%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:10:57-04:00
2021-06-24T15:10:57-04:00
2021-06-24T15:10:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-04172.a1
uuid:2886e191-b9da-479d-9854-661d509c616a
uuid:b15a9ced-9779-4657-94b4-23aeb3dcc871
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-04172.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-04172.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:10:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 7, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-04172)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.499 -2.2 Td
(Braden M. Murphy, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.276 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.041 -2.2 Td
(Terry L. Elling, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated March)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(11, 2004, which stated the reasons why )Tj
15.969 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.969 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), and Guideline C \
)Tj
29.799 0 Td
(\(Foreign Preference\).)Tj
-34.242 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Michael H. Leonard issued an unfavorable security c\
learance decision, dated November 8, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense )Tj
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge's conclusions with respect to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) violated )Tj
16.634 0 Td
(Section 2-203 of the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manu\
al)Tj
-16.634 -1.125 Td
(\("NISPOM"\); \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge erred in finding th\
at none of )Tj
32.476 0 Td
(the mitigating conditions under)Tj
-32.476 -1.125 Td
(Guideline B applied; and \(3\) whether the Administrative Judge erred in\
failing to properly apply the "whole person")Tj
T*
(concept. )Tj
3.609 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge'\
s decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.075 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(CG\\r)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mk0:%JB`~@j+aq'[=XRִϭda.0Xg-h^E K=^d$yu$
JKXas4"{uW|5ȡ@F/G,v]in|L'5]QT93Z3be}U/9↹|b>S,S sCdŬ"egfzp_E*+W_IfW˦301v:|LOH?+ (!
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H| TTTv;3p'nEQbpDyKbLd(QqG8;Q\0AwI]}wF!_X2?Eągi Λ#&j+ \, ˢ
.i
];9$v
XALTxbc0wL\bRjK<.baN y<~ﶀlgfdx\T#x\ N5&涟yGGojG ́f T(
W
&( G[ $UP[{[Q}7uȿ76fvm|`g/*4lgf[ԒFlպM}ڵѷSg.]uǁ={~~y_|7~7A?884,DDFE6|DlQ $4v\ ?2q)NM6}F̴Y3dΝ7E,eW^zu
96n[nݞc{
_T|`ɡGJ;^vg.^WMՑjv0 m
bbyQ0ɔFh !M#
/TU#TTe*zzXRIA [i4HQ(K%Dz!j"5 2MJ;X;U])tv:'NҵҵӅ뢼^^ZdPveO-;r,ȩ,yJ,Ʌ>|R>#_^0}>Z?B?d^aa!`vV5\eLZM!4R8ZCTYA(3\\R:U:Y~&yJC,JKuRhM&S96T|shS!8dw8+Cw904xtTCzS{nV+hm[`͟Dc~;^qI/y5W!vavv~ )9Q}J#eT-],-v-m-m,,--zY*r*Wus(ڛ;foS_S)o3ڛZt&w+]㭺URcȘ{GیA^ƞFoΨ5oJnU2dgWΫujiR%YΊZ `> B!R}Nx7^ZoSUnT (k
93QaÂw̿șT?3֠~JR`,{02 Xΐ!MPOa6,T(u X
PQpi8'܇h8gPxsfp# ba$d(Hx
c'H0,`<ȇU0&j9#p1* V,\K7j٣6\ql\JtWx ոz4`n 7܊0cWp0w.܍X`!:3+܀aclp?a1X b3<9@nmPZQ<DZOI<QF=r<<^B [b+l
w.^\Nyv.MT@{>OECTB0R:J8 :IO4ty@]+t)OH&NftnmCw'=TIwzLO3zN/_i
JSN4Ri&:\ogsŝC +ПTK6cL`v̞LXW(GĜsen/eWŮ̏ua]?ƺ >f=Y/֛aA/nbwxO/ZCR|$.>(*SӔӕ3ʙ4err2C9G>eY6}Y6Gl=3oB1#
ݙ3̿wiq"R5$wwB]pw@Km&Yn[6];.[{>_!s[v#<&<%O3GyV?ɟ5s˹ܔ_owS%yQ^yU^u5]]5u-][uu=]_7
u#X7Mu37UϪj%jjFjLjƩj
Qj
SdjfuRҭuV/+Zou{AwTnGU~u@TauDUquB=lOViUgBi9ylx!^Wx-ވ E(',RgR G.IR&CiD0Yt2PF$Qf"QvA9)<7U?sSO((M TR ~~:Q=
bTJPI*ErT^^x@!J)&d
)44fWzުwU>d>/`b%+fX4lsZN9gLpVf윃sr.y8/M3i]p>wƸnB\n b\KpI..s+R]ťrjw]WJ\pUչZ\p]7417܌snɭRK[sn=w܉;snS]у{r/}/<$`,5Q&ĘXCy