(19. UўOL?MDz
_uo, HgщNq2 V){?R:2- +:eҟһ?ԏIO 97!%Wy1LYf^f1'?2aX1;d(U4X_2L
deEcYL("?ޒ
I&9>ē)#J%V?dA*k
B =:QS YD =3>ӈlI
5M6
syd<պ
h| k*{4U~_V* 33,ά`N&hN|wTOVy{>|C~$5VV pl pk
F@Uar`;;uE"*i`5-bU`-k)2ޤZ$ >sX*O)rzdmDW
Ɓa^y}ԶΞUru!O"ЖeN ֖)V<pӥy
CO!!"wu,> iiT}XLP *ЂjY=%Gqt'\k>Nvg@`Lyu!pY
|qH&({qk A A9rC M D\ Rv>֑z>=k&E> ZzFx &̞=sW,G`=1P %! p xKP{ ;R20 [p!*U+ЊIʼ+w=~\7k$)^eqwv!Gh}s= 92@DebW,nwH/
-5n?cQبӫ>?5G ߵ]d7bXV# 2S4z=մyY9֍ 4 [ NΞƫ!;27nM`bbS,5ବѦ4^
+ ?& žQdi[!Nw8J qJ q*rP Il PE*PqBe ~3g[KFvm[=}{jDTӡ zx k{{.qRaG /
eR`Z˦d ӒMlcUdک"Vi""l2!MjvT mݺTՊ}mS-=9 -,U)4^$$]]ڸ
) ."˅N/#.,#"N)#~\?y1)WlG%đ1qX Z!D|{M|G ܾ^ ) j\ Oi(
ZzQmM GehDjfkzz䑡~ ĉ Yߦ{G, %+ٟ T]Sz+ۚ
KT;rTR8LtXKaFaRFXVY> YF,̘e~>Ɓ ^wC fp86
¾(J!#Ć1
8F`>cz5\xsMb}Dg
}~JebQsEĵ!r2 _䢇jb!F5(d|
xϞ?u uaޕu洃lyqfxYxm$ ڇ w2,pԄor I% "Mpќf
rJS|e(-%U#xᅩ\wt\ ߾_qjCNmY;} ixn 5ےL;jԓ]0B<OљuHTӘiC]1ҔM(lJN }RuIB2LAi ^Bc 6/x %,0I3@\#r
06wO|LFRzC⛬Jt[`O4 XG s <\4wFvF̷
&eMZx6a{AYlPV
XrXoc~%DWCsvi*jjBLuFҩ;7Gf]S'd olh
pCܰl@t|f6ΰ9+{k,!,D~Ǔݘ YMMG GTTЅb^=u+(ӧ~Vp7o1NI5in$z8kBW4sίtAs7A7-8` bG:-|nqG/*tw1!H*d2F9/ dlNQ>G
0f@D&tQJR {"pdgG`|ʳ78>6ZO ? 5ɽ\|-U'{_p+deUI{
B `̧- (r_X\tc@wٕvҕN4/ ZfXpȋH6=.M%ٻ 3[S?.j&g_OE7y31 oDsx.-??#OgVƼ~o\_Kݱ_wlqyAWhА] ٽcwz}&TpFYV 9!f[
@4!e
Uh/|o $6@x
6Ȏ+;0 \bg! ͨIYQm@^\Q//pAo!+D;+߀z':*$.rt"Y~ cqُ|3ڽ.^B}
y|M](}e= d 0$/;g_Xn ߚ s i~$Ts[ h^'. @ ƚ2el9˪3X$
s-ڀ$sf}˯"c{YQ3L `=aGrG_bԿNm_1q:[m[
#Oߜ
> m 49>͡# Ցƀ '?9 kn! ߀-ڇ
u1mI|
@d:}Guo=n JBx I C&І$%R0d VK
֑ 284Vm;m֤:Hjębh=ۓ]Bw~MfaU_`{db쾅ǩ Z2om8n\Źg4+ȟ>9*}YQ*b᧬(q8s ?H h_"}CIYoR^U v`g`J/AYv3D.:":-֦t&9f7]j>tw:)B`f<;CuW>֊Rz)VĄd*0~\ ORjC
&'E |\ }bؒbm18ϳ%lψky|S.Ϝ 8Fs2>M;ʳvi[8v'⮠K8>rqc^ort37U( 788, S,
blpe{ BnhNE/ѹTyԩz/qޝ 7Eʟ4ȱB7^?P(j^s(AQ*v&xd[Ov7[~,/?i*oΡR*-@쿃E\Yax:=^]}7blBժ fftD|,AontTCʮ܍rUp:e
pb?B t[ J@nYFtC?lHZ .vx :(~/ 4k4>MafS6Me> ?}>1/9;x {G7iDS[mw6j?G[AS3pv>jĔ K,yg}*gT)9pkd>6jYao+m
l2s})
ǃ 0-&Cۨ+O*-b/# =k<;aC^$
ByaoD| ܁I/> b-KB Koo\q~U(mq>l VP 8L.{eDy0ޤƍ%ֹ9Tk_}mT' 0GG=rw 1aC'?@D5 5d@ :(`WcZ"֫{~h;7 $4bgM6t,xg? h\
T蓇Ftk?!G`l;x&v } +\9KwCSr<⋭V>-z@ܣXgEĞAy N/]Igi"s߱ 89kn?2g3Ab^ٴ[U})ٟ %@:_퉻OZkp֥x`<;oOD?9M r*0_O=N@ _G̮gMj 9TDlqJ#/N29cvr0F :+ 8i<c9|)A@8{4W+)B= 9o!jm,`m@/(sEy}MTx~f}ToKp
6/ِ!/NiL2W:QE>nS=٬ X>Ȗj5vz_usr+qʕk*r|ϙa_6֕y\iz`g*uVHFvV⿵_x:6,}lBZH&@{1 Q]p M
}e+JczD}!2z*a9l_V#[s)8X a4]^nV{
Q!1TGP0vZ]ϙs>iFĕߚtH4{1r 5ćވ_|jtMv{X2`Hߡh krƬ"ÚwuΗ, Vmgl ܨk" i
kc&O>"[]o<.?nkMFwaC>CgV }DfHwr6d>d{HhyR:1q# k0;FV/cɻcg> 3ô̵l32ZH?i ј`+Hש̫ZJ7hi엦BVǞlf駣j^5z5mN=gV봑USX]MYd ]lSMktFiu~̼ݧwtb"x7,6Zp%yu_g=GR "G1CqoICpRAmEb־) zKSG=si+,-S(ѼG cNlMw}^>
շDN]~s7^ʊ%kW-EeH7uj2!Z6sğfk`a1uY@yԭfN{woJ2IGG5$;cV =y%W+6ލ!Ą39aB&N>ҽ
^z;a~ʷCr ^tZo wQ@/}N˽I g˴\TfDU|
͛عAE%|/;X@ZC| Fk-3)idx?pV4bYѳo'ķ3'-$=}ΒT
9s!N)&fLL5m
si\?&eeF[iG_rzBSA)\mxRg=K\
?)%RV0}exONk")VbQHQHW(i+ߜ\JW]kc,5^$rNq˩sof&[hK;)POIop;%k| .Q[wYtzG_$ҁrmKH.ur]=k&]h+}7Jh 4k\Uݪy;X1Numj
K8P}i,2qcD2^R
0^;g
cIiecԌ0FZyar? Ūgg"IzF.<1éGZ-F̑z)WԐVird҄r\sNf/}ש L4oNLDZ}4iou}gIN7oXrwBd< #ivjH r靻v -A {;μ3X~^')tN
J` z(zEܯZF-y _pr؍ɫaֻ
ǼDo!B!vtVifJ`T`2
& kh2zݝR̐^s˿g!RJ]D3c{JEvi>urۥL [?
]>=:OJ_A2]/w9 sۄhRc딢6Hͣ
rzX~{Ò>Ͼ˜#ݍЍ7ڴ6b箑|C]'
1>ʃsp9G:GD㯁tp"|Bؿ>_Q_#vڹ`#\քM,:qG)]ӷbe*C u\: SǮsIzѵ;E?^:CW6~24f
foMaΧ_A6mwq4͖D;ED܊SN G_Yn|7 # c|f~ IY5k%g-d6 !RPj CavH-^'}!k,ʢX0tS-U/!{pU ǿ}M@jB ܄ p&@Aa`@M P
P | ojI P((q=s̭m?={H.)"i$$' 依(m"uIֵbFT~ VyR+,+کSm 02C?~7Ro4WsRnhYk +h7 ۋU1k#}22{AN:&9^9-
L_Wx$~w0F Y4d1kY,{ yko('q2FXQ z{Hv.Dr 9 ei}1.119
2/y
Ԅm"'܉.쳗05cxweDJ?v % 1wc0Z=>*TQ܅ZgF$w!_N8h ~VZݷx{7%ᷬzsR \Cs$$zVԻ3PB'2gMARY$% -6!"5s\:=e7&2c3{o&lblmPcO }Gs j8*z1ggs^uRj"LmZcGCŀS]&$*IT7dg)wEY蝍Zޛr9cHݞ]$ Nǥ8 JVD"&sF{bSmǔh)j]n?J OTS0Jd\_3|
d'z-2Ksͼ7BEl=:%=վX9Qx>i̍jsIysl 팠2 t R-{4
r^~g<nǃ#5=}5g+ʍ<y>F %}+̐3O{@Y.9B8 )ی;[::XBX_t
"NSt.
1H~U|#%]YJ@LGY L&`˲/, }[Nvv?6
n1=6
{NN>4e֏e2UA;o
:4ӥ_\b_bNRG ݓ=Fh
^ :zk4?&:ʹ:5LHcNm4 ~%Qw>C9Ն00@N"Fy`аxT Q`]Z=A ޞ- W
;N
-` %
{+ @M`(@jhu`x@hثvю&Z"
٣+h]@
yA:i fE/ yMo^UNMOl?XSwSQW"J# % - -`VNqZ|e]߮Os׳zF=YOS{I c>) T ankUKZ* p6x-@˦oC+:Iqʨ`-5 hXC +1F ؆.yTȦQ5 p% שY
p W\"S0gjCx|),,)45A}ɎF:^n
IU(OPU8Ar7 8NUp x Re{ )<$sLR 5X=Ը Ij E~_bKw`ݍMJDf## G~HY& G30pz qoi(%׃iSp`4t
<ƧΒ/A:4G>W/L?XEK>R+{>VɤQJl(2{[&pFeL(i̍䈪rZ[ sl!lP=%<ƨ= lŨ*
ǧw>eЧxj$ F Go?,
û@+텫:4|aF,ճaw5 X_3!Q< m6DݑdHmU7Dj\ dt 5r
\-+±q[DDI!/.oY"T\GN}g|(OKX!KQMMGQ.Pex"C{E Rh~0R!pɤs HiQ 9ܛShhqhEI-
#xdH"Msjkf?/OU5ûYy? ,\嗺fY}^w>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\͊@}&jݟnnp1?3I$ĸNN#hNHq춻C}}éi!]PpL-P7q7VC_y~ eמb :𰮻cz,oC=_c(. ,VNG_%rZf?5ySXLsbNPОS*,gU+ OP,xy6˗ deVdc6dgvgg
y˼E~c~C~ge!sdz"<12Gdad:#g3pF:#qͼF~e~E-&}
)SЧ,0+T4+J¬4+J¬4+J¬t*J¦(<Ʈ ]2te4 Ʈ ]=+CWFM6veؕ+gW~w~w~w~w~lҏ݈OyTatL ;iw}ȫ-
0 ~ X
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
H|y|gyL6H6yg&yGkmUhrJ/"͂H$H -RkD{c}߉XľCo'3G|>ys<{9XHܥQӐÅ._LRt~(^3^/!ک0LW;j3ўHg =OC5?1ZBobh&?s v[nCa 8g%X1(mNJ7KJlU
My O7l> |c}Gwo[A ~r*d$?[B:Vj E=(h_o!?H}{,LBr`8 9x1
s0H'X5 KQ1$p 'p()x 3pp LFbG2 C1 1Qo1a cD x]KsHCiIGsi G\Ĥ#=ܴ"ZLț|ȗ2KZN+h%Yi5z*
6fڂ_qTJh;GUh&
QL)~:@
H5 BMu@t_[M
Df:Fb*St(TQCP)st.`7եw ܥ/s>/
^Vmvռ:^7&[x6Qx;w x? |.\8\%|O.Ֆk+.[,~4d,-Y>"_|5s#|=~~t.J Ut\O^VW ǿϹ{9y{ ]bA,ҋt $ƘFA (1Nd CQCRDi 첽; p~9?|:A'$StN:Cg,nm8-r_rȗ2_ W֫k?;:[9:W|]B_ճ =Wu~S BH/K;z^22^W5Z[
zޤ7wUoFNŠ]z~_{CW ?~ 'rdNTNtLln9y ]]Eї? ,q!8p #q>q p 81q
>SqNnυ܁;r']Gu]wDž|2\+p%ո:\oSn.h.˸_HZT8;9ST9NS9N4:MN! A `B qtv@$BdHTH\tuA AB CBs{pO>g [\+ t.Aw=> _{^?0\x
70 ^o?xa{GWwR|-o!s̜4g8*N(WO⦨w܅J{P
5P+ ^{[L)A=4@#4A3p!IH/;ȇò/ŲDC9:4D*g'y|Iɗ+U9'X,T.+c:[+BQnNG_gsy F(S,DWyU^R٢ҊUTk $UTYU:.zT/[UEXJ@5H
VCP5L
W#H5J=F1jzLS5QM
5?
