%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:19:57-04:00
2021-06-24T15:19:55-04:00
2021-06-24T15:19:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-12089.a1
uuid:16957eb6-aa4c-4baa-a9e7-2dc9a5678a2b
uuid:d771da21-9d19-49f8-961d-1c0efc85695d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-12089.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-12089.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:19:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 10, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ---------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-12089)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On April 19,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2005, DOHA issued a statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns raised)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(under Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\), Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\)\
and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.964 0 Td
(Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\), of)Tj
-30.964 -1.125 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\) \(Di\
rective\). )Tj
32.377 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On)Tj
-44.844 -1.125 Td
(March)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(30, 2006, after the hearing, Administrative Judge Erin C. Hogan denied A\
pplicant's request for a security)Tj
T*
(clearance. )Tj
4.274 0 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.995 0 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-21.269 -2.125 Td
(The Board interprets Applicant's brief as raising the following issue on\
appeal: whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(adverse clearance decision under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.437 0 Td
(Guidelines E and J is arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 469.8203 314.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 469.8203 313.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 284.25 Tm
(Applicant contends that the Administrative Judge's adverse clearance dec\
ision should be reversed because the Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(did not deliberately or intentionally)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.413 0 Td
(make false statements on two Security Clearance Applications and in a si\
gned,)Tj
-14.413 -1.125 Td
(sworn statement to a government investigator. )Tj
18.746 0 Td
(In support of that contention,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.887 0 Td
(Applicant argues that some of the)Tj
-30.632 -1.125 Td
(omissions were due to oversight, she is not a dishonest person, and her \
omissions do not mean that she is unwilling or)Tj
T*
(unable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.916 0 Td
(to protect classified information. )Tj
13.302 0 Td
(Applicant also argues that an adverse security clearance decision will a\
dversely)Tj
-16.217 -1.125 Td
(impact her employment situation. )Tj
13.691 0 Td
(The Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.499 0 Td
(does not find Applicant's arguments persuasive.)Tj
-18.19 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's statements about her intent and state of mind when she execu\
ted the documents in question were relevant)Tj
T*
(evidence, but they were not binding on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.829 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
10.554 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 01-19278 at 6-7 \(App. Bd.)Tj
-26.383 -1.125 Td
(Apr. 22, 2003\). As the trier of fact, the Judge had to consider Applica\
nt's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.395 0 Td
(statements in light of the record evidence as a)Tj
-29.395 -1.125 Td
(whole, and Applicant's denial of any intent to provide false information\
did not preclude the Judge from)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.836 0 Td
(weighing the)Tj
-41.836 -1.125 Td
(record evidence and making )Tj
11.55 0 Td
(findings that contradicted Applicant's denials.)Tj
-11.55 -2.125 Td
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions and whole per\
son factors does not turn simply on a finding)Tj
T*
(that one or more of them apply to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.135 0 Td
(particular facts of a case. )Tj
10.216 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound)Tj
-25.351 -1.125 Td
(discretion in light of the record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
21.187 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd. Jan.15, 2003\).)Tj
-24.519 -1.125 Td
(Thus, the presence of some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the\
Judge to make a favorable security clearance)Tj
T*
(decision. )Tj
3.833 0 Td
(As the trier of fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and\
decide whether the favorable evidence)Tj
-3.833 -1.125 Td
(outweighs the unfavorable evidence, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
/TT3 1 Tf
15.994 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(Ut,a^"TD)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq(i9e{V:='ۥll%,ݩ3wèr7'.xՆ(-O9
q
ԙqfu
w+lj7isWo7kpB!#%z0!_w\-By.vsEVgi5E
{p.8g2L8iʠ?E&j4"hDzL\'WOOUqYH,bJB4xQޜƱޅiE~
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅Kl(1RQ@DDň+EDETe*F<1Y,}s朹s 4d m|-,".<>km}? p1.Q#`<:~X܀b u;!| &*