14xlAh"e$LS(h*M4fR6};;;;+Y9ͦ9ͥy4? : OW - xDg v8X_w6N] lwբbZi)-崂V*ZMkh-6D|B[i}I+ wN{E h7xrh tQ. #t(q*B*b*tNi*2:Ct*蜮kyH?y{fH?%LW.@ױJzmMW `1D\p9fr꺺:XPH:\GFQ:UN:RGhxMb@6VUmZmdf
[ִlm[ֵ|:F7ձ:N{x{κvks> !k#ͳ=n l-ŶĞ'){ږ2{Ɩ۳Zm= _OԘ½9 rr稓;D8!NS(e(gE8'⚸.nQ)nWDBOK
dC,C P&F73/!=fH'Yu_T1ORU0EƩj#eQ̕L2S2Y0Y3ihلTȦ2Vx ̋'@=T11QřLLQ"D(kUiLiM3̤ꆺɜdڄ3mU{o7am"UYjfYiVfYk֙fh6fjDB[> dG*d'05et$() 7Mj0E@u~P LP^??a0 X]0N )Z$:!A
v uHcEY=l31 R ܻ0pɻw`2Cg^3 ZjXAЀ P*{s+)CPq[Ra4L5o%~ Dx b VVb = Ŀ^ hO{7H; tЌm4lc\(B4A cG˹ L%MK u"X]T)PkΑ̐c/?
U I`6|ϕ;V1= c~ސm
Ϡ?qH*L7s#(c2D e"+#[ ^f÷8jG 5xcag1A
_Æ [rf7XQ~}K-p' !{e #3 C9܄kXޙLX(ʙ[*Ogg癲긿O ta `}`p /k܇%xg#/E/搬';r,{.yxy=n3w>|y u㓠-wH/kGk/ ^Z Qb8$01c1w*+WabŘ&>|*S$ZLV l;Uz Rl~wy? K[ư5 vC.R}9\+/}aw&sTXUq|3m[PW8װM[<~"x6qݝq}NG$bMB!_
$Np lH@٨V-ctT+V`]3I F56u
]7
mJ9 f[Ͽ>{ OBBt?=+:VX01>FaT îb/طMji?^~]n
'#-| g
>gxZσGC $9s;i)AlY,2 lTg*v ބK5}h L=/:'c{KXuv/cgk(qI)DSЦqgr~#]8F;Q%P _>#1WcH[v,L
N:`h@
:/w/d\g `o"H-%d;κm|px{j̠0,&vQn',Bw:ʽ^X_ZQ3UD;pTރ9flfA|
{pY> ϯv؊s A=ԓnQ4Aen;j~kQ(9}.y
YClK^Na`|%` ^& N'qM vWuxlX_ì=^k$;| aB-}&!eЏ5p.0ڠ=W
0cw@69x3ǁyN3w ϒHJvz@̤:{t>ʑ$KçZ.uB2ؓ_ v(s >jac8/a
p
uz9K
UmWP c ld=, W;;Fmv=dW+y2bp{[q@K [ha;Z9宲Rn]Rl,Y#oXxJT=)MM~
5RE$gʨbJgJP %CSDĘ,% :ku!,I8A9JRbL)T"rAT`!BCJkP0Rj rT@eܱ 5$)$Uêū@DF5DT^Fܪ߈r +@w;GڜPՋFUӷP\8;bsWT&s%mL&q
Kǭ7ݓLdn)j'N?_ (mZ >e[
]Sat,4 e1QiKȒ蒓]lP6:]Kgr`6cL S< 5yÔeB"jL[J $8KAlU ")Eh|s y㙔 -
d*Ԑ? ^:"|}:~@HDCA ڶ+P$!FD lMq] TM4qF&9v38ə1 =S?`/5?ؽy~F#!ƔԄmf`y~oRK" E' bt.)a
IRY7 zPdy#FN!b\RM1isR6wW=6/Po ¬6u(i/HQWRJW67- ᝦF鏥&=
wI6NID
&-[/;{ ylKj<55 ôKm+V!F>(!Vv-v*7nwa+?7sBeqIAڸ 2skR
H{ 5@y7\9eq;ݝ;t%%ݛ,,Y6 K:`
Mf6N☘Lb
Ri 3̄d(`Lnˇ&M)̤n:uf,wWSa<* o'|89>~<[e_a5le{@d%*$#Vs1w:<73xӺ &OZm!<RI`\m >f`q.
7b ;Z:T뀈VenRF,nvi(=)b dT : AהI`e
i ls{1\V;: MaѝL97麒 DHh.>\ݻݗxdhi^}pźX?:AMY*kk{T̝*S- \~< u%ג}P5L İMHUG+ spb0ڼgD|3 > ?Q3\S^1]|7$>ެg&njuwv;T % &ya#Hm<=: ڶk k_c쬟|] }2+vwpB3V|
8Sĸ_4&W|#exUGY-V0Kۦa@f0Pf x2)$E(EVLCM\%rm(>jluj];8ūS@&J[Gv_RDvO,Qi^ P WPP1PXɽQ;l 7a3 _g&d_n 1]KĜj?.t0$ͣ0q= n)+z>)rWJh} mJaBҮc1:kq~#OBf:rETt2ݟ>p}"|v}bٝQ@ljQ1Ra3^ $H`Y<,mLWM1g0b2Kt ejl )R),+,sr;hNp.#nln3ENoeHߦDSvz;өE㺁'6Xol7cil<ˉa=4Hcvߊ[u(
3 ;0ېr𧘭]k/9U-H3
y%+.D%ʠKi靜[ mZS⯶ [
z1v]'M߿㹅;Kԥ9m{שCW~t!߳osyİQBYYCR$B1IgI,g;k6ֶ7|8~t}>;mfgYM
HNYֻI!%$v30#ȌdƠp|ʊui;~]8cjmmdKu1mP`ZU&
kTi8`-4J">ٙ,Jl܀2QX@wl+짹/UYi yaY``JzvtZ|_8
Ӵ'l{+o[{c_q$мotkߡTr+[s"ˑ*{aVfkA'M5kvMU~5>,"#> 9GyO
+mkw%w욜''.(d%@|XOQre2c`<Pɠg,\SPהy ;Xn/vL͘&hmŸf _/2eȈSeۯTh´fQ
sTvlȪau)f-SeE]ϼa )"#Cv\|/6nl5*U8_o̿۲ {+×` ʷ~u[! <~veiz] )p3
b?b\|Wkl Wóϙ}qR !dq֠5f|V _u8Mo% ƺ^us'QZS8[PI- _ދ 5)
.C+DV߸|=hw xi>gעmֺe?d7;C ͐j
䳔* EʨM4SOVÃ]]$g, ˳q6
T˛FKY̮Q-,kj N9EaZ9(2VjW3 U \UOKZ!-Uc BdNROB$$uW2?E)Luve}J%r4
&? gDRp )eC\7#B]
3^}`8aքr0h]Nı3.gݹ4JXn ą;hc!mR|_2r}9߷GXkY8Y=پoUVLBu f8UVCt;/n7 Q#>MGw7pO/DoAd '?Dp$/,
ߦmr
@;\f|W_sB||- KWZ ~!{
Ak hk|C>`״\|,cƋ>>^ߵȖ}}[w9n nl47]\/nKwia9@4U5Pms Ow(5@5oJ\QIQq !Xwgj,8ϗ8/8 n0&a>f Δn]uj0z@6 ,5(7zg%Xd5!SF5K^L pZY]bԊ aOJ'6海͟[+L캥ǎ ?
qpͰ,gF/ ! Wӓߢ/Ag-Ұt:aL|Tڠl0v)7ZxC~ }r0@=
dmWg CJQ;ZaEBJZ|"Q,j/61_FLqjRd]EЖpf5E'{pD)&.$$uq͔[s
j𩥚}PWzGn64 V{'H4?Xu ='ۨlKe=9@~كgKYL[NMxmT8vbeCs+Ū:;O:Ifz!P=55eqݵ> ID 6elezGؑ3ЫncC^Wycmo[km T4 ӶX7;vZw8iG YsP-m+IU-"X&9}izn!y Om~"lxaӦ' ݵq
}sYes>=~Nh6j'L7 B/"uYٗV tH5`䮪F8P6< ʡ\( w{{ ((4Pr -xnL!Aح *r !0Y'\$,ġ<`Z0$M$I,ЈWtz6Jr>zj)f^`_gi]#()E$Z}MC"%DpfҰdH({2 g>h Oǘ%1v hXj%/"XL /f36
YtD|n@~pxm1U#χ_|ޮ)yɼ j%yp >ՠ25Jr9 * bip6
0~
">L|\0.i&c~nDirEv)gMHp7/'MQ#j:Unxg EM(O7D dM!!2 og Bgeg kc\tVvJ 3k^:y Y^gL?LɄ
݅/z673+nt ) S:˱V_Gx^?_i>[ҿW?BG>[Xρa q ٍ͆ bsbv'*{=3YY?.m1Eώ&s *&lĵCV O>& # ̖lL) eu+zS}GUT BL>ɵqB!N Ɨ
(*PFaC*LĢݵm~PL5F$M5
sydnY 4lG4x5?ٯ#LM e \,p| <BŵjiT7 Ʋ1{D| b5J7Pe
n-\x'Xdlݻ@5* GLz)2ޤ% y\㴔SStoɨS竊-̵ }G%{S[;UՄkCn=u [,*ZmӼ=ϭzz Q}lVsCOi8Am,kj$2QL:j"b@pti0u}>x)2|?DXDj݅w1enpDJP3_N 2&+D\ gS6R
?L;0~
w& R3 k(L=x[5Q4k||'<0 LȒ%,@INEK~l&(wC˲C6&m(sG.SZr]EF5ba5okWlǒ/yzױsZљnQg5"w$nwhOkuM&=f?cjTUt/ݧD{{\ ;,iKEsȃ3a\{ d8xr @^5ٌvNӤ3|IMQ &5/ؔ0y]kLj ox"!?DqiWr883HK "A?%n3qDC4 }(OG
L zŤ?mHu?ע. 1uɃ7Gb$ G_st?kK_{4PE 35cĖJrXXT!N.dkVW+ïTe'{݊! I%y'I'ab`\5ɿI-35
qfsy9|F2JQ9/ u;ΗϿrgwI69 ~B1dHA0eZUci6jkT6!4u&Dh&-I։GіMJnd S-}wy_W( ]
~!)lW/gGq@qhP}8Mtu lj 5DOtSQB>`GX`F>* RKШ펢wՊr4ue~ ȉ ?{LJ; \<3w`maSO6T>~TR'w4sǴɈZ#̤$KiN5uy}p%2YqSO
} F wC fHK86
Ox= ꌫW
QRݪR;) 0vk .h3U)Xiw5mh((q- jH+9'{Z`P
_A}1w]K
ҵw>x#k#lyqfLvHF32} HOw>;Hu 8fYIRxoxzuhGSs;?&=QzAXY 3YRVr߈J+.βwp$gzȵz0Ҧemad3Q $>xYt>Ox8^A'7p-z;Qg7V_QVXo tq]J_vbZxebXi7@^< $DV1~a^o]/{7IF;*T
6TzoK468d%0
e]fe<#TD_a]bW֎X4Q5wEEO l^2)VT:N=m2j(5&oQDH5ڢjLڧ myDt:@r;E6jBMKLrS4xc1O&ũx :}ߠs(&Jiѓa~kWACOzn|+o3o=3:=?jmQA{i SD\ DU"\kiMD"2
TDsԁ:p*)%-S U<_fKe\] +{rd, OH r^Z, RPg FHGRrô4-?fz 24: hP Zyjx,
Dg`tffhLq]okQ״U[}N%ھn5yƏ ir͟)skʯM("$p)
F{(q'IMݠ ~4 /?<YpHmqpr:BJ B+CUmv/uAih 2SCjw`ЧOY1rŏ %R-B̈QÊ|9_
:| k n ,P^#U:f -jXC7>,(M#T y+7-%1 F^ l,+
?R¹¦?9ȱq^M]g=^_q?⯘{+ '$ #]Sԑu#Dte-m!Zl6Q
BeڟTJ B"R(:K?9{9<{ ϼy/Z FGdۺ ٹHy< %>
jQ8IY[_]Yk~) ۯ;ƒk^{TʇvQ 6'i =i4&68NWJjʘʆJRaT6U*)VJegROUGq*&>- _|USIO1e+9i*R }")ɤԚܕNe= |0rUnU+釹-Zܲ;lV(eU=350N5Oqc
WnL֬tʯfԬh ~wC3>s}r~S'{Lо>D~n~ SݏR'$|J%%ܧnG ס1+WeaؕՇPeWPZ / ,P,^ u{ǣ 7J[jqDM+iV k `vU_6O=+[̴ ?鬐E vsL^i}tEIC T;y7ӑ5
/T^_&r}
a vMh߁ϒylKu:OVJ7%ڹ0(Tts a 8B~33/C-Vo8Xy?&M:S)oPOh}~R)ut#G|6}KW@;ɤF)@k5
vzff_mG͠ Pp(40Ҿ|64?yp(w^;}侒I7jn龝O5Ku+ͫB_ᑂST#dD&ddȩ9%0! 3P:2ҥS#n# 0m7tTuEvB^쌴ƥ~S" x|N F4< L{?죁J`IYi8rv v]2lҭ K K$!HNg&b( Qꭈ7{KeLd8ߖ [ZŇѧŢ(7s+&9^:ָ;g^OW7;R)9
