2UziOHe
nvb |?+}# !",NE)qV'ð_d۴Fa -} j0ȾJ"pgegL";[* "dҁ)GtO pW1QU=J:m
~
J
}t$kȏ1}!p/w7SszHݷ݃\?iDW'Wo=yyzuA/>}
.H j`nQƨVm,Rb+tU[1 :~VYW
0 Vy
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-04300.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-04300.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:11:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 329.25 591.75 436.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Administrative Judge)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 678 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 653.25 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 576 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 551.25 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A3.1.3.4 \("Individual has expressed a willingness to \
renounce dual citizenship"\).)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A2.1.3.1 \("A determination that the immediate family \
member\(s\), \(spouse, father, mother, sons,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(daughters, brothers, sisters\), cohabitant, or associate\(s\) in questio\
n are not )Tj
29.825 0 Td
(agents of a foreign power or in a position to)Tj
-29.825 -1.125 Td
(be exploited by a foreign power in a way that could force the individual\
to choose between loyalty to the person\(s\))Tj
T*
(involved and the United States"\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A2.1.3.3 \("Contact and correspondence with foreign ci\
tizens are casual and infrequent"\).)Tj
T*
(4. )Tj
(Directive \266 E2.A2.1.3.5 \("Foreign financial interests are minimal an\
d not sufficient to affect the individuals security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(responsibilities"\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-04300.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-04300.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:11:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(own findings of fact about those contacts, )Tj
16.94 0 Td
(the Judge did not articulate a rational basis for the application of Gui\
deline B)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Mitigating Condition 3 and her conclusion that it applies is unsustainab\
le.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(With respect to Guideline B Mitigating Condition 5, given the record evi\
dence in this case concerning Applicant's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(substantial financial assets in the U.S., and )Tj
17.33 0 Td
(the Judge's own findings of fact in that regard, the Judge articulated a\
)Tj
-17.33 -1.125 Td
(rational explanation as to why Applicant's foreign financial interests a\
re minimal and not )Tj
35.809 0 Td
(sufficient to affect her security)Tj
-35.809 -1.125 Td
(responsibilities. )Tj
6.555 0 Td
(The Board need not agree with the Judge's conclusion to conclude that he\
r application of the Guideline)Tj
-6.555 -1.125 Td
(B )Tj
