?1wxYC;α ,8p\7;ڻϧ]Ql = C]پ~+Q,Jx -1yL|3-B#u?-etCFLs7hP1HqHa
er
*Rj aw>ƝOJ'Vhqs\
/N# eJ^?[ x!ߺ2.< d)tvu9.cja7G1sOyO g ; g~-=O}ESgMHYǢ9"r5Q
D($B$z$
Y=L&kYނ4%-upIr"N!2 L"Ak5K%:Du+!ר/bP"fVCQ#\HEˉi4,'H7^
^ &Gf-f0J5mLi\>\n hɦ ߉gKMᎫ{csuQd- .r1 g&)31hƩm2l܅Jh )Jv]1qVAN0 z6XH+ئwVۭ22nXӾpQ^XF_/;3L[
ZW-E
;5=JM}\ג^ xeG4Eje !l[[pk$CpF0hXaUhev8SMߕ͇# d\MN= x3֚b?3+x&m|#N#~94ҦJ3&w?~SU?J?K1ʦֱeHfB
~ q# JLNSL|*1c~`}I{%RG/W_6n_Sށ|l߶sF싁/K j$+ΛȊsf2z:, +GڧL\9·ԃVH7B?I.D2* *LAs13˫ pѲ|߿^s_$2 v
TVJ2^HE7 zκpgyytz<:=N ! hϊ%Mؒ(ѝ
yF=!C\C9ʗu@ƜASl,%cŨ3ƬWE`\e?&$ڳZOB,^QL%!&[mA. W+(lj7js;CGOlٙJ
CmT#b]}RM?m2G+}揄m*kv\v;v'
7*-4DIl cCk`bV,@JHEH 0Cٲ)j%2~!UcL?cs=8 131'_h LD=q
=SN`aI# cHL ~'%4 #|jEdl !0N$JfmM&mgUYVA BW0@6noRzcIҽ2E_bei6ؖDO$YUD x&F$L.L86k
jyeZWTP^=|(ЪZD]=2|{^>az&Z/A
^ɬdKFF Q -@'L-Z3kV-~D1$!> 7L,c *s¼}2}2#P<^~s37`ן$D%D:/RK:2=WOKV4lÃ]ID& bC5ezEb%`T˩wSJ1:i MHҬHu3 (vr+,8hvjc; y _m&oS:@.G}\qClW(gg&$FB!X WtJuYArv&m>4HOs=J*=\ >d
8Z' (a/n|GU 3t h^`BYs֚u8 G14.e_J6\>g\6gQpMv -BW
Iq2vrI0 EMB-Zk-*l[IL\F>!}B0B <1ҼMM3VB/[87PK$nSdG순K+e,@ugwTӟYsGT#Jo{ˊy} wL>:L | {O:/rE6dlS!%<Ġy1F(RGTÜJl~A|&r)ՑH!?pڕFfSJ jFG\
mx7a0ִDBC+v -[r@Y¯, =>)aVh"1AZ"YW]V冼R"'0XBpAw t%1E_ՍF`!h_p_h<8 L,&p^DLtS&F>tr]XoQb
6r8B> PMC&kge7ͯMu|Ԭ EU҄첅bR0)7M!ne ܆|D!9~qJjcuMAp[Du)hk\Ip} =iگ =>Y $ʬ1,}pbqƵh@IfdTjUݯjt
i
~ ֊@u T)YiAO@-5V\RdŒq*-F[)0NԹTXPp Z+P
brI)tƑѽ hX%=̩ ;J=_Cs[,] :a: XV MM!/j2q?/X ]pO3֫ypAhbZw; ]~301Hb=cG+:N+ӭ($z P3hfaGAaPwS c3iM$5ʲ*(IZ
iغal ifxZ\| H]nq\e ?gosΙ^fw;7vwٛ=4@VA-Tl)TX6B /y@N +)/-yT)QD893;37*Qy
ÂwDŽU|rc'ny]grΡ~Dp#E&vkU2GѸ*$;ejj3+]#!8#i -mk`y5
gIggɗ2C}7 rU퐴[!|aK``Ƴ4\%"hILQt|7Ж +YN &bp뺡"~#oXoKltkT%ag̢
^$04VsBTBz߂^p,]
=_]ՃtU1 Q#Nِ#B
o6%ނm֑+rK2;ײ΅b y
k&6Fl7} V D/OZ¦s%R5d_k}b> 1zr w3WmzWPbBS|Eghu8'엫GIk'OEsњN^kd][7߶oj7[vCL$ 8183bu'dijt,ʯ*VE}ޖW=8=/ bSi artRsl;ki%
i>`( [bB!K\ڻ3Cϋ8= {x5C vC4 Sfh3Q$TjbHB{˒ѐz>d34qQ-Q[ˋh&]v`O&Ơ`9s@>} yX~ۑ~LMI.{?; PHǿZAM JJ~+%Հ
7!J B B!yNׄH4VQC}05J^E'ʃK₾й -19y-Z -~O7)rJ< ן2Otimr<3#s\fNzD.W
]"BHbn w79 Ucx>i !>j
m; l6R kL?AR&ct:]>0wvWK,e"`3¬2bT*K\Q4vڍO-hOn8h
TZbiRv f_bRДXS`tu┐"IӦ&Ao7Jto
U-10o[[zUO=%D躯lzm OVP7 Ni9عCvkbv ܯWA6/-۵/Urmwm'As # ܅ÒBLnmѰn1X}4<3P[0A(
(K78G*>?^ry?H_СMJ~MD UƩh=۽UJ5X @pZV`ǐ7
G/"H3$ ?=
9^Er!#Bi's%]LNzn2شc f ;YƱ\JiWաп_C7_}
/띐 Pջ9B1 )
VΩ6OFcPSFF)dtۢAA{Qjr
\fpذ{GGf9M6Ϟl4ޯ3W?Kr ·@N vHZM%i
Q6j8UQP]lh>p:9pѵ
l JQ̉^S̀ fkN.w P!%^nNL!Rm:,ׇ-s=|Ur♯r =e'c#ik[dtgQQ㲝竏ί32 ʛY4mm#@ܒ2P:Ly JqsѲ,vYB͙}e'*|-[k=oh]ݯx[=iќ)r4hcqQ;cSL 0t=[Wԕf}n[*cg CVpײ3Yd&TCnj ҈rNKsgfn~M5 ߠKPNIJ9V89b QC?*eج fى2^a1& ˹by{Wiwc>>h= {hxN?yWa925Bzک
ji6R|-QO{h q(|D@>
`)00 mcX{i}%=&
Y TmF|U"ʠԞ+\vbBϠiϾr
`4ʃurxj^8x rA
xg7 >
T(nns 5m12bRqNQk R\iJu5lW`7 I$V ۾u UZjW m<*Pk~ O$|;l e%)m?xj dOR-L3^7e=pk(OBA 8ܣ$q!c߯9 cLg`_ W +:m#%; L9@^A,B Y S@m0n3MsC |s܂a%}Zz 6])>G}fn1g,:Sd sK dn