FoE4Tg#tC5s{pD ğ#;ύӏj؍N
3iFriq||kԢqIPB9/hTK(뻕 @}x+%\_
B`9@?81y هi4i~ʁ(7+i}(ЖH7 >kgF=NB:|`7< r^U|
4ކ{snܓO n}2@Yy3.\/N/ŻSf5>&C#o.xNR)5w5D i x?3Xzhv0 Tƺ.Ae<_<ޢnВizЖS_KAc; :9 1Z/b?y($ ޓu_1Yl`mD29W@h ƺ 5hxyǸK, 62ڛ&COUT4Bu@Bx~ 6s E\z#냵x VYBͦ*1sq<*b 8G+fZeU}ީSK=> l-} x݊m 9q<9Nk8o3hk{=J/પ+{ιP^
2`WI0@P0@QREC >W)etZ"-RiQK,PZt٥iuPKG](peIq}B%y9r1_-бSJ) ӽXL_..JrM\OF_j)ls/
7w_RbtTF&2G~ӾAi,&fQ줽}Ow eu )Ü$p_a`WD a f1/l'ڮ&c_Ȱ"V!ֵ5OeZVyfJ#YuP[C4j6Kcjgg`_Nzu
˗Zyl^c?ۃK"wՀIq-ȷfs⋵r 3zQd` 8 CiL-oOz?>XVG`| ;ۣW ۊ{A?~*"x Y,vt-Ǒ є?Z(qVhb贸V{%Wf.ڛU}d^
'5F [Q=ኰ _tq"1XF*~Weoد?)TTTaˉ}rHZBoQ~Qǧ* u(+4oSu>kzq Xy)ASThLGua.ilNn jj'pw~jO <&*h
LZu&.rKE. }V8 :} P:d}PW2ȼG/}R h`w`5;ye16Ed
JG)06
.1nGy~e-ш4~M>|ㄒIZ:Zjc(ͻ:28mlZ".~F&av<[|t@ޓ1yX{ܓ|T<YyQ]dianmcrڧڿQ:1B =Q.Q4 ˛tC$oH ٰ.so ;7h]h00z-D(ޱ6Dqf} 2|6҇<%g"3eH2><;Vst C=-R':wZs4n>7!>3? ) Š
=9WD߹)<{olJ[=YLxղ)%`29֘9*xsS$㜓^-9};JJ{r dΉ Zorr@FLvT'z;'#Rx1ACP<^H=:PΛJmV;XMO◭`' ʏ
.lEU[mbr!Vd,..R|ĠMvg5ڇm6p]+9pe𫵊w yc^I ˣ\ad"Ybw\
guVx1yZ(M@g#я1M,ڃr;77
װ<
7`GS~װ"
Q;Oy--FGނ<{/A`(0Ƈ< 0G@:gkXx^kS/zl w ozs
};5y?JfWپJ7n}K)Tf(*sl&t=>{\dS(w9Gdr@Nj傔L"tMl8$9|w d:}L.9yȭ¶q!vm;۰O`ʻz=LiZtW |#[>v& ^Y7>Qa[ Hf f>8#ݰeߩɮ E y% _8ɮ2)1zqvJN+k-9K
↷`ڬ\)~Cn e\euA0!*D=
!Z)2Vlj u 2UZPtiV+Z߹ //!fsrv -r_3_6q;D)Mb hPo tqF Fke-;Wz%Y"Úw#9F;0T
kp>SD:*IMF}DG֒Æ>} ̸H?{̠Qk2yQF% f\$GzG{g oPA.e2oa,A0=Lo,}mzXF^ &.h6:yU=[4` spgV la駽jU 5z6MWi/_Sݞy봑퓩/k3t{=V&C
4ИlS5z4Vʼ';p*1Zp%qM' (ɷkw!x'!8E6"O1k_xJr}A*U%EyC"v!=:[OaO|uKdVq^mcc*ɍKSZ'7:hWsaݟ"{˾Ȝ^Ixk6-x.+.Gp*G:GF5P_g`" \? '5F;k6;waLtjϢw됂951}=#fZ*Qǥ1u;'S2s_㕱OY{OgtU_ۦO~YC[>cӽ(WK#ȥn;
?>woѶ8>uX"M;mF ̡(kJ
2J[C_(Vp 02 PMI-#}"+9wx%0ZTW-U/!A7ȇ+Hi"AAe;>HaEC,SkD$\l[Ze8q<ދ_k "%0,
U&줨F3:m4z-wP] xU3R(Kq"@\j3lH m~ȝs4oîR^nMb?FwI{ cxW8g$'1UzwHd^wS_7IFr+k; IߘNUMgt /ߦA眗Q^oi 3]ϝqEap
[eg9ro`}_E#E쳒qH
R&A~Niʬdmƞ)4v.x'M [Ƹvhл4.UO7˝A~, e\eu}{ !X^M! 2a XriDZ@ZZ}XJ:Gj3v,(i´s{ Mk N2{g{ 7W*|%l?(}~.Q 5vx?N]:7 ^B6Ѿl?|sH
9EJ({gTٜhM(|s~.uC }J˾oy }<ר[5}IkAvd0M'E8d'š)$2ϨvQ?B
Y_!e "sΠf;*T= 3.C`wdt`o9f11Ut[2. >o1>Va}:}ɜ:=v"֙i;a"<=r.3ݴ<{ϡՉ67'ʘ}^w eT.+F3Fq
d.u*G7a]Ju6RoJFjH`\I9aS^KJ"mo2[˴~,`DAgi/ؗm}\LfQ4S~ZЏ I.[+1c@9')S4$cʹDĹIz#XdZnf vA%t=_}~}c*ls+s,_f/ 4sxҙanfP m܉sS4v1GK
< 1S:}y Pr
sf2#$jQyxK xu^Wr qm)M}ie#mN: kπrwb6u;o~GGИǬUf1 m1iC+oL.s@~c{wlq/sO!}v> n$jkV0v,5$O@ -*g.} G~kq Z0ǟ'ʱ = 10>?m+߄?"ܪ}j:#2Kُ;~
'>/g9e7Gb2)*Onr MW綠N*(f.ꎘ_7J lBy yy` Qa#_IOlBxb1G_q˗}5p^1.`R R;8
1
uv&@^N,~l9×=:2]lP'[O{Y%eLd fZ!',ܓ
oyv9 {( JX0JDIX.YR\7eV"5 5,[Q\i,[& s,
%UrN~7
cr F8f+(7Qb]8f_&_@CGb[mwMhږ1s칶&r ;2Q w'ԑ_em\ȵp~%l,wayYgwR`;_Wrbmr-}pjWHg$+D"
Hgݩi]:Ԅ{}|'1qI;Tu;kE5_}mUwsn8iJn nӘЖLK-e7nIm6ka=2-:iJHhش"%,McL{H&5V&$ Ⱦsnx`/< MZ~w~ 2}ܑ!![7{{r}پ4v N
' 2?0;`\ 1Y j g!CÃqH.p p:m>N)cpPN,PJ l':0=;۳Dg^nCzCCޡF6_.$e\6Fl^ v@%?dXj-F*A\te+]q9"Z44۩6 B+ -۫jDBd\V'D/Aruvۯu;X@8 , >HZ"$0̉X[eo7 v #=5!ٯV"+S+Vq2_@'̹]Δ97KM7ZmNW4·onlNٜTB U!Mn+i
ExN`9Fc ::Ӳ=(`H$!y",oY :U5f
#`E-@/8u+DsPVp+ͤ5{] ^.wrĎSa(.w˼)jU ;&CI+t nL'ydo9^[>Z&|eE߲ Os3Y,Kzz<9OS{I'DŽE/V@ C1``deI1EO:7n>=7\Yj)
nۏ0 0"J:!JKe:wQEWS%gJ:cjwH묌\ I+ ]DJO d
j%,K8p!v eȿK1ߓ~ k kg]Ew܋ߐߪhh/FTDT*YBڟBCtH;ҾB&/y`h 7=ah_565|j$_-[5U[Ӫ=K>'IJƪx]/1'CV
i䉽U<1~ ,:QU
RɣCzIGÐ<.ϴBWF <7IVyl?xѕgH nbrS<9ãȏ]9ͣ: ygN@~3ANꉉ
Rvm&x0O` 2,3fb]hvMShx$6ՙ٤YjH
@m IpiDs]Q@
@۷L4P۷,h <)@Fp>D٪DI G! hetcf>m`K |*YE ǔEs5]03i#:{£i# 9N`Q3=gɵb]kxmgklcM >
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H\͊@}&jݟnnp1?3I$ĸNN#hNHq춻C}}éi!]PpL-P7q7VC_y~ eמb :𰮻cz,oC=_c(. ,VNG_%rZf?5ySXLsbNPОS*,gU+ OP,xy6˗ deVdgvgg
y˼E~c~C~gΰe܈q}
)4 >}*
Ҭ0+
Ҭ0+
Ҭ0+
Ҧ)=
+CWƹƹƹƹƹƹƮ ]
+CWFcЕf]2veٕ+w ~w ~w ~w ~w 5lҏ݈OyTatL ;iw}ȫ-
0 U x
endstream
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
H|y|gyL6H6LRz/{-" " JkI[l5}'b'eFU z;>s9Mz{ x:$=ʅ cfެs"~
/Y̶|U5Ek߰q-[m߱s={C% =vSKq.^vǵІe@"T E^IUF:HCLi#-NKϵArS 'Oȇ3^]~~kH67 4 3xƟpŠV+]Jw+eI)V)vLLMM' lLr`K%RâXXY#5!fF
TC0ZKRj:ZRǫ9tuZݠPw zEkX[Z{YIִz#귴mlE6_ŮWSW~ ~VqgHO'}_
5И54ER+bTz]8yWE,u
NpUq\W+W9w藜~N[ѫ+뵥bVWd"?~ ?7.u {x,=7ؙ Պ3 t8~NSrjx}asp}Ee@2zDBkXS֤,Qaqt9߳߱E /G-vx{o-KEDɖ~6ֺ/pqutsus^WE$!G!+H/sQ37υ%OlyaBLw 4{- 8"(DwA$km_4b>O|B-˾Sbd{p?`21 +!( t<ϘYO$c`%~S<"`
z# C"(N8N$~B4JQ>x88'& H "
A!{o0b+"D xGHCiI nMsh.C9<Ĥ#=OP!-$?
ERZF6ZN+h%մh-6W\Mh3mm L!TBq?R
©*nC{i Aհ:ՠTL5Ho[dt1:N'$H"UԐTJg,A-CuqwOlIG |Oi.պZ+C??CYzO s|/%W*
o-w.>?`'?#H2]dՅ*BuUtai.'3{\.lc.إ RI.3C"(M IIc1HRX-u+; 3uNI:YTuYܐq [|/e.+|kWUzU^Wz:WG|Gg&:G< tS](s8zzg=yz^Ez^FNFJz^WƨA^kZN
z9 99997-#Uo zDw]zޣ81's
rsgrgs\b ={b ~ 88P|p #c cy p|t)pS."n '7&< p!.Ÿ2\+p%p)5%sZSf: |G#iASq:{}ST:UNS:#yŬ)1Q@4|0`!BCh48wZ8-!! C2@*Az̾ļ"i崆l
4 ȅ<ȇh
*v|9ŷ7P͠9
ZCh h0~?
SatfL
*e `->luX6q2^&`=E!2EI"MHD.1yL)2Utɐ@fL%ԐQ S%R5dJTJtʠLʢl_RR S5B*Md5ԂZR+jMm-'=u'̕yԉ:SԅԍS*Tw >ԇR?z HYLCh(=Gh8=ous4mSw{~Os5}<4T %H
҂ # lIh4i,3@i@/K2Uz~N+5A7̅y0 BXa ,e
X X
k`-CJ7FdL0$y&oom1o 34_í p T.fb/bX+b.>;nJ|-[s 3'#8/.'qKp}x *JvOʎ ;kc7j A o x >H 0=Y*lv
O]naGX K^aO7x a{ q=aOS{{ڞg9{^d/2{^?kAc>'yS\t.9ލNKu\K빾k\n7tLK#̹VFњh3MXǂƻ n6v7Ms 7r&nn۔a>G /e]U/M6 !d_H"",BBBꈀY B@ v $$a (8 p )<;wour.::qKw](@X-v
$^N9e0 J`ES B>Q< 9+4"R.iJ$z18N}
A #u%8BeB
uԃzҫԋzS2P Jԏ Hi4O`ʠ!4pAg!ȡrLi Gci @iM)4;P&MWA LEie\G#3g++i-i-Oh -mk: 𦃎t<3:|ps r9j[zI6FlJ2ZNٴi%*ʥմ>G
@RDi m6N;h'}ISʧl
KB:@ #tq*b*tNQ)i:Ct* US
ҷnF?<]dyEDu=~x=
+*)}8 B6vispN8˩[uK [Z6:L 4 tSu1:xg1F[?[ַ
,/6K@>g66Mm3ܶ8 =PA:]։:Ig辺m=`C=bc-ŶĞ')[ji{Ɩ۳V*{V[LgBiz:Sw7;]9s99N8-ΈrqVTJQ%ΉjQ#jŷ;qY('&&s s!]
