%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:17:42-04:00
2021-06-24T15:17:42-04:00
2021-06-24T15:17:42-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-10571.a1
uuid:6e65ad32-d62c-410b-929d-d8e12ca387f1
uuid:9ff35c81-d042-4b36-b9bf-6dbabd09175b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-10571.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-10571.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:17:42 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 8, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-10571)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.114 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REMAND ORDER)Tj
8.32 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.332 -2.2 Td
(Catherine M. Engstrom, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.109 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.346 -2.2 Td
(Charles I. Miller, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated October)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(3, 2003 which stated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.998 0 Td
(reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified informa\
tion for Applicant.)Tj
-9.998 -1.125 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline J \(Criminal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.553 0 Td
(Conduct\). )Tj
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued an)Tj
-18.553 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable security clearance decision dated July 28, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.497 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.188 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.271 0 Td
(how the Administrative Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-24.271 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
T*
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.912 0 Td
(\(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
7.969 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.034 0 Td
(or capricious, the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-26.034 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.54 0 Td
(explanation for)Tj
-41.54 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.524 0 Td
(reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to consider an important as\
pect of the case; it offers an)Tj
-7.524 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.188 0 Td
(record evidence; or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-21.188 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decision\).)Tj
-15.215 -1.125 Td
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.057 0 Td
(they are)Tj
-43.057 -1.125 Td
(contrary to provisions of Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other\
applicable federal law. )Tj
38.347 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.415 0 Td
(required because security clearance adjudications are conducted by the D\
epartment of Defense)Tj
-7.415 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.138 0 Td
(VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
13.69 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(`n+F\(%)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI&v!0rR[cdfH3dTv,0f[0 /pئf &74PnE!\ȧg;^`%`!*f%fe)-tK_dֵ~^֘\<4ηlƌ&(68JYqjNt
HI`@+ 9S1 ĬH>9w9s1 FFe1UUYG~QG#1E]ԙShɳNSbɛfoiɛfojRUG/-lc|:ԹuK̢O
0
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=]{/.{H^bQ@
KMT(h,Xłr*F<5}z+9kgϞ5ߚob#꾮#W҂B"m?>dPGb.9>@X~Q;7@m}C3!5#2%g C=:7qdptTػ@G5{s쐌 mT!CK=d4*؏.]]"܈BSPB߉$UQTVjbq["Rtnc3s[uZ^{j-A7^܅Sx)WRUՉduzT}WW%ҺNwջ(}~X?K=jdf^hN7ZzZY-s,ZZZZ[XY;Xa>ŀE
w(gT2|F}߈0bX#Θb2-F8l4W~~-ZX}LͲ5['['&oLNM_.βΆNgg+g[g