،;
0v=ktMSuA?yq `ބDRvεdl^g <-Bmj)Ry \Le#YWA>=#ik
jؗTak vߧD;I+s1$'~`^QӇ3!e ./zrIv҆ȍGu@},p?s=r~؊GۣVvTB;貇ǤRq2 Rӷ{Q/,&G٨:al)PQ蚫ssU?_ k/Ab!CW)> RLޘ'{)|?N(~KkNy.]Rj e@͝5u'3'Rk¸[c2aX s |iz5柇(g~cgn>v}SKFX{'f(XWzݗ /SGq>_(*K{sZ }G [|&WrܻsP=oA=I?qbV!l3 ~Z\]JW}
ڇ,5 ԿA=i5cfQQe H,k%Cu-Ue80u?4FYn ȵV8=JWyS hEBgTW cGz6~lb[~۶ ÕQ6 l;>8-j]Q̯옦o<r< gouͳvmѼ3`oڟx/Fo[; i8IgO@suɼoy+FcK"g|b2|`bRVz?=_{Ce"yi.ϥ D|&?
9;Ըkl5~ZFTmW/'Wo#Aə R*s7oD;K Spy C I~.)0wr b7 1L} {߇)a>Ù)}WJ I~|\*sj,)? ; wо1&<C5lتވ@`JYl蚓4y+kb )T'] lG1M.pꨤs
Iz6XD?
2;= MI3bOc:7h
cs:pziR Y e'_Ѿ'v܈?#»4[z>>¶zlRvkÜ,= ^,}q#=ktj;X9h;czW$mv_#
lY}Km]wKNgIރ-d,iAc lSꞌ
6 Yb>E(')lvX} 8>;BJ]cCKKhiUnט{ҟX"c=aZю =b Hj#K|~}E}wOsφ;&"y ;ph"ax>678wY}:\fh4<=1F.MHכޡ(+ٍ^|[r*o,zo~rG^Iv|THNxE-Zگr2"}VicaCl2涃 5>?
s2m匏&@/0xIN)ߍG C0h Mw$ah@y>-XͅQ?c-u^_G፣].s.Nổ|
ESQ['V@:OyHSEYYC] X }"R"aNzȷ>ꗺ
a߹ jx.>5RgMzL[^ ɹnI|Ǟ̮(oɼBYs F)yRra]-k@[dw2(2?GJ5R&Y?dwS0,y?e|(rL:ՙg- SYq"qQJNZ|_<2ūSG ;8/yjTLϕՁ+r:-LLˣ4)oËxC2NI}ާd(_t[Mp.T\ݹ^tנY&(ޗiGOӾ>V\q2Ơ.ʫd@zy-<s;:{+a/!>km繻w[dpt[Q1>Eժ/ˤTΉb?R}B ߾n|y?Y>՜EacD~F'ƷZc>5 IE+ 6+&fNN]m4 Jmh>o?Yk}=/*!&;`C28;YaL\~R{ xVX3^ k27Di5ANMf;U{,o@)9{V_o|Mm[.b5 r=&o S9 YT
5nNaOmP t_d2Tms<
:7<vO\z@#z3G#ߘyXϙcZF a-ռ{sğlWۖ =-L
ɕip&>aKB,Jd
0OsZ|.w]9~wySۤ]-d{y%DRC!,"B?_E
(8Vi T4ЁSF~ @uЎ2P:ԱiD:
2Zn?g}x4|={c0s4o,wT3wvZ:HIߓώcu. ˣR+eQ=
]֒'Z!edޕ]s <nLeWIuN
̯4?c>{!_}(AtfKwC ,0 ;Oc< ϯb']U6:}+}YPp(=C蛵]j:g
t>m~ar\##Oy;r6XJwWz#6R@56 .':El7rCy#yo{p0/U="&U<W+啠Ai ood &SCwz{s^ĽDOiΌ\dM̧kuf_h5+$+%~ 1 [eu59j!R^n)6[Hwb^o yອu;##6&7:g2ʃk%U٘[ꥳDJInu q)e6!Msy% MWFvH&u@fpM&Rc6{禀
)2,QQF<|N#9%͗;* ;8* }l:S%6A'dBu[ {R_˞H+ *
o'aVo nC*>OO+ɏWZ_JDjED v/%h@^9!砃d^/Z"{D oCc
@ zhӵa126]MMOهEsn#- :+n;X gEfI) C0F3Uv]8{v o[&QgYuf,? 23)6UfF
# X~p":R*e Y$[Mζ_S]4?miLf>f %۰UgzeSfƭ ֞3e/#W ߙ6lpL~+#:otUz>+B[c9$q(#ys}\g]cgul&Eg|PaM S!/cn"ɍMr;-ʎeKv?*0ӶΫoGVݥK,G3h۱B0IFk\!2YyY:[ƙ !g^^]>SKSyg_._/A7`[M2EgBۊ[MsQx]g]e[T(_9kE`
:x=zY|L
xǝ`-e,#8Q42AO!\>)w(_~ɘ(93$wd|> m|֞,zojzy%>bxGȣt~p䐻0Om \ATP'V}MRH7|#/I`_`LU_[LShcVq|n^A͕n?,};,Ascqn{ ~ zn^G m
Ά6\_ DCZ`̣jvB'7|%8|'7~ı2ؑʵf>Z!=hwyy
l"ͽ4 w[R_1= .GQBdm`D>"6T?ȤU)hכ Om|Eی>/l}I麗3ZG,{4bu$BOa㪪8~nc iw6i$
Aݶ m44c tnv_%}ZJ,PEmq8 3"ÈSKB38s9s^ O
! IGIûKGhA˵yyzeV_ww;I|Kٝ
J lQSa:m!g#3snv.+ Yd̟cѩY{q.hL[sL) &FQ{/-k)\``u8ĽLT55uu'ڐ#E&M&3ox薛1BcB8}n-.|Dw܃g>q@ҎSIO`<{ O$]Mw(x?8 # C |_i$Bc8e )
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BhDi
h $*zLTB?dr!=2i~ص-ci.מCٟy
wmosmJS tm] ex,ljSi#5j ɦ~JKV2) 6Q?GYY-dL(uk <-'~Ѯ6 F,3}=mf@5r QF.GQ#ڈQۄR"ڏ1fg$!!瑼xZpڂr'"+q L ј(uHO?r8c$V'!n-aQ + #ҟG_z CsE5XvX}\ڐ'Wrz^Q9JN,z|>8ol=oSvn[LDs ;U$oKt䲼Z}Vv3c
ju"v'DEjx[4ۣ 녷I詽'egDg2&#rltʳv&fAuVV.Hfk#-w6Zߞ賲;6/ja% L4nE3zG<;}1
nъx3wcI9[??
)?O*2_8wuxy%֙2
e(|`54)P45.o=:Vj:cpW~.'h-p\pΖ-q#nCBx>;Oo gP+_U ph 42iNB5ѳ^E cQ
=C8"%β3y\C6!
C` x i:"<8;q~ u+BcnZ_a#TeGˡc( =ꖿ-vBy î~GPny r cY+ 0X#Ft#Mؽ,){z: WX!qKưCX!Vn<
N r6A "g9Ȳ/+β>úg
r 1QbXj~vSe%2h|uaC+|Uli|"B+r-
/_U
} |l s*̟7B%>̆=EmZYֹWm\zj
X8iC@ ̶~K~$| E(yE^/^x RDZ^v3:"RDZDK-,/BN
4ddd ~#Ar
]x~ӱz7̙D]JfDvZWk`c8Z
QZZzPd}! a)QPIv&`^3H-OQ 6RIY,; -ƛ~9q_[ C_,!#R6I&43ݦ`aC{TCE
)W]~ʻK.69jNRiSN0 u | NA;Zho;2o(7 t zn>zՅFqE{gvgf3ѬQd!ƻƟjH
;ݬZ,BH*&Th$CqvֆM ZV|S_Z(m/鹳?B/{7s{6
_Hs~O<}~oB+H~z/ <gl'}q1n jƗ )IOg, 6(# 7ٌ b ~MHq=n_ %(M1˸6
gmL# 9feaCv1OU nӀdf M +dGk 1vȸB)7Iϑ#K\qŢ8*=b.FfqIjz^$I'!iSu塩!MB`:?9A rK t9{0FهnfWŕCNv+290sw Ne Mnc"0p[.9 Gn#hX$ָwî}*#=;"q{0\ w.yemw`hz;"7I/!fg-
)8А*Ha4O;*I(5]HpXb ۊZXVFQ lz`
ʪ
]er
矺Z+AGŎ㧜.*c, ȸ}p, MdwϜh戺hY1jE sgUFt9gY^&ir*s \JLlK\snX.Y9se c;.K($ְu'9<=-sMKdqi]\}}M\ܰꊜҴ\u៴HS(J%
tEhޖAwp8t͌`} 1m8BGԑ@|[~60@ԁ@X[l6A;Ԏ D%md6PH;=Ɣ1c05s (yeBRf G 1%#i æHk̈́C!> :Cf(
~ ~k'0 嫲+/+, oB0*t
2¸0)L Wд0-ry\ ;eSNA"b{+3*̰(XDY$$Y DOA9x?.ߎ6PnA @~ A_RaoOFNZ FJgO*`0r
kWu@/ .^S@
öLL"S,hbP5|#\(B o-e%p(? C
