%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:18:45-04:00
2021-06-24T15:18:43-04:00
2021-06-24T15:18:45-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-10959.a1
uuid:7ce1033a-6392-4349-94bb-5cec49becd53
uuid:778ef9d6-399e-41c7-98b6-2919d69f1e77
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-10959.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-10959.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:18:45 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 12, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-10959)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.569 -2.2 Td
(Michelle M. Benjamin, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(October 14, 2003, which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(stated the reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classif\
ied information for)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline D)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Sexual Behavior\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
37.297 0 Td
(Administrative)Tj
-41.741 -1.125 Td
(Judge Henry Lazzaro issued an unfavorable security clearance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.21 0 Td
(decision, dated August 23, 2004.)Tj
-25.21 -2.125 Td
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable security clear\
ance decision. )Tj
35.167 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on)Tj
-35.167 -1.125 Td
(appeal under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.386 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Direc\
tive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
-5.386 -1.125 Td
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred when he failed to instruct)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant that a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.637 0 Td
(request for a closed hearing could be used by Department Counsel to argu\
e that Applicant was)Tj
-6.637 -1.125 Td
(vulnerable to blackmail or coercion; \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.16 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge's conclusion that Applicant was vulnera\
ble to)Tj
-16.16 -1.125 Td
(blackmail or coercion was supported by substantial record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.548 0 Td
(evidence; \(3\) whether the Administrative Judge erred in)Tj
-23.548 -1.125 Td
(concluding that there was evidence indicating that rape charges brought \
against)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.016 0 Td
(Applicant in 1988 were )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
9.664 0 Td
(nolle prossed)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( in)Tj
-41.68 -1.125 Td
(contemplation that the victim would subsequently pursue a civil suit aga\
inst Applicant for child)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.492 0 Td
(support; \(4\) whether the)Tj
-38.492 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge erred in not applying Sexual Behavior Mitigating Co\
nditions 1, 2, and 3; \(5\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge erred by concluding that Applicant engaged in delib\
erate falsification when answering questions)Tj
T*
(on a March 2001)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance application; \(6\) whether the Administrative Judge e\
rred by concluding Personal)Tj
T*
(Conduct Mitigating Condition 3 did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.167 0 Td
(apply to the case; \(7\) whether the Administrative Judge erred by concl\
uding)Tj
-16.167 -1.125 Td
(that Department Counsel met its burden of proof by establishing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.995 0 Td
(Applicant's ineligibility for access to classified)Tj
-25.995 -1.125 Td
(information; and \(8\) whether the case should be remanded to allow Appl\
icant an opportunity)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.378 0 Td
(to submit additional)Tj
-37.378 -1.125 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge'\
s decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
16.632 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.191 0 Td
(whether there is factual or legal error. )Tj
15.326 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.801 0 Td
(specificity and identify how the Administrative Judge committed factual \
or legal)Tj
-14.801 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.186 0 Td
(E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(u=\nXp]o\n)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI
!0rR[cdfH3ϟ>Ԯ!yipw64^A8w*fW 74PnTE%9,l3T,]jV4Wp@7,v퀐IJum)˚jN|.!TĘ[uTņV ʼnVIΝn*2>P +x*42y'cy/g9f+0/hӬMgѬGt.LJ^Ф@qFO}~@U_ y
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTϹg.܋4݅h$ȋ/1"*(*Q4Q1R`]*V+](q2Oޗ;sfΜ@ q@uvͲ[PHTptښ `2.F#\`o^=4w .wh'",8|G||¶}r#"*&6m%h drQTplkFG%
or?@=jlLwOzM)P uTA^
ھC $2Q&vl vR#MuR0FjN6f.IM2AV֒lSn=vN
:4jܤ=TG͚hcmڶjc']|vį{zgѯ_~?ÐаÆ9*z1?;aϿL<%nϘ