(itigating Condition 5 to the security concerns raised by Applicant's for\
eign financial interest is sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(3\) Department Counsel argues that the Administrative Judge's applicat\
ion of the "whole person" factors to the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Guideline B security concerns is unsupported by )Tj
19.69 0 Td
(the record evidence and is arbitrary and capricious. )Tj
20.685 0 Td
(The Board does not)Tj
-40.375 -1.125 Td
(find this argument persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(As indicated in preceding sections of this decision, the Administrative \
Judge erred in her application of Guideline B)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Mitigating Conditions 1 and 3. )Tj
12.556 0 Td
(However, )Tj
(that error is harmless in that the Judge did not rely heavily on those t\
wo)Tj
-12.556 -1.125 Td
(mitigating conditions in reaching her ultimate security clearance decisi\
on. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
29.823 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 03-19101 at 8-9 \(App.)Tj
-29.823 -1.125 Td
(Bd. Jan. 31, 2006\). Absent the applicability of those conditions, it is\
clear that the Judge would have reached the same)Tj
T*
(result based upon the record as a whole. )Tj
16.245 0 Td
(The continued viability of the Judge's favorable conclusions about Appli\
cant's)Tj
-16.245 -1.125 Td
(security eligibility under Guideline B turns )Tj
17.441 0 Td
(on whether the Judge articulated a rational basis for those favorable)Tj
-17.441 -1.125 Td
(conclusions that is consistent with a "whole person" analysis in light o\
f the record evidence )Tj
36.78 0 Td
(as a whole. )Tj
(For the reasons)Tj
-36.78 -1.125 Td
(that follow, the Board concludes Department Counsel has failed to demons\
trate the Administrative Judge's analysis of)Tj
T*
(Applicant's )Tj
(security eligibility under the "whole person" is unsustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(An Administrative Judge must apply pertinent Adjudicative Guidelines dis\
qualifying and mitigating conditions.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(However, a Judge's obligation to apply )Tj
15.816 0 Td
(pertinent provisions of the Adjudicative Guidelines does not override th\
e Judge's)Tj
-15.816 -1.125 Td
(obligation to evaluate an applicant's security eligibility in light of t\
he "whole )Tj
30.915 0 Td
(person" concept. )Tj
(Accordingly, the mere)Tj
-30.915 -1.125 Td
(presence or absence of an Adjudicative Guideline disqualifying or mitiga\
ting condition is not solely dispositive of a)Tj
T*
(case. )Tj
(Even if there is an Adjudicative Guideline disqualifying or mitigating c\
ondition that is applicable, a Judge must)Tj
T*
(consider the applicable disqualifying or )Tj
16.079 0 Td
(mitigating condition in light of the record evidence as a whole and any \
pertinent)Tj
-16.079 -1.125 Td