V2X!5-z1@
Ti̋M5~ORUƙRUsL)jdLP$!#efTlf'LELL,#c/+emeLIَyP=R } dbejw nݘ=L3Q*D&F%XdLJ4mMId&]QWO̙(M&F&x>aL8Mg.*JE&Ǭ2fYc>3kM|a֙fh6fl/;ʇL)LCLi"gbV&Ĵ6 3&B-P}![ ܫܮq>Q 7ֽ"W40X
C7
X 0 T0Tϫ0ËmL! ЖE,n1A[^omd" VB vF!ބv%8b F2̫qqt=|V-.TȄa.;C\y$r]īQesN)``*b,TȽ
F5x | [˩*<۰j}\uhgU;^g/ :A 0
p
q55GT{J
} ߝ}/]* ].?Wؘ=DX?b $C &r̕g9dO{y$o_.@vБ/ MDd` ,xɁM.r8{!= }KO9IfErUĻb!+qKo,9A:x< W%9[VE%Wß^5_;ĝ "v1#ʠ.
T M0!w+V?Lce( cXY8GO2Z6 Y0ޮUU.j}즢QL϶EUbJ ^» ZR|>vI-Ui +OsudgܟPL;i'\ 0m>TWi c8:~-W.'Cc7Qx lKd ;@g"c/*^|[È.(!vY)&KȪx)k7yr+e5c Нrŗ%M.TA?uVzl=mzvRR+<` 43#?GO?'GdjLxrUe||X3(aYh*)#jɆ F7}hh+'R['忥]xs~+i=뤓jR0F>M s Ym=Fm&
(ku{A};JҐfZD] &ޣ0v#]?
3ːN{
|w5<ᄺ~@8F sk+Ϻ)e/5jqO Y1{y ~
'C j _yQv Wut.eLWPoU "]c92 Yc
2u_j܇( qO
YPP;cYu'.XiNb7 ه r?=x+2uiA6, E=z yDk?@sEȅ~卯#x[t /mr>b5DW!_~==zvvoPwغk]ꞕ_\Qswu4|%UƢp
Vί(/79w*YWeKǹ@ H«A 1_ xx,^8NDF9ZFbVclm<8:Ιe
8H.&M︽Nt a~ zY-s/
<_ڍ4aۀU|kk:d8 /jH{,eH7 $&ɝ@! 9bT j@= =AX"ӥ;P7x0"ӝ66 nvCUľȔ) K4붥0bPuii 4WI;mK+(X}^C?o,t "S`UWI6
Ft Cdқ!!w:rȮئ3| ~qbǾljc'6)aiHVRJ\B( PRJFVI*(HhUJ[PMlZ6T4qv}{s<.DTr D0imrd\R
f .Ui?>-sW]U@imEzԏ.ݷtTz,()mUg'":-qxaΩ#ޤ q瘚z Ў(ĸ^Q ӬW}Gfl-I/$i*;3U0[Rsef3lb Jʁwz/"W2qǵ07L+Édai>rA䤃4D5Uw#I vg'7? ^\$T *ʃV7A6(2
T,'rPB%3ssEb eeqbJHV6l#L.Iz5fM wM
6=HSlXr?Ŧ %<_n(oo0vwIP6Hi*;
dL)LL JfM \S n/ES8v:\:'k>Z) >TG ^ ^և3a0Ui zl~ C0H?<,zsڼ/} DFE9E"iʼnhʛc)ɪ8+¬Igo9 NG# Z>W+ ^mWǕ
d azZ+Zl5wU 4?7^:
TnLr/Dpg;'y\w
ژf,,H /[OXx{`
f!7
E_+Pj, g|J aij 2+(╉KbT-7EMM7٬]B$ $ 鮞P!05Xgr1Mwaz*9HsV%+Gc 7@'x!K9wZ ܪIz 20ğ(Y{([
a";aUn6h/:aqWpc @T[a ƠߏP0T"<^-z}2/a
N7*s*==f ϡ/=[b CY(Hd7qޞWcOYrNF$zd} %Y]Oy_syj , %V֑S(N /'s6`avՈl@:9؎Q}3s}"\jl_0 g2[9k2C;
%@I YDcI,Qp1$0~:k*pUQTUe`lwxk 4S }pHz*WZ
|N %='7mzst2ӧO~σ.C^vV#f}jXY늘"/͉lK O%`,?]|xr_Ut+d[!fpILe +2C'FiVv;~=Vg`,\V*'qTgm`@?/Kt)M| C[ $".%nXg4llm\&pnAMv,l4bvpEZP+Bñ!{8lA`Z fE,*[P& |vPF4Ru4+3k$%g/t_g| W~ںMٮqAs4 {5,ߝ=])>O=_}W S |Yu/ ;=o? EhndqÞM]'*G m(UfT(R].JxR >1LVEiÃʏX|G/Ss9CR8$ѭJn *&650hR ^F^ցa퓡Ce4MO2r3S\ {냍~cm??peӮ+z%pmJe
^ n`[CR {:{?Nz/8꙯TU&Șt,^vؕ1\(tT\BR~5FJ V$] `I.MX}y{8|nBV*6v|F䟺bdFg g ˼G>l:3jnY!&OfR}}hm\1X`Y,&#%c~rp0?kߏUg.7[EwݏWT w 1^F;R֔-KwRSBö߹%%ǒ,I'FܒB:8?OQP %M>! ϒM͑+cήx ? ޝtwzyҝt:BB}'] lBy9`
&%8ښ6 88)%iCi 1M;C6-<g:SO[{rZJݻ=I}z fs{:yuBZ:ɌZ?:F5 f2&)ϘMSඇYTX#ܲG5y=O@JW QS,YA Ƚ?$5lq
B6^v9>P7 SbbDugJHPP$}S;@9 Iʏ}6JDSn3E=D0\t (,ICF9v4Bn3 &?{#ϟ+ =V?Лݰzy|u/}8k`ׇ7}vݞ^uBq{Wlnέܽ9{ۖ_3m v%%lj6дBB=侾ҴUuy 6uCzy[;HzV={ӊ!M@pY.e3oA۠16}I Ss-fE4A*d,
=y2;@# ѥJ=aEn R_B Po_ﻑʖS1"M_vAd9mDq?D@tsH?ke*|IQa GMR~{" 6Lu$t DK
T&z124":>^O(ALߟ[gthoǒ4)~»+ l|dOuu?#YV/K=th} L# J/8!zaC $
C3 ꬤKEf-˹y)JR 2+{o y?oson){X"HݠC!YcZbN*s|/'qnpB'9 %7=!C O6H0,,;:ˡY"#2K-Q;Z s+5x* "ElH07ǑEhu}Ho#OI?7巟i0&^pc2̅B,F,?ۊ0!YK:R 撤P0r\RU(ǧA
7^yd#;.Z Wm 'FW}-xBsމ1\Xb |J$d8JFu)LGy֗ Y 2 B321oG0u"-r6HQp]?g]:R@
VPYt5o=ξ;'~ gl;svq(mF" d]jQxtZ=:0mMZ%jNcT\XY XPMLX4j*ٿg$--`r5:p +_-~CJ֡ 䮹f4WjesL1LDݍ=:G9ڨ8$ֽS&lj IAfY=+=\{ Q=tsZHo+2 fPP}&4zhyXc!Lp [ؙR:%Q{ƈ E "1ςu;! h9;'\D·&B/FigeR,9UTt:S|σJSX=ջ8{
{BQE1K**"qH`hp !| [{B0ٌá'h^=
[ BRKp l{PXeW%\>N)ȓ
aCDC/Ș8VIj>Q%a<Wޯ_ǛOo)[X,9_̅o2$ ZB by4E)
$@%w:wGn $?i%d)5Y2/?WN& B'B2+qaA
,4ۨ3U{(GGn94
%\zci{Tn@8d .ozrwWmVjg'i1ugƿ4DGS 4YdȠc]ŮovG#S`s&y tF^ee3/4,gqI8gt Z@ iimȔvc@e1dѸ.O1x,[U?~ tYx,
6W6]@ k 9p/Ҡ3frT5ɰv(~.ɂ32CE9 lI65gjT9p!Fqg+(> 熲G: IW>bu^(l|˽rS#&r 46?"1u {t
GNuK GxQqwsvb8w978ߋ8qKL[!6+^meDmi6*mN#6@BRb:F Q-2N
%SUeƚd(-β6RBpoc d`6 %7y\M;ȗ9 s"йZk)2{,/_&6ōf}"
ÂF50a(ս1KA}Ż [ϜO_S3 vxXq8Wt"v, maQ=b60ITڨq(F3qP!بot{{$Z&dq9kΙ.LbvRU)J".&Ρܮ Mm HS[I TAZ,\j/p)Kt
Hc,Ii,c<˺%+fX$HSb.<_" H)&QHm-i:* B mB(U Kn
r/Ev=bb3N vQ&AԢ:6 0 j&< Qtˇ9YZ1]SgeIvdryߧX 47sČ!c!a b)gbrS#"FD$"HVS _9yAx!{6gĚ{ Ab`"D/3 gb^N%LX%ϴu?b/l1n&ɿK2(KVbaq}tps2x͘9M$^i B@TU?랚HZ
^L,OB 6HɊA5@*XWkc&F;BAСE[wtm*Mjo= }g}^rз |W~c0
E%_'ȓLgj,83OÙ)t !#WC&n}G>@s~wVp'/Kirsbyt? Ut_\l8˰V|=}.ls6,PhT1$%iXө-Mz'I8S 'Dłn]*ŝaZQ0 zpNpѨ4=n#d!h$*w,b,7 d?bRSqWU}|T娪
ܜwO,ϔN+y[1Tޓ<+'Iͼ
J3 \nI4[{d751s]CQTLeă+U\SZ{5 rUQpWvgk;~K/V[
zk&ݹ+irmp$M9/MZ)1HVv47q͡7`϶@:PY]A
mQr$v4JX
6v7u/@Ց 3^X4 ($' v[VE"Tg*##zDyZsSaoya}TH^a>
$>o:XUZ>l XURQ]l3h+R)̒I.d*P n5O;N֗;= v=I`G2;9yO}d. ̼z^27gXN%uUbpSvg0?U1 3! D-JF/ZK+0G@H XN !2 /蚛w2(q@ÕISS%G2ͫi5P pB1v
. &;;;Kb|w{gNl8R""Y@)
kNA]va 1@ȦQM릢jh*mDžJlF콗A'-RlY{r #_9~\OqB=;ӯ 36eC@
= 瞗[O{r:s>QNmaNw.Ξix֝G(`NӽL(f-f?;]ԯו:R4D)^Jv9sm䠹lxA@I)= eo@{?yMDSjP9hAX*ިtPR{U775yI( rr`0`
tv e&>fNWMl& C`=` L G38<}&a|l-[D~}|$eKJU Ҍ hfD 4\t ⲚG{7^A"T 5 E:)P!