jzZ=ßz'=|%y^y^={Ho7ޛMfzOyxϙW 3e%fYnVfb fcvk{vk?~m
8A|L faz aǰk3|8|$ ¢X Kpp8$x a{ q=aOS{{ڞg9{ޖ2{ۋl ՠ-DS9r"upt]tu]v=wkmnk7
~it.9њhm.Z m0Mٴ؈u,qn&In[7MqS47p3,7m渹n #|qOI>_"μyLNB+I)HRh!t] AD,E@WB @Hץu^\Ξ#o/ ;{f3s\r-q[w)
b>:쁽p)P (b)vR<%PWBp.B %\꜡$J- Ԟ:PGz^#ԉ^'BPWFݩJ=P*Q:>ԗQʠ LCh(
N`9Dr h q>}@iMI4`{ʢ4JCA4fQͦ94>?_οܿ|Bo:H#<7!WWW
#L2Q8 z#)}JKh)2̥G+(V*VS}N_Zh imMF[h+m%Oi'`=}Moh7 ڋh ta:BG TDtNi*R:CgQ9UP%UQ5P-}f Og6]KTG?w.ͭz^jӠ Iyr+N嘇+p ln-unCtk tБ:Jig66Mm3ܶxD_g:SI:Yҽu Wvk=h=j-=eO[jس̞V*[mklm`3'HO("SYi9 v8GcqS3(DJTQ+߉GqE\?5q]7 j$e+"[3 RowTT#!骷Y*Q+TbLVSTd&H%e seV3)0Y0Y3irdc,2A2I&d[CH=fvS/L bf>;1;NޕwcBteFt7Q*DژXhT7 *ɴ1&tE]U?1g6LXӛMb3y7/{;hm<䛕f̬6sYc֚uf`6Ml/+ ^2E4 Df˙N8E 6LimBM 7&R-P![ ܫܮqKs^
?@8bG}V
! zA5ײ0 C8ߓ:x &uQ1y&@cxѽ͟=w55ײ0uX 9- r+Km-WanH`!r`98>aa0
a6ކx{zcW}`T 6c?7 i.,dDžP$dwZAt0u+n-_+J TK`#yvwjuC|V~v # ^ A_.BL
0,bE%Ϲܛ 10 g\i院
kje^G?a]}VCuR#dpSal]= ?WSDߞ_<^ݙbޥB8Ⱥ؊g |sq :,DLw7\iZ0Fn(F< cI`mqϸ'c]o"(;xC43;_& I2ߑr &|yVVy&yvzWGv}uy^ q:pi,0R< ;y' ÿ `{~Gn>.e.,,SgYQ\%vEOxAܒ-[2Gfe< Y)yRFիxriaO/ow Ng t, J.
T M0!w TV `
b
ᬑ8
Grp6ŏp dV<-%g ì|| 8?U qcX|99|Iw- {&LR%Z FRsQτ4j%Z"R&mZ*-ه]U䙻y 3f7A| ȷV|?
2W [^V^S.+WUkvuzH}G}W}O\[%~d ; ~_ɥ{D>Ư.*Amu|]٫<\MEgW (+)m?cĔ>!wG?7؏~%}rZ >"W(Ɵb?v]NwIWt
V=ďa|>pu[\VOЇnfu1ױq
vٷ)^ET#^TN-%,]PBRLURoWj%.La+;|/OK\b+r{0VZA;y6>D5iZIgGht3~~Ohհx/"go7QòRURF$<
;C; o^.6VNN@K WzI'(`[G}3NOA:y{݃ ڂ7MpQw rvS"Aw!۵
>M GaF
fgԗ!*9
k*y, u qn9VuS ^krbw|Oh/@w>.2V; M2]t.#ު@D rd&2Al
dn"ιQL=-v DzhN]҈z#n@~~2{We|
lY:z 8r~(42 O _G"CK{h{wvh߶5ukܻz=+hdKE!}/_Q^6osU2xFߧ
gM)[UPj i ғЁJMS97x3^d}=IC =:[Li0,]{{YB'+tl=)R݀3F:JDOYV^Ǽ/OƲfA(Qi4$|AJ p2#[dC0%.AF X(-#| nhXF9# uّ 'Jڒk̉`QAL~g L
*Nb@ -djH~- s NN
t[`.!]{.fFT:Z VVTԝv
AJ7ܕGNS)l`NXw ̚-м.{MseR"cA:$1
i%{-P,Q1 f$l'> - 0tS72 OIv
DRA (dу9.G8۴Bzsq 2-f ֩+8J%-)&( GlJEQU7;P67 쿐{6ԓ=~MS<}m6cy\a&iJ~Z8e$FdsVǃ7wGaf %r.5'/{DnP soQ^s{D,2OQ Zś; x
-g8)CO9ι.CΘb*3'?ԈMXuԐɒn7E{{b)EKw11oFaE;-m Fm
,L(G>i S
+})SBY;a imKa,ńBC7@iBv0pVPҽ4o!/6yߴYP)(8#D 髄jl^(7BB\tl/늾+z%Y^V^Iƒ啱 },ٖ?Z1 c0MH1-)2-tX
!
C?mt2j0X}}ww={g|0XBQ4J9."azkGi(J]`.(`/mj~
GVr 7 Id Z`OLhm@ UM? j
AyrE:Vr KJ 'l~JSH;OsԳ_sC`ˡ==zhĢމy$PXyשԵiX\Ha:h\8܃ף|_߫oGIG`!$ҩozf(RCNg`=7 )zyu7@{P.,TTxDԹO*/Uau`
sp|00M59M3b"wL y;T:6kЙQi1w! =mߕ/3ٙZ[9oPr>I^LƃiYNdVXe~2wtI VF}
VX-#~\<$D"jSx2%Q.y#{HZ:wѠ0jILdgNqTx2st,], 2CSJ(v#L:w7w^:i NccIMxM{+
B.bk
8j⢎u2
ϤC$_l.g0*W[PSC}S
H I B
4c
h8^ p ^])x6 /V) DjXƞg-^.@ r
_m}(IDe?
np.t^gқߒ,c?2 IqY8N)D# YI Gj _xTIѪ+h9B;
CE o9[Xq%/(
UB>}σǟ ={m{۶My Umڢ랼t϶cZխ篦Ss ¨qG$E)̘9+^i Dr3Ns7B2TROld<]]-
;"/6k261T1RAQJQueJG=ALn5q\x QcO~fOs*W1-w7AT BKQ#%O0trUm&p`_W ǮM(
U\oĽaxN."C4̛22Ҥg/ٲm i3 eDxt2sOZ Fmda49Vd5Vi ~Ss#nsK%CKN=E3w. m6tǍDMDUm_u&ڗ d+룇s;NN4y9OmDN(lRH I};*/$wnT6$ %*QGvGԼ PZ(gAcP̰c=k ~CLa ysJTG$P (j[[ Ǒo/ z\p߳>? * j
2
Uq.TO !9@2!^v=(Ά @ x
l rx'|bj~s0 gҒ>=aϞc6r>
SI'%МKH9X./NJ.ZQs: CAX!>#4|@2[k1a;ݗ &DT7ZiVF5q~yS{cYd3eEmKD_=IpZ *ءRz
M4x3 Q`; nP*Q$E2w[1=u5JVTr
h)Z3 O3vkJ{,6۳v"a+]x 8Ar`;\V|"Yɱrs s}!D|gYF4x ˛q=\?ѿч }p6%&.(aRH wԟg77v<
N8w~/*qEOwvTx(Vh3:MI2 ]MHyt\S)=<aS&oۛ<D7^is:յpy+inGz^"J\Iϳu=RTH:{5Hf+Q .H%JZ33uE_߯ MЍLO+b Ⳳ2*.nFkhJ<
c2o/HBw*K2ݛ-p,]>~5kNm
<
+Gڝ9?
nUNp+x^[ErU
'ڄ,& O?1 f
r_(Υx^RVkIpXζfnYˌzՉٞYkԴծ>Y 9_dD2#j<ubj
gy8$_r550esd,k$1D05y;ޅ)ۣ]g,"zlCμDrG,[ t. 9S{w~ߨ6h|#[k?ɮ9x- Z<}J6T "0rʄu,%f
(2DR*| N8aؔ9%Eu(V)I
ep @M_Q)FM%f6i$(nGHUt 87I{<6! vatPmcxŊTtt Yfeu^D6cEOcA-ހ97yEsepO`k/}~Ŧd^n 1`?g`Sx{8el{8$:YY}dd|m )($)b!:
JG7J,.a )T 51pkAX9rK6$f=B#H*`X1%Ts*UESp nٝifZ3p*邽R10z3/z=G~گ~|av q&0z^4&Ɛy0( vP _ @VM mÁw_w2,^~^%ܺӓCwL/}fIIB5R#WJ
FDn>@* ac-q|/]ވ<}>k~6-V *4DQ&b
cYlL0-Dg85\|:Ƶy#Ukzʃ{{hw%Xie^)%#'ݐr(ic &)`8Lk4)mip(aBIJ):8?Fk.5ԵKXu}{,U'H[Z=x䊉;6\ ~ cF^t٩n|,i|_Wb` FƓMY$ im^M0a Q:c>E@$fEDiT=Ci:gQCjuP*\}l ܳnxMpٌ(0Y64FƷ)"@.<9{#dW[d^}:'7XEw@JF%CɒmKƚg5ٗ< QCw,y7~.=~Wx?~p L- XWEW'[P ~hD n0avv_߳ ry;v2K
7-nFoN1<YdG)"y?O d/,~X021R5zb#1*u ÿiẅ́}n,g&r4'O8P'Ì-Y5"HQ$ćQPC* w
.z/%5Kg,iP /(\} zRUU9}7s"+A鎑~ly/_?C$W~{e*M\'|bc6| qcɺ[{^e75} JZ?bU MU|=>¤!
