%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:16:10-04:00
2021-06-24T15:16:09-04:00
2021-06-24T15:16:10-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-09212.a1
uuid:479404df-65fd-4e9a-9e7a-aaefad4b8231
uuid:790fa27b-0850-44d3-a09c-05874ff0f7d8
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-09212.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-09212.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:16:09 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: May 10, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-09212)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.401 -2.2 Td
(Elizabeth L. Newman, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On October 14,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2003, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline D \(Sexual Behavior\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\
\) )Tj
29.992 0 Td
(pursuant to Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-29.992 -1.125 Td
(5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Directive\). )Tj
18.828 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On September 14, 2005, after the )Tj
13.552 0 Td
(hearing,)Tj
-44.847 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge John Grattan Metz, Jr. )Tj
17.997 0 Td
(denied Applicant's request for a security clearance. )Tj
20.615 0 Td
(Applicant timely)Tj
-38.612 -1.125 Td
(appealed pursuant to the Directive )Tj
13.967 0 Td
(\266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-13.967 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issues on appeal: )Tj
19.468 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge's overall unfavorable determination)Tj
-19.468 -1.125 Td
(under Guideline D was arbitrary, )Tj
13.44 0 Td
(capricious, and contrary to law, and whether the Administrative Judge's \
overall)Tj
-13.44 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable determination under Guideline E was arbitrary, capricious, a\
nd )Tj
30.461 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(We reverse the)Tj
-37.014 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision to deny the clearance.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(I. )Tj
(Whether the Record Supports the Administrative Judge's Factual Findings.\
)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(A. )Tj
(Facts)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge found the following:)Tj
T*
(In late 1996, during a period when Applicant and his wife were experienc\
ing marital difficulties, Applicant met a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(woman 12 years his junior at an on-line chat )Tj
18.023 0 Td
(room. )Tj
(The woman was a citizen of the United Kingdom living and working)Tj
-18.023 -1.125 Td
(in the United States for one year as an au pair. )Tj
18.716 0 Td
(Applicant and the woman met in )Tj
13.33 0 Td
(person and began a 3-4 week affair)Tj
-32.046 -1.125 Td
(during which they had sexual )Tj
12.025 0 Td
(relations at a hotel three times. )Tj
12.523 0 Td
(They also had intimate contact at Applicant's office. )Tj
21.089 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.638 -1.125 Td
(affair ended in mid-January 1997, after which Applicant maintained e-mai\
l contact with the woman until sometime in)Tj
T*
(1999.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's wife was unaware of this affair until sometime after Decembe\
r 2001. )Tj
32.585 0 Td
(Applicant went through marital)Tj
-32.585 -1.125 Td
(counseling between December 2001 and June )Tj
18.549 0 Td
(2002 during which time Applicant's wife became aware of the)Tj
-18.549 -1.125 Td
(relationship but not the specific details. In December 2004, Applicant's\
wife stated that she had )Tj
38.308 0 Td
(full knowledge of her)Tj
-38.308 -1.125 Td
(husband's extra-marital affair that took place in December 1996 and Janu\
ary 1997.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(B}jD{R3QT)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0Ezl`!i!ݖ8$khd8[[GH3'wO.HC{ɝ%Ԫ;깏ٲt]N_^1˭pNzӐյuJw醣>f{4~o.?S/'WuzFož~/ߍ_Q]9iNcjjYgW{֙`iRV\r _̶"{Y_L~o;0}lkOO77O77O77O77O77O77a^A^aAaAaAa̵O'03
2
s r s r s r s r
+ WOOOOOO`.[0 _`笽d#6<[>
oW
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\GOO%!^MoU]]ꭵZ٭[nU"(*ū
7ވg@o/D^UzՏ&$?癙ywy& 1߰nb+.96ع
ƥSorMH$wX0$
OxVPm~.1_.=zTaFag
j>za)5r8pǭ%}RID Hf?ep|gZB !}!Iݐˍ.M0^ɲF^G=>.f[!~ݎLh55C/? T=.DQwᔴ2>~*U Zzh2GFjծ~ݿԫ>k&M?oџ4kޢemڶgGw翾/|յ[|ݣgX|;>O~L4xHiC
1Qnj7>&L5yJig̜5;gypQ%K-_ҺjҺ6nڼe;vڽh8X|𑣥ǎ8yϜ=wE\b_-mhبElUFGctKR'i.eJ%)6@I/)'șT|_~5٣Ko{R'"=bq%L1(mJ]ZlVMy