Th:|?y^k5/1k5\dyO{lFd Y1 ^W
SoᑉӀ{oZ+ thxGmˮ0q~ZncI}w>&T6ftTXj>q1^pO3n6 8x"< Sm0 99'2Ӛ.M ހک̵t.&`I'\v ǴdziVeg4⺌laU²U˸%i1 A;#O)M"^_1Ja Wv ~6)J]"]QT[v(_m 6Ƣ탍h5y^X -n͜d }}CA9pp~T"5h\͆cXukGIʹp\WVWִ˯++k_khHL:*RŽ_; ξNLmLt|6OFX>g"zVEPb>)x҄Fa4 :H"[9U$C@8qPbuمo :\x|dlo 3yӜ&cX6%7 2#f {y ,LCD+SdOUD3f6BpPOo樒LG>H_=6j>?|Ǿ=|gs/`8DZFIZB$R& 1Bh[}H㵭eDu@:B ZUh$L[UeMwM~|Id(E.8p7 BlޣRkA,BOS9 zqQTN ~^|L$b;AHHF=ډz'
נ˵JjZdyp~
Ġ*|zn4ŲQf61(L7 TѨNbKX.,FaO
R̳W{>}wYU ʂB!=patNsGG{ttOG"m( 8nߚ啞/ [sO<ӭGGom;_?ZJQ6]Y,H
cs C9BdG46S̏U@Y
Rh4 'tJr4/dn)
J 3&)Os<\ +9oN(zYC\ AwNhveoY\O6֓e:"_
PC8'DDb\[j{-lf ]i"'̅Q
M~
(狨`b=da
ehQ߃؞%r?\oUWs齙EgufV`y ZC~Zl'҅|\_lȯ02AL) 73Ud"PZ)YՔܪu5iS$W`V~ 0ܸ@]BIKyy
7p!ɢ),iK ﮉ9u;ps9\\$ɭ2)c͕#蜬srʞyP^}
?ulA"Xr3DQ4`S7(6Z0 -\;!6CvRb$xs+b|b;"d:2I 9ஔH)b5,B|4K0t1yW o9OVUT/IY(+ Tk@ ㆄ
n͔tx,!-T >C MU%yхGp< @Ϩi B*[vI|Us;Toz~ۤ*s[Á\HUxd4>Dx cg9ٱcc, Lq+KeyDPB0q_-_s
u/;U rwq961^H & ~/t5\6M0 gOněIqvG O
t 5p{ @tq
.j9Ne)n
9zR(As3 |kSd8(*dcҍܼ7tX6bhk`-V5߶̽ XF~u
+OTJ.QbKG?lWkl Wkgg֞]c}ͮ=k {wa0ͻ&FD. J-ujPd j((8Q@X( D(,)
|wi"}aΰX IoNr3Cu3z&g{&T{D-J>H:tWMq?^q{lp}Q 8f KJ\3O|I 59h>Ɛۄd-wzl{g"{p$yc,2?-L' e7y= S;3I $66jh(JvQFp0f t/|K8'0JF LGRH*U0Bhyjvs6Tc55n9Db_bw
WVK +1H !Q!߿Hn)nТzUu45îJ
]ɭb7R:u|R S*VX
R(7gNCe.cKNBaL$]Gqҏ%46d:li9tajxH7L?5p$m-bg!Zm6?A:um>; <|q! 1D (o F@de:C1TcZ
1La,C2 1BHCK*zoU(I/ S.Rk /b%1?=wƉR%/"cqe6/ Nkd#yˎϊdL /) kS1
crƊ@8Mpe-s 9anƄҍ ' LiK=VRz,z, B v0Q0MHd#Dr{m۴ReN1^95XZѢShvB$S ə]KxΌ.mѴk39nn&#a;>Ge+ w7Kܴ"t,'TڳBUPdQZVPl)]z30MTrsDŽzA
}#Cv*c2Q ڥ6uʤ*Qш͂U DWteUpט2.Y Nߙ676 Z]u+t~ }hWH0&
eQ|W>3%@ NTUSPRPjUqW)/)bu&g`spV qCvMk $p: kqg45F]! o]Bhѧl )![/(-ҪVˎ(0_vœS4gǥ "DޙSf!7Au%I9UrB-)7Z'"Mˏ8U}lF͏yW qSb 87JL-(Ӥ!gu_q}v3O|Gnxx Ȇ1ۿ^
67uM 4*0q'mx_?<3]m]'S'* ~w۸Th mܱU[ȏGq1QP(p^N*_l)PݡL!.^ bDaׇ(!RU[LZT~ i˪C# x>Cp#ߩ:Bd6 u,hitL1(ԯ_f23쏘 ބ뉦wX
Ȉ
ß'J ]>@mF]Y[\Ks]tp .+kL4lԫN@\fCc"nq!ԬJr(p 0 PU4/C@7ٻ7xɇH̏CEչq!^N>P 5q!gn
U5'{N=֮FM
u4মgϜ9&ݽy[։Z̯~vA/zSQ1(sJ^e#Vޯ7Xl";_YL1 7yNfV!H6SyZ)Y C 5`s p;ʕQ96 vC̉x &;ޝ}6绳'N q( Fe
t ԍݤLnWU'1Șԕjk`clcHC U["mb)"؟B#e*s;?{}?LP]: ~>}/0U'ug{2 Dm}E;d FjܟC & J-=bsVlc]g9{^f? FL"`]"UӇ|}/<ڃ*9$zf_
_kpM mAHPKh -t-} 1 sb!wLv@Җг%+RAX0ގPh"ҦRv=Ⱥ%MR(U*P{l=5,>RÓ![UFX ,rmɥ%a9믘ޝOj~\n<#~)q(B5X#&"@kQS), ~
9 V5 a/Cj 15JJdn[ bS) ʅ8̠ !>(dyy
`'p 5+.J0 3GXV9~'lL3d.dЍ\ns (2/iЄڐlng^w>ɜΔ3Ɍd8166qkMB6leV{z@6p !L+OS%T !V|@MmurHsj nMrV~ۨM{?_h:ve11ㅍ}! 3wxOX+ v}+
Xx ?(O=F HfAf4,-l(c`zᨪ
W[S "
MG;*ݿFŕ4k\+^F7(r ?t
# o1+h)A3
뤗ZHZAdٌ~<$g}% csҴpBPu.G5 `1Y gM:+OWohR1[YZ!$
3W!">0ʽ! TG~lO]?|@˓V7*G>/O /| zWI mvrEn40:8!ij҄2OnwgFdpލM|D-NвڐW o.] YrQ{ a٤e ?[!WE67^wc"" o":"DDA<%.4Jqŧ Ev~G"[2 cD]K ʗ͋j
9P(TR"^ԡNҦ
P{;*p0YaC?<[928DcYR K&k+ʽTZk9ՕP6dep0B1Ha]L
*.>()B5eR
A FxM[?so_Z<VBVmǭ˻ + Է;F_sGX!fzv JIikn;MlYcDPIy >Bȟp&(9_Vʝ|Eʴ @D`ߠg . ?`IOb\*6Y˲C:d9z q7 ?=M6MYGqm
op& ȸ8.N%E ~jJraQG()cEǣrQ>V
VZ*ģ@bgqw7%KXq5&W#~? ?ϷfM%vvVb
#lɘƐG.3 Ry'?y<@ U[,vt. l7-41= 3è!X KF }D>uhTw* s UpaC!XJ8&S+u
Mk[ .+wX9(r:>=eFqChrrlkkZU+{M3?Z<9ӝ8kC!mnER Ha% +_ԕ-Qq~dB~ j cZSA;E/*vV4B2Y)(lT@T wxdĢ0xX'nTxl"A5
dXn,2I 2Si9@2T 2 sTɄ8$ǢAr|k$ {J2*esa\o
G+#2s7 d(c >f H#$׳Ju>%@fW!VN,yK
{Bf,h!X J}L@o ^{CJ(8>$ O-4D@WcZtcm
j =XUf3PK,(f3^?j,gb 뿘x/;^T3k>
dO鵉˯ wz[ e~7r8/|]7qV7q*=)j ={9Q
zOwWO x͡ᴺ¡klp SEE?^PRH؉P#!tDL6$f3 SJR5 V ;H$P \pe2 Y
s9&3<jǏRaѠMH dH$7wx@*@ EjpƮa4;1IonZ|ù]9&K;\ ;>ȳ=} $.[_=_on^ۧ33Sqv
e(̀ǰ|dT . ~î8P"kV#
0Sq:]68 5MޗQ
z *Ǫ.pnPh ֚3 L3Sjcc-Cc:Gn3MFVznޖ ęVk$v Y =" 6hN}1l³?h &kGdQ5uMTM:t"FKr m-@ gCn-
D`[/7?~'M$F~C On0Iw:&}jnEw PcgN1_Nţն8@Ž;ӿGl톯TkN"~p֮]kZM{5bYcX%Ǣݱ s ) mfotvalfcM
e}4
,|>?DA+4-4P&L5ySfeȍ.62{}.ql'c's/ǫ7Gl݆5N꡴DaI$Ф
-&!T_HtmeB@TMPH1!F
xv{| .ۿMg؇C*Bdz? LW%;MD%JM N1A JZk1(GwѨeBz-u'4\
)d q8 Ju&qL<7.ɾɌ )
9b }_ŅJȊ
kL>qѲDg[{) 47kKs Z
5 =4jt/:zac#a6Ԇq,PpI GCヷpd$ä-@uk ʞz'OSFi 1.Fa(UCe6qn菔,6sew
$UƳxi43.O.5ƚe%MHY6ˤ`?$d '7"g'o/{]xTi3IbKW+I V"zNRtzU8iLwuy.N q.Sf=?Vz{2t1y4]|F/]k W/{\~ަQv8 5 =nGW4J.T%kZ7gպ ű54ݦv^}7C0\tM Z龈k5ZC54 *a)nv5k GsF.5ؑ WƲoH s'Yru~Ir 1;A -DM+Tػ1Qa䕖RQ,hV&ۇ`S]U5 7),,'4d(0Fwc5uc On< )mU逿 ZЃ_ Z:+a8rp?V,D"sдt/oܵl,MDD 70\&kل ]JD~f`Ozu)n);|1#\H 0_G jdbkyKٌZ|Q,b^_k5X7[uQuvX<*Kr`fyk5Q x|UđٙE Z*1¶x2:~ċ5 eK7iCMi{k;tn :@'$g'f}
v6qAoӳWfHDjC~EO8x~2?Tįq :Guлe` qZ(NKij\"Kz
d1(㌬0$D!' _BUc洛Ir9ȱoXB QQvA9 c (MPhCv6qqo9;/
$c* "j%[^e0J"ֲvhVF7uhXMv^ۡU[J6M?QMXy HΗ|~ٍ/ABO)J+cd"FNȃY 26 |mq͏vx,EȸTpS0\/L
,rx-J^,q(غx _mɁf֥D+N[n;5Q|yd"JbXIZW.7V(o9Q+=nO=o/ e6mc/pAL$ ^~cX\ R~5pl*P6h oj S@_^J5[ygͧ'dJ{ЉVccJ jsK;5R4l 3נ2Tn]WM )=D(kvQcqx$K.c)-L_&v:
8) a4葉CD YxȲcEa a#nlυϕ_+@ދ}hk/ z(o8k t=F;%Wg1&9] ^0;N"˱=t<= _.쮯 y+S,x -1yL|3-B?%TSZLqi7hR1HqHahMerM* Z w>ΝOIRǛQhqs\M/N eJ..MP.Ln}9 q r\J{z
1ʙOޘqpt녳fwܥvΉ-}O~8ES `-H]ǢY"r5Q
D($B$z$M Y#L& i MhP[Jx:ErB@/d6dD8QZtuvBt=Q{_\ŠE̬ػ VG
]Ë%hUN(`1n LB\ZT`Z /0g^LsQ% ZPoK_`ˁ'|O NN<-\o
w\ #]ݬӋ&cws<+AY!K\a WBxMUwHsȈL:PB;Q O8r|1^\m6$gg*cEy5cI F7 |N{ 7Q{# \=&t6D5=cus=%!4R[G4EZeR]!l[[pk%KpkE0hXaUhw0N:ГɇU3
䄮PK#ҥRHqw avlĦ=] 9:R~
$z!8 $KHĄ$bB0O0U\R&^ e>yu"rK5 1*+kY ,6j^MXfP+iLnֹ֟e. ZG/17$; ̍xQ}8?{(7) 'imV~{bG_(hlz-wMyVQv\l=:y!R`@͂dՌlQիLB~D*<'EaHv@ Gsh1HOn;p]F!&$PK,I\t͕_qd&N& !$Ldm*n _֍9j'jt)ݣ@D4~$(W&يf"=*$. UXP=gӛ
߱M]ރ珍R)]]ϟni6%ﶣ_1k.pFЂ7 h ,`,Ӗj !GXu6p0FjY'ɅHfT%TҀ4dMZcex@.CW;V{\]>;u.JIXOk b|ƃ79O-/Yoԙ6՛^vgYɢCYdmz\²-iF/hʈU\U=30!9 ڌ,Ra&3M2es,+f9nMZ/; !QT|H|bFfGL0\!}Su֛UD_9vrdb_ j4n}{9"64&4QYg{~6 s}?l/۹ s ۹N|c7qp2sE Le(
Z &h%dTĺ3-"Vb-GBQUP=T*-9vy=sN}<Ϯ /}RzcIҽ2E_fai6ؖD'YUD VL(I*
\x3GqJm^iy*.J, 0zxpiU-TD͉ >=/̰B@ =RJudW|1t1Y9}5zz ݪվqt>Ԣ5fBh4gb5 K=; C9w4^zi˥xORKtu"Q B WOKV4lÃ]ID& BC5mz^ĊoRbRu&R%4!MK#FC gک9lrhUdS~e9sX'.KWxAIsƁ\[Wp
|2S[ 6i@t`A*?Fx"e TRq'T :Y`G {wʝ:f(X@ Κl|酾 H<:t1;wJ6<>gx"x4 lW. I q2vH0 EKBysuZKRa P=V= T$ I #`^}B0B <1*!.f 0^ ~v7&;mH4ݦȎXGG+9VJXށ%!\ӳsv..}ShG(k_3Y
2/}ē>)ЅԾdIsHrl1h T6
_ Sg4Z@JV5̌f5 xvjE: *, 'd+.)qɌSbɉ8G`#-U ŌBFA '\pq*B,ɁFe`Mc`(1\9C̤u:}n|x':Vesr>fc/ ek7?L>5Lg
` X>yL y
p@_ )67oLExQmLoq<ߕH mO 6ixFO%x!_#W?# ?o05]0> 3w )V3m ##nnMG]! 3Eki)yz;ǟWY]Wmٷ#o&IbwhEitJňJ]G4COGSw#ܠ0{˩wcs3iM$5ʲ*(IZiغal ifxZ\|cb8~3{zwn7{, h iSՁD+ZRld ^':6VUW2R^Z@#SZP;3vqYsfvngX7*Qy
ÂwDŽU|rc'ny]grΡ~Dp#E&vkU2GѸ*$;ejj3+]#!8#i -mk`y5
gIggɗ2C}7 rU퐴[!|aK``Ƴ4\%"hILQt|7Ж +YN &bp뺡"~#oXoKltkT%ag̢
^$04VsBTBz߂^p,]
=_]ՃtU1 Q#Nِ#B
o6%ނm֑+rK2;ײ΅b y
k&6Fl7} V D/OZ¦s%R5d_k}b> 1zr w3WmzWPbBS|Eghu8'엫GIk'OEsњN^kd][7߶oj7[vCL$ 8183bu'dijt,ʯ*VE}ޖW=8=/ bSi artRsl;ki%
i>`( [bB!K\ڻ3Cϋ8= {x5C vC4 Sfh3Q$TjbHB{˒ѐz>d34qQ-Q[ˋh&]v`O&Ơ`9s@>} yX~ۑ~LMI.{?; PHǿZAM JJ~+%Հ
7!J B B!yNׄH4VQC}05J^E'ʃK₾й -19y-Z -~O7)rJ< ן2Otimr<3#s\fNzD.W
]"BHbn w79 Ucx>i !>j
m; l6R kL?AR&ct:]>0wvWK,e"`3¬2bT*K\Q4vڍO-hOn8h
TZbiRv f_bRДXS`tu┐"IӦ&Ao7Jto
U-10o[[zUO=%D躯lzm OVP7 Ni9عCvkbv ܯWA6/-۵/Urmwm'As # ܅ÒBLnmѰn1X}4<3P[0A(
(K78G*>?^ry?H_СMJ~MD UƩh=۽UJ5X @pZV`ǐ7
G/"H3$ ?=
9^Er!#Bi's%]LNzn2شc f ;YƱ\JiWաп_C7_}
/띐 Pջ9B1 )
VΩ6OFcPSFF)dtۢAA{Qjr
\fpذ{GGf9M6Ϟl4ޯ3W?Kr ·@N vHZM%i
Q6j8UQP]lh>p:9pѵ
l JQ̉^S̀ fkN.w P!%^nNL!Rm:,ׇ-s=|Ur♯r =e'c#ik[dvPS)trrz-=ًdCƛ4e|oP
Y¨0M{Of3ҕTAfm9-C o
We oe.MԶ%EN hzI] 9 AO uC0h KΔ
*l&`ypLif &1Jn©\
Մ|<) ũH@xo5yXS ,7VlvٙK$l xrͽ=R6R3dﳈ ^̿X쨁s&-q5SC$ס"[~fPHe<3(z}
T!(d U1w.h4Zӊ'O(>;ǩK ˫rFT~un.˰ so-fX{,y r {^hcʤJ/4)й7bѓg:5C8Ģ]C.A+,9E99͡h8Z,Pu kj_dk09}'w
_l-,6WmuZ/o DNFDG [d 19
AУ0Dv/" À]], ¨cKɻtBq| Q9ۇNdOg,,ddhI /MFIICuZ'Ttɞp# ӧ.n--S}Gx[
? ouWHx*yodsdXT9DV u{O
wt{Fv?Zw 4"r᭵ +1 ,7> _`k
8=P8`
tϰB
ƥpfz8( }ihЂ8=( 6|_r ͈>jD.{
ql{3:F
aX ϊA/'<@x;xPwb]m/'nzld`xk]0(
r+.e !k>/ Q (W`y+:쳌 &C= 6k
+ 7;Gwu(m-Y_#6_g}SsSo11P[olǰ/c\OpW?y( wz'>Eyw%"yYaW:R.