#j.R*z\4VA~Qƍt2nBv bt dKڒzNޚ{q FYV>O]-pu!#chrX}Tu^<[HXy8תי%h!EZlr!di3a2|Al3`3h>.6JJeVk1[II&2Ue
]Kb~__ojƢڝ3V6uZn[esr3sY;]= 9nE Ns ] L*9ߐkRrt8DaQpM4EJ AH.8;|8?V9 \P'5M+Y|f%zud$+F: ^
931Sxvqgo.|Wo~n~ͪk\fs/? 5 (XH϶h]{kz5:N$>J qH! ! ^y<0faBl D8 Y`Q\5 x\?-ilp<#<{VQ5D
\C M/Ԕ>
&VTsi1r "~%c< pQɋjq@ K_sPZ&Y,eNa)u*{BCҫCI It!xQxExCno)eP&BnPPQ`9w#YY)*T )@Mr6ڰM!KIJ(؋Pfe%t,˱,q"|4[H )XiB& HHA>|~ׯ1q(;]Mg;Η|;9e4KRNvR.JiyE aM.b<z#^ UCjYH j 8` Ui^ ]_ћ,*q Qh'zf^N#(vv йT]
]kM@wpC ѧto:`| .uXpJ:e!Uԃ) MR_5wի&}!rZg]Gc֥7#~Xܨ__w; s,aZ\msJ<+G9Ɋ%Ad Im & k~ I&e *c{w,5'׆A~!-LG pfyI 7,5N" W y-Av;7\Et
ҙL4m
p2U@0nhØׂ`4j뒑4MC.a$`أNH y㝴9 /s糧/ݿNH]xq١?g%kƺ>V?Vh~.?DVӋ}^'"CH+` Nz
|akaIQ3Uqr~;l G!{Ƭcdib瑌R3(
:mVvt!J|LVdkXIH"Pb餎81
B-ݖoni -|sā qDEsDMsD8 B7 \} y6:|{s#].αĎ}/8B ]mȾ S@vZ X'iA&WF%!VQ$@j&t:P{_;4 ~{Vyw#YEeur ;fq
BpFx Ȱ0Di-('i a0\qmSoc1(mŻX]`%ޥqٿѦ҃
\۲ڳX5/bݑ'ةڼvR76).ۦ4MXDGV~w~?7-M;JG3ݕ>f|i$??b{Ѷy/f, &sԟ9H[;SЮ;QRm:Ғ:HZuoԏm~L N16;9ncW8dp#n-rW8e 0W^yo BDdZӖ4F]0)V%5 ٺQ۩Ց٠O*fik:> j2 OQ/Ѯ Ow1fKȈY1l0f1$c#A,w4WMyXYw:
}>g]V Y\/VB7Ů n-V紥oJַiD_qyy|XQ^b4yۥ~ @5yv R2 " b)iC :~*;TZWu
Q?)YKErpʣ/~y-7'VA= RSÓ^|Pg y"u cVJx;~᧭u.. #݈۳_beO0IWY
]=db(,:90?30N6PYҷ)u wpy~_g1uu
^
B5Qty6{t oiZh-mld
, B"9$#$Y姴ý3`JAz | A3Ү`& UUZS ÔϭQ fд{.gC0-\o54Biޞ w:!=\k6029;#{cy,~s<:CR/͜^L^W^ am=P}h=**@@2C&|B윭 BbmZ)w> @h<XA;$DF!,B ]c`pTeffvZLk0k6>6 z`K!{啥b%
jH_f:p @
V,VJ8ξ6'5enlLwD,-HGN BaP3Ef_lw>lؾ8? ԮXEAfm %-$
UM-ӴuSƪ@B (6GTM ?*I0tb}_'v|Y:|WcpY8#b-94m or~q&3dƙL@sNsX_S<4 y+>,SI^axuXpIt*bNq6WLtd aOLZ;l?Ժ<Ӓݭx]ߊX߽W-|@|Nd[H3)`Siea7 մ_:p+B
4f|[l^6 \Qn-A\g-Zp~+$,N[̥Q\urAi[|OmGmAk?ڧ` ֡D"Tn{V|1t sa<5rz_yߺ\\D z4Vz4TDA,LhAEJ A@Q\=f弖"[9%9r0C)X$&F#~R>^L #nўf0S-L\ 0-&5H$Si;H](INb@9[_A,(R JA -9HwAq #!rN SIFLŌA8:/J M6 xG~n;j|U5Z v?Cؙ[a܃֊m&7? n"f(.'?a !>u;Be1*@z z_ 0$qqNƗQI d(1/%"&I yOz%)JՒ;y `5(Hd㉈X9iVq8ppI,RIԵN5z#|nE|(DƧn,O5(D7QPHG4gkT*C5@TXLR
IF
iiK8
ot> 4Bi'0Exl%sG" rdә@8sTrK/#@DK#
1Ƽ\L':؇hlĪaɑw];jLԇ:2#$}\Ǿf'6r)fphLPM)};COkl_CNe>V٩eKBΕ+lȦkFJ֔HɉV04rHZ!Zڅ$j6X-:;Iv1Z iT(6 _8HZGL0j4Y14_iI4j%,d)5-M4*q\c \֥xGu0qs\ ]-~xµΕ4b$qfLԆY
-t{(
m+a9 'J7;`~.\dstk|? E^ c7oe _]dؓ|x ^ÇsK'LĒIhk39i n=⦊cnFc0R&./Ky '%w 4vH$Tz 'tCl(ul:Ƣ 0X>Ƣo}Yhf 'Q,)Ӕ\4R \@Pd
Ae:DoX
%52;gbVhMhs+V$
(MH* i9$r{[0iAĂ%ɨڄ %VGf81)n
RD~r|kl眝m2ޙ :w5^Lb$Z%iܤiDi $4`ơDTDAQ@J)UC+"{1^Z9sY~|uhѐ~g`#+D- l9}[7 QgND'1Y NG?~} .syvAבe+f i R玈 Y%^O/s5l:2{?(PϔĢHm)G,׃K7 (/G||g@D3Pވrsg
U|
Y $Ӹ`r= ΨM9-g ?`K+LՆe P1U@\L
4Kdg!_(x|H4թu,ve:LeZɕe\=ohL -b&Wzi_iH'Hzo
܀t|--}5yt ?2Y5$vvO/QͬWo&MʩLAJ4Q/5m*&*+0b KISEקz
m}7'pMw㻿} I 5FƛS K
c/?s&q$.Y +[f
8
*/g%Pt)W\M~*/VR{r:'wM_Nc >Ǽ aqoO~dv}&ӯn
O;9)ʽY 1CU]L,Ubs\φ*۴-fr(LW]*?Qbp!A5eҥKsk ϶QrHdGo6ºf.N:>cdF,0HpGW[3JWgw6^+&>DzYStD!qXD
oKli$Y K)3Ns QOtfBJtfC I&Z ]xYDT- V\_*] s XGW` F~(TI5\"b}(רz98f+_* ҰXy}xCs lF1fZJd?>ƭWkUܽX]mn Pq`' &3|ww;%88ٗa;%fhLLhZh zkhIVVԪ*EF@ݱ?4UHĤ!&
i 8{sZ~ĺ}s\_|?qg tf_H N>zXؔ`[3I F]"pT$buiIsEaqJ PmAcĦΪ2ωHL( GN4^hD@pY
Vj|K&V3ӯyU ^s$)V1MK aPD`BS+ ^!q,g2jŵleiZGny sHGb
p'up.ޒ^OڧB/i0T%O tA0ՙq)};jWab'
3~b)$Z|ٻݭ6~!s&: L.bͲ,5#itǐg?vr;QXw<5iWP%0MV; |$M[? MqXEuLj2{T.hJ\Mthz3%$SL% LM.VdQT2 8R]| *rk_ rCQ/3T2.So[$[?ecvJ1eEtLif0+dw%wdj^:LSb|QDc]5B"d)=s;$}CE-'{t
r/%I JGʂt )ۻTXKo-]%ʺZ4^F K^Hў\Z}F_{W
#]Fork8,QoGDqͰi@rTFc4)M^W(bIB3zhDOqq+/T3]P=B*Xp~:R6/^?Ar?&*wgn^߱\xUk7PvC#N5\6}$H:<ᜀX\Q!IcZ. B_ u8$x $[a
;s,bmn$AF=
i\2:# f -Sz& @p
j#EzZCy<Ɣ=®(mo' JWx,mo&O!k.G`HOJ09 y|dlu/AIVW(!#r e-WQ$욵DzeW9$tcګy,?Ջd=VAZ'3b . ʕ2#hMԦ<烍N6Fqcqoh` 0W=R N8
h%-_,) (wb@%Zw%F*uG9ЖSPb0t"[~kbĞݨ{ܠ
T(?l_A RFҨw \1"+x8Yt#UtKp^s\C áQC_z7G.f,-eW{TʻKBGʋG@4uZ7GK"U` /jl >@[JO@Qtu) (9*٠T jT?_Q ZHC)%EJQv_vuTWQjlh\YƲ 9FOj 'n.d{L/}&AAD/ˏ=8K$B}iBD&<;|-2*/M0b,g 8k@[,AU n>כ_ mmi!/B3M0 QG='cSe#a]|{[59]" YndMS5АTngu{lgrmtw/
6s
;Jqw _,7 y;{; wqb;8CI -R P?25 S'R1[6"HCIiʯ!"e?Աjl
ʔjBb{סi-={y8zXd1x oVI؍ :
OB=x+$A,W
LI#0
z#=s1q *yF0j+$a P{8ο)]O% )&7h's ɯSHJo*%ij6X ZЉOV,/ ϸD /u ycxlO#tK) ?ίi"E ? 3|G3 ElڦUpT5=(.96"Q#6)
c D xYθR1 md͌yh!V ElIrߏ\1[+kOwg^_춣Gw57 O|? XJ {uC蛫#˯fבQU6Had u##gJTVp XjΉA^
n\=y+LDI"o04yUH w7
.!,ulkdk= h=eO]JNp!' =x18
AO
gg2\r+z۾Kòxl%Uۻ>bk das-M]3i$9R }d &*ȩU*zVS=)
ٖM? \|ō3\1ȥNyCwWlglwLQ _iii-`VPZWig#@s0m-iJ==9#8=ګ216DGzy1B98 Z&p a)v$_ 岺~-ܮGrbpǗW6'ޡ{dc*2ī;v8ya/unI.`^ KLuTs *e9ri;fqZl ei v-$Fx ahsWH^s]]0w=7<W0ؚ(h_bk7ũhI@Xa[[[_l;Ӱ_7'wrsr2]e4N#n3J@&D<(moo`@}>TѺpm{حJ{Xz
mG_H7('ڣDw즯]gT]0 8)(dZR%^x9fcP#(F;9=E~F?lƙ
1i|tǨi
P/sLl@ r͙'Q7-FfL$ 8פI[1Fl
e
ūaBxnZxW<'?/GZap@
wEW Zh6ru4)qL 2~*$qW XA
o+Yy#*Ɠ ԱB]/⛅_ V$xR= Wae´~ R%l El
Cf2"K
>yӔL3G$bs=!gda&YYkuЀB!EhT(7Pr
DVY95%2rFo^qKm3AqfjW?J* gMY $.'--m[GeB jb0XMdH< #wyQΫfM2[i 882>Sa +&govg4i\j yaI+Дϐ̐I#`D~uq˯+ҟʝ+ =oFtƴq{}|}w>8lBc&@PZij c)ٔ/Ͳk5PvB,MR'qaM4>D4kѴ}
[l߽{=߃wdݻ=S
l37(ͲuӚnd#oI $d0986劻*UdX*XWsFVq nR.2fS Jl ##J?5?v)>>ױ0{=ܰ ay|m+Jg%fɾ®8.˺g ʹhufT+4k[+K@^OEa /HX6Vx.GK/\(4i{zm.Wm)Қ YI/9ƌ\uu2N_4C۫zṇG%` V7%tOF~ըQ"'&SQwXF;7\?6 'ޡC^? As$u77
1٠Ch1:%.rU)EnCg$}GcWͿ4Փx;`ݔ .-4ñcý}xjP [o Jػ=D*=ש- 櫢g' M|r ʴ3_Ys]cSbaѺh;hő}SZ Xoqc7ܙ` 6)Q~7
YW[9 n"Q<,5ks5kĚ܊z[
xmJ[uxVhegiacMi)&x&mrq7rWkϱ, ˰<*tʬ幄|-)@9J%Cmm$k (4|%+I:)a>Ob(%vzaMg2&Ƨe<M 8c(Fbۘ^X1Ɯx$\S0EhbBd,{n+rMm\|k