(general factors, and decide what weight can reasonably be given to the )Tj
28.516 0 Td
(applicable disqualifying or mitigating condition.)Tj
-28.516 -1.125 Td
(And, if a Judge reasonably concludes that particular Adjudicative Guidel\
ines disqualifying or mitigating )Tj
41.989 0 Td
(conditions do)Tj
-41.989 -1.125 Td
(not apply to the specific facts of a case, the Judge still must evaluate\
the applicant's security eligibility under the general)Tj
T*
(factors of Directive \266 )Tj
8.727 0 Td
(E2.2.1 \(which refers to the "whole person" concept\).)Tj
-8.727 -2.125 Td
(In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes that Department Counsel ha\
s not demonstrated error in the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's application of the "whole )Tj
19.751 0 Td
(person" concept with respect to the security concerns under Guideline)Tj
-19.751 -1.125 Td
(B. )Tj
(In this case, the Judge articulated a detailed, rational explanation for\
her favorable )Tj
34.236 0 Td
(determination under the "whole)Tj
-34.236 -1.125 Td
(person" concept. )Tj
(The Board concludes that the Judge's error concerning the Adjudicative G\
uidelines did not adversely)Tj
T*
(influence her "whole person" analysis of Applicant's security eligibilit\
y under Guideline B and that the Judge's errors)Tj
T*
(did not significantly under cut her "whole )Tj
16.932 0 Td
(person" analysis. )Tj
(The Board need not agree with the Judge's "whole person")Tj
-16.932 -1.125 Td
(analysis to conclude that it is sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, the Board m\
ust consider whether: \(a\) the error is harmful)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or harmless; \(b\) the nonappealing party )Tj
15.995 0 Td
(made a persuasive argument for how the Administrative Judge's decision c\
an be)Tj
-15.995 -1.125 Td
(affirmed on alternate grounds; and \(c\) if the Administrative Judge's d\
ecision )Tj
30.754 0 Td
(cannot be affirmed, should the case be)Tj
-30.754 -1.125 Td
(reversed or remanded. )Tj
9.162 0 Td
(In this case, the Judge's favorable clearance decision under Guideline B\
is sustainable. )Tj
34.752 0 Td
(However,)Tj
-43.914 -1.125 Td
(her favorable clearance decision under Guideline C is not sustainable an\
d the identified error cannot be remedied by)Tj
T*
(remand. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(Therefore, that decision must be )Tj
13.162 0 Td
(reversed.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
6.163 -2.125 Td
(Order)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.823 -2.125 Td
(The decision of the Administrative Judge granting Applicant a clearance \
is REVERSED.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 52.5 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>stream
H\j > wIJB[ȡhHt
qylOg>?y?ZyΈ=JK:04 J.b -$ ٰAͻ LxdItJ/p#j=dж q^F:O#q@7Yhy2_ e,Gǚ"g.qB\>D*L8WL\ׁωuqA[W:9 w_9$~C"4
0 ;
"
endstream
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅Q1hL
Jl`DAPĎƂuV