h{' r! ۭf{ [VClhB߷ S {8F-CoP5cF G,3ֿ8|Dw7~ = rQRФ4C&B E\Dvh~M
,
XrϼmC#' -m~~6ӽ@ǦܢIIw/.'"'ط Z$(ClE$,MuJ2~{"%SJ~+dе~OZ<'u+(Zۃ_ w8$Зt L PL-8$[Ǚű q۟DJ_, LQI-McĩDB_3B@$E(r+P y3.i1U$
&\Xގc [SI-i )#~t|x8%&S|/]J=L`&ۓ|R²s_UTW ?ow߾B
c4
P CiD
ZLb5j[ ?8chq(6VF+ڎ* SǀɻIϜw{6h| 66k qOe>ڟߗqjKҧj yqwmkFyi48$3s
8B {v4Y23˝hf?W`O-NyUS2b6XS}2*sJǥN6q| u}+*|ϑMO`׃61[ͳ}Fs92JI*O۹:g I֛6ȗntd υv߯@:Cao V5go{Bn/wwPw=|}u/K~BhG!CVoԟ췽2@515&=~fS`H'jg|ȑyye4YDwhD2 RrŒ\ n!c vԸo7 5Glq29+*4: _Yln# X_# rvf>qm?xN @:iN<O9i{ܓ`beuHy Z+lP>,g ->WŹn
wqy ˬlWYe>"fA>ԍ-> ڙ{`錿
^^z !qɠu +,[y 젟Cp1Γy
Da'y)iF+m|vn;Vm^Y}0hr8n ,[p+
XF竰}p
dރ4ƂԀzU6
Z-KФĵ[ sE9'+h_OciMCLf[&n8[CܭU(osFҋ!ũW49OFErF*
} 9#$RH?eTds^'AoB8=>wΚ}u0r6J1p@s9^&UW ?n/ #hBl!2 K Y4
-2´VRm0؊CøLJ:(,:v8*-PQbn}ܼҎߜ{Q澄z#te<}Omǥk5j >Ҝ*)I)hbSur)10 X4kX+UA wf)ұel[uTBSN)#x Xoa]ůßʶvLROg
Bo-3Do
IDzkD<M xp2cm\/|q.>fE_}}mVTF~w۾ZE43"\ݒ:Y36u-lyQ $p'[ADžѩnd駗vƆ'}~ogM}E/f/_#
lYe,Mw#KNg߳u%l]'c--SOVdHft,gtȭBϝLo7MC!=1 /E@Tri ,堂w}3IE ^
3R ҟYjL:; o//_ּ/5$cWk;)͍[` ކOf\bę9C>-w8ʹKird!Hx@W_hfg/(:1jcQ\Wbߗ[r2o̴zo~/p^vQ!9):YeoYcXKG=}:[>+5aE ~}όmca|/
v 䌗} ;ܩ+@[E܅Da#.mwφMD\`D~I틹j;1~
o(EtXEVf G `B=u|?1G)GcŮ )]Y̷{~h K_ l%gJ|m/uؖ( eKuL4blee#uB{rM?4-
9julZ`x<ᖀ~ 2;C譗v0I+ݼR, 4v;IҩM%A0Eڷz J S6f&E3ٖl{kܠ8 tdNyP|_G yd*ޅ=\ꌶw4)seuೊsL~g
ף4| ohW6Ά~ $ Hͼ/Zwg+~ Y+iΜF)yކe/&w뤃pt
G*ח2& }}؏Tu~o۫v_~D[?N4>Gl4yj|5g>-!?Hj/_Qn>hntmE S
S?6X ՛'
ƿ%;' D < ѷnk9 &99%O(Ak,R'~< }n2W[zz 6oTS h{X~+m˖4Xֈ5Hv9tKa-vEٻ »; 5*IKj$@Fm
%|[ MRNL*ː(~/kr < gKZ7w'FZ ƒC {J?Fn#'R=u_`91sIX^C-AgHi U'Uס#@e[/Aû#9q(Yg;cxV{rIʼnE:f6=c8v7}>ob5&߉TI٠.
Rޝ%rcI+VR63u epj&Nh-f Vam?3NyNѧCZڨp
VI¼]ܑC1X&ۭnwg4| &};8[K?WlxU{Oh|j9co
m,{q ~ qX9f ?;ʛ7}Lo:
鑹20ؔN`^n@>tțmYANǰ45,"N8==|l?WCӅ\fFpF_D߬{qY<:3MW(co>e8^OÚ/qW AUHƝ2+JU$$NUSVx`dCϷ?
0adÞo`ƥ_w8Xo1\ӊ>1P}8sgk/xWng 2V}*8[;5~Yl@w
'
RaiQz'}Zj8=05k1f9|ė~3_
߯/6>g ~" '==_;!D{iIih6k_
0I Wt;foF<ú7Go4<(j,ì"?wn~ɛ
V-3? qwFw~pu&ڢf7k5q߲`i1ao ОqГ4o<3_c& ԛ8
F b"3|)ҩR-{?z9
c 蓠unb$ RIP)gMZ!8y̙c쯔~ϓPT*ݔ) ;Ȏ=*4Gw TVL)Y 6( s®eQ΅ed\kѸ
DaW!@l',W@v S(uZ:uRSI&mFtX]LfN:jv?6
IZ;餥9F;cd ә.<9k # 8 ѵh$
iPHkiMzL Իi]ꇴ"j-
jppThb
*!U)hpp?~m`WLB7 jz;C@HKOj`4C
DumKjb u-7-ZL5SһP*u`7"6(:o{KsyKo ۩ j
w|Ҹ hh2$ ./ݯY#W?i&>ZЍ/ @^|X}HV/@|{ǓEZػER@8{ cd$}՞%.`%cxGH"9hU灌vNBI5J˜"aX{[@V ci6jjҍlJ5k:xm.)MU%J9<*}X)%_87eds:?eoaˢ-C]Ā?a'2ًc3 sp L
@ "lM`
q=~uY}*t //t,? 3/χF_lP
uŌB)D^*)NN'LٗYH4uBR6l;N<9# qrĄ}Pʳ
3
x %
Y;(#l4aI-d.[K\rhgzpN & q=\ڱg'`^pYhzVY"jEE "lǙ5?'2jd.gsԣuS+k@#dlL;L9U>r;Vϔx /'ʨUqA~S? L(tJ- l,_ᬲz(XY;x 0@5L$v @EtNdND^< .oh=)>j@SIge! q_d;@;2
n1>`0=v+wA nuN.՞ؒQKU_|Trwvz^azu5J)ީTzJr{GQ m<(j0ccRQ˶EPbm
L2ƁNbptjC)Y%n
ݺЭSߓ@ }w;ݓN| ZQӻUFYcͼd0f,hH^a4)
iƃi#9m?{"~qˏo6 bXG ;^\Dz)e}lOs"hFZ !ys^|۱݊KީqnzF`Ccb GǞ JB(-7*D=C@u]-Q!:-m U`5OoT-Q # 3~ f:+3uX
#8!?4y;=- EQɤUW)WWW\ Ϸ"٭%%}
+@&,C\7F+ʓOWKYrْzEת5تK7O_B+t -sDX IFXdk'E%]b"A`uA+{ 0 ͉
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 7/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 146.25 591.75 619.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, wi\
thout any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(and that I will well and faithfully)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.469 0 Td
(discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help\
me God.' )Tj
32.477 0 Td
(This)Tj
-45.945 -1.125 Td
(section does not affect other oaths required by law.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(Applicant's brief refers to the need to raise this issue to preserve the\
matter for possible judicial review. )Tj
42.528 0 Td
(Whether)Tj
-42.528 -1.125 Td
(Applicant needs to raise the issue before the Board in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.604 0 Td
(order to exhaust administrative remedies as a condition precedent)Tj
-21.604 -1.125 Td
(to a federal lawsuit is a matter for a federal court, not the Board, to \
decide.)Tj
T*
(4. )Tj
(The Board notes the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recentl\
y affirmed a decision by the U.S. District)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Court for the Eastern District of Virginia which held,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.495 0 Td
(in part, that the DOHA Operating Instruction did not exceed the)Tj
-21.495 -1.125 Td
(mandate of 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.416 0 Td
(Nickelson v. United States)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.498 0 Td
(, 284 F. Supp. 2d 387, 392-393 \(E.D. Va.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2003\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(aff'd for reasons)Tj
-21.913 -1.125 Td
(stated by lower court)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
8.471 0 Td
(, 2004 WL 1700932 \(4th Cir., July 30, 2004\).)Tj
-8.471 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
(The Board notes the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recentl\
y affirmed a decision by the U.S. District)Tj
T*
(Court for the Eastern District of Virginia which held,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.495 0 Td
(in part, that the DOHA Operating Instruction is not unlawful)Tj
-21.495 -1.125 Td
(because it does not establish any criteria for the discretionary decisio\
n whether to recommended a case be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.567 0 Td
(forwarded for)Tj
-42.567 -1.125 Td
(consideration of a waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.607 0 Td
(Nickelson v. United States)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.498 0 Td
(, 284 F. Supp. 2d 387, 391-392 \(E.D. Va.)Tj
-30.104 -1.125 Td
(2003\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(aff'd for reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(stated by lower court)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
18.102 0 Td
(, 2004 WL 1700932 \(4th Cir., July 30, 2004\).)Tj
-18.102 -2.125 Td
(6. )Tj
(The record below contains some references to Applicant receiving a secur\
ity clearance in 1990 and other references)Tj
T*
(indicating the year was 1991. )Tj
11.997 0 Td
(For purposes of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(this appeal, it does not matter whether Applicant was granted a security\
)Tj
-11.997 -1.125 Td
(clearance in 1990 or 1991.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
(Applicant's brief also refers to the constitutional prohibitions against\
)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
28.646 0 Td
(ex post facto)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
5.054 0 Td
( law and double jeopardy in)Tj
-33.701 -1.125 Td
(criminal proceedings. )Tj
8.914 0 Td
(Neither prohibition is relevant to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.358 0 Td
(these proceedings. )Tj
7.636 0 Td
(Security clearance adjudications are not)Tj
-29.908 -1.125 Td
(criminal prosecutions and, therefore, do not implicate a criminal defend\
ant's rights under the Fifth and Sixth)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.556 0 Td
(Chesna v. U.S. Department of Defense)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
15.441 0 Td
(, 850 F. Supp. 110, 119 \(D. Conn. 1994\).)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-30.997 -1.125 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 94-0295)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(December 30, 1994\) at p. 4 \(discussing federal cases\). )Tj
36.463 0 Td
(Therefore, the prohibition)Tj
-36.463 -1.125 Td
(against double jeopardy is not applicable in these proceedings. )Tj
25.271 0 Td
(Furthermore, a review)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.163 0 Td
(of federal case law on the )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.495 0 Td
(ex post)Tj
-44.928 -1.125 Td
(facto)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
2 0 Td
( doctrine shows that it is not applicable to security clearance adjudica\
tions. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
30.185 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 99-0424 \(February)Tj
-32.185 -1.125 Td
(8, 2001\) at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(p. 7 \(discussing federal cases\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(8. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g., Black's Law Dictionary)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
14.267 0 Td
( \(7th edition, 1999\) at p. 571 \(definition of "judicial estoppel"\).)Tj
-14.267 -2.125 Td
(9. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g., Black's Law Dictionary)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
14.267 0 Td
( \(7th edition, 1999\) at p. 571 \(definition of "equitable estoppel"\).\
)Tj
-14.267 -2.125 Td
(10. )Tj
(Indeed, the federal court decisions cited in ISCR Case No. 01-19823 \(De\
cember 3, 2003\) at p. 6 n.6 make clear that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(an intervening change in the law is a well-recognized exception to the d\
octrines of )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
33.21 0 Td
(res judicata)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.75 0 Td
( and collateral estoppel.)Tj
-37.959 -2.125 Td
(11. )Tj
(Applicant's argument is also flawed to the extent it overlooks the simpl\
e fact that DoD policy and standards)Tj
T*
(pertaining to the adjudication of security clearance cases)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.879 0 Td
(have been revised and changed since he received a favorable)Tj
-22.879 -1.125 Td
(security clearance adjudication in 1990 or 1991 \()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.576 0 Td
(i.e.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, the current edition of the Directive was promulgated in January)Tj
-19.576 -1.125 Td
(1992 and revised as late as April 1999\). Applicant's argument fails to \
articulate a rational basis for reconciling \(a\) his)Tj
T*
(implicit acceptance of the lawfulness of applying to his case post-1990 \
or post-1991 changes in DoD policy and)Tj
T*
(standards \(as reflected by the current edition of the Directive\), with\
\(b\) his insistence that it would unlawful to apply 10)Tj
T*
(U.S.C. \247986 to his case.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 6/Type/Page>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 747 Tm
("In any case in which [the] Administrative Judge, or [the] Appeal Board \
in the event of an appeal, recommends)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consideration of a waiver of 10 U.S.C. 986, the Director)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.716 0 Td
(shall within his sole discretion determine whether or not to)Tj
-22.716 -1.125 Td
(forward the case to the Deputy General Counsel \(Legal Counsel\) for fur\
ther consideration of a possible waiver)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.513 0 Td
(of 10)Tj
-44.513 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. 986 by the Secretary of Defense together with such rationale as m\
ay be requested by the Deputy General)Tj
T*
(Counsel \(Legal Counsel\)." )Tj
10.906 0 Td
(\(Operating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.582 0 Td
(Instruction, paragraph 3.g.\))Tj
-15.488 -2.125 Td
(The Operating Instruction does not authorize the Board to review an Admi\
nistrative Judge's recommendation whether or)Tj
T*
(not a waiver should be considered. )Tj
14.135 0 Td
(Furthermore, under the Operating Instruction, the Board is not authorize\
d to give)Tj
-14.135 -1.125 Td
(reasons or an explanation for its decision to recommend or not recommend\
that a waiver)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.627 0 Td
(be considered, but only state)Tj
-35.627 -1.125 Td
(without explanation either: \(1\) "The Appeal Board recommends considera\
tion of this case for a waiver of 10 U.S.C.)Tj
T*
(986" or \(2\) "The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Appeal Board does not recommend consideration of this case for a waiver \
of 10 U.S.C. 986." )Tj
44.436 0 Td
(Since the)Tj
-44.436 -1.125 Td
(Board is asked to make a recommendation in its own capacity,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.271 0 Td
(the Board is not bound by the recommendation made by)Tj
-25.271 -1.125 Td
(the Judge below and must review the record evidence as a whole in order \
to fulfill its obligation to make a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.737 0 Td
(meaningful)Tj
-42.737 -1.125 Td
(decision whether to recommend or not that a waiver should be considered.\
)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Recognizing the limits of its authority under the Operating Instruction,\
the Board has reviewed the record evidence as a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(whole and states the following: The Appeal Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.384 0 Td
(does not recommend consideration of this case for a waiver of 10)Tj
-20.384 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate error below. )Tj
19.604 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's unfavorable)Tj
-19.604 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision. )Tj
11.272 0 Td
(Furthermore, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.97 0 Td
(Board does not recommend this case be considered further for a waiver)Tj
-18.242 -1.125 Td
(under 10 U.S.C. \247986\(d\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 416.25 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 391.5 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 314.25 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 289.5 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 212.25 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 187.5 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\) reads: "The person has been convicted in any\
court of the United States of a crime and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(sentenced to imprisonment for a term exceeding one)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.215 0 Td
(year.")Tj
-21.215 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(5 U.S.C. \2473331 states: "An individual, except the President, elected \
or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the)Tj
T*
(civil service or uniformed services, shall take the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.854 0 Td
(following oath: 'I, AB, do solemnly swear \(or affirm\) that I will)Tj
-19.854 -1.125 Td
(support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all ene\
mies, foreign and domestic; that I)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.157 0 Td
(will bear true)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(specificity\). )Tj
4.998 0 Td
(Applicant's conclusory claim that the Administrative Judge's decision is\
contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.075 0 Td
(provisions of)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Executive Order 12968, the Directive, and other applicable federal law i\
s too general and vague to discern what claim of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(error Applicant is raising. )Tj
10.525 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board will not speculate or guess at what provisions of law Applicant be\
lieves the Judge)Tj
-10.525 -1.125 Td
(did not comply with. )Tj
8.583 0 Td