xP*A.Osȥ S01*5v bv+"!}TOBBΰhE9%XdE"2f&F}k'}읞{ϤnԐq0=~%=/*3_ic F #n!d6G] &;2;^--?}dʱ'tNpcCsjٌ3ݔ5qz9#4IaܗqGR &o%'\ Ď6:RKx
ec/H"#Aq D8T8bpD4a:`BSI$r5 ?wKVG Vkk< 5TZ7MâxI!qAI%D\B
q+ĭO9i`|Qxr_l b^Rb#w] Dl5,T.Y.eٻYZcxv6[.3Be
z<7s oQHv-F}_:` P4C'<%]搋+r+ Tn^ԭ n#E}U[ٮKg%2j Wj
o>IHF2?"|2&, 50_H
+\xr "v((o Q
X"`bّ] Dwѕuڣ*{u%ힽ-nllH8h։3~|wW!I |x"=- o\(gÍ|KNv@W
l?nRa & b G"W$^ j_xH`=0>G;] p>k!/;)gA4gUxe{f}dWkl;gbڞ όxƉ:NBĭ-6]0UپGi!*U?VJDTJeCB?JԭVmEylQŮ[=
<;'
o!"[ [Ę4MZ (+1AZD| X^9ƙ@/L H0wGG7Al 2};Cyɚ19id3[͈. ##TOO
yu_?ծc$GN|H5V*=
kVJXG`ꂕ}cXʘpFw풎m=
lA?7e}K+}+?!ko"c@lz lMiR? <[f.DXSLWȈ^{~`y;pu{>+ ݹ/`Gyppr;:V'u,#9#O=./lkGbL|X^V䭕S
*'lp5-c9\J~djZwϑv+o$, ??ӄ6&}ށ5;IàJF% ZX6GxBõ=2uL֔'mz%,'@tZ:i}3. ƶPTm %s LL~je@vZ/
W k &*VPӴ7yb!c -%CRx=5ꥎ7˥`(%O*'Փ)zڼ$ 6M\{۾AG{EsªKoD b[PN^QZm}qvKK"aQX솠 m␕9/qxhI*RKQ
x-Dd7˗ƃPwA?espwXHO4 f[cٱt$r1kf1r;E ת ~w(c|f{@Wnshۙ E#VsPew:8%:t!dXgL^۾37LF
i^RG}^|T'N!yFކa t8`<܈ GчsVᒅ|P,N%
1W3ZC[2ϧ,}lKŧd)(L7$&Gr_[W;$xTE<[d'I3v
~JQ 4gљJIFL=S걉 B> |LҐ Is1x̹xJkC2G-nOȦQpq5j5
[4Ti\ T%Ukq|Z5֊Y`|8ej6Mi]uCPTpܿp^C"FQ5TZC0ߵ75A\p%6 za +aFn9ZwqL^ f]!/,`ad L`6I %0623NayX=$c><TB-!ljU]x@>&Ґ'j So6wI)Y[h
:z'~%L?'쇫 {o'uC n{T3AwP> r ڭ|J_ a0Po-9ЫSښ/_5m$EҔLR/J,^hzve{5|Ij4Ӻ6;! LT .}Ult81N9,q
ܯN:WtZ!˖.3@}xN NUrJBƿS{3S5 `
͞'xCן6v7ǟ!Hl\j
&ړ.5H']6$R
`
SLM<1FqQ#b1Xķ J\C%R0QVQ}bJҔ@ g4]+YO[#?^b7ށx@dÙ ^xh5 *F wFF>3+OpvX3s?L > %<~vzdZ@n̢G/HfP>eCfTm60Sl lq`{$KNc)F&Aί| X#!b Y7pȲQ+R$%j #pc{gɏ~}-3j١ G$ cvbc@bCGmnebB2
e-<3<̮ {eAu ڳmmOY]Ʈ1^Y{UWtQ{k [.&KiLb) So Uhj@v(IIi:ՖS\-t*4 -y ~g@BtMIxF:yF=<&LOAҦaү:NS R:GB9-E\8.ўI[=v ∊+ZVn
*q˵u (+e$0x[TOڕΧ,VJ-:*8tڔ6w406ޚXxvmNrBiBRb2 -[64Q%~ch lahG^ }Ϳ(Wz/+h0zZ>d;ɔse'~9W}M,2AiDo^¾8@ʤ [ z~ ⣈H Irc#'$''l_p
HxNz gLyH :
r\#
ol-HgnYYM֢
rUЃ mr?x#||(9ؚ 2'1m*:?}< Ǐe* bt!h~`. }-Eϵ_e^W߇ͼc z/x/r 3ȈrD8(GcLB3~D*yN
XL2bh3h ] Q]ޗ :~ {v!h6"!w4)ͩ\@mU@D rJpD"RkB.M%P8E)ĴD4;~3CH33㙹~/b ~4L__ f"
v$|ljg?:߭2֯l@h67E.1*]b{ ĺLM[H{xj鹳0zbOȽ؊mmH "aj".usD[R6'BgkG_-j O=ƜC\NmWE9Èg _]y} ,J,aDb;LӦBQD%RO>Cp$S!n?I&"Q#/A*G̣I1 @0lmth>;"ozOzi/,$K.?$_ƍx,*?_X9G
CЎ)J(N*&/fL؞O;) _B\ymя CyFJJMR6f 2Dケh\7Xcg x٩cSDbgӐզ|
|DՈT_䔟 a
]
c
ug;#ǟ !9'w|l L
3zken*>3!>й1f"GԠ52kDS5$TbM !s i ̇0L!,zE,bsUPɣ=D(3t4OUh U el~-4LU$
K=e4a a_`i6WL/&dN>]GNJڐ73e\fm[ݺhKlu%0 *z-͢eUm54Lry|_q6YZK[VO?[\2Z\3'4}Oӱӕxzc2\x$c֬ww89r`FjcY/9_܊`D'Q
U,8Cl.3C RR[*%iL!smfWD @GI)Cܞ#wgSGd %@@_p5F3tjshcf3Ll&>? | L5
l6F1KCFϦኁ͙:v;Ϯ@E.r=h0v>fJ V~^SlKUkݵa ٶ }G``3b w 9pg3JB銮G* Wb[ %ƚYD@3D`Gp.#0Ļ`$az&ݟ6Rc߹zKHt:'v _ξiMe?s~3O\(V :I >iz|f}BPZuх5/pd| 5ޯ+UHS!)R#T9 7
YB$j<ܐ#V/;R都E8EH^ӆx{]a $x!O"9 `؛! %,OJ2+4>HLY._o4Ŷj@"'1^p~{ t=1+j×#MKS:c[
Dª39ĄNˬioć\ ChPMo;e@ZTtBbG4 J ʢr]V?=758FlJ:]R% -!H`S[f؆\[w~BiuMt[ g$u5B}Rf&hߍBzdfwV=|| Zt]YWF O <'$^]b }p"uoɌ$%Gr3t2Qx)Ҹ*(gوbSsnyW_GUoNW2oײÍs xW\V.8އUN0O>]渼A4jqawJęx7JeT*
7XĒ\ qވL k?bI1XSF 3dp&Ir;
?lklՋ)IIeIk%k -t؊!CҢ@ V;C
t %vb;5ں6K|X@aȺuȂKکM6!){?$ǮݝG'ʇp~%.` '~ J) O8p!m%({E(uffK nJlL"A,*ca-4eKR hp4FOD79Qڕt8$-;VHN>0Yڇ =.Qٍ {bqcG~/?:dg>櫻|rY\A.k x(ݹӮAeDm#eX(̓d"$=@ ]yvp˝~.57e?PŰ3@T _xIdMiqMoJRqOr92JfaWukk뙷2,o(k}R]0
7 jyq^/E/; 9ۈ
FSxw2xZ{1q~k
!53>P94+wIT((*NSdMAOr Q˄ 0B V1c</4.tBs=P4'Rpi o9!uhV xoq9h(e\7AlH ˠ
ңqJym Ym])aa}5
mgJg]T_ \ |;4-x >d5K`QSZNAĤ Ag' @[!ɀ~$`X p4N? .b]7tCĿVi6eb3읽R
vuk' b'?s1ntζ H >f NڟOf pfm[r>S ϧKu6Lvv~|c Ȝ9guW`&\!W̷!мnQ0i0g,'8 |9,=e sLq];=˽} c#EUЊUCVEE1>A~Ki@yt$RX嘒e&-˄ %Yg$xyR,%9)Ie)̓Ry5|;Ky 門
B>iGwbTC@ "ſldgx/^ZGXUv;ڸM}ǟj ̊#XI
Gd
HGH qG> %nڨo XrL5> yɌ[kad fu ֺub [^ybRVzMܢ R`|-VхbBA^=J֟:CNj(sO!GF`GQ-x2E2.$#mJ-ALP !Itn] C? c@q~BUZ1iu
_ k GHm}c>J BF 5RCTr|#聩VTZw:Q.:<lff#:uK)T!&۲cGv;6XpPܣ'a0obf38IYҚF1!&*y!/+ok-^h [ \
l!dgP\iۭ6 k5Z
HE NFÑH
zi OD,:`SܴOn}fǭvK-d_= Y縳\X( 2͕s { 크QC^UȹtBd
=1D) *Jp#M OQIة 7<*H|zYѮCO!+^ků[zm
#k4:@͏X4 j
w9b Y}u62i5;>x,ljWHi@pޕ%Ɲw=lÒ*SK_W.K kEEpɎ.?# y,
Sw+|"(
e` :]sU]+gaed.%!J^QD )Ҝ4#s04p3 'op3Te嚨9-LBЯ]|'w, V4q\S;ۍOi4M q ^cٌ03 xg\9+^ H(pC~]ziȫK=dȣK W|PC=ma׆OOpS} ?='؊+P b> ːEo]6NX{YX1l
Dyp 1gLW0~ɘ ݠCG?KoI+S d/7rgXH \;s
{dfpm* zeEVM ͑UkA Po$ˡ,e: lfFaS%[bY5澖.$Po~3+ أ" ƾ
>kΝ DOP
/ >D1xL58L 3Scи3@7:s&a |28K {C +ޙ_
[؋H;8$ΑLw&ngJU3ufɸ66 qk%sj68[4IDICӸ#6VF{G^-b([*-٣ u{ ۰?0u56. `yqtw_G !wJ:^7P!qY ,|"
Qg{Ge$ ymle*x3 <%CrI#,+{W^$mY1Cb/{4Ț1#. rm ˹rɐ%IwYƝ \EuvK(4h PLBAҦ1@!`(j3 qԶ:
Z3SLKiKq(*PGm-VVQJ;CTL
MB|{w=ʼmU=U& XQAW_[e{*ci_P[zD>Wޞ'x}ܶo]Ny&k y/#ajGmfl)1϶jj cY~N&ת29gŪ&4<<6
93XN+AOs^,r $\j={d
]bY3Gl e[/kvUґ~ZH i֩XPGoe9%ɓR.N6Zl)u}BW+U&#eabg!]b`ZXQֲ ְKg@Z
V; h |-2Н~G d{k_J#ݣƻkb
W [R"p Azwa@M<- Dfeh7ў۵5O k$uz 4Ss=Mf7<>F]f6\獐kÖ,kM`\g K:XF2yګ$쾠 GfoﭐJjnrZ&/VN%m"W̙|*2qKEϮRqL߸pF=Dny [x
ݾX
R3N?fcߏ"x9];+;[en&>hHE{^wۖ_v,r{mٟ,%Sڇ3Uж*6Zߏ CƺV꺺kKv;-,[yf{:^ŒFEGc?y^J{zQe?^Ԗߋ4 ft0ϷC;[]%47舋]哿H/1Z!K߷̬ylPKhG(߉G`f[ޅU0~ @g3뚏sǥ6wK5ߙX~?D t攚Gk.$꽭ڼpjkr89sp+˸t#3&>uvmr9@!=PS]jy mm\=iZ[N4r@S̍Q}BnVZU:O htNH#G0%5Vyi/]Wѻ| ?ǭ-,F2! FJa|H(\xw冬gdet=vwDirOɶ2 ߷5q꿔C5³0zdoD2;#NxrebG5RD\Qh8?A!fXoϹxO=G-1 5C_*=I )_C^hP]_uPRw0jt`89-a%-@ 6g=ѷ7HhG&?);uWM2] C܇w }?V;d}"-n=]
S
RKU8ߒ1rc~tjb*0gmnLB[xNoSe9o/>9 6N9X769H=͍lLYuMڮnLZ}8=\/\ɅlnB{+盕3(o{4ғ/&md VG1_Nc+a0(/o ҋ=Pa}9ǾQߺALy>ZvKQDZ5/w{axvÍ0'ܧs³U$$.ߏċ`}l[{kr?N^/[d|/Py %F?%~+!835O y9kxv%L ^8?*a ǀ4ksOg8gq{/bn#F]8U[ zq8ԫ 1Q~P ]?:0ob 'vֹ(EcR ' >
^^zquI #,[} /ÜKp1Sϓ~
Dap ~.iF+_ ۃnl!
