%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:18:44-04:00
2021-06-24T11:18:44-04:00
2021-06-24T11:18:44-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-31872.a1
uuid:d870bd71-9cb2-4a8a-ab22-77723b5ed42f
uuid:2b3056d6-57d6-41fd-bc10-e3a8da7c7026
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-31872.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-31872.a1.html)Tj
49.073 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:18:44 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: May 24, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-31872)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(November 7, 2003, which stated the reasons )Tj
17.968 0 Td
(why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classified)Tj
-17.968 -1.125 Td
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
26.718 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M.)Tj
-31.939 -1.125 Td
(Matchinski issued an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated Janu\
ary 5, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of )Tj
17.327 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-17.327 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by failing to give sufficient)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(weight to applicable mitigating )Tj
12.719 0 Td
(conditions, and \(2\) whether there is a basis for reopening the record \
to allow Applicant)Tj
-12.719 -1.125 Td
(an opportunity to provide additional evidence for the Administrative )Tj
27.632 0 Td
(Judge's consideration. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow,)Tj
-27.632 -1.125 Td
(the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
)Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(dzb=Bā)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CqY9e{V:='ۥlYGoΚ Ϫ 2_B8XVV
SipSp.Ύ39W<[Fo6_m_ m4epÄSخ7aQߋ!T\Q
`/dAy0syT߃gq||$?&&!1&Eq~y\G9E)"늨+NYWg:j"HުetSuڙF;h,ާf7` (+
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| TTW)Яu܂hpDd,E#*"hPFqEDETܗnV2blBmttI9ֽ{F _w\:?FĤm
C'Ʃ7yL 1#} <ȨY ^`Y >Cy=HиC0xxǻ ƅ`Р2?qZ6&|ؐf8@3nB u?f|xLn}nJڣ\Q&D(QP($v[ ~b3VH^XXY@ @O|p[pyWZL[QiנaM6sqmޢe+7h=dG۴mc;uջ[w=}{įO~|:Ͽ4ˀ7ÏÃC`DhXxQDE;~BO'O/SMOY$MN7?uAE,]<}JXzMfVu7s6nʥ[n۾c{+G+9~d驲gΖù.^|]7oTTkJ-4(Ԋ!-N4S2ͣ,:KX# t9B@8.<^vvԭ͢Zz&5$i4D&(MvI =^Ju0u:U.TWkkfjR4K59ZFDmmm!pwFY!7egUn%{.%'ȉr:wKRf2(*JRi-S
kN!D+
BpQnnu*P%2U%WI-
q=RtY!=^AS39i5i98p͵wa!=49SC)psCn4 zVvdv3wV;J45oDݨr%ald3SUW-2 Z`1u3u5y::::>67316LfPSbYEvE
@NKElE:VUxUxFƨ54:Pe0n[2
|v̰ްokc0h
V53B
ËF,ryͪٮ]angxVa 4\]_؞.,v`D&en=V;.*J=-y?Oiy{
Ta܇ِ
)
6:di&,jxa9$AKOa5l^B6lP[`BA)q8 gix pB9lE8 B̅0
@4DXȄq10&Oa d/Y0n9c؇p9* ft\+7٢U`&f6l\z܀z sq3n
p;.a2.܍{0b#l =:#܄[θ`Sl BUcwT9SLRU&+S4}KWQ{
L`](qDa;sw]Z<)F wwR7ܝ"8Ih^o\/7ȍr,ȭr.wȝr-Ƚr/ȃ<\yT yRQ$v.;W
s]"O[yyA^eyE^u
]Sҵu]WuP7ҍuT7ݬn6ՏRU5@
T`JVCP5L
W#H5JVcشڍWT
Ua*\MTdj-tKJmt[NRүuQwR;.[Q{>_P!uXQG1u\=m/Q')S"ix&x)^x'{AHxZJ#$IG%ȧ/KJO(#e̢$e"HlrPNE)|i(CDY*H0@(םu}GV)T2TQy@?&PRDD)Tt^zިJVQ}R)*U}f,Y1ǚ
c`3r&Y8+gO99