%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:16:24-04:00
2021-06-24T15:16:23-04:00
2021-06-24T15:16:24-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-09483.a1
uuid:0e849958-525a-4fa9-aa3b-cac3f48c28e6
uuid:e90cf952-fd75-402a-9d91-550665f51e7b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-09483.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-09483.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:16:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 17, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-09483)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(December 8, 2003 which stated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.356 0 Td
(reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified informa\
tion for)Tj
-14.356 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F \(Financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.886 0 Td
(Considerations\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
-23.329 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge James A. Young issued an unfavorable security clear\
ance decision dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.127 0 Td
(July 29, 2004.)Tj
-38.127 -2.125 Td
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.497 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-10.497 -2.125 Td
(The following issue has been raised on appeal: )Tj
18.939 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge had a rational basis for his unfavorabl\
e)Tj
-18.939 -1.125 Td
(security clearance. )Tj
7.689 0 Td
(For the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.995 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.271 0 Td
(how the Administrative Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-24.271 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.912 0 Td
(\(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
7.969 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.034 0 Td
(or capricious, the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-26.034 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.54 0 Td
(explanation for)Tj
-41.54 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.524 0 Td
(reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to consider an important as\
pect of the case; it offers an)Tj
-7.524 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.188 0 Td
(record evidence; or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-21.188 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decision\).)Tj
-15.215 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.057 0 Td
(they are)Tj
-43.057 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(2~ >i\))
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\݊0l/I",/ul2v5h/|ɔ.3&IX~{MzgL-NRi{3Wk20ԮEQ79,rlE,]j2in n[YB^Z hy٠Oxi\8-L5ZwQl)eqƧt϶Kg -䊹">1]d,sF3ț7#o2s+b"+֫W̊X3k=| <#)ʦ8B4A)1gӔMs6M4єG
s5H5gI;x4?z.zů
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=
Clw0&@K&"@Q-Q1 XXbł]^U5Vrڳ>gϞ5: %FHW5뼬/W"bcg.* @cU8Ǻy@):'*{Lz zݣDͫз5{Dw;lh _kC.]*LƝd#&n̅x87"\I$FALXϩRDpSNʸ?
; s! Q~lؕ!wXE07Tj]T'ȷ4D)IUUX\CɂYV)䁯;6˙:!-uЎ̫//4TK3 mbRCnP]\5[%J{*Uw*VA*UUFZԭWAF4
l-[nv|Y|W_oة?t
GnQ{;:O~8p!Cy#0zLbq'LL4yig̜5sΛ`K/[b%Zf6nڼ%c;vڝgo־f:|'N3gϝKm+W!'
ŬtTV <I~!J`&D5[>g}et=Hw;?M~n|s7s?se%2Ͳ̪X]2
VZZnS<,(nx^F9oT7Fo$I8cXel0;1qɸ"U@X@D@T@G*ݒ&=#`e3r8
Ζ6|Eg&MbQ:)k؟Cx('HxKQRՎj:VNRs>}77^N7Bx}~P?_џ/0G̩4PK%RCy[anE!T#XȀ^CX
(nMOJ_re-NO6\ȡ়ex%}ě+߳bRItqxhySlc p+IƎ:ڎZUUsܑov.:=wz wiU~2"n=holo`keb+ڽd{h˳9lm7
߲ev2mm-o,6뙅9Q&iurR9/믮]gtPi:5 MV%z=뽵XfLM+LY)p~mg~mJ=&M}7OEep?kŚKkEHh`R0˱HFa
c%#
`M N4fӯR\IC͡4S- Q1*Ni^%-%i-VjZCki
p)6fBJPIFɝ<5\'OPYGh7eKYM9a>GW*9|O><_|/+'lc;_\:|o9oc~O?
;p"'XuRގ;_+|.$BUW pDq١J
w!JSxy@]&H4
E#X4MEh&DKJmDh+>ZV_==~jLL Ѧ1DSi)ٔbgo`hJOg >"D|˵@`(|f}fKCpww@p
(R]mSp?ֳ^n&Yn[6];.[{>_!yXq.9Q<&<%O3<'?ʟsr.;77CO)(/*뺖躺膺n覺n[薺ͦR!jFIjFQjƪqj$5Y5E05UMSjfYnZmu;^wu'RүVw]tWGU~u@TauDUquBTiluF@uD(kR7kF$GQB|)"U8 $IGȧ/KJO(#e̢4e(K(;堜rSKY~~QNBTPQ*Fũws*I4TSH2LBS(h*MpN3hzIhz^7zޫ*I%JQ*M}f,Y1ǚ
c`3r&Y8+gO99gsF