{uE/97wfΙ;;g @"۲ueD>c v l p 8. 7_ @$ 6cG;M =<~hLTxI x>50.seOhg 7 Drq\x +kE%K eGN 8ľ ?**~c|
u j5vR Z\PD+PP($vmA0n bV%WBG- ,(B n ]mתw)sςvޣg{W}~ ?Я~y`hX8 3dظ#G˘OuS6-i䔙ifɘ;og.Y
˖Xj7lMlݶ}]߷C ->vDSϜ-s/\t
\n40;N#8d)4M4P*͢Ut^:,Xh)|/
B0G8&<^JT6JszJ} giS*.HFJDjFj54
@4mv6[9tt
u.\v +ڲ!{ɍe FcD9INgU&y/SY|_ wӇ#a-zv3h
Ɇ-pȐ J8C C90_2xtCr Vwڞsv9+Q7\GCj.kn5dCC@ JNs]`Yp7vKkK+SK KsKSK"j́ ee̫̋i 2OHs(Af)`7tF&ˍ=m[bc1[G[=]>FQkT*ǘJ.U8hWwǥK 3\kju p
8ǿp cT|LRNWP&+S34,ler2}d_>/
ml=33XA QwܝamqwwwJ) C ݵ
wH)A8['
r$7-r& r%w=r's)9ayD qyBi<#?ɟsù\_owS%g9y^^%yY^Wuu]CԵtm]Gt}@7ԍtcD7ts7MT_
P 55T
S5RR56vBU
W$5YE)j9t RҭuVsBԯkAwԝNKV{^OWAuH VGQuL W'lO}IuiD('}/ⅸ&^Wx+މd^|$RD(G.IR&CD SH((IY((e rQnCy)_~}?(-PQ
R!*LE(P1
ugEw=FtzJũ *E rT*PO= BF4&d)44fz^7z{A}TTJUa.KVf2/8=g3s8spNŹ9|ͤYbw h7 pA7֍s.ąu$b Ź .ť].O
w%r\+w-sEĕ
Wj\kpMŵz\pCndsn9܊[f=sȝ3w-M[w{'܇r?x CmbL3D8ǝ0Hl |Ȁs<1_GfdAVds;G]@NBnq"/+|(((@18J$P
QeQQtD0**
jj !1)9Z%Z5ڠvhN.n-z;4Lgt5 }1 uA]Hvވt]T ] ҁ.+` v d6&A!abcFbFc b cB0Hs0 )iY Fl6[Vl7;N6{^sN3Ls\6W> 0,;αs<;. SgxxWx7xwH{|G|B 2s4ms5qs\5us_G:'(ďcX?ΏD?_/+*_&oߛOQI1P&w~g'Eӿ?|W{T{gvQ1(2 *E bk]@1MTx56zQh|5EǘcD1V;jj ,Jt.|5O G1q\|*NI7qJ|.Nk+x\!2/jICu
86MZvi .ү~JaZ:Cw_䅢Q3+=!:nk©WSVCۖO[h.uSZ^X 8 # < 0y:L2WksBZ洒c'@x/Be&q2 N:JK൵.p}u _d%I=w-(faDJ(` 4Bᩣe=?`8kxWo"0Gɇ*jb+77y]= q#x vl C}GKvb^kΉ\Q)~*$>RJ% (r H6ȊΈۋc9Xc| Q'x0>x_+8zGgxӹ+x fwo+ƈ~!'s2j:%Oa;{2pڷ}ږvbKgpr?^sf6̦PJn ėҟ!sy. Qaw>
u}pY1C/ge ̕?aj`l{ (SѕDYrE ; x kζvvnɵ߷7MdJ G> @؋hPn"I"MIE`DΒ 9yM6 趞"d0azZۈįIO Ƭh6SwzݜC*77!j8C\q]y(#9ph;ND
m,K4HլA46ɕzQ3!6UbyTĹ7UOxAni)6/@2 qT..LH1U=eT ?-' n0v/
qѷJmr#|E
)(.q)I۪DȆ"vșN%_~H
3C 7L% Ȯ34+m:syH)%ʤ}'˟^^p\dL},U N({ߧّ䨣Y cUMp |/v̗q|HqG23\r8}pWMTNH}3{?D.~ɵȺ\1Rdܥ˨<+*Ug;f#:dpԔ'%&Z|>b{8{z{d];w
TE
T$$鹹iV]/AC
~CCSc ==2#g #9RCcR5'ܺS _s>CӉ '˻8֬j B3~S}i| KE,o\X-J褏+~#6`PQ!66{B -P՝Ƹ8W]߃E{zekIKnn.];BRh%u-C+ӠWF2L
eb c1nmtrvk&FZ>O{}h آ,t LDUO1n&o@ł[-mk?;e'
? sI|Qx
x_+Leolɼ͏,l2;WnYB4r2z^b7[)|]XY c=Z4]_ !`b'
@iJ^JLPзf1*K6f/) $5=R46y6Z-FXQ`AŃCaBd%d'C(e0Oi1O12ْ3~>'W8aG\>8^/ :T?Hml6i4; ^>nv?Z;@ -C~MuǶ pGo߮zO
Sk'goԿ3K@1NեY`2۸v`jgҕҷMp=v8P,b`#Er
^t9c,nhs| ti%Bdqz#AG1 IoSc8>I P"/C LQt7nKQLw>y19>^Vg{tVgɜ:0V7{ I 6U#bY {4Qtex!pպoׯEmu(N ]]ߕv#= {K*U2
33anNsT9}bH֚6!@UK硇 x
yF&,[=Y$IoӉd>2 `6oR
f逤)/UB#sF A@\x!$?0FITCGzdR"+5yhwtJYРQ&|N`?[KN3u,[WQj YZ/bh^L|$G
sRpŀW4009p܅ Qǔc 5A8}ț >q2!\cC-FVVlI15ʜ2*&}V
IQ4
vk';|P[m`bEѳ5
^epWᑡ PԾ"~atjR{7{>Zaq) P
_%qSIқ :xRg.fx*sIcyތcm,~2uт0p":;|4f]3Y27v§@ޓ1V[fHԤ4k55VcPr3K*Ypصfvˌ)v[
Rw>Z/=@(r9 0[i@&9 v JV );"@R"l4Җ;g,v V
*KWV{[6eN ~ f5N_e֠8Cf:_/ÀA9|-H
Z^. rJ-_|
{"^&[%_hS_O0 2 N3ܼy'pVRr^+ +;X$2X-A m\UzYW7i@ ^"5q^nו$fxli6v)de˥rX0- 5XG[n V ã(:eJ(eD*IO,Nҥ'2 +bhcۡBb㉡?y=Hoo5 'sݫ..U7 uB+#Bh9ZRxigl9)ʫ~ G:;&;XVkKv.$ eXFkdd ߄Wkpww,ɒ-YZVwJ%[A
W`(!<2!$ԍMJ'@`2mgf:
MR S2d 8d2RsWk{|j/؋\mL3
MՇqmu3l=@qȃ [ekƷ^xQ2L]i_|u R^ 㐤5擛Y=ɬFk!*N?)&uHxnp Z#H&.MvOD}z
h寝7.w$xzߓ^精
ܾ8{yMgwۦL=-vj76vYc!Վ"TTLZ?ٸ*→=L$.DC :#ڴ3bkSkpC&clȤ?ΤJq*@wmť>ȭp8.wZFc=Yn^QrTn#aItxz9<-y#kYG JyJ'Әd$I'EKwN;X=b`xXDbTۦIuw*:Fmkw[1|KHШ=
6 gSLGkd7.[uFA<)p3 |
de13eK_˒&9Yxݭw&"76ʑĖ
.GY@ P᮰h
@@NXme:#X` ^.5/-/
,3?[L8Fz qԉa b6lה*ȯ1,z"D"ނD qbkfͧy|PzDINK:E?
