%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:09:11-04:00
2021-06-24T15:09:11-04:00
2021-06-24T15:09:11-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-02097.a1
uuid:b3d77a4b-eb5b-4291-a9ad-be51588a91a7
uuid:845ca892-1a0b-48d2-91c5-c10c26e6132b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-02097.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-02097.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:09:11 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 17, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-02097)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 20, 2004, which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(stated the reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's acces\
s to classified)Tj
T*
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\), Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\), Guideline F)Tj
-5.221 -1.125 Td
(\(Financial Considerations\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
25.883 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson issued)Tj
-25.883 -1.125 Td
(an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated October 27, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.274 0 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1\
992, as amended.)Tj
-11.274 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge's decision with respect to the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(criminal conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.998 0 Td
(allegations is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law, \(2\) whether \
the Administrative Judge erred by)Tj
-6.998 -1.125 Td
(concluding that the security concerns)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.134 0 Td
(raised by Applicant's drug involvement had not been mitigated, \(3\) whe\
ther the)Tj
-15.134 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.716 0 Td
(concerns raised by Applicant's history of financial)Tj
-23.716 -1.125 Td
(difficulties had not been mitigated, \(4\) whether the Administrative Ju\
dge erred by finding)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.101 0 Td
(the Applicant's falsifications)Tj
-36.101 -1.125 Td
(were deliberate, \(5\) whether the Administrative Judge's decision with \
respect to the personal conduct allegations)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
45.221 0 Td
(is)Tj
-45.221 -1.125 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law, and \(6\) whether the Adminis\
trative Judge was biased. )Tj
37.932 0 Td
(For the reasons that)Tj
-37.932 -1.125 Td
(follow, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.276 0 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.408 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.191 0 Td
(whether there is factual or legal error. )Tj
15.326 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.801 0 Td
(specificity and identify how the Administrative Judge committed factual \
or legal)Tj
-14.801 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.186 0 Td
(E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-22.186 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.355 0 Td
(specificity\).)Tj
-26.355 -2.125 Td
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
T*
(\(1\) arbitrary or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.191 0 Td
(capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
13.689 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.899 0 Td
(conclusions are arbitrary or capricious, the Board will review the Judge\
's)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(PqJ\(Z)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CxY9e{V7='Yl,e)
3$a2-L`Nxrox*v86TYBAX=kapgX}fHbO^:ڍI4ül(xϤ3Y`UҪ<Ҫ:ϟ=Jة7]PeΏӔq-\3ĻdTYd9Vx˼1kaͼ3VZhURK~Ԡ-Zhi҅p?~!&k8S>q?y(W З|
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅{`Y%`AA,1
y%Q)E#*"v4IJ*(bwX,}s朹s Ԇ$ e&yI|-,".<>s? 8mp6/7 vmNÖ{
|8itΎ_9A