^]oy?n ,ͫ0
RpMp竱oaByD.7qAx2=m1/5 ^uЪE4i~JqtCm'zQF ĊShbFگa\@$&3-7Uwm!`0VS_%E~͐$@F]"Yci**} 9#$SH?+l> ϗ!qۤw쳭sX/+w@4,FAB( $5!$ԅ4*-2´ǥV-@+E 2U+e8Ԋ
TH⨴c%~q;f~sۗsGJvsGR j4)raߗCdxh=$Co?H~TIi0K*|{l) OuH-[h Y/Bh:8]s
c!5Jh
I}1?a;2ŽJ6lk|*B`%7ʜt-֓|gXӟh5:%goa%,=
/߫p)eKMزY hGeyODǿ"»ahRz>>ftο7?OjÜ d/:ߑ5:5ѝ,mglxڷ=k+ ]}2{Ri`{2-[_gٌ.좿;Yr:{v%(V
[(P;OVdrft,g %=N .rJYcC% Pnx>O,G=a:Dp#@3U=^x]ye嫚wOcO<vݸ
heAa |`yɠ~ݿp^%t9 2 wh$/t]ƺ8UrpNuZtV0w eRBk4E{Én
04 (U?}1^3_G]yɹ(bw%&%us?a}/Q GG~oa7QmT̷!kzz/ K_al-̄|kgFRc75;!N|m/- Q['ʤEh8a-SӾQBt<˻6(V9MW2/{ Y˜_ F;Q >OVU;kOKm0TD _r ߶6T鉶UyEXi:8 I8WϚt !GRs4|orA۔p3o
L6~mh>js?ƿc}jS [BL*qlcepw4qIm"z_-fAdvoZjV'ۛ&L{
tj~\(k3fԚ8sO
2v@3z;#رYϙT-` oiދ= /zygr?Jǥ8Xg4+Yo& +`2 .zkܕC2zWoHsP:&r5͞*WM:dc33gQ;v^i9]e)E2< &sF̺+ 5E@ݜ HO
2m{L.dL[$'lgx$
>|m<.E:naLf< x"g`x4 Kt I
O1ku&ûi\K1&2?{3!k{bg@+͜γwߓ).e PȌKYIYmԿay2;e 17={:oQ]OO{|ێ߫gі$ǘ57{eKc7LǮmc2S*)R(?M
b ڧs?B0:OoCh9nI? |YnɭHH@ \P gZ#{F
woj6Uo,[k$ :+a 0VXػ˻ 5=Ioꢉ^$@F=K&|{3|'}TI1/k1qX6{iwެׇޕľ&#$ A).R #]JNzJu^NOH~p'1=*9} |J
+ܫ5ES
7ƿ=[k%
Nb#2֣Xm> 7c vN\
Y%ĩo ؟U&_& ~%ͦ_:{iW`#5|@ABUKS2|x J~,6r j*X_'ozS[p;}cO /
s Ɖ{ϧߋ^// ]63ڧ[-EҞr~h VuO2
7D<؏
!~L\S HʞmK jF?2btvMdvƻ,F8_X"9W bƑzh7־*`fs>1BƭM֒Ԏ?>ۯ! VxOh|r%co
j rv?IqᎬ vթ-/R!5"BahM N59 u3AT#oe
*?>qa1e;m*>b
Mjh~ H[6{6'*b-L jڇԗC!Aڙ;'5sqJUN4K3Or#HA+7]D-7_-W
& i+6)ֽm#vLǀ=/]
"i ;P-]!U|*UBW5KSצ/_fR7<5%8ɬ'9HʨJTHڤmW36ؒk@6uo-&R3WheߦVk mN~`@ind y{Y1v;dw;cnV=r=r u;~&#MU]C #6üucƨ֨br(5oOF>}z.2G~5j= 4cgi%Ze(=Ehglu;o-ĜFYV6c[)1k;0mb3=[B-Rh/+hd5ٻ:Js'v
f[~ԝT9WmPT>瞅]ˮp., ZmE%PvЅ]wAJNTkmI jh+Nڿ OMCN:isή c:y}={h=
P$ zC4o05v Df=Gun"!16á-kPpDDeUBʝZ/Ѷ!~DkC=@TՂ7*{~_PKOj`įC Etm?GVׯG-ZT5KLF Gzbr>
F5lh*iӣ;C͡>_SKCe@CD!1g6>_d?|?dH_#H ;M#y_<-j@^(Wʍ|O d> = ="%5sy>
vtߒ1#LĆ
<6?މWW< h:FQkZ$+]?`(jc,͑FeeMB|Z oMv!EVu9 e_$VJ 'W$(~/\~OXh.vß,,
^.⍲cxיf9DB{d8L&bsh6&0
.Bq=~
)<;)5
諈A_A]X~*gRP_
}1/ =o٠l7q5͛ S(֝'LٗYP4uA6
ǟXǖc뇱sعabBjg(Yˆg!Ȣ/*e6@=}x)_ E >cVG>u7{\W^l/u P[!"43VeV/X$z|EnRd~@!B@`b~v> deFLeU4:s& bkB7- .
a`j;س@zq&ـ(BPgϊQ+,2M@'Ne?o#s"F6Lr<'J@-j*j*j*\71CX &c ~,e~Nz<ǹzƊx1=QL=
S =^?YF>T?R3q%!|ݢLbf 1@0)`ۭ
-.,r">&s$?pxrCX0|Jp'K2 xc?. |
mݱ' :0Fnݸww w7ۭ\r9=%,]=k)PU% \!ГYޫUX~V]Rw*YU/yFZU$$d /v+Pl Ӓk%,ꏹ\ Rr K*+Yp~@5<)tp{!3 5 1'5-=..5&Q02vCK}p _%4vcF_N¨g
az8/λ4G!4Aq!&pŴ*'E̤>5v nK66U Abר4a%vJb!*'~_rv_ 'V 5o5Ŵ.p&
*Qa23aA3|
WW_vdkY u q^ }X.OzڑH{̓Gf7%hM|/L+|
F\eT.;wl$f:q]]g[k͚9Ҝmɲ,E Œn1Y d'g=%tt`, q+ԢSZ*i,ԵVKئsmS~ %m8"46M(- =#thX{;I]ׂd<'f\F XVOW=:S\೬ϲ麖6c1,ϣ\֢}mZ9irYsUH[)qi6ׂꪩ-Z#L8GoISwB BW'l8άwP̺V
Ӕ!,S 2= mw$N r mPS0<G| 3nպ^,}KӦDBU] >=vˮW*mD/>{W*fm'trmP K5i)e["fB6!L2ƁNbHtC)Y%n
ݺЭSߓ@ }w;ݓN[ζ{2p-s݈:VstKg#쬉-cyXSg^5$=^
9Y/BZ9(3|jN͞_;f# @X/Q$E $mw5=>\Ip7v*(8CHܺvlb>hu^WM A!mofBm"RT(MdzAQRfɜv*G}` ̸0R=#0Fƾq` G>0~4(PZnr0T<
