%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:19:15-04:00
2021-06-24T15:19:13-04:00
2021-06-24T15:19:15-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-11448.a1
uuid:0857cf2e-0935-4c3f-9975-d0de8b6fbff6
uuid:dd6e940f-f66a-411f-b081-d77762f4c983
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-11448.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-11448.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:19:14 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 10, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-11448)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.526 -2.2 Td
(Erin C. Hogan, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.304 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(October 15, 2003, which stated the reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.44 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-19.44 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\) and Guideline E \(\
Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.798 0 Td
(Conduct\).)Tj
-38.241 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Charles D. Ablard )Tj
16.386 0 Td
(issued a favorable security clearance decision, dated March 31, 2004.)Tj
-16.386 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel appealed the Administrative Judge's favorable decisio\
n. )Tj
31.032 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under)Tj
-31.032 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.853 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-20.853 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant's)Tj
T*
(conduct was mitigated, even though no Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.607 0 Td
(Conduct mitigating conditions applied; \(2\) whether the Administrative)Tj
-19.607 -1.125 Td
(Judge's favorable credibility determination cannot be sustained; and \(3\
\) whether the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.001 0 Td
(Judge's favorable)Tj
-40.001 -1.125 Td
(conclusions under Guideline E are arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to \
law. )Tj
30.211 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board)Tj
-30.211 -1.125 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.011 0 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.674 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-21.074 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.073 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
-41.073 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(party must raise claims of error with specificity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
19.881 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, the Board will review the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.14 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-42.14 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its conclusions, including a rational)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.442 0 Td
(connection between the facts found and the choice made; it does not cons\
ider)Tj
-14.442 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.708 0 Td
(of the case; it offers an)Tj
-36.708 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(ZEXl9 Q_)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CIi9 t1NzOJ3$ٲϟ>֮!yipw64ނAw*fW 74PnTE%9,z*yCﮰ5$Ͱv@Hb٦eC5;>y*bhqк+bKLT|zKg۠7o+$|"?E
F@,:w{=̹p|>0˽G#hЬAQE.s֜gYO.R`e;kB ckl}?z*ԯ IX
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
ܙKlމbI4Dc" Ŋ[bDE`Gc
6XbWeF:?5w@JZuuοA J!k{U-#NإG$/- }MXfBp#SH@xAâ:4 m32,ވYc2Grtݲ2$sߞѱCx\ Zz }QZ7264L ߕ~aёKֹ ꈘb:d)ZvMKUܘ@U)QbߑSe `PXu.Юr"S̅ʔTB;AY^<@X5ix[OOFTY˻M63jwEjt+QT2e=yUR*UMb>VFZS^
5nҴYOZlպMv?_tePW~].wn!aգg}F3`؟:lϿ9*ncǎ0abS&M>cs,^ti+W5k߰q-[3mܱs={?p0#G?qTN9{|f{
"W]႑Th0ֲy/SRAJm[%DLT*}{.42-2=kZ;E6kM{
),K7Ke%jXX=孕5cq
zI]+Uu_@qzOg5F=SߩЏ] @~~~Q~}:Ւ:>5=5#pusr8VζΠ3bbސξ9^rK9_"XtQ de