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30913.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30913.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:40 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 50.25 591.75 715.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Nothing in Executive Order 10865 or the Directive indicates or suggests \
that )Tj
30.937 0 Td
(an applicant must be granted a security)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(clearance unless that applicant's conduct and circumstances fall under o\
r implicates all thirteen Guidelines listed in the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Directive. )Tj
4.22 0 Td
(The mere fact that the SOR cited only Guideline J and Guideline E did no\
t preclude the Administrative Judge)Tj
-4.22 -1.125 Td
(from making an adverse security )Tj
13.356 0 Td
(clearance decision based on an evaluation of Applicant's conduct and cir\
cumstances)Tj
-13.356 -1.125 Td
(under those two Guidelines. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.47 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 01-12922 \(April 18, 2003\) at p. 3. The Judge was not r\
equired to)Tj
-11.47 -1.125 Td
(consider Applicant's conduct and circumstances in the areas addressed by\
the eleven other Guidelines listed in the)Tj
T*
(Directive before making his adverse security clearance decision. As the \
Board has noted, "Even if an applicant has not)Tj
T*
(engaged in other conduct that has more )Tj
15.967 0 Td
(serious negative security significance, the Judge still has the obligati\
on to)Tj
-15.967 -1.125 Td
(evaluate the security significance of the conduct applicant did engage i\
n." )Tj
29.73 0 Td
(ISCR Case )Tj
(No. 99-0254 \(February 16, 2000\))Tj
-29.73 -1.125 Td
(at p. 3.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Moreover, after reviewing the Judge's decision in this case, the Board c\
oncludes that the Administrative Judge)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(reasonably considered "whole person" factors )Tj
18.56 0 Td
(within the framework of the Adjudicative Guidelines referenced in the)Tj
-18.56 -1.125 Td
(SOR, such as the Applicant's age, the circumstances surrounding the cond\
uct, his )Tj
32.756 0 Td
(motivation, and the likelihood of)Tj
-32.756 -1.125 Td
(continuance or recurrence of the conduct. )Tj
16.853 0 Td
(Indeed, the Judge found in Applicant's favor with respect to many of the\
)Tj
-16.853 -1.125 Td
(allegations )Tj
4.582 0 Td
(contained in the SOR. )Tj
9.082 0 Td
(After considering the "whole person" factors along with the record evide\
nce in this)Tj
-13.664 -1.125 Td
(case, the Judge nevertheless concluded that the )Tj
19.048 0 Td
(favorable evidence presented in the case was insufficient to overcome)Tj
-19.048 -1.125 Td
(the security concerns raised by Applicant's conduct. )Tj
21.007 0 Td
(Considering the record as a whole, )Tj
14.135 0 Td
(the Judge's application of the)Tj
-35.142 -1.125 Td
(relevant Section 6.3 factors listed in the Directive and his weighing of\
the record evidence was not arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
T*
(or )Tj
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate error below. )Tj
19.604 0 Td
(Therefore, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's adverse)Tj
-19.604 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 409.5 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 384.75 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 307.5 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 282.75 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 205.5 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 180.75 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge made favorable findings with respect to SOR all\
egations 1.a, 1.b, 1.c, 1.d, 1.e, 1.f, 1.g, 1.h,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and 1.j. )Tj