# {WJ3ZV * }JuZ5ڦ=6$RrJuy%Wbv.w)ˬ a}6d{l:ftχ| _eWD`lsEY'f]\]]pu>ߊfn- K/ PW Lހ}xi8oRVf'g缾19|R.֗`.S_ ?
Jy4A_aI0,'!aPXA`zt3$"""' =
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 6/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-01009.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:08:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 141.75 591.75 624 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(4. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 03-05645 \(September 15, 2004\) at p. 5.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-29608 \(December 17, 2003\) at p. 3.)Tj
-4.332 -2.125 Td
(6. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Cf. Anderson v. City of Bessemer)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
14.248 0 Td
(, 470 U.S. 564, 575 \(1985\)\(". . . factors other than demeanor and inf\
lection go into)Tj
-14.248 -1.125 Td
(the decision whether or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.608 0 Td
(not to believe a witness. )Tj
9.887 0 Td
(Documents or objective evidence may contradict the witness' story; or)Tj
-19.495 -1.125 Td
(the story itself may be so internally)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.358 0 Td
(inconsistent or implausible on its face that a reasonable fact-finder wo\
uld not credit)Tj
-14.358 -1.125 Td
(it."\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 97-0625 \(August 17, 1998\) at p. 5 \(an applicant's refu\
sal to acknowledge his misconduct or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(accept responsibility for it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.719 0 Td
(seriously undercuts a finding that the applicant has mitigated his misco\
nduct\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
31.437 0 Td
(Cf)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. ISCR Case)Tj
-42.157 -1.125 Td
(No. 98-0424 \(July 16, 1999\) at p. 3 \("An)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(applicant's acknowledgment of the wrongfulness of his or her past miscon\
duct,)Tj
T*
(if found to be credible, has some probative value with respect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.881 0 Td
(to a Judge's consideration of whether an applicant has)Tj
-24.881 -1.125 Td
(demonstrated reform and rehabilitation. )Tj
16.133 0 Td
(However, an acknowledgment of wrongdoing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.606 0 Td
(is merely a first step and does not)Tj
-34.739 -1.125 Td
(constitute evidence of conduct that demonstrates reform and rehabilitati\
on."\); )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
31.231 0 Td
(Singletary v. Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.359 0 Td
(Air Force)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.916 0 Td
(, 94)Tj
-46.505 -1.125 Td
(M.S.P.B. 553, 560 \(2003\) \(an agency may take into account whether an \
employee admits misconduct and expresses)Tj
T*
(remorse for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his or her misconduct, as well as the timing and circumstances under whi\
ch an employee acknowledges)Tj
T*
(responsibility for, and expresses)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.136 0 Td
(remorse about, his or her misconduct\).)Tj
-13.136 -2.125 Td
(8. )Tj
(Contrary to Applicant's contention, the NISPOM is not silent on the matt\
er of sensitive, unclassified information. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
46.534 0 Td
(See,)Tj
-46.534 -1.125 Td
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, NISPOM,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.223 0 Td
(Section 5-508 \("Disclosure of Export Controlled Information to Foreign \
Persons"\); Section 10-102b)Tj
-6.223 -1.125 Td
(\("The Export Administration Act)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.517 0 Td
(\(EAA\)\(50 U.S.C. app 2401 Note\)"\); and Section 102d \("The Defense A\
uthorization)Tj
-13.517 -1.125 Td
(Act of 1984 \(10 U.S.C. 130\)"\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(9. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0481 \(November 29, 2000\) at p. 4 \(Board does not h\
ave jurisdiction or authority to)Tj
-4.332 -1.125 Td
(adjudicate the manner in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.107 0 Td
(which DOHA personnel decide to issue or not issue SORs, to order DOHA pe\
rsonnel to issue)Tj
-10.107 -1.125 Td
(or not issue SORs, or to dismiss an SOR\).)Tj
T*
(10. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-04344 \(September 15, 2003\) at p. 3 \(Board does not\
have supervisory jurisdiction over)Tj
-4.832 -1.125 Td
(Department Counsel\).)Tj
T*
(11. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Adams v. Laird)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 420 F.2d 230, 238-239 \(D.C. Cir. 1969\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(cert. denied)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
29.332 0 Td
(, 397 U.S. 1039 \(1970\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See also Department)Tj
-29.332 -1.125 Td
(of Navy v. Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.387 0 Td
(, 484)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(U.S. 518, 528 \(1988\)\(noting a security clearance decision "is only an\
attempt to predict [a)Tj
-6.387 -1.125 Td
(person's] possible future behavior and to assess)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.148 0 Td
(whether, under compulsion of circumstances or for other reasons, [the)Tj
-19.148 -1.125 Td
(person] )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(might compromise)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( sensitive information"\)\(italics added\).)Tj
T*
(12. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.832 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 02-11454 \(June 7, 2004\) at p. 4 \("The Board has decli\
ned to interpret or construe the)Tj
-4.832 -1.125 Td
(Directive in a manner that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.69 0 Td
(renders any provision meaningless or superfluous."\))Tj
-10.69 -2.125 Td
(13. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g., Dorfmont v. Brown)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
13.082 0 Td
(, 913 F.2d 1399 \(9th Cir. 1990\)\(security clearance case involving app\
licant who)Tj
-13.082 -1.125 Td
(mishandled company)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.776 0 Td
(proprietary information\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.247 0 Td
(cert. denied)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.72 0 Td
(. 499 U.S. 905 \(1991\).)Tj
-23.743 -2.125 Td
(14. )Tj
(Given the record evidence of Applicant's experience with defense-related\
projects, Applicant would know, or should)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(be expected to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.025 0 Td
(know, that documents pertaining to such projects could contain classifie\
d or other sensitive information.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-6.025 -1.125 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0228 \(March 12, 2001\) at pp. 4-5 \(discussing conce\
pt of imputed knowledge and citing)Tj
-3.332 -1.125 Td
(earlier Board decisions applying the concept\).)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-01009.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:08:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 747 Tm
(The Administrative Judge's favorable conclusion concerning Applicant's e\
fforts to obtain financial backing from a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(reputed foreign arms)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.58 0 Td
(dealer whom he believed to be under house arrest is arbitrary and capric\
ious because: \(a\) it fails to)Tj
-8.58 -1.125 Td
(articulate a satisfactory explanation for the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.326 0 Td
(favorable conclusion, including a rational connection between the facts)Tj
-17.326 -1.125 Td
(found and the choice made; \(b\) it reflects a clear error of judgment; \
\(c\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.542 0 Td
(it fails to consider important aspects of the case;)Tj
-28.542 -1.125 Td
(\(d\) it offers an explanation for the decision that runs contrary to th\
e record evidence; and \(e\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.124 0 Td
(it is so implausible that it)Tj
-37.124 -1.125 Td
(cannot be ascribed to a mere difference of opinion.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant argues, in the alternative, that if the Board concludes Depart\
ment Counsel's cross-appeal has merit, then the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Board should remand)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.859 0 Td
(the case to the Administrative Judge for further consideration and issua\
nce of a new decision after)Tj
-8.859 -1.125 Td
(correction of identified errors. )Tj
12.3 0 Td
(Considering)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the record as a whole, the Board concludes that such a remand is not)Tj
-12.3 -1.125 Td
(warranted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal of the Administrative Judge's unfavorable conclusions\
concerning SOR paragraph 1.a fails to)Tj
T*
(demonstrate error below. )Tj
10.274 0 Td
(Department Counsel's cross-appeal of the Judge's favorable conclusions c\
oncerning SOR)Tj
-10.274 -1.125 Td
(paragraphs 1.b and 1.c demonstrates the Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.855 0 Td
(erred by entering formal findings in favor of Applicant with respect to)Tj
-18.855 -1.125 Td
(those aspects of the case. )Tj
10.274 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Judge's unfavorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.148 0 Td
(security clearance decision is affirmed.)Tj
-25.422 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 495.75 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 471 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 393.75 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 369 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 291.75 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 267 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-03683 \(August 9, 2002\) at p. 3 \(it was legally per\
missible for Administrative Judge to)Tj
-4.332 -1.125 Td
(give more weight to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.748 0 Td
(applicant's statements against interest than to the applicant's other st\
atements that sought to)Tj
-9.748 -1.125 Td
(minimize his drug use\); ISCR Case No. 96-0897)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.693 0 Td
(\(December 9, 1997\) at p. 3 \(Judge had to assess the applicant's)Tj
-19.693 -1.125 Td
(demeanor and credibility and decide, in light of the record evidence, wh\
ether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.043 0 Td
(to accept the applicant's recantation of)Tj
-31.043 -1.125 Td
(earlier admissions\).)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
(Evidence concerning what actions an applicant's employer or supervisor t\
ook in response to an applicant's conduct)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(may be relevant to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.664 0 Td
(understanding the facts and circumstances of a case. )Tj
21.13 0 Td
(However, in assessing the nature and)Tj
-28.794 -1.125 Td
(seriousness of an applicant's conduct, an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.426 0 Td
(Administrative Judge is not bound by the position that an applicant's em\
ployer)Tj
-16.426 -1.125 Td
(or supervisor took as to whether the applicant's conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.48 0 Td
(warranted disciplinary action.)Tj
-22.48 -2.125 Td
(3. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-9020 \(June 4, 2001\) at p. 2.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
[50 0 R]
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-01009.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:08:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(any federal right or interest implicated or affected by the document rem\
oval; and \(b\) make a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.096 0 Td
(reasonable, timely effort to)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(inventory the documents he removed from the company premises to ensure t\
hat they did not include classified or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
45.432 0 Td
(other)Tj
-45.432 -1.125 Td
(sensitive information that required more secure storage than he was prov\
iding in his garage, or that should be)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(surrendered to appropriate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.801 0 Td
(officials of the Department of Defense.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 333.5312 716.25 Tm
( \(14\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 333.5312 715.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 352.2124 711.75 Tm
( )Tj
(By focusing on Applicant's attention to the)Tj
-28.018 -1.125 Td
(private interests of his company during the bankruptcy)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.105 0 Td
(process, the Judge failed to take into account the absence of)Tj
-22.105 -1.125 Td
(record evidence that Applicant made any effort to ascertain whether his \
actions)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.931 0 Td
(could adversely affect any interest of the)Tj
-31.931 -1.125 Td
(federal government in the documents pertaining to a weapon systems contr\
act that Applicant took)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.377 0 Td
(possession of and)Tj
-39.377 -1.125 Td
(stored in his garage.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In light of Applicant's failures to address his affirmative obligations,\
the Administrative Judge's conclusion that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant's conduct in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.206 0 Td
(removing documents from the company premises and storing them in his gar\
age did not)Tj
-9.206 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate poor judgment under Guideline E was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.634 0 Td
(arbitrary and capricious because it: \(a\) fails to articulate a)Tj
-20.634 -1.125 Td
(satisfactory explanation for that conclusion; \(b\) does not consider re\
levant factors;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.184 0 Td
(\(c\) fails to consider an important)Tj
-33.184 -1.125 Td
(aspect of the case; and \(d\) reflects a piecemeal analysis of the facts\
and circumstances surrounding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.706 0 Td
(Applicant's actions)Tj
-39.706 -1.125 Td
(and inactions with respect to the documents he removed from the company \
premises and stored in his garage.)Tj
T*
(Accordingly, the Judge's favorable conclusion concerning SOR paragraph 1\
.b cannot be sustained. )Tj
39.697 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
-39.697 -1.125 Td
(arguments to the contrary are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.967 0 Td
(not persuasive.)Tj
-11.967 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding that Applicant's co\
nduct under SOR paragraph 1.c. did not)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 511.5 cm
0 0 m
547.682 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 498.75 Tm
(indicate poor judgment)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 498 cm
0 0 m
111.305 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 127.3047 498.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found the following: \(a\) Applicant made vario\
us attempts to contact)Tj
-9.275 -1.125 Td
(influential people through a friend in order to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.383 0 Td
(obtain funding for a weapon system project that he had worked on in the)Tj
-18.383 -1.125 Td
(past, but which had been terminated; \(b\) on one occasion, when)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.742 0 Td
(performing as part of an orchestra at a party given at the)Tj
-25.742 -1.125 Td
(home of a reputed foreign arms dealer, Applicant tried to get the opport\
unity to talk)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.712 0 Td
(with the reputed arms dealer )Tj
11.634 0 Td
(in an)Tj
-45.346 -1.125 Td
(effort to obtain funding for the weapon system project he was trying to \
develop and sell; and \(c\) the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.127 0 Td
(reputed foreign)Tj
-40.127 -1.125 Td
(arms dealer declined to speak with Applicant, and Applicant did not have\
the opportunity to speak with the reputed)Tj
T*
(foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(arms dealer. )Tj
8.274 0 Td
(The Judge concluded that "[t]he Applicant's efforts to market his weapon\
proposal to friends of)Tj
-8.274 -1.125 Td
(friends and influential people,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.246 0 Td
(even if those individuals may be scandalous or carry a bad reputation, h\
as not been shown)Tj
-12.246 -1.125 Td
(to be illegal and it itself is not indicative of poor)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.523 0 Td
(judgment.")Tj
-19.523 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel contends the Administrative Judge erred because: \(a\)\
the record evidence shows that Applicant did)Tj
T*
(more than just ask if)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.415 0 Td
(he could talk with the )Tj
8.915 0 Td
(reputed foreign arms dealer; \(b\) the record evidence does not support \
the)Tj
-17.33 -1.125 Td
(Judge's favorable conclusions about the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.093 0 Td
(incident involving the reputed foreign arms dealer; and \(c\) Applicant'\
s failure to)Tj
-16.093 -1.125 Td
(get results is irrelevant to whether Applicant demonstrated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.66 0 Td
(poor judgment by seeking financing for his proposed weapon)Tj