}"!PvTlr-)mh`deHBy-i=*Q7Gfjhx_r2ڏOI8KݗF {-,z%){WNS}* K .GBNֱd _ gNZ S4^!J ߒ(?<9"Ge_D^ ؤ%z&kTeJ |ƮZpֽ$n#a['M8G̥g<>d= ܗ$H%OͿKO͡)8>@26zP9#x:5 ˑ2[jR4XAQȗȏ ReZs^AK}lg+rV4^ 8o F(=AG-g cda{o퇱.g<)V=Z Y.eBo{ ? x]Yث3T 净qk#C3hv1Ե_8z. &MK|GrPOӕQzZl5m2ÈwR}SZqvOځqe?42O}WU]qx{=7Ah0ABDZQTR|T UʌÀZjKcE ӊPA֢h;Xʣi-Z;XHބ(wu>{~Pr ֦w vp3|zx FceOCQYVëp3ނ}8ઠ'ԭU{G)T '?ܮ\Jcq~CY%@Dd>0/Q'm!3q|gWz^ `"Ch×S/&呔+|uSX?'vUN?,s}+Q' ?I<ų:_uEh{pXr0])!Z}8s/?K\mk"_]%\ cq:[ .rv( {-?=sP٨/'8;R^`4Esrj_DZ`+ j jUإXBMK#zW [߀[`lmK%#G u g;!c' mwpߕuw̃? YOi tjJѪe3gՏyfc+{- Ykf 9S]ވDzzCk wĞ2b'|/װ?ImA
i.v]#]n9ueNb/ZTt?u./y]w6h%;)ܬ$ui E+rRwt%szR*$]wѻM; 8l98p9k8 >"fTA9ݒ9dL^
;3r۾M{;L ,}C R ~ ZݓL?.\'$4`v\)Q&V2JVg)576MĞfi5߈bMޕċh~L`4`sr3A9It:t
CS_SQ o!gk-rkz/Vx+}ByJz]j5UA}s=?38^oE\jQ]O>1=SWm]$IW;9 Q]1?MB#GV'%~Z7(6CP??MBI?O':qΨ.Ի-%/m
_K~ p
wpfp[Ǎ nΨohl unMh<3[
mMvm߹U؛oGhmk#K< Y8xb/cyɽLoɍفǙ+ \_EN!~F\-=E"P#_,brϦ I{iv/11Lyn9rɩү_F|~Ȁ2,@FFGEJ22[+[_i)%oJ r&9D;[ C *eqzji9B~l ZМ[FcdzQ?PO-|wxoL]3ynQ%&!x> ; o ~cLx,s8Gz8ź2 R{G76kI]tTLSN:ۍXm7ewϬ#JZSpPj2sY?gE0/e\~ʞ3rOstvtsғAkΆŬKp1zatʍ
py_߲Gmo 4"fD#ש̭Cl^we Gp'ADžѩNG3h;cw}֗^Xm-_#
lY%uua;ngrRwb<ݢjPgLrV?%0XO;C"ndZ==ꌀ _s/0YB.*J+YR vuDz` @yw}Yˑ|Ù|^Ro݃Af<җ=< Y3hn]O}
nM8F#ɳcsXh5g.MHQ^W\+ył[JĜz̷z6qG^yY\@VbTȝ=mdyJε C` >ex^6YUg ǹoy(E*HP|Pd(`+m * 8K6
CmA00E@ ([ I\&P s[^uK&ClM *2(f qlHBKڏss٫̔N˲m#nS =e- YJW GGX]r'Vcm|H*֩~ /Io-*ց/*u{[5W}r(
'23fVZ%[#rE:gYsɹ-2VNi@O9wTXqxG "J[q}jm ջrkm߭_n-*fÍo˅v
: ~r/w;܉ ;2E:<Y p->oCE9_~'Ur)KCfz q&SeWn<=3{-}vZt20x 'ؾ@MS2k '/I^ b m{V&1RQI2&j?Ƕe YoѾx%_pYOv>#1/m 'K߳z鿊r_}9mogmz힆gt?^{vNӱ_,2|s{VM??}uܵ
TLڗ Ӟw1.,A&={ BWimǻksܓOY%Y CY (0 zCz\et>( iL )w +Mo)ڴ_u :NMl6
rmx? L)e})#&\>~~{%~y ,T9ώnsb_t&L&,"gH3A$'R=sX1H`51BbYx< 5MLr8#%v,rL3B5 qkԪCȁFTRғ7oAm [m uƆmL^(4.k4SwuHrq_/'Uʠ&zF)ĥgb;0=+;,DVS笓U`nWIgB4OQ"O| zsT'*MF?7z1>r R&2ɶZ=O,jE4ke̓oפ wMr8<]Oc|;i-[hgSY|O/%"".ҡN
e7G6DWE0#%R ^S^4{I
4>
ym[ղ 6ˉiluZY^%sK 41^`"_8)OK#ϳ'_,;GA< cUFbϦIS/bc>8џڇJiK^1ƏRX: z \nwWfdfԹB qdDn:[PH4Ye0䇕 ]4*y`i"s{vDqB^2{o'}A&ڹ&uLܯ`sAbٟsЯ$)){.1ƹbK{^&9ܓڻnjuJw!Rfȅg\
7wIg
%;C Mz"y,~w: T>\F!©7 o=N&3FR^(GjIn?G5HPئ6,.x;q ¸ͷpӌK8q qL>7@V~p | #g̾f.`ĝ|(ˎ'* j? ʗx^F[zU>W⃯xl7 e|iZKKiڶ/>"k:Hbԝ`}?m3p xf wUȲAaO4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4F# 999}5j)N斠RO
1 q vm3RY9&&$Ru>
wF%n_cZO^P6+sϾqUVAe9X9IT2R-,rLi&
U`_lr!드E=B^G`6UX_R\< %-H49h<hJԇâ-'mVﴂU"+[bS̊t>h_RBⲏkELT68#@4=Lȑ:zB UOw4.B]P l",&~}Iu 9" kHXz`
pTD 1V
';7ԯiZV[ imorU X"T_$ 2Gvtbwx
QqH)oʖ-ktK @j Lt :\71(1
3%uoY
1F8G\eI.:"fqadߪcL+T:\]Y1<{]
,D
(R5glGHb߹L,>$Nqe^#eUY,p @ ^5~_,( 0x8%n'|T8f|.; 5#y>'!:3r\'.Dsd/&q!`jc96&ɱ}cHG a,|kdž3: Z
JXu2
u]h +I?!5EC# L4o?Fԩ[cğI<=so8PfӘ$@/0
8U0&KoSR?.~x%"w3h U}
~E`v%*
i ֝W
7aYi=RPlq;st< lqlqqq@jgcC 3ϐx_d/e~ 0{?]- pG &DXYdj`n`Mv qi˳@\ВGf{r"ړ[^QP^nc@!U`vU=ζ#nbae
;-I,eup |>D}%`i:bV}yG
DK{؆ + m { q T =s|eFVPNбjX̴jȶ \ήmh
^ۨ`fY8g@/Pf Oz
Y = Ŝ˜8yy5\7i}ϱ,0|Q@ G32nxk?! }ijco9@ $ 9ym