.#JEek]r *1 ~xx;h'= w9҃vgLq|ךP4ِ/=pwoKH*#q oR VDĈ "vT27u G35i4
f,<0QqR^
JK=2-> bl3p3awN) Bq >$K_dazV +\"o i 'fYFK5"SvaKYz(su> tfJkMunz^7Z"5u|\f ?0r2{Ԅuo m0B)5O xi=Xpj܂A$P-wi\AI W%8!8i6{T%*jԯ`ke`6v @;6 t 0>/A+keC5 + ??
]9nqP=0
]Iu\}r0s܆0Jdc*[&h* ^
l C!
x ,09GFY#w 㰶} K`nM>&Fل{ s g<VE~wqwo>Pgc.7ZϡF7 XUT{l3RpO;^ao"Ɨы0R(15> ح_*n HGv:@mx5cۂ{ގ~N͗O⮉7@OpQ@-k{ 5D\G^ܻ&qu` %=`;<1>|OP/sS _)tߔcۘu#]F kxuRnQLJ3o௵sR^ROQHr뎄ui*vY A#;ROg4y u\NI[ܑ} n\!7-Oh s+̳b9k~
#{q GZٽ`T)HJ!j)RD KmA,(y٠L J
@kJq1PwN/gqs Ueqa.6XAokW1[UgFC`Ѿ X x6Z`FrPheQ;9! ff*Hqv*wk'i@懝#/2[/|k
{Uߎ%?G xEqr{WnqA=q[%` X*Ý c?eÕk@60;4N8u9ϩ.ޮ )ȥ:VqQ,&yCOΛȟFGJԼ2^P%Z9pn
G[O Eަj>YJrzu~| U>Y%m|1 -LC $FY#JdLr{3>^*r>ۆ,"JU.IC>} 8йY4t
i>>{s.c eg"dsŚ[ 万mM(S>2YcA VeV;IDowJR=tZe TeMQ[-RKV 'r})m.ݴXC>api.d@I~2o" ȈFw{̋t_"^%R@&WGY گ &:`F|YI/\-CN覙Tiu?0P oP+Ճ4R|+zϩ\V#FX1(~A:g8h=OX8xh_yLwj ǫz XCh(} ٳh|6zsuف=:z?` q\3SV7U6Sᓘj^|",(\*|&\*|f/~8b9%~nR,$a ρWkaLC)+(DUJ][nFLw#xC%g9iVJ>ӵsyڜZA߶iv<<Ӹyw
tj-wx"ptP+Zns
tw6iRxsmB Ñ$J9/pn~"pu|_|/8M"끘\O?5]D*|
諯c~uJ]^Wԭ COt;cZqjƏQQ3sНDLk >zc|K'3w?%j $|* SDq>q\ݴMƚ?Rt 8H_:9V
|tFDלh \̛aPc~H@1rL: $0w ]kLA|n@ll+g~Zgfb e zݯ默qP$` ?<Jc wYI4H0Fo
) 1@Qc/|#:xPfF5]* .0K̈iG q?6Ӎ~Ƕ8D9J6wkfCb Ղք<(lc5քpG+0.69 mh ڳGC0О?y;oXh v ~4t]@{kqWh+rZ`t_={ 6P8F7s +`/ӅF` >k2Ӡ1&@W[hȘbo==^־ wsx kwnt/c̍Wg~c4C[r0`GD`Fys̟*wxpW!< ,9()?G+7]R[hZ
J ȵKJ8=fv/j^u4ONDְ7 ttΛ$Iݩs*rAmh mI~i.ryM4%˝wxݚ4zFή\4{#g]o56z
z'Z2~h3Or'P缂ķL:֠.>& |ڋQ>]Ʒ-`Oi l :kVW:
x$)U{^gPe$: ?( 0}߯@/A$$2]ԍ&͝Չn_` ˜./Q rS6nw'k;&xX =ʧsLBVWƣ
a2bj" !LE1 2ex&,E1:cLd QIFC'T;~3&#k|־ss
F{UhB c-+Á * Zj|
tt -[0u\k>zbl9}]r2}}?{l3Z"no[u/ J ub=
ˬ˴}y;
1^[Nηm*d+~W.Gb}%8ٔ4lK`~h'M#l` #Pɔ.wi* a 9 0f(
sow8 G?8TڅqvRSjl{\[6 o~wUGmo>Pg7Ct pLڗxXkw/y t Cۺ>b ce/
0f6-x=
KKnrKa vkC}QrAɣks ~Wy +~(9o\" ; ?