(Those favorable findings are )Tj
14.939 0 Td
(not at issue in this appeal.)Tj
-14.939 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Directive, Section 6.3 and Enclosure 2, Items E2.2.1.1 through E2.2.1.9.\
)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
41 0 obj
[43 0 R]
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30913.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30913.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:40 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(1996\); )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(American Home Assurance Co. v. American President Lines, Ltd.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
29.135 0 Td
(, 44 F.3d 774, 779 \(9th Cir. 1994\);)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 741 Tm
(Metallurgical Industries, Inc. v. Fourtek, Inc.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
18.162 0 Td
(, 790 F.2d 1195, 1207 \(5th Cir. 1986\). )Tj
(To do otherwise would be to place)Tj
-18.162 -1.125 Td
(form over substance. )Tj
8.608 0 Td
(For the reasons )Tj
(that follow, the Board concludes the Judge's admission of Government Exh\
ibits 1,)Tj
-8.608 -1.125 Td
(8, and 9 is sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Government Exhibits 1, 8, and 9 were security clearance applications or \
questionnaires executed by the Applicant in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(2002, 1993 and 1995 respectively. )Tj
14.025 0 Td
(The )Tj
(documents were official records or evidence compiled or created in the r\
egular)Tj
-14.025 -1.125 Td
(course of business, which had been furnished by an investigating agency \
)Tj
29.326 0 Td
(pursuant to its responsibilities in connection)Tj
-29.326 -1.125 Td
(with assisting the Secretary of Defense to safeguard classified informat\
ion within industry under Executive Order)Tj
T*
(10865, and they were not DoD personnel background reports of investigati\
on. )Tj
31.465 0 Td
(Therefore, the Judge could properly)Tj
-31.465 -1.125 Td
(receive those exhibits into evidence without )Tj
17.828 0 Td
(an authenticating witness according to the plain language of Directive,)Tj
-17.828 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.20.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred in considering Government Exhibit\
s 8 and 9 in reaching his adverse)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 581.25 cm
0 0 m
521.52 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 568.5 Tm
(clearance decision.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 567.75 cm
0 0 m
91.277 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 107.2773 568.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant contends that it )Tj
10.803 0 Td
(was error for the Administrative Judge to consider the fact that Applica\
nt)Tj
-18.41 -1.125 Td
(had omitted his history of criminal conduct on his 1993 and 1995 securit\
y clearance )Tj
33.825 0 Td
(applications \(which were admitted)Tj
-33.825 -1.125 Td
(into evidence as Government Exhibits 8 and 9\) in reaching his adverse c\
learance decision with respect to the Guideline J)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and E \(Personal Conduct\) allegations. )Tj
23.495 0 Td
(In support of his contention, Applicant argues that the)Tj
-23.495 -1.125 Td
(Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) only alleged )Tj
16.941 0 Td
(Applicant had deliberately falsified his 2002 security clearance applica\
tion)Tj
-16.941 -1.125 Td
(\(Government Exhibit 1\) under those Guidelines--not Government Exhibits\
8 and 9. )Tj
33.549 0 Td
(Therefore, by considering the fact)Tj