^ 4nP}vۍ_V{.ߎi*~*Ow|.w#q+W'|lЫ|&r_evRGzܨ06#rSL w#l-4 SM| uy57WWT0U*1+|/6]W 4#WkkkkpUVK~w{{V&{f-}X Q دB
9RRqjHjWjM];u),Ƞe)?S+KTFʭ5BiBFdhʚ& +YcedhYtӢϠ">~SVΤڋ+Q 8emiK_S*5OH&} MqZ"FBJ l"l969ik6\db6*>[ ѧt0VJ`6!)JUT
.`P ̷Vl8 K$,,MafM2=4 ɐYҧCѣ~z:N=tXo {:+~YhguWIXD`n;+=m$N3w&27j|Ry
E3)RVJԚ2d8Mg$iWМ]ۢ\_]?:j>Ls2nJ1lƌ,Konl74
fBHK_5BlW" ' O4B1O焇=Oyl2Y=VeNFٮ
k fuÚ1yx:QTg@mPMMP:z127m6(Gߥ&wA3%=ۗ mNBu9@ 퀓'3! oO 9au.YJBAV>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-08988.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-08988.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:15:25 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 159 591.75 606.749 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 756 Tm
(contrary to law for the Judge to conclude that Applicant's ties and cont\
acts with immediate family members in the)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 742.5 Tm
(People's Republic of China raised security )Tj
17.176 0 Td
(concerns under Guideline B, and that Applicant had the burden of present\
ing)Tj
-17.176 -1.125 Td
(evidence sufficient to rebut or overcome those security concerns.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings in favor of Applicant w\
ith respect to Guideline C \(Foreign)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Preference\). )Tj
5.107 0 Td
(Therefore, Applicant's assertion )Tj
13.009 0 Td
(about siding with the United States instead of the People's Republic of)Tj
-18.116 -1.125 Td
(China in any conflict is moot.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's discretion about the nature of her work is not at issue in t\
his case. )Tj
31.173 0 Td
(The SOR did not allege, and the)Tj
-31.173 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge did not find, that )Tj
15.748 0 Td
(Applicant committed any security violations or disclosed sensitive infor\
mation)Tj
-15.748 -1.125 Td
(about her work. )Tj
(The federal government does not have to wait until an applicant )Tj
32.351 0 Td
(poses an imminent threat to the)Tj
-32.351 -1.125 Td
(national security or commits a security violation before it can deny or \
revoke access to classified information. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
44.152 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(,)Tj
-44.152 -1.125 Td
(ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 02-06478 \(October 25, 2004\) at p. 6. )Tj
21.331 0 Td
(The Judge's findings and conclusions about Applicant's ties and)Tj
-21.331 -1.125 Td
(contacts with immediate family members in )Tj
17.829 0 Td
(the People's Republic of China provide a rational and legally permissibl\
e)Tj
-17.829 -1.125 Td
(basis for his adverse conclusions about Applicant's security eligibility\