{Bk?xvM=kj\b`jV_'=\{ rjt&ݠ:C^
jUS!jqߜOà:^8}!&Q+_t7@kQsuCÍt zM՚
c8P?7O7+}|C*S^Phz sڟm;f)K]T #cmV7(M AM#zDy,]WacT͠gR G#3k'RKvGh$R Cɰ53b Cȋiv{m.O
;m;oh=4wN>/` q|m~T:v ,|^Rixs?ퟋ~_fQ v'>3se{Kֻ{:G (-;|,:ڋz^p
6bƗ!6 68cg*7h+d,웣Mu{z F
rU{hmU f2
11<0h97eK34G;]lӍY'%-C5>TdA=Hď}#xf>giS9Ϙ 3ɢ2džM4b2}_<1_* fbfB<:5J{ &L^QC3x_הN_(Y|Эsb>?rsvKq%ч8] rOE ȗC?n֚_s{4cZfw љ4y _Y2DI
tA7Y|v(5 }߆MB 90m
)# zx&HEM
$T+} b 6$㻃4Ž~Y1]TMWGSO"c _|[$w5 bW@ 胂I1 =qßxi]Cԩaq
(s;Dw8IA& }xM uC8Su&LDM%:pu6:9ˍ>N/snh,YR:?"ޞh졦nHnwf g}
Buܾ߆6W9)
p~Sxہ1:
wh-[a՛2&ͳhuWS8{O TI?BU[zT݆}~F] o1otJu9z\LO;8PIxH]+\CݦF vu~ԭ_.Q^U ?{I6 A
&l#e YٍbҖZ0
c -2)(0*(ôEH"2oCUΔ37sΡq]XӿI]93jͷQ n,*ݏ&92_ҷh\Feҟ__k͎e)? FoVgaJ1MNxFdǴ}ZAm b=cG
g#lnyg E0n ,/UO;ii's-C> L?e#C? e.Zkӗe3[} ެr6huKR \)M_N\Bw
5am`~
l^&C"\`t+"ӿ{e~sr~ElFSzڅO MXx]!w{F~6Sa%fߢV#![gԞ)ǜ(b+a;fMKH
7Z 'ޥI["sq>9 Os8;OP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(e]4M:TGd^g<-~
@ +e# waU!ѥoAp.q !QA;
,x|t};eŀ+n3:Y"8L5 tC'Uc3~L:wv'3 K8NI mIEM7th E ʆzv6qbHHHHTB@HmBP.V|Y_Cnc@I+pd~w=L~C
?/nU&-Psc㆘@W=w di&(ZZ 3sFi]`ߊz ლ6du?zkm q>f5<ń`7;ͰcZ\1ԑ13|!'K"ڽ̠̐6`A};
Zma|];]~5G͞hFnHx~6 ~#MFv3xuFZ v>oĀFfE$~熡/s,nUcRd C)daQ8 i募ef+R6G!$m 0 fgT ~)pg-QݢCf<0-鰱!6L!dKg"]zRFi3=&Ý}:Eà3 O"F@CF`tF2Q;hBg Iԥ.y nng h 15cd
_'ζgRHcBkO)/Rc)RO)ecJɆȽNzBz>)+1[12ScJV((z}\;oGͫ|g*
rHg d7ze{HEe &
HY1J7?sfyb
"CImۮ8!یD*/,Q)W nI&7?fin4[(Jןfw ^s_-O.K#N0~7\v3 3:y|\~_c4/ KIA|GIEU4{}*!HaV9ҼzAG'?êXl
tx-ۙ2+lGۮ `il[&QE!UDasMjݓGOOT&JdKViPKR CMne9(d"#ӫ߰
`C0u@CkPmCLמHa*OqFӼ{toq%Tbɇ&5p"@v7 nt=_TvOWe+v Ǝ^/PQtZԜӪP&1Bۜ $N?l #60+
`v0]ܵ
WBs> cijԫ ^ +R6=Q
[\%>l~[B") <\
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
50 0 obj
[52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R]
endobj
51 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-04300.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-04300.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:11:04 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Guideline C Mitigating Condition 4 concerning when an applicant is )Tj
27.717 0 Td
(required to comply with its provisions. )Tj
15.749 0 Td
(The)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(unfavorable record evidence cited by Department Counsel is not sufficien\
t to demonstrate the Administrative )Tj
43.931 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-43.931 -1.125 Td
(application of Guideline C Mitigating Condition 4 is arbitrary, capricio\
us, or contrary to law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
37.464 0 Td
(See, e.g., )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.832 0 Td
(ISCR Case No.)Tj
-41.295 -1.125 Td
(02-28041 at 4 \(App. Bd. Jun. )Tj
(29, 2005\). )Tj
(As the trier of fact, the Judge had to weigh the evidence as a whole and\
decide)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(whether the favorable evidence outweighed the unfavorable evidence )Tj
27.987 0 Td
(or )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
5.108 0 Td
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel's disagreement)Tj
-33.095 -1.125 Td
(with the Judge's weighing of the record evidence is not sufficient to de\
monstrate the Judge weighed the )Tj
41.585 0 Td
(evidence in a)Tj
-41.585 -1.125 Td
(manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
22.103 0 Td
(The Board need not agree with the Judge's conclusion to)Tj
-22.103 -1.125 Td
(conclude that her application of )Tj
12.912 0 Td
(Guideline B Mitigating Condition 4 to mitigate the security concerns rai\
sed by)Tj