(To the extent Applicant's brief makes other, more specific)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.45 0 Td
(claims of error, they have been)Tj
-32.033 -1.125 Td
(addressed elsewhere in this decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(c\) As discussed earlier in this decision, the Board construes the Adm\
inistrative Judge's decision as holding that, but for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the application of 10 U.S.C. \247986, Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.706 0 Td
(past criminal conduct was mitigated under Guideline J. )Tj
22.3 0 Td
(Accordingly, the)Tj
-41.005 -1.125 Td
(Board fails to discern any basis for Applicant's claim that the Judge er\
red by not concluding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.004 0 Td
(Applicant's past criminal)Tj
-37.004 -1.125 Td
(conduct was mitigated under Guideline J.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(d\)/\(e\) The Board does not find persuasive Applicant's arguments con\
cerning the Directive's requirements that an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge must evaluate an applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.286 0 Td
(security eligibility in terms of the "whole person" concept and render)Tj
-20.286 -1.125 Td
(an overall common sense determination. )Tj
16.439 0 Td
(A reading of the decision below persuades the Board that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.16 0 Td
(the Administrative)Tj
-39.599 -1.125 Td
(Judge discussed the overall facts and circumstances of Applicant's condu\
ct and circumstances in terms of the general)Tj
T*
(factors of Directive, Section 6.3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.023 0 Td
(and Adjudicative Guidelines, Item E2.2.1.)Tj
-13.023 -2.125 Td
(8. )Tj
(Whether the Board should recommend further consideration of Applicant's \
case for a meritorious waiver under 10)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 529.5 cm
0 0 m
547.646 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 516.75 Tm
(U.S.C. \247986\(d\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 516 cm
0 0 m
73.336 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 89.3359 516.75 Tm
(. Applicant asks the Board to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.859 0 Td
(reverse the Administrative Judge's decision and recommend that his case \
be)Tj
-17.97 -1.125 Td
(considered further for a waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Given the applicability of 10 U.S.C. \247986 to Applicant's case, the Bo\
ard cannot reverse the Administrative Judge's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(unfavorable decision. )Tj
8.858 0 Td
(A reversal would be in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.358 0 Td
(violation of 10 U.S.C. \247986 and would usurp the authority of the Secr\
etary)Tj
-18.216 -1.125 Td
(of Defense under that statute.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Deputy Secretary of Defense memorandum implementing the provisions o\
f 10 U.S.C. \247986 states: "The decision as)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to whether a particular case involves a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.577 0 Td
(meritorious case that would justify pursuing a request for waiver shall \
be the)Tj
-15.577 -1.125 Td
(province of the DoD Component concerned \(i.e. all Components authorized\
to grant, deny or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.462 0 Td
(revoke access to classified)Tj
-37.462 -1.125 Td
(information\) beginning with the Director of the Component Central Adjud\
ication Facility \(CAF\), the Component)Tj
T*
(appellate authority or other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.107 0 Td
(appropriate senior Component official." )Tj
16.209 0 Td
(For purposes of Deputy Secretary of Defense)Tj
-27.316 -1.125 Td
(memorandum, the Director, DOHA is the Director of the Component Central)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.131 0 Td
(Adjudication Facility for industrial)Tj
-31.131 -1.125 Td
(security clearance cases.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(To implement the Deputy Secretary of Defense memorandum, the Director, D\
OHA issued an operating instruction)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(dated July 10, 2001\) which states the following:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("Administrative Judges are responsible for initial resolution as to whet\
her or not 10 U.S.C. 986 applies to the facts of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the case." )Tj
(\(Operating Instruction, paragraph 2.e.\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("In the event of an appeal raising an issue as to the applicability of 1\
0 U.S.C. 986, the Appeal Board is responsible for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(final resolution of the issue." )Tj
11.795 0 Td
(\(Operating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Instruction, paragraph 2.f.\))Tj
-11.795 -2.125 Td
("In the event of a final determination that 10 U.S.C. 986 applies to the\
facts of a case, the Director is solely responsible)Tj
T*
(for the discretionary decision as to whether to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.55 0 Td
(recommend to the Deputy General Counsel \(Legal Counsel\) that 10)Tj
-18.55 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. 986 should be waived by the Secretary of Defense." )Tj
23.958 0 Td
(\(Operating Instruction, paragraph 2.g.\))Tj
-23.958 -2.125 Td
("If an Administrative Judge issues a decision denying or revoking a clea\
rance solely as a result of 10 U.S.C. 986, the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge shall include without)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.47 0 Td
(explanation either the statement 'I recommend further consideration of t\
his)Tj
-17.47 -1.125 Td
(case for a waiver of 10 U.S.C. 986' or 'I do not recommend further consi\
deration of this case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.21 0 Td
(for a waiver of 10 U.S.C.)Tj
-37.21 -1.125 Td
(986.'" )Tj
(\(Operating Instruction, paragraph 3.e.\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("If the Appeal Board issues a decision denying or revoking a clearance s\
olely as a result of 10 U.S.C. 986, the Appeal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Board shall include without explanation either the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.245 0 Td
(statement 'The Appeal Board recommends consideration of this case)Tj
-20.245 -1.125 Td
(for a waiver of 10 U.S.C. 986' or 'The Appeal Board does not recommend c\
onsideration of this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.185 0 Td
(case for a waiver of 10)Tj
-38.185 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. 986.'" \(Operating Instruction, paragraph 3.f.\))Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
51 0 obj
[53 0 R]
endobj
52 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge should have adjudicated his case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.133 0 Td
(under DoD policy and standards that predated the enactment of)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(that statute \(Brief at p. 41\). )Tj
11.052 0 Td
(Applicant's argument is not persuasive for two reasons. )Tj
22.37 0 Td
(First, Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.527 0 Td
(cites no legal)Tj
-39.949 -1.125 Td
(authority for the proposition that he has any vested right or reasonable\
expectation in the continued application of DoD)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(policy and standards without regard)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.58 0 Td
(to an intervening change in federal law.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 381.209 716.25 Tm
( \(11\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 381.209 715.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 399.8901 711.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Second, the Deputy Secretary of)Tj
-31.991 -1.125 Td
(Defense memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247986 constitutes an explici\
t modification of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.993 0 Td
(the DoD policy and)Tj
-36.993 -1.125 Td
(standards applicable in cases covered by that statute.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(6. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge was precluded from adjudicating Applica\
nt's case because of Sections 4-100 and)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 658.5 cm
0 0 m
555.322 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 645.75 Tm
(4-102 of Department of Defense Regulation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 645 cm
0 0 m
214.6 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 230.5996 645.75 Tm
(5200.2-R)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 230.5996 645 cm
0 0 m
45 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 275.5996 645.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant also contends the Administrative Judge was barred, as)Tj
-21.633 -1.125 Td
(a matter of law, from adjudicating his case because of Sections 4-100 an\
d 4-102 of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.378 0 Td
(Department of Defense Regulation)Tj
-33.378 -1.125 Td
(5200.2-R. )Tj
(Applicant argues that under those two provisions of Department of Defens\
e Regulation 5200.2-R the only)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(question the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.11 0 Td
(Judge should have considered was whether, based on the previously adjudi\
cated facts, )Tj
34.712 0 Td
(whether to)Tj
-39.822 -1.125 Td
(recommend further consideration of Applicant's case for a waiver)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.475 0 Td
(under 10 U.S.C. \247986\(d\). )Tj
(Department Counsel argues)Tj
-26.475 -1.125 Td
(that those two provisions do not apply to Applicant's situation.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(During the proceedings below, Applicant did not raise the issue of wheth\
er his case is covered by Sections 4-100 and 4-)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(102 of Department of Defense Regulation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.05 0 Td
(5200.2-R. )Tj
(Furthermore, Department Counsel's reply brief identifies other)Tj
-17.05 -1.125 Td
(provisions of Department of Defense Regulation 5200.2-R that could be pe\
rtinent to a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.658 0 Td
(determination of whether)Tj
-34.658 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's case is covered by Sections 4-100 and 4-102, but the applica\
bility )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
31.312 0 Td
(vel non)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
2.916 0 Td
( of those provisions turns on)Tj
-34.227 -1.125 Td
(factual determinations for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.579 0 Td
(which no record evidence was presented. )Tj
16.687 0 Td
(Since Applicant did not raise the issue until appeal,)Tj
-27.267 -1.125 Td
(Applicant cannot fairly complain that the Administrative Judge did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.604 0 Td
(consider it. )Tj
4.693 0 Td
(Moreover, Applicant cannot fairly)Tj
-33.298 -1.125 Td
(invoke Sections 4-100 and 4-102 in isolation from other pertinent provis\
ions of Department of Defense Regulation)Tj
T*
(5200.2-R and without developing or trying to develop a factual record \(\
during the proceedings below\) that would allow)Tj
T*
(a reasoned decision by the Judge as to whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.966 0 Td
(Applicant's case is covered by Sections 4-100 and 4-102. )Tj
23.063 0 Td
(Furthermore,)Tj
-42.03 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's argument ignores the fact that Sections 4-100 and 4-102 appe\
ar in a portion of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.309 0 Td
(DoD Regulation 5200.2-R)Tj
-36.309 -1.125 Td
(entitled "Reciprocal Acceptance of Prior Investigations and Personnel Se\
curity Determinations." )Tj
38.888 0 Td
(Applicant has not)Tj
-38.888 -1.125 Td
(identified any record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.58 0 Td
(evidence that indicates or suggests his situation raises a colorable cla\
im of reciprocity. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.767 0 Td
(Compare)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-43.346 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at pp. 3-4 \(discussing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concept of "reciprocity" under NISPOM\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's argument about Section 4-100 and Section 4-102 also is incon\
sistent with his argument \(Brief at pp. 38-39\))Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that the Administrative Judge prejudiced him by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.579 0 Td
(failing to decide this case without consideration of 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
-19.579 -1.125 Td
(Applicant cannot have it both ways. )Tj
14.635 0 Td
(Applicant cannot fairly claim both \(a\) the Judge erred by not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.52 0 Td
(deciding his case)Tj
-39.155 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline J without consideration of 10 U.S.C. \247986; and \(b\) \
the Judge erred by deciding his case under)Tj
T*
(Guideline J. )Tj
5.083 0 Td
(Moreover, Applicant took)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.664 0 Td
(the position during the proceedings below that the Judge should analyze \
his case)Tj
-15.747 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline J and conclude he satisfied the mitigating conditions un\
der that Guideline. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
36.658 0 Td
(See )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(Hearing Transcript at)Tj
-36.658 -1.125 Td
(pp. 22, 157-159; Applicant's Hearing Memorandum at pp. 6-7. )Tj
25.314 0 Td
(Having asked the Judge to analyze his case under)Tj
-25.314 -1.125 Td
(Guideline J and apply the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.47 0 Td
(mitigating conditions under that Guideline, it is not reasonable for App\
licant to claim now)Tj
-10.47 -1.125 Td
(that the Judge erred by adjudicating his case under Guideline J.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's analysis of Applicant's case under Gu\
ideline J was arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 231 cm
0 0 m
532.834 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 218.25 Tm
(contrary to law)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 217.5 cm
0 0 m
72.639 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 88.6387 218.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant contends the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.219 0 Td
(Judge's analysis of his case under Guideline J is arbitrary,)Tj
-22.272 -1.125 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law because: \(a\) the Judge failed to consid\