-33.549 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant had omitted his history of criminal conduct in Government\
Exhibits 8 and 9, the Judge was improperly)Tj
T*
(basing )Tj
(his adverse clearance decision on disqualifying conduct not alleged in t\
he SOR. )Tj
34.991 0 Td
(Given the record in this case,)Tj
-34.991 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's contention lacks merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(As noted above, Government Exhibits 8 and 9 were provided to the Applica\
nt in advance of the hearing, and the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant was present at the hearing and had a )Tj
18.91 0 Td
(reasonable opportunity to dispute or explain any information contained)Tj
-18.91 -1.125 Td
(in those exhibits. )Tj
7.055 0 Td
(Therefore, Applicant was on reasonable notice that the documents and )Tj
28.406 0 Td
(the information they contained)Tj
-35.461 -1.125 Td
(could potentially be used against him insofar as they related to the all\
egations in the SOR. )Tj
36.242 0 Td
(During his hearing testimony,)Tj
-36.242 -1.125 Td
(Applicant asserted that he had been instructed by a company representati\
ve not to list various felony arrests at the time)Tj
T*
(Applicant completed a security clearance )Tj
16.742 0 Td
(application in 1993. )Tj
8.221 0 Td
(Applicant further testified that the manner in which he)Tj
-24.962 -1.125 Td
(answered questions about his police record on the 1995 and 2002 security\
clearance )Tj
33.794 0 Td
(applications derived directly from)Tj
-33.794 -1.125 Td
(the instruction he received in 1993. )Tj
14.357 0 Td
(Applicant also asserted at the hearing that he had been truthful and for\
thcoming in)Tj
-14.357 -1.125 Td
(disclosing his true record before being directly confronted by investiga\
tors. )Tj
30.353 0 Td
(Applicant argued that this was a matter in)Tj
-30.353 -1.125 Td
(mitigation. )Tj
4.611 0 Td
(Against this backdrop of )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Applicant's theory of the case regarding falsification, the Administrati\
ve Judge)Tj
-14.72 -1.125 Td
(could reasonably consider the fact that Applicant had omitted his histor\
y of )Tj
30.381 0 Td
(criminal conduct on his 1993 and 1995)Tj
-30.381 -1.125 Td
(security clearance applications for such relevant purposes as: \(1\) eva\
luating Applicant's overall credibility, \(2\) assessing)Tj
T*
(the level of Applicant's experience and familiarity with the security cl\
earance process and its forms, \(3\) determining)Tj
T*
(whether the omission of information from )Tj
17.052 0 Td
(Applicant's 2002 security clearance application was deliberate, or the r\
esult of)Tj
-17.052 -1.125 Td
(misunderstanding, oversight or mistake, and \(4\) evaluating the applica\
bility of )Tj
31.604 0 Td
(any Guideline J or E Mitigating Factors)Tj
-31.604 -1.125 Td
(to the case. )Tj
4.72 0 Td
(In this case, the Judge's sustainable finding that Applicant had deliber\
ately falsified his 2002 security)Tj
-4.72 -1.125 Td
(clearance application \(Government Exhibit 1\), as alleged in the SOR, w\
as alone sufficient to support his adverse)Tj
T*
(clearance decision under Guidelines J and E, )Tj
18.16 0 Td
(absent any adverse findings with respect to the omissions from the 1993)Tj
-18.16 -1.125 Td
(and 1995 documents. )Tj
8.776 0 Td
(After an overall reading of the Judge's decision, the Board )Tj
23.534 0 Td
(concludes that the Judge referenced)Tj
-32.31 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's answers to the 1993 and 1995 security clearance applications\
as part of his evaluation of the alleged 2002)Tj
T*
(falsification listed in the SOR, and did not use the falsifications on t\
he earlier applications as an independent basis for)Tj