.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(The Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision because Applicant \
has not demonstrated error below.)Tj
T*
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 492.75 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 468 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 390.75 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 366 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 288.75 cm
0 0 m
114.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 264 Tm
(Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings in favor of Applicant w\
ith respect to Guideline C \(Foreign)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Preference\). Those favorable formal findings are not at issue on appeal\
.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
[45 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-08988.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-08988.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:15:25 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(contrary to provisions of )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(or local law is not required because security clearance )Tj
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported )Tj
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In )Tj
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural )Tj
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence )Tj
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record )Tj
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a )Tj
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing )Tj
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items )Tj
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
4.932 -2.375 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
/TT0 1 Tf
9.75 0 0 9.75 331.8137 375.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 331.8137 375 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 345.75 Tm
(Whether the Administrative Judge's unfavorable security clearance decisi\
on is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 345 cm
0 0 m
566.613 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 582.6133 345.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-47.218 -1.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded )Tj
14.996 0 Td
(that security concerns were raised under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\
\) by)Tj
-14.996 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's ties and contacts with: \(1\) her parents and her sister, wh\
o all are )Tj
30.532 0 Td
(citizens of the People's Republic of China)Tj
-30.532 -1.125 Td
(and are living in that country; and \(2\) her brother -- who was born in\