er the earlier favorable adjudication of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.871 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
-42.871 -1.125 Td
(security clearance; \(b\) the Judge's decision is contrary to the provis\
ions of Executive Order 12968, the Directive, and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(other applicable federal law; \(c\) the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.492 0 Td
(Judge should have concluded Applicant's past criminal conduct was mitiga\
ted under)Tj
-14.492 -1.125 Td
(Guideline J; \(d\) the Judge's decision does not reflect application of \
the "whole)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.497 0 Td
(person" concept as required by the)Tj
-31.497 -1.125 Td
(Directive; and \(e\) the Judge's decision does not reflect a common sens\
e determination as required by the Directive. )Tj
46.192 0 Td
(For)Tj
-46.192 -1.125 Td
(the reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(that follow, the Board concludes Applicant has failed to demonstrate the\
Judge's decision is arbitrary,)Tj
T*
(capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(a\) A favorable security clearance adjudication in 1990 or 1991 does n\
ot give Applicant any right to have the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge adjudicate his case without regard to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.716 0 Td
(an intervening change in federal law \()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.16 0 Td
(i.e.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 10 U.S.C. \247986\).)Tj
-38.875 -2.125 Td
(\(b\) There is no presumption of error below and the appealing party mus\
t raise claims of error with specificity. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
44.153 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
-47.484 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why claims of error must be raised with)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
53 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[381.0 714.0 399.0 725.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
54 0 obj
[56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R]
endobj
55 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(For the reasons stated in addressing Applicant's first issue, the Board \
will not presume to review and pass judgment on)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(the legal sufficiency of the Deputy Secretary of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.214 0 Td
(Defense memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247986. )Tj
21.83 0 Td
(And, for the)Tj
-41.044 -1.125 Td
(reasons stated in addressing Applicant's second issue, the Board will no\
t presume to review and pass)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.477 0 Td
(judgment on the)Tj
-40.477 -1.375 Td
(legal sufficiency of the DOHA Operating Instruction concerning cases inv\
olving 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 483.8945 716.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 483.8945 715.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 686.25 Tm
(4. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge failed to properly apply the process re\
quired by the Department of Defense)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 685.5 cm
0 0 m
528.152 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 672.75 Tm
(memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247986)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 672 cm
0 0 m
213.65 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 229.6504 672.75 Tm
(. Applicant contends, in the alternative, that even if the Department of\
)Tj
-17.804 -1.125 Td
(Defense memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247986 is legally permissible\
, the Administrative Judge failed to properly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(apply the process required by that memorandum. )Tj
19.828 0 Td
(Specifically, Applicant argues: \(a\) the Judge erred by failing to deci\
de)Tj
-19.828 -1.125 Td
(whether he should have received a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.049 0 Td
(favorable security clearance decision "without consideration of the stat\
ute"; and \(b\))Tj
-14.049 -1.125 Td
(without such a determination by the Judge, Applicant will be prejudiced \
in the future "if)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.51 0 Td
(and when [10 U.S.C. \247986] is)Tj
-35.51 -1.125 Td
(repealed.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's first argument is not frivolous, but it is not persuasive. )Tj
26.705 0 Td
(In reviewing an Administrative Judge's decision, the)Tj
-26.705 -1.125 Td
(Board considers the decision in its entirety and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.996 0 Td
(does not limit itself to reading individual sentences or passages in)Tj
-18.996 -1.125 Td
(isolation. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.944 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-10215 \(January 30, 2004\) at p. 6 n.4. )Tj
(Reading the decision)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.856 0 Td
(below in its entirety,)Tj
-39.132 -1.125 Td
(the Board does not agree with Applicant's interpretation of the Judge's \
decision. )Tj
32.158 0 Td
(Reading the Judge's decision in its)Tj
-32.158 -1.125 Td
(entirety, the Board construes it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.552 0 Td
(as holding that, but for the application of 10 U.S.C. \247986, Applicant\
's past criminal)Tj
-12.552 -1.125 Td
(conduct was mitigated under Guideline J.)Tj
T*
(Applicant's second argument lacks merit. )Tj
16.731 0 Td
(It is untenable for Applicant to make a claim of prejudice based on an)Tj
-16.731 -1.125 Td
(assumption that a federal statute will be repealed in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.27 0 Td
(future. )Tj
(Applicant is entitled to have his case adjudicated under)Tj
-22.27 -1.125 Td
(existing law, not on speculation as to how the law may be different in t\
he future. )Tj
32.436 0 Td
(Moreover, even if there)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.69 0 Td
(were any)Tj
-42.126 -1.125 Td
(rational basis to conclude that the law would change in a particular way\
in the foreseeable future, Applicant's legal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(rights today are not determined or measured)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.911 0 Td
(against any future change in the law. )Tj
14.939 0 Td
(A claim of prejudice to a person's)Tj
-32.85 -1.125 Td
(rights must be predicated on the evaluation of the facts and circumstanc\
es of their situation in light)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.739 0 Td
(of existing law, not)Tj
-39.739 -1.125 Td
(speculation about whether or how possible changes in the law might have \
retroactive applicability to their current)Tj
T*
(situation.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(5. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by adjudicating Applicant's case \
under Guideline J when there was no)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 366 cm
0 0 m
531.662 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 353.25 Tm
(adverse information concerning Applicant since a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 352.5 cm
0 0 m
241.91 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 257.9102 353.25 Tm
(favorable security clearance adjudication in 1990 or 1991)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 257.9102 352.5 cm
0 0 m
276.223 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 534.1328 353.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant)Tj
-43.178 -1.125 Td
(contends that the Administrative Judge should not have adjudicated his c\
ase under Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.046 0 Td
(because there is no)Tj
-38.046 -1.125 Td
(adverse information concerning Applicant since he received a favorable s\
ecurity clearance adjudication in 1990 or 1991.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 314.25 Tm
(\(6\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 16 313.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 27.3687 309.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant argues that the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.524 0 Td
(Judge's unfavorable decision: \(a\) "defies the law, logic and experienc\
e"; \(b\) is contrary to)Tj
-11.472 -1.125 Td
(the concept of repose that underlies the legal doctrines of )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.103 0 Td
(res judicata)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.75 0 Td
(, judicial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.749 0 Td
(estoppel, collateral estoppel, and)Tj
-31.601 -1.375 Td
(equitable estoppel;)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 106.3047 284.25 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 106.3047 283.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 120.1108 279.75 Tm
( \(c\) is inconsistent with a recent federal district court decision in \
an Army security clearance case)Tj
-8.676 -1.125 Td
(having similar)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.999 0 Td
(facts; and \(d\) improperly fails to apply DoD policy and standards appl\
icable to Guideline J cases. )Tj
39.184 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-45.183 -1.125 Td
(reasons that follow, the Board concludes Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.286 0 Td
(arguments lack merit.)Tj
-21.286 -2.375 Td
(The doctrine of judicial estoppel)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 171.9473 228.75 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 171.9473 228 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 185.7534 224.25 Tm
( and the doctrine of equitable estoppel)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 369.0229 228.75 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 369.0229 228 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 382.8291 224.25 Tm
( are not applicable to Applicant's situation)Tj
-30.569 -1.125 Td
(and provide no legal support for his appeal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.384 0 Td
(arguments. )Tj
4.666 0 Td
(Moreover, the legal doctrines of )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.106 0 Td
(res judicata)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.75 0 Td
( and collateral)Tj
-39.906 -1.375 Td
(estoppel do not preclude the application of a new federal statute.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 325.5508 198.75 Tm
( \(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 325.5508 198 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 344.2319 194.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant cites no legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.969 0 Td
(authority to support his)Tj
-37.322 -1.125 Td
(premise that legal doctrines developed by courts to regulate issue precl\
usion in the context of adjudications can be)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(invoked to negate the force and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.828 0 Td
(effect of a federal statute enacted by Congress. )Tj
18.963 0 Td
(An individual's right to expect repose in)Tj
-31.791 -1.125 Td
(adjudications does not confer any right to, or reasonable expectation in\
, being)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.324 0 Td
(exempted from the application of a new)Tj
-31.324 -1.125 Td
(federal statute.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The federal district court decision cited by Applicant is distinguishabl\
e on its facts from Applicant's case. )Tj
42.363 0 Td
(Moreover, to)Tj
-42.363 -1.125 Td
(the extent that the federal court decision cited by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.742 0 Td
(Applicant is based on the federal district court's exercise of judicial)Tj
-19.742 -1.125 Td
(authority under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, the Board cannot a\
nd will not presume to exercise)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.99 0 Td
(such authority in)Tj
-40.99 -1.125 Td
(these proceedings.)Tj
T*
(Applicant acknowledges that 10 U.S.C. \247986 is an intervening change i\
n law, but then appears to argue that the)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[483.0 714.0 497.0 725.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[16.0 312.0 27.0 323.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[106.0 282.0 120.0 293.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[171.0 226.0 185.0 237.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[369.0 226.0 383.0 237.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
61 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[325.0 196.0 343.0 207.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
62 0 obj
[64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R]
endobj
63 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 752.25 Tm
(\()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(i.e.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 10 U.S.C.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\247986\(c\)\(1\)\).)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 149.3066 756.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
Q
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 149.3066 756 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 726.75 Tm
(To implement 10 U.S.C. \247986, the Deputy Secretary of Defense issued a\
memorandum, dated June 7, 2001 \("Deputy)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Secretary of Defense memorandum"\). )Tj
15.43 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.193 0 Td
(contends the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum exceeds the)Tj
-19.623 -1.125 Td
(mandate of 10 U.S.C. \247986 and, therefore, violates Applicant's rights\
under the statute. )Tj
34.978 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.193 0 Td
(acknowledges that the)Tj
-39.171 -1.125 Td
(Board has held that it does not have authority to review or pass judgmen\
t on the Deputy Secretary of Defense)Tj
T*
(memorandum, but asks the Board to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.748 0 Td
(reconsider those prior rulings, arguing that \(a\) the Board has plenary\
authority)Tj
-14.748 -1.125 Td
(when ruling on issues of law; and \(b\) "[t]o look away when the Constit\
ution or the statutes)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.485 0 Td
(of Congress are violated by)Tj
-36.485 -1.125 Td
(administrative regulation is an abdication of the Appeal Board's plenary\
responsibility to uphold the law of the land.")Tj
T*
(Applicant's arguments)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.178 0 Td
(are not well founded.)Tj
-9.178 -2.125 Td
(Applicant is correct in noting that the Board has plenary authority when\
ruling on issues of law. )Tj
38.547 0 Td
(However, Applicant)Tj
-38.547 -1.125 Td