-12.912 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's acts of foreign preference, other than the possession of a R\
ussian, is )Tj
32.144 0 Td
(sustainable.)Tj
-32.144 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge's conclusion with respect to the status of Appl\
icant's Russian passport is more problematic.)Tj
T*
(On appeal, Applicant acknowledges that she has not yet irrevocably surre\
ndered her Russian passport to a governmental)Tj
T*
(authority as contemplated in the ASDC3I memorandum, since she says that \
is )Tj
31.411 0 Td
(only done in "the final part of the)Tj
-31.411 -1.125 Td
(citizenship revocation process." )Tj
12.959 0 Td
(Instead, she deposited it with an independent agent of her choice \(her \
mother\), for)Tj
-12.959 -1.125 Td
(surrender )Tj
(to a governmental authority at a later date dependent on the occurrence \
of a future contingency--an)Tj
T*
(arrangement that is revokable at will and not final. )Tj
20.437 0 Td
(Therefore, the Judge's conclusion that Applicant had surrendered her)Tj
-20.437 -1.125 Td
(Russian passport as required by the ASDC3I memorandum is not sustainable\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The ASDC3I memorandum notes that the possession of a foreign passport is\
a disqualifying condition for which there is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(no corresponding mitigating condition, )Tj
15.859 0 Td
(and that the other mitigating conditions of the guideline cannot be used\
to)Tj
-15.859 -1.125 Td
(mitigate such conduct. )Tj
9.275 0 Td
(While the memorandum does not specifically address or limit )Tj
24.91 0 Td
(the application of other provisions)Tj
-34.186 -1.125 Td
(of the Directive, such as the general factors, it does state unequivocal\
ly: "consistent application of the guideline requires)Tj
T*
(that )Tj
1.75 0 Td
(any clearance be denied or revoked unless the applicant surrenders the f\
oreign passport or obtains official approval)Tj
-1.75 -1.125 Td
(for its use form the appropriate agency of the )Tj
18.299 0 Td
(United States Government." )Tj
11.517 0 Td
(Because of that language, the Board)Tj
-29.816 -1.125 Td
(concludes that the Administrative Judge could not mitigate the concerns \
raised by Applicant's )Tj
37.754 0 Td
(possession of a Russian)Tj
-37.754 -1.125 Td
(passport under the Directive's general factors.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(\(2\) Department Counsel argues that the Administrative Judge's applicat\
ion of Guideline B Mitigating Conditions 1,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 569.7344 396.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 569.7344 396 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 583.5405 392.25 Tm
( 3)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 380.25 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 379.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 27.3687 375.75 Tm
( and 5)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 56.6948 380.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 56.6948 379.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 70.501 375.75 Tm
( is unsupported by the record )Tj
11.886 0 Td
(evidence and is arbitrary and capricious. )Tj
16.41 0 Td
(This argument has mixed merit.)Tj
-32.838 -2.125 Td
(Having found that Applicant had close ties with her sister in Israel, an\