-23.66 -1.125 Td
(system from a reputed foreign arms dealer. )Tj
17.438 0 Td
(Applicant counters by arguing the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.857 0 Td
(record evidence supports the Judge's)Tj
-31.295 -1.125 Td
(conclusion that Applicant's actions did not demonstrate poor judgment. )Tj
28.73 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.692 0 Td
(Board concludes)Tj
-41.422 -1.125 Td
(Department Counsel's claim of error is persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Given the totality of the record evidence in this case, the Board cannot\
sustain the Administrative Judge's conclusion)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that Applicant's effort to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.011 0 Td
(obtain financing for a proposed weapon system from a reputed foreign arm\
s dealer did not)Tj
-10.011 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate poor judgment. )Tj
11.498 0 Td
(It is not plausible )Tj
7.166 0 Td
(for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant to argue that it was reasonable for him to seek financial)Tj
-18.664 -1.125 Td
(backing for his proposed weapon system from a reputed arms foreign deale\
r)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.712 0 Td
(\(whom he believed to be under house)Tj
-30.712 -1.125 Td
(arrest, and about whom Applicant told the FBI "I realized that I would h\
ave difficulties due to his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.259 0 Td
(citizenship & current)Tj
-39.259 -1.125 Td
(problems as an alleged arms dealer . . ."\). )Tj
16.763 0 Td
(How could Applicant reasonably expect that obtaining financial backing f\
rom)Tj
-16.763 -1.125 Td
(a reputed foreign arms dealer whom he believed to be under house arrest \
would benefit the U.S. government? )Tj
44.096 0 Td
(How)Tj
-44.096 -1.125 Td
(could Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.665 0 Td
(reasonably expect that such a reputed foreign arms dealer whom he believ\
ed to be under house arrest)Tj
-6.665 -1.125 Td
(would be interested in backing a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.218 0 Td
(proposed weapon system so that the U.S. government -- not the arms deale\
r -- would)Tj
-13.218 -1.125 Td
(be the beneficiary? )Tj
7.856 0 Td
(Furthermore, Applicant's failure in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.148 0 Td
(obtaining financial backing from the reputed foreign arms dealer)Tj
-22.005 -1.125 Td
(does not diminish or reduce the significance of Applicant's poor judgmen\
t in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.896 0 Td
(trying to get such financial backing in the)Tj
-30.896 -1.125 Td
(first instance. )Tj
5.637 0 Td
(The nature of an action that a person tries to undertake does not turn o\
n whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.739 0 Td
(person is successful)Tj
-39.376 -1.125 Td
(or unsuccessful in committing or completing the action. )Tj
22.579 0 Td
(A person is not less irresponsible or reckless merely because the)Tj
-22.579 -1.125 Td
(person's attempt to commit an irresponsible or reckless act fortuitously\
is not successfully. )Tj
36.395 0 Td
(Applicant's willingness to)Tj
-36.395 -1.125 Td
(risk embroiling himself)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.638 0 Td
(with a reputed foreign arms dealer whom he believed to be under house ar\
rest in order to obtain)Tj
-9.638 -1.125 Td
(financial backing for a proposed weapon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.549 0 Td
(system reflects a serious lack of judgment, if not a reckless disregard \
for the)Tj
-16.549 -1.125 Td
(potential consequences of his actions.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<
>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[333.0 714.0 351.0 725.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
51 0 obj
[53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R]
endobj
52 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-01009.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:08:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(and stored them in his garage for several years)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.854 0 Td
(without taking any precautions to protect them. )Tj
19.162 0 Td
(Department Counsel also)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(argues that the Judge's analysis of the matter covered by SOR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.924 0 Td
(paragraph 1.b was piecemeal in nature and failed to take)Tj
-24.924 -1.125 Td
(into account the totality of the record evidence concerning the matter. \
)Tj
28.1 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.193 0 Td
(counters that: \(i\) the record evidence)Tj
-32.293 -1.125 Td
(supports the Judge's conclusion that Applicant acted reasonably under th\
e circumstances; \(ii\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.392 0 Td
(Department Counsel failed)Tj
-37.392 -1.125 Td
(to demonstrate Applicant had any obligation under the National Industria\
l Security Program Manual \(NISPOM\) to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(protect unclassified information; and \(iii\) the Judge's analysis was n\
ot piecemeal in nature. )Tj
36.503 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow,)Tj
-36.503 -1.125 Td
(the Board concludes)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.414 0 Td
(that Department Counsel's claim of error is persuasive.)Tj
-8.414 -2.125 Td
(As a preliminary matter, the Board does not find persuasive Applicant's \
argument concerning the applicability of the)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(NISPOM.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 64.3457 636.75 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 64.3457 636 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 78.1519 632.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Because the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.303 0 Td
(NISPOM was promulgated in January 1995, it is not surprising that the SO\
R did not allege)Tj
-10.483 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant's actions in 1993 violated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.815 0 Td
(NISPOM. )Tj
4.279 0 Td
(Furthermore, the Board does not have supervisory jurisdiction)Tj
-22.094 -1.375 Td
(over DOHA personnel who issue SORs)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 206.3184 606.75 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 206.3184 606 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 220.1245 602.25 Tm
( or Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.831 0 Td
(who present cases at hearing.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 478.3765 606.75 Tm
( \(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 478.3765 606 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 497.0576 602.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Accordingly, the)Tj
-40.088 -1.125 Td
(Board will not presume to opine or speculate as to why the SOR did not a\
llege, or why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.966 0 Td
(Department Counsel did not)Tj
-34.966 -1.125 Td
(move to amend the SOR to allege, that Applicant's conduct after January \
1995 violated the NISPOM. )Tj
40.838 0 Td
(Since the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.943 0 Td
(SOR did)Tj
-44.781 -1.125 Td
(not allege Applicant's conduct violated the NISPOM, the Board does not a\
ttribute any legal significance to Department)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Counsel's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(choice to not seek to persuade the Administrative Judge that Applicant's\
conduct violated the NISPOM.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board rejects Applicant's implicit premise that the absence of proof\
that he mishandled classified documents takes)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(his case outside the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.998 0 Td
(scope of Guideline E. )Tj
8.914 0 Td
(The federal government is not required to wait until an applicant has)Tj
-16.912 -1.375 Td
(mishandled classified information before it can)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.105 0 Td
(make an unfavorable security clearance decision.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 481.1406 497.25 Tm
( \(11\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 481.1406 496.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 499.8218 492.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Moreover,)Tj
-40.318 -1.125 Td
(acceptance of Applicant's implicit premise would result in the untenable\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.115 0 Td
(situation that all Guidelines except Guideline K)Tj
-29.115 -1.125 Td
(\(Security Violations\) would be rendered superfluous, or dependent on a\
showing that conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.713 0 Td
(alleged under each)Tj
-37.713 -1.125 Td
(Guideline implicated a security violation of some kind. )Tj
22.3 0 Td
(The Board will not interpret or construe the Directive or the)Tj
-22.3 -1.375 Td
(Adjudicative Guidelines in a manner that results in rendering any provis\
ion superfluous or meaningless.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 515.2187 440.25 Tm
( \(12\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 515.2187 439.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 422.25 Tm
(Furthermore, mishandling of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.776 0 Td
(sensitive, unclassified information can provide a rational basis for an \
unfavorable security)Tj
-11.776 -1.375 Td
(clearance decision.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 107.2773 410.25 Tm
( \(13\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 107.2773 409.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 125.9585 405.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Accordingly, the absence of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.718 0 Td
(proof that classified documents were included in the documents)Tj
-20.881 -1.125 Td
(Applicant removed from the company premises in 1993 and stored in his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.438 0 Td
(garage is not fatal to Department Counsel's)Tj
-29.438 -1.125 Td
(case under Guideline E.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel persuasively argues that the Administrative Judge fai\
led to articulate a sustainable basis for her)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(conclusion that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.332 0 Td
(Applicant's removal of documents in 1993 and his storage of them in his \
garage for several years did not)Tj
-6.332 -1.125 Td
(demonstrate poor judgment. )Tj
11.498 0 Td
(Department Counsel is correct in asserting there is record evidence that\
shows the security)Tj
-11.498 -1.125 Td
(officer of Applicant's employer informed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.702 0 Td
(Applicant \(in connection with the fax incident covered by SOR paragraph\
1.a\))Tj
-16.702 -1.125 Td
(that the particular weapon system contract involved material )Tj
24.436 0 Td
(protected by the Defense Industrial Security Program)Tj
-24.436 -1.125 Td
(\(Government Exhibit 5\). )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Furthermore, there is no record evidence that Applicant made)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.879 0 Td
(any effort to ascertain whether)Tj
-34.988 -1.125 Td
(the documentation he was removing from the premises of the company conta\
ined classified or other sensitive)Tj
T*
(information that would require more secure storage than that provided by\
his garage. )Tj
34.156 0 Td
(Finally, the Judge failed to explain)Tj
-34.156 -1.125 Td
(why it was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasonable for Applicant to rely on the advice of a bankruptcy trustee a\
bout the handling and disposition of)Tj
T*
(documents pertaining to a weapon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.968 0 Td
(system contract without trying to ascertain from appropriate Department \
of Defense)Tj
-13.968 -1.125 Td
(officials whether there was any governmental interest in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.714 0 Td
(how those documents were handled, stored, or disclosed to)Tj
-22.714 -1.125 Td
(third parties.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A private company's decision to file for bankruptcy does not vitiate or \
nullify any legal right or interest that the federal)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(government might)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.61 0 Td
(have in protecting documents or other assets pertaining to a weapon syst\
ems contract being)Tj
-7.61 -1.125 Td
(performed or otherwise worked on by the private)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.882 0 Td
(company. )Tj
4.166 0 Td
(Nor does such a decision relieve a private company \(or its)Tj
-24.048 -1.125 Td
(officers, employees and other agents\) from the obligation to take)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.13 0 Td
(reasonable steps to fulfill obligations to the federal)Tj
-26.13 -1.125 Td
(government pertaining to the handling of documents or other assets perta\
ining to a weapon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.602 0 Td
(system contract. )Tj
6.748 0 Td
(Although)Tj
-43.35 -1.125 Td
(Applicant could rely on the bankruptcy trustee for advice on bankruptcy \
matters, Applicant could not simply rely)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
45.543 0 Td
(on the)Tj
-45.543 -1.125 Td
(bankruptcy trustee for advice without taking into account the possibilit\
y that his actions might have an effect on the)Tj
T*
(legal rights or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.804 0 Td
(interests the federal government could have in documents pertaining to a\
weapon system contract. )Tj
39.459 0 Td
(At a)Tj
-45.264 -1.125 Td
(minimum, Applicant had an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.47 0 Td
(affirmative obligation to: \(a\) report to appropriate Department of Def\
ense officials that he)Tj
-11.47 -1.125 Td
(had removed documents pertaining to a weapon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.411 0 Td
(system contract from the premises of the company, and provide them)Tj
-19.411 -1.125 Td
(with a description of the documents he removed so that they could make)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.242 0 Td
(a reasoned decision as to whether there was)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
53 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[64.0 634.0 78.0 645.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[206.0 604.0 220.0 615.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[478.0 604.0 496.0 615.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[481.0 495.0 499.0 506.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[515.0 438.0 533.0 449.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[107.0 408.0 125.0 419.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
59 0 obj
[61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R]
endobj
60 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-01009.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:08:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 756 Tm
(to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consider Applicant's explanation or recantation of that admission in lig\
ht of the record evidence as a whole and her)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 739.5 Tm
(assessment of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.249 0 Td
(credibility of Applicant's testimony.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 275.7812 744 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 275.7812 743.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 289.5874 739.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Considering the record as a whole, and recognizing the)Tj
-22.799 -1.125 Td
(deference owed to the Judge's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.563 0 Td
(determinations, the Board concludes the Judge had a sufficient basis for\
)Tj
-16.563 -1.125 Td
(finding that Applicant faxed, or had someone else fax, information to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.964 0 Td
(Israel Military Industries. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.442 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive,)Tj
-38.406 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
19.884 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal arguments seek to have the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.702 0 Td
(Board weigh the record)Tj
-38.585 -1.125 Td
(evidence )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.803 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( and make its own finding of fact.)Tj
-3.803 -2.125 Td
(The SOR alleged that Applicant had been reprimanded by his employer's se\
curity officer in connection with the fax)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(incident. )Tj
3.721 0 Td
(However,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(whether Applicant was reprimanded by his company in connection with the \
fax incident is not)Tj
-3.721 -1.125 Td
(material to the security concerns raised by his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.549 0 Td
(conduct in faxing, or having someone else fax, information to Israel)Tj
-18.549 -1.375 Td
(Military Industries.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 108.6543 621 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 108.6543 620.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 122.4604 616.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Accordingly, the Board need not address or resolve)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.049 0 Td
(the arguments made by both sides concerning)Tj