(errs by arguing about the scope of that review)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.577 0 Td
(authority without regard to the legal framework within which the Board)Tj
-18.577 -1.125 Td
(operates. )Tj
3.832 0 Td
(The Board does not have jurisdiction and authority in a vacuum. )Tj
25.994 0 Td
(The Board has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.082 0 Td
(jurisdiction and authority by)Tj
-35.907 -1.125 Td
(virtue of Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.28 throu\
gh E3.1.35. )Tj
34.13 0 Td
(Those provisions plainly show that)Tj
-34.13 -1.125 Td
(the jurisdiction and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.971 0 Td
(authority of the Board are limited to reviewing security clearance adjud\
ications made under the)Tj
-7.971 -1.125 Td
(Directive, and do not including reviewing actions by the Deputy Secretar\
y)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.991 0 Td
(of Defense. )Tj
(Although the Board has plenary)Tj
-29.991 -1.125 Td
(authority when ruling on issues of law that fall )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.913 0 Td
(within its jurisdiction)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
8.557 0 Td
(, that review authority does )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.164 0 Td
(not)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( constitute an)Tj
-38.633 -1.125 Td
(independent source of jurisdiction and does not expand the Board's juris\
diction beyond the provisions of the Directive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's reference to the obligation of Board members to adhere to th\
e U.S. Constitution and other federal law adds)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(nothing substantive to his argument. )Tj
14.776 0 Td
(As federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(officials, we have taken an oath of office that requires us to uphold an\
d)Tj
-14.776 -1.375 Td
(defend the U.S. Constitution and faithfully discharge our duties.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 323.6113 461.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 323.6113 460.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 431.25 Tm
(However, the oath of office)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.273 0 Td
(does not confer jurisdiction on us beyond that conferred by the Directiv\
e. )Tj
29.575 0 Td
(Followed to its)Tj
-40.848 -1.125 Td
(logical conclusion, Applicant's argument would provide a rationale for t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.977 0 Td
(Board to assert jurisdiction to review the)Tj
-29.977 -1.125 Td
(constitutionality of federal statutes, adjudicate an applicant's rights \
under various provisions of the U.S. Code, or decide)Tj
T*
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(lawfulness of Presidential directives and decisions by the Secretary of \
Defense \(and other DoD officials\) whenever)Tj
T*
(an appealing party raised a claim that implicates those)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.909 0 Td
(matters. )Tj
3.443 0 Td
(We will not accept an argument that would result in such)Tj
-25.352 -1.125 Td
(an untenable situation. )Tj
9.275 0 Td
(As federal officials, we adhere to the oath of office not only by carryi\
ng out)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.544 0 Td
(duties under our)Tj
-39.82 -1.375 Td
(jurisdiction in a lawful manner, but also by recognizing the limits of o\
ur )Tj
29.105 0 Td
(authority and not acting outside those limits.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 578.8984 351.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 578.8984 351 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 321.75 Tm
(In short, the Board has no authority to adjudicate Applicant's claim tha\
t the Deputy Secretary of Defense memorandum)Tj
T*
(exceeds the mandate of 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Whether the DOHA Operating Instruction concerning cases involving 10 U.S\
.C. \247986 exceeds the mandate of that)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 282 cm
0 0 m
549.85 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 269.25 Tm
(statute, and is contrary to the Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 268.5 cm
0 0 m
214.266 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 230.2656 269.25 Tm
(Defense memorandum implementing that statute)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 230.2656 268.5 cm
0 0 m
233.936 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 464.2012 269.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(To implement the Deputy)Tj
-37.35 -1.125 Td
(Secretary of Defense memorandum, the Director, DOHA issued an Operating \
Instruction,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.155 0 Td
(dated July 10, 2001.)Tj
-36.155 -1.125 Td
(Applicant contends the Operating Instruction exceeds the mandate of 10 U\
.S.C. \247986 and is contrary to the Deputy)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Secretary of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.634 0 Td
(memorandum implementing that statute.)Tj
-8.634 -2.125 Td
(As discussed earlier in this decision, the Board's jurisdiction is limit\
ed by the provisions of the Directive. )Tj
42.256 0 Td
(Nothing in the)Tj
-42.256 -1.125 Td
(Directive authorizes the Board to review the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.965 0 Td
(actions of the Director, DOHA. )Tj
12.857 0 Td
(And, for the same reasons discussed earlier)Tj
-30.823 -1.125 Td
(in this decision, neither the Board's review authority nor the oath of o\
ffice taken by its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.699 0 Td
(members provides jurisdiction to)Tj
-34.699 -1.125 Td
(review the actions of the Director, DOHA. )Tj
17.3 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board has no authority to adjudicate Applicant's claim \
that)Tj
-17.3 -1.125 Td
(the DOHA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Operating Instruction exceeds the mandate of 10 U.S.C. \247986 and is co\
ntrary to the Deputy Secretary of)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Defense memorandum implementing that statute.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 252.9355 137.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 252.9355 136.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 107.25 Tm
(3. )Tj
(Whether the Department of Defense memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247\
986 and the DOHA Operating)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 106.5 cm
0 0 m
517.201 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 93.75 Tm
(Instruction concerning cases involving that statute are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 93 cm
0 0 m
261.586 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 277.5859 93.75 Tm
(arbitrary and capricious)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 277.5859 93 cm
0 0 m
113.947 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 391.5332 93.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant contends the Deputy Secretary)Tj
-31.294 -1.125 Td
(of Defense memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247986 and the DOHA Operat\
ing Instruction)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.798 0 Td
(concerning cases)Tj
-37.798 -1.125 Td
(involving that statute are arbitrary and capricious because neither one \
sets standards for judging whether to recommend)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(a waiver under that statute.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
64 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[149.0 754.0 163.0 765.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
65 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[324.0 459.0 338.0 470.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[579.0 349.0 593.0 360.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[252.0 135.0 266.0 146.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-33144.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:06:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(party must raise claims of error with specificity\).)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
19.881 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, the Board will review the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.14 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-42.14 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its conclusions, including a rational)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.442 0 Td
(connection between the facts found and the choice made; it does not cons\
ider)Tj
-14.442 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.708 0 Td
(of the case; it offers an)Tj
-36.708 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
T*
(a mere difference of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.328 0 Td
(opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.887 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
-15.215 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.006 0 Td
(to law, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
-27.006 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
T*
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.69 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by such)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.758 0 Td
(relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-24.758 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In making this review,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.248 0 Td
(the)Tj
-44.764 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence supporting\
a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.475 0 Td
(evidence supporting those)Tj
-37.475 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a Judge's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.234 0 Td
(determination is not immune from review, the party challenging a Judge's\
credibility)Tj
-12.234 -1.125 Td
(determination has a heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.883 0 Td
(cases\).)Tj
-18.883 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
T*
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.717 0 Td
(E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-0.492 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, Applicant does not dispute the following findings by the Admi\
nistrative Judge: \(a\) Applicant was arrested in)Tj
T*
(August 1986 and later convicted of conspiracy to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.939 0 Td
(possess cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine; \(b\))Tj
-19.939 -1.125 Td
(Applicant was sentenced to concurrent, three-year terms of imprisonment;\
\(c\) Applicant served more)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.652 0 Td
(than two years)Tj
-40.652 -1.125 Td
(confinement before being paroled to a halfway house in May 1989; \(d\) A\
pplicant was released from the halfway house)Tj
T*
(after approximately four months;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.496 0 Td
(and \(e\) Applicant has not been charged with any criminal offense \(oth\
er than minor)Tj
-13.496 -1.125 Td
(traffic violations\) since being released from confinement in 1989. )Tj
26.491 0 Td
(However, Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.358 0 Td
(does raise several challenges to)Tj
-34.85 -1.125 Td
(the application of 10 U.S.C. \247986 to his case and the Administrative \
Judge's analysis of the case under Guideline J)Tj
T*
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Department of Defense memorandum implementing 10 U.S.C. \247\
986 exceeds the mandate of that statute)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 81 cm
0 0 m
561.164 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 589.1641 81.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-47.764 -1.125 Td
(Under 10 U.S.C. \247986, the Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.969 0 Td
(Defense may not grant or renew a security clearance for a defense contra\
ctor)Tj
-16.969 -1.125 Td
(official or employee that falls under any of four statutory categories [\
10 U.S.C. \247986\(c\)\(1\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.405 0 Td
(through \(c\)\(4\)]. )Tj
(In this case,)Tj
-36.405 -1.125 Td
(the Administrative Judge concluded that Applicant's 1987 conviction fall\
s under one of those four statutory categories)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
82 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/02-33144.a1.html)
endobj
81 0 obj
<>
endobj
83 0 obj
<>
endobj
70 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 291.0 null]
endobj
71 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 252.0 null]
endobj
72 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 121.0 null]
endobj
73 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 82.0 null]
endobj
74 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 713.0 null]
endobj
75 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 660.0 null]
endobj
76 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 594.0 null]
endobj
77 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 515.0 null]
endobj
78 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 462.0 null]
endobj
79 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 342.0 null]
endobj
80 0 obj
[20 0 R/XYZ 0 317.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 84
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003652 00000 n
0000189064 00000 n
0000003530 00000 n
0000003585 00000 n
0000003753 00000 n
0000003780 00000 n
0000187792 00000 n
0000188130 00000 n
0000188172 00000 n
0000187602 00000 n
0000004820 00000 n
0000179325 00000 n
0000168625 00000 n
0000156831 00000 n
0000146656 00000 n
0000139003 00000 n
0000133803 00000 n
0000126787 00000 n
0000003883 00000 n
0000003929 00000 n
0000003978 00000 n
0000004333 00000 n
0000004077 00000 n
0000004109 00000 n
0000004141 00000 n
0000004173 00000 n
0000004205 00000 n
0000004237 00000 n
0000004269 00000 n
0000004301 00000 n
0000005031 00000 n
0000010934 00000 n
0000010983 00000 n
0000011018 00000 n
0000011620 00000 n
0000012043 00000 n
0000072819 00000 n
0000073086 00000 n
0000041353 00000 n
0000041626 00000 n
0000012480 00000 n
0000012756 00000 n
0000013211 00000 n
0000042065 00000 n
0000073703 00000 n
0000126987 00000 n
0000134003 00000 n
0000139192 00000 n
0000146870 00000 n
0000146895 00000 n
0000156505 00000 n
0000157045 00000 n
0000157105 00000 n
0000166681 00000 n
0000167005 00000 n
0000167327 00000 n
0000167651 00000 n
0000167975 00000 n
0000168299 00000 n
0000168839 00000 n
0000168885 00000 n
0000178029 00000 n
0000178353 00000 n
0000178677 00000 n
0000179001 00000 n
0000179536 00000 n
0000187687 00000 n
0000188603 00000 n
0000188645 00000 n
0000188687 00000 n
0000188729 00000 n
0000188770 00000 n
0000188812 00000 n
0000188854 00000 n
0000188896 00000 n
0000188938 00000 n
0000188980 00000 n
0000189022 00000 n
0000188380 00000 n
0000188214 00000 n
0000188550 00000 n
trailer
<<4EF6F0C06B00C14DA3B1730EFBABF763>]>>
startxref
189237
%%EOF