T*
(his adverse security clearance )Tj
12.16 0 Td
(determination.)Tj
-12.16 -2.125 Td
(3. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred in his application of the "whole \
person" concept as set forth in the Directive.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 125.25 cm
0 0 m
562.623 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 114 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 16 113.25 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 27.3687 109.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant contends that the Judge's )Tj
14.622 0 Td
(decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law because the Judge \
erred by not)Tj
-15.569 -1.125 Td
(applying the "whole person" concept. )Tj
15.257 0 Td
(In support of that contention, )Tj
11.887 0 Td
(Applicant notes that his disqualifying conduct fell)Tj
-27.144 -1.125 Td
(under only two of thirteen Guidelines. )Tj
15.524 0 Td
(Applicant's contention in this regard lacks merit.)Tj
-15.524 -2.125 Td
(The SOR issued to Applicant cited Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\) and G\
uideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
42.104 0 Td
(It is legally)Tj
-42.104 -1.125 Td
(irrelevant that the SOR issued to )Tj
13.275 0 Td
(Applicant did not cite any of the eleven other Guidelines listed in the \
Directive.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[16.0 111.0 27.0 122.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
[46 0 R]
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30913.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30913.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:40 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
)Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
-43.935 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to provisions of )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance )Tj
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported )Tj
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In )Tj
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural )Tj
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence )Tj
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record )Tj
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a )Tj
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing )Tj
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items )Tj
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
4.737 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.1487 321.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 334.1487 321 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 291.75 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred in admitting Government Exhibits \
1, 8, and 9 into evidence.)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 291 cm
0 0 m
483.545 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 511.5449 291.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant)Tj
-41.295 -1.125 Td
(argues that it was error for the )Tj
12.301 0 Td
(Administrative Judge to admit Government Exhibits 1, 8, and 9 into evide\
nce over)Tj
-12.301 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's objection in the absence of an authenticating witness. )Tj
26.339 0 Td
(Applicant's contention in this regard lacks merit.)Tj
-26.339 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, Applicant asserts that the Administrative Judge's stated theo\
ry for the admission of Government Exhibits 1,)Tj
T*
(8, and 9, which were security clearance )Tj
16.02 0 Td
(applications executed by Applicant, was the public records exception to \
the)Tj
-16.02 -1.125 Td
(hearsay rule as outlined in Federal Rule of Evidence 803\(8\). )Tj