-29.921 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's finding concerning this aspect of the case. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.674 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.967 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32)Tj
-36.641 -1.125 Td
(\(Board must address the )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.942 0 Td
(material)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( issues raised by the parties\).)Tj
-9.942 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred, as a matter of law, by refusing \
to consider the )Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 563.25 cm
0 0 m
420.861 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 448.8613 564 Tm
(extensive evidence in)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 448.8613 563.25 cm
0 0 m
103.289 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 550.5 Tm
(mitigation)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 549.75 cm
0 0 m
49.33 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 65.3301 550.5 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.693 0 Td
(contends the Administrative Judge refused to consider the extensive evid\
ence in mitigation,)Tj
-8.804 -1.125 Td
(contrary to her obligation to consider all the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.828 0 Td
(record evidence. )Tj
6.857 0 Td
(In support of this contention, Applicant argues: \(a\) the)Tj
-24.685 -1.125 Td
(Judge demonstrated that she refused to consider mitigating evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.575 0 Td
(presented by Applicant when she stated the)Tj
-27.575 -1.125 Td
(following: "The Applicant cannot mitigate conduct that he does not admit\
" \(Decision at p. 8\); and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.334 0 Td
(\(b\) the Judge erred by)Tj
-39.334 -1.125 Td
(concluding that Applicant's statements and explanations about the fax in\
cident are inconsistent and drawing adverse)Tj
T*
(inferences from that conclusion. )Tj
13.134 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes this claim of error is \
not persuasive.)Tj
-13.134 -2.125 Td
(There is a rebuttable presumption that an Administrative Judge considere\
d all the record evidence unless the Judge)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(specifically states)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.331 0 Td
(otherwise.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 153.6191 445.5 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 153.6191 444.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 167.4253 441 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant's citation of one sentence in the Judge's decision is not suff\
icient to rebut or)Tj
-12.619 -1.125 Td
(overcome that presumption. )Tj
11.441 0 Td
(The Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.499 0 Td
(does not review individual sentences from a Judge's decision in isolatio\
n.)Tj
-15.94 -1.125 Td
(Rather, the Board will consider the Judge's decision in its entirety)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.508 0 Td
(to discern )Tj
4.166 0 Td
(the Judge's findings, conclusions, and legal)Tj
-30.673 -1.375 Td
(rulings.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 52.334 402 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 52.334 401.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 66.1401 397.5 Tm
( )Tj
(A review of the Judge's decision shows that the Judge specifically noted\
and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.062 0 Td
(considered the evidence)Tj
-35.24 -1.125 Td
(Applicant offered in mitigation \(Decision at pp. 5-6\). )Tj
21.494 0 Td
(Although the Judge's decision could have been clearer on this)Tj
-21.494 -1.375 Td
(aspect of the case, the Board does not review Hearing Office decisions a\
gainst a standard of perfection.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 511.8086 372 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 511.8086 371.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 342 Tm
(Furthermore, it was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law for th\
e Administrative Judge to consider whether)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant gave inconsistent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.358 0 Td
(statements and explanations about the fax incident. )Tj
20.661 0 Td
(To the contrary, it is legally permissible)Tj
-32.019 -1.125 Td
(for the Judge to consider whether Applicant gave)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.938 0 Td
(consistent or inconsistent statements and explanations about that)Tj
-19.938 -1.375 Td
(incident.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 57.6543 303 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 57.6543 302.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 71.4604 298.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Moreover, it is not arbitrary or capricious for the Judge to take)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.492 0 Td
(into consideration whether Applicant admits)Tj
-30.114 -1.125 Td
(or acknowledges responsibility for his conduct. )Tj
19.19 0 Td
(If there is record evidence that leads a Judge to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.047 0 Td
(reasonably conclude that)Tj
-38.238 -1.125 Td
(an applicant is unwilling to admit his or her misconduct, then it would \
not be arbitrary or capricious for the Judge to)Tj
T*
(further conclude that the applicant's denial of having engaged in miscon\
duct tends to undercut any claim of mitigation)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(made by the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.137 0 Td
(applicant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 124.627 246 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 124.627 245.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 138.4331 241.5 Tm
( )Tj
(The Board does not have to decide whether it would reach the same conclu\
sion as the Judge)Tj
-10.203 -1.125 Td
(did to conclude that the Judge acted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.579 0 Td
(within the bounds of her discretion by considering whether Applicant adm\
itted his)Tj
-14.579 -1.125 Td
(responsibility for the fax incident, and whether Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.757 0 Td
(denial of responsibility for that incident undercut his claim)Tj
-23.757 -1.125 Td
(of mitigation.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
19.836 -2.125 Td
(Cross-Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-19.836 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding that Applicant did \
not exercise poor judgment in connection)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 149.25 cm
0 0 m
555.51 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 136.5 Tm
(with the incident)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 135.75 cm
0 0 m
83.648 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 99.6484 136.5 Tm
(covered by SOR paragraph 1.b)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 99.6484 135.75 cm
0 0 m
148.289 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.9375 136.5 Tm
(. Department Counsel does not challenge the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-19.328 -1.125 Td
(finding that Applicant acted on the advice of a bankruptcy trustee when \
he removed documents concerning a weapon)Tj
-0 -1.125 Td
(system contract from the premises of his company in 1993. However, Depar\
tment Counsel challenges the Judge's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(conclusion that Applicant's conduct did not demonstrate poor judgment wi\
thin the meaning of Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
T*
(Conduct\). In support of this claim of error, Department Counsel argues \
the record evidence shows that: \(a\) Applicant)Tj
T*
(was on notice that the weapon system contract covered a program was prot\
ected within the Defense Industrial Security)Tj
T*
(Program; \(b\) Applicant was on notice that there were responsibilities \
associated with protecting both classified)Tj
T*
(information and unclassified)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.691 0 Td
(information associated with defense contracts; and \(c\) Applicant remov\
ed the documents)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
61 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[276.0 741.0 290.0 752.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
62 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[108.0 618.0 122.0 629.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
63 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[153.0 443.0 167.0 454.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
64 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[52.0 399.0 66.0 410.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
65 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[512.0 369.0 526.0 380.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[57.0 300.0 71.0 311.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[124.0 243.0 138.0 254.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-01009.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:08:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(\(1\) arbitrary or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.191 0 Td
(capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
13.689 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.899 0 Td
(conclusions are arbitrary or capricious, the Board will review the Judge\
's)Tj
-15.899 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.131 0 Td
(evidence; it fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
-24.131 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.019 0 Td
(choice made; it does not consider)Tj
-32.019 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect of the case; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.316 0 Td
(offers an)Tj
-42.316 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(a mere)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.942 0 Td
(difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.941 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
decision\).)Tj
-15.215 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.719 0 Td
(Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to law, the Board will consi\
der whether they are)Tj
-9.719 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.939 0 Td
(the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
18.408 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance adjudications ar\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.903 0 Td
(conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-28.903 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.012 0 Td
(fact are supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might \
accept as)Tj
-14.012 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.854 0 Td
(evidence in the same record. )Tj
11.661 0 Td
(In making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.684 0 Td
(Administrative Judge." )Tj
9.49 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.523 0 Td
(record evidence supporting a)Tj
-35.879 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detract\
s from the weight of the evidence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.278 0 Td
(supporting those)Tj
-41.278 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record evidence as a whole.)Tj
T*
(Although a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, the party c\
hallenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a heavy burden on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.995 0 Td
(appeal.)Tj
-14.995 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.914 0 Td
(pp. 4-5 \(citing federal cases\).)Tj
-9.914 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal ca\
ses\); and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.109 0 Td
(Guidance, Items E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
12.116 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant faxed i\
nformation knowing that it would be)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 226.5 cm
0 0 m
528.867 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 213.75 Tm
(communicated to Israeli)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 213 cm
0 0 m
118.957 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 134.957 213.75 Tm
(ilitary Industries)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 134.957 213 cm
0 0 m
78.984 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 213.9414 213.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found that: \(a\) Applicant faxed, or had someo\
ne)Tj
-16.495 -1.125 Td
(else fax, unclassified engineering information)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.549 0 Td
(concerning data and diagrams for the marketing of a weapon system to an)Tj
-18.549 -1.125 Td
(individual outside his company knowing that the information would)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.469 0 Td
(be communicated to Israel Military Industries; and)Tj
-27.469 -1.125 Td
(\(b\) Applicant was reprimanded by his company facility security officer\
as a result of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.516 0 Td
(fax incident. )Tj
5.248 0 Td
(On appeal,)Tj
-40.764 -1.125 Td
(Applicant challenges those findings of fact, arguing that the totality o\
f the record evidence shows: \(i\) Applicant did)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
46.348 0 Td
(not)Tj
-46.348 -1.125 Td
(fax information to Israel Military Industries; and \(ii\) Applicant was \
not reprimanded in connection with the fax incident.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(There is conflicting record evidence as to whether Applicant faxed infor\
mation to Israel Military Industries. )Tj
43.374 0 Td
(Indeed, the)Tj
-43.374 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.832 0 Td
(explicitly noted that there is conflicting record evidence concerning th\
e matter \(Decision at p. 4\).)Tj
-8.832 -1.125 Td
(Faced with that conflicting evidence, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.522 0 Td
(Judge had to consider the record evidence as a whole, assess the credibi\
lity of)Tj
-16.522 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's testimony, and make a finding of fact as to whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.562 0 Td
(Applicant faxed information to Israel Military)Tj
-25.562 -1.125 Td
(Industries. )Tj
(Although it was legally permissible for Applicant to offer testimony and\
other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.937 0 Td
(evidence to explain away or)Tj
-35.937 -1.125 Td
(recant his admission that he had faxed information to Israel Military In\
dustries \(Government Exhibit 7\), the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.294 0 Td
(Judge was)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(not compelled to accept Applicant's explanation or recantation of his )Tj
27.727 0 Td
(admission. )Tj
(It was legally permissible for the Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
85 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/03-01009.a1.html)
endobj
84 0 obj
<>
endobj
86 0 obj
<>
endobj
70 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 390.0 null]
endobj
71 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 351.0 null]
endobj
72 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 285.0 null]
endobj
73 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 246.0 null]
endobj
74 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 207.0 null]
endobj
75 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 200.0 null]
endobj
76 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 121.0 null]
endobj
77 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 55.0 null]
endobj
78 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 759.0 null]
endobj
79 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 734.0 null]
endobj
80 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 708.0 null]
endobj
81 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 642.0 null]
endobj
82 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 509.0 null]
endobj
83 0 obj
[19 0 R/XYZ 0 443.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 87
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000184105 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003752 00000 n
0000003779 00000 n
0000182627 00000 n
0000183052 00000 n
0000183094 00000 n
0000182437 00000 n
0000004718 00000 n
0000173072 00000 n
0000160285 00000 n
0000147740 00000 n
0000137251 00000 n
0000131839 00000 n
0000125009 00000 n
0000003882 00000 n
0000003928 00000 n
0000003977 00000 n
0000004291 00000 n
0000004067 00000 n
0000004099 00000 n
0000004131 00000 n
0000004163 00000 n
0000004195 00000 n
0000004227 00000 n
0000004259 00000 n
0000004929 00000 n
0000010083 00000 n
0000010132 00000 n
0000010167 00000 n
0000010679 00000 n
0000011106 00000 n
0000071041 00000 n
0000071308 00000 n
0000039251 00000 n
0000039524 00000 n
0000011535 00000 n
0000011811 00000 n
0000012252 00000 n
0000039973 00000 n
0000071924 00000 n
0000125209 00000 n
0000132050 00000 n
0000137454 00000 n
0000137479 00000 n
0000147414 00000 n
0000147943 00000 n
0000148003 00000 n
0000158335 00000 n
0000158657 00000 n
0000158981 00000 n
0000159307 00000 n
0000159633 00000 n
0000159959 00000 n
0000160510 00000 n
0000160577 00000 n
0000170808 00000 n
0000171132 00000 n
0000171456 00000 n
0000171780 00000 n
0000172102 00000 n
0000172426 00000 n
0000172748 00000 n
0000173283 00000 n
0000182522 00000 n
0000183518 00000 n
0000183560 00000 n
0000183602 00000 n
0000183644 00000 n
0000183686 00000 n
0000183728 00000 n
0000183770 00000 n
0000183812 00000 n
0000183853 00000 n
0000183895 00000 n
0000183937 00000 n
0000183979 00000 n
0000184021 00000 n
0000184063 00000 n
0000183302 00000 n
0000183136 00000 n
0000183465 00000 n
trailer
<<4B66434E4ADC1248BC8281175D7C8905>]>>
startxref
184278
%%EOF