d her sister's son and daughter \(who is performing)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(mandatory service in the Israeli )Tj
12.856 0 Td
(military\), the Administrative Judge articulated no rational basis for a\
conclusion that)Tj
-12.856 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's niece is not an agent of a foreign power. )Tj
21.09 0 Td
(An employee of a )Tj
7.386 0 Td
(foreign government need not be employed at a)Tj
-28.476 -1.125 Td
(high level or in a position involving intelligence, military, or other n\
ational security duties to be an agent of a )Tj
43.934 0 Td
(foreign)Tj
-43.934 -1.125 Td
(power for the purposes of Guideline B Mitigating Condition 1. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.358 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 02-24254 at 5-6 \(App. Bd. Jun.)Tj
-25.358 -1.125 Td
(29, 2004\). )Tj
(Given the record )Tj
11.302 0 Td
(evidence and her finding, the Judge's application of the first prong of \
Guideline B)Tj
-11.302 -1.125 Td
(Mitigating Condition 1 is unsustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Regarding the Administrative Judge's application of the "second prong" o\
f Guideline B Condition 1, Department)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Counsel asserts that the Judge failed to hold )Tj
17.83 0 Td
(the Applicant to her mitigation burden when evaluating the security)Tj
-17.83 -1.125 Td
(concerns in the case. )Tj
8.524 0 Td
(Department Counsel argues that the Judge's conclusion that )Tj
24.063 0 Td
(Applicant's Russian and Israeli)Tj
-32.587 -1.125 Td
(relatives could not be exploited by those countries by coercive or non-c\
oercive means is conclusory and is not)Tj
T*
(adequately )Tj
4.581 0 Td
(supported by the Judge's findings with respect to such factors as Russia\
's and Israel's aggressive intelligence)Tj
-4.581 -1.125 Td
(posture, the age of Applicant's mother, the fact )Tj
18.952 0 Td
(that Applicant's mother and aunt are dependent upon Applicant for)Tj
-18.952 -1.125 Td
(support, and Applicant's statement as to what actions she would take if \
she were ever )Tj
34.282 0 Td
(approached by anyone seeking)Tj
-34.282 -1.125 Td
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(Department Counsel's contentions have merit. )Tj
18.676 0 Td
(The Judge offered no rationale as to why the second prong)Tj
-23.897 -1.125 Td
(of )Tj
(Foreign Guideline B Condition 1 has been satisfied. )Tj
22.108 0 Td
(Given the record evidence and her findings, the Judge's)Tj
-22.108 -1.125 Td
(application of the second prong of Guideline B )Tj
19.051 0 Td
(itigating Condition 1 is unsustainable.)Tj
-19.051 -2.125 Td
(Regarding Guideline B Mitigating Condition 3, Department Counsel argues \
that by applying it as she did, the Judge)Tj
T*
(erroneously concluded that Applicant's )Tj
15.842 0 Td
(contacts with her Russian and Israeli relatives are casual and not frequ\
ent.)Tj
-15.842 -1.125 Td
(Again, Department Counsel's contention has merit. )Tj
20.676 0 Td
(There is a rebuttable )Tj
8.44 0 Td
(presumption that contacts with immediate)Tj
-29.116 -1.125 Td
(family members are not casual. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.773 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0484 at 5 \(App. Bd. Feb. 1, 2002\). )Tj
(Given the record)Tj
-12.773 -1.125 Td
(evidence in this case concerning Applicant's extensive contacts with her\
Russian and Israeli relatives, and the Judge's)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<