24.353 0 Td
(Applicant argues that )Tj
8.803 0 Td
(the provisions of this Rule preclude)Tj
-33.156 -1.125 Td
(the admission of Government Exhibits 1, 8, and 9 without an authenticati\
ng witness.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board need not address the merits of Applicant's argument regarding \
the public records exception to the hearsay)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(rule to decide this issue. )Tj
9.887 0 Td
(First, after )Tj
4.416 0 Td
(reading the hearing transcript, the Board is not convinced that the Admi\
nistrative)Tj
-14.302 -1.125 Td
(Judge relied exclusively on the public records exception as the basis fo\
r his )Tj
30.353 0 Td
(admission of the documents. )Tj
11.693 0 Td
(The Judge did)Tj
-42.045 -1.125 Td
(not make an unequivocal statement on the record as to the basis for his \
ruling. )Tj
31.436 0 Td
(The colloquy between the Judge )Tj
13.19 0 Td
(and)Tj
-44.626 -1.125 Td
(counsel for both sides on this issue contained references to the busines\
s records exception to the hearsay rule \(embodied)Tj
T*
(by Paragraph E3.1.20 of the )Tj
11.469 0 Td
(Directive's Additional Procedural Guidance and Federal Rule of Evidence \
803\(6\)\) as well)Tj
-11.469 -1.125 Td
(as the public records exception. )Tj
12.884 0 Td
(Second, even if the Board were to )Tj
13.829 0 Td
(conclude that the Judge did rely exclusively on the)Tj
-26.713 -1.125 Td
(public records exception, and then concluded that such reliance was in e\
rror, the fact that the Judge made an )Tj
43.511 0 Td
(erroneous)Tj
-43.511 -1.125 Td
(evidentiary ruling is not dispositive. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.665 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 96-0785 \(September 3, 1998\) at p. 3. )Tj
21.886 0 Td
(As a matter of)Tj
-39.883 -1.125 Td
(judicial economy, the Board can )Tj
13.218 0 Td
(affirm an evidentiary ruling by a Judge on any proper basis supported by\
the record,)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(even if that basis was not the one relied on by the Judge. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
22.828 0 Td
(See, e.g., LaBarre )Tj
(v. Sheppard)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 84 F.3d 496, 500 \(1st Cir.)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[334.0 319.0 348.0 330.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
51 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-30913.a1.html)
endobj
50 0 obj
<>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 114.0 null]
endobj
49 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 75.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 53
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000145471 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003731 00000 n
0000003758 00000 n
0000144859 00000 n
0000144943 00000 n
0000144985 00000 n
0000144669 00000 n
0000004394 00000 n
0000136432 00000 n
0000127752 00000 n
0000123017 00000 n
0000003861 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003956 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004605 00000 n
0000009667 00000 n
0000009716 00000 n
0000009751 00000 n
0000010255 00000 n
0000010678 00000 n
0000070580 00000 n
0000070847 00000 n
0000039111 00000 n
0000039384 00000 n
0000011101 00000 n
0000011377 00000 n
0000011818 00000 n
0000039823 00000 n
0000071454 00000 n
0000123228 00000 n
0000127966 00000 n
0000127991 00000 n
0000136110 00000 n
0000136657 00000 n
0000136682 00000 n
0000144345 00000 n
0000144754 00000 n
0000145388 00000 n
0000145430 00000 n
0000145193 00000 n
0000145027 00000 n
0000145335 00000 n
trailer
<<6446595C4811CD4FAAED780FB6A3E96B>]>>
startxref
145644
%%EOF