the People's Republic of China and later )Tj
44.001 0 Td
(became a)Tj
-44.001 -1.125 Td
(naturalized U.S. citizen -- who currently works for a European company d\
oing business in the People's Republic of)Tj
T*
(China. )Tj
(The Judge also )Tj
9.137 0 Td
(concluded that Applicant had not presented evidence sufficient to mitiga\
te those security)Tj
-9.137 -1.125 Td
(concerns.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findi\
ngs of fact about her ties and contacts with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(immediate family members in the People's )Tj
17.287 0 Td
(Republic of China. )Tj
7.832 0 Td
(However, Applicant asserts: \(a\) as a U.S. citizen, she has)Tj
-25.119 -1.125 Td
(a right to work for the U.S. government; \(b\) she does not believe that\
she should )Tj
32.382 0 Td
(be denied a security clearance because)Tj
-32.382 -1.125 Td
(she has immediate family members in the People's Republic of China; \(c\)\
she has stated before that if there is any)Tj
T*
(conflict, she will be on the side of the United States; \(d\) she does n\
ot tell anyone about nature of her work; \(e\) she has)Tj
T*
(done nothing to hurt the United States, )Tj
15.72 0 Td
(and she would not do anything harmful to the United States in the future\
. )Tj
29.467 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.187 -1.125 Td
(Board construes Applicant's assertions as raising the issue of whether t\
he )Tj
29.479 0 Td
(Judge's unfavorable decision is arbitrary,)Tj
-29.479 -1.125 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(There is no right to a security clearance. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
16.298 0 Td
(Department of Navy v. Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.414 0 Td
(, 484 U.S. 518, 528 \(1988\). )Tj
(Being a U.S. citizen)Tj
-27.712 -1.125 Td
(does not entitle Applicant to a security )Tj
15.69 0 Td
(clearance.)Tj
-15.69 -2.125 Td
(An Administrative Judge is not bound by an applicant's opinion about the\
security significance of the applicant's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(conduct and circumstances. )Tj
11.273 0 Td
(Error is not )Tj
(shown by Applicant's disagreement with the Judge about the security)Tj
-11.273 -1.125 Td
(significance of her ties and contacts with immediate family members in t\
he People's )Tj
33.865 0 Td
(Republic of China. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.832 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(Case No. 02-26976 \(October 22, 2004\) at p. 5. )Tj
18.857 0 Td
(Given the record evidence in this case, it was not arbitrary, capricious\
, or)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<o=5jN_1_)/S/GoTo>>/BS<