%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:18:30-04:00
2021-06-24T15:18:29-04:00
2021-06-24T15:18:30-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-10880.a1
uuid:323cfde3-930e-4c90-a397-cfecd273a1d5
uuid:421ba172-c807-4042-9e89-94967382db26
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-10880.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-10880.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:18:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 24, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-10880)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated April)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(12, 2004, which stated the reasons why )Tj
15.969 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classified informa\
tion.)Tj
-15.969 -1.125 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
26.718 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley issued an)Tj
-26.718 -1.125 Td
(unfavorable security clearance decision, dated January 12, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of )Tj
17.327 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-17.327 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Applican\
t was given an adequate opportunity to prepare)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(for his hearing, \(2\) whether Applicant )Tj
15.412 0 Td
(was denied a timely decision in his case, \(3\) whether the Administrati\
ve Judge)Tj
-15.412 -1.125 Td
(erred in making certain material findings, and \(4\) whether the Adminis\
trative )Tj
31.156 0 Td
(Judge's decision is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
-31.156 -1.125 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge'\
s decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.132 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
)Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(EPk*Q})
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI6XrR[cfH3>ձ$8&vE[ /pئuv Lq \&9NqOnJ$oAU>}J&-Or#B:hQ M2Y֕nט9;8Cc!6
"(d~QviwERfr\Ona3xϼ'k*T)sJ:tfĬHGo 5k>WӹZ1+bѤ
!fMh\H5gfp-j1\Z{3Ͱ7C{3Ͱ7C{Ér}j"载ňm_ot$f'~ 8
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTϹg.EEewcc4h
JMTX](+] '&K̢Oޗ;sfΜ@ @U6Mr[hxlX\~ %|\F#{~YT~!E4Hk;4fBe >v#"MZ87/O8v~{G'dv 1 i46,!u{xȰ HF: pԶ7&2ns2 Q{ $q-PRD .(
H"Un5 ,6u>X^ky 4Zk;
$ƃGؐݻ$d`vʡV:u]\whаQc꼼GM6kcZmί}:wI@=zg}>/054z1#Gō36q&LI$NeZ3gNK1w-\-_2k5k7lظi3mٺm{vٛo9xቓN9{|1\xMVI)l$ڃLF[ɋhjOV 'ɻlɯjMf&]LNӦjj7EWOP'zt^VEPj+N4VJ[_Q$%YWV)[JrP)P(C>@Շ#ZLq 4h
3
9ȗh[,nj/kZsg6`HIC:bd,Xl-Yb8W,+9Ĩ՞B5ro99Q+W[4QxM&s