%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:13:53-04:00
2021-06-24T15:13:52-04:00
2021-06-24T15:13:53-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-07245.a1
uuid:5c12fd98-3716-4c5e-b3db-d6cebeb2f5ba
uuid:52f16bd2-7be7-4f88-8bb0-e03b517a04a4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-07245.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-07245.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:13:53 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: May 20, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-07245)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.291 -2.2 Td
(John D. Morgan, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(February 20, 2004, which stated the reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.857 0 Td
(why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for\
)Tj
-17.857 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\),)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.718 0 Td
(Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\), and)Tj
-30.162 -1.125 Td
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
13.303 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Robert Robinson Gales issued an unfavorable securit\
y clearance)Tj
-13.303 -1.125 Td
(decision, dated December 29, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge demonstrated bias against)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant; \(2\) whether the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.079 0 Td
(Judge failed to discuss or consider relevant aspects of the case; and \(\
3\))Tj
-17.079 -1.125 Td
(whether certain findings of fact and conclusions by the Administrative J\
udge are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.49 0 Td
(erroneous. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow,)Tj
-32.49 -1.125 Td
(the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(WjS&SF)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0E
/E!N$ĢRb,,xT%ǵgsI&alkd;:Bމu&mN^CEzN0T12fx"yB.rUK7` 7TF/mI*4Ps _vpMq&VHsVp|Xv&4ŀ5q\0yrΜ6'v0j28ZEZeE~ԎyGg|s{VY1!FgM5{AM4Q5{A(R%G[X\bͨZNjO
0 wK
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=FS{a-.&@^(#*{+(r*F<5^9yoٳgͷ7@1ăE/+ȸY(\5pY{~> umM7LVk!15<
ݢ#6}4&KMn."~ϣF8.)yR&O:mfy.\xeiW\ū]~MlM߶=c]3ݷC:vS8}.j5S\$䯺
é@1+5ȡAOJow;n|ss_D\s92ʒlnYnUnVokIkYnhlmkF*b5<
_(oUFˈ7Dc1Xh66Nq8e\67
n3OUKWmfI6-=`U3r9K;:CM͜-o
LŢ| 㡜 9LŜ/EqP;8u:YV!9?Ԁna8V~A?_a10S%X- $2րw"]
9C{)F=,=CDUTK+fMKL[rUuN:PpKDIy;dM+QoK"{aaJRI:EurxXs Rv898j9j:j8;9>tTqTvTtTp;JqW ڌ9reksKzNӜZ9AV{{]{-{u{E^k'#[aczvȖimKuVf ftoƘQSy^v/sgTj:UE-TWd_y;kYqhL})pcć,>Hy'e|9>"_|ES|s_|omw;>?\~ȿ#~y3~#g%v4ᱜdIz;A*$~ɯ7v@@P!T&܅&LCEe*.JO%t.eB6+h(X4fh!ZVh#j
Z#vW9-W{=FLMcLcMq$Siiii)E|,>vL09BbcVF33ü]Zw5$$!Nmqw@k=r(72In[6];.[{>_!yعܒG<&<%O3A(?_+Usӹܐ?K-(/*ZznFnfn[VnV7Hijj%jFjƩjBvdB5Uij
S3L5Kvsֺn;~_7jګ:::N>g`&DN^"⥸.^x'ދd">HD(PCK1yP:Q,|2R&,JQ*J2SI(7塼/eE9* SA*DbD Mww=}_{Q *I4TSHO=L!4R(MF3h&R/h6Q/+ZQo;^%A}TJSa.KVf2/8=g3s8spNŹ9|ͥyn_s~7]ƹn\r.A\KpI.ťr
w*."WrU*W\kr-u.܀r#nM܂[r+nm-fܑ;qg]w3^MW ȃx0:Ea9'90H$Dzd@F}9LbX/ 3 +9Gc.*!r 'r!78F~@ABaAQCJJʢʣ*ʨꨁڨhh&hfhhVh6hvh::z·t5LwD_C@`u!]y+EtQQYAt%.K蒺l1mءyh#Apm2a)1
1c111 LK0 0a٘B,B,rVb1±RDGF!qG+=Vc
bc6b6# [۰;F {u]888"'l]}Fy%R6(sŨ,8:K+Cf|f"5^@)͵#Etԉ
TJ^=
cMHՅTøAJtzM)4Fh%AoQrS H?
غ/dE}P
i
4] ֲ
L80tȔ~U4}rghYe6avq淴'\#Nb2Gܺ8t2tь5R: ;Ȁs<"#Q;$sQ&=kͧe`Ni?f|ߟ"]^z.n7(_.s1l~줣$S ^[
K3i 3Nt;iڬ16R$Di4e,8CWh#