%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:16:22-04:00
2021-06-24T11:16:21-04:00
2021-06-24T11:16:22-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-30603.a1
uuid:5b1e2616-be98-4608-94a3-8c5a37835afd
uuid:9bc4e9e7-8f22-45a6-9cc5-d725daf924b8
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-30603.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-30603.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:16:21 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 25, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-30603)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated April)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(16, 2003 which stated the reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.719 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.719 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), Guideline\
E)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.772 0 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\), and)Tj
-35.216 -1.125 Td
(Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
13.192 0 Td
(Administrative Judge James A. Young issued an unfavorable security clear\
ance)Tj
-13.192 -1.125 Td
(decision dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.998 0 Td
(November 18, 2003.)Tj
-5.998 -2.125 Td
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether Applicant\
should be allowed another hearing to explain)Tj
T*
(his past conduct and current situation; and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.135 0 Td
(\(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision is arbitra\
ry,)Tj
-17.135 -1.125 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
12.246 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.995 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-11.556 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
({ّw\r6Կ4)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CIi9u{V'='Yl%ٲ94!y9]lipk6ۛ>3^%|^u*KH>9aճ/V[zwW}^CryR*QֿB6%?/S|.!lƌ'*S'BgT.n*3)Zf>
md2ĢY{LFZ45Zu\υs.{fɯ9>e?Ot"!-nu-cC'
£<^s5wwx ~@Q_ oG
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅
kL%1F)E#( v4IJvXPDTlˮUby%;>}{_ro9gs u iUDb? l
.p 8.?hI mL-@0:2, rx=h5WxvU -1pנ1 QlXB|kFF&sǕ ⤸QcmDmlGq:@F@3A QX"Ak|?ʆ(
@n-*vm>ت>Ž h5S.<8?>ÆS(9;&1QT:ժ]ǹG^
6jRKGҤi->m٪uwةs@٫w~ŗ?}À4hpHh =lؑF &S6-)yi3fgΙ;o/˖^ju7lMlݶ}]ݷ@CE=vSϔs/\t^3ˁ՝k'`2 f OS(fJ:C/Y$BB0[8*<^FJU6
SzK@i4I)K%Dz!Uk"45BMvv6M@N9tt
u.Lv +ڲ!{ɍeVcD9INg&y\ |OЇQQ-z0h
3[yhuzZ֮^֠jo[Vsf*~Tl!
9d**W̙B0SHeB
8UZ
Du%iR{!R[*.IץgK
h4LM6 m6WΡNC./8)g>p(p>pB}iRW[q`u8@kOkj6x}+Q=bf\I8:8v D+ 5 wRhioig|jiainijib[Wr9|]BBs9
־SimQ+sccm
0u4LLMM:S# F-cxgGk[=ݍ>FQkT,70h\/T.WjŎYN.5Z` B}!B}Ux?w^PloUSnP(?9ӁQW4iy_L{ʭ$HV