͗28ckk8RRBO#]WI ]@ܵ
jF ɕ ?;wnmPށ\v*21QeTqJXN8M. з3h`x]bX2X٭-- ςgj 4w EAtH%5ч+]./ t:4I)h8=-Sg*8ZI˂PN F\!%ZDzd9ѷ'! Hn!DpD(u7$}diBM v̑cAٌy'8+BI;-Z:k AAer z?'](69)Ҩyz j}H(}b.w[t0(~o7:JmVa+N qH3ǜɆt_ٓ՜~f_syIn^V6] 3W. V$
!FZ
=<7
εS8. d6S)9klyAS۩݅_ Q*-߉"5TPpyG/ JNxu+ؙz?
8pU}GUqw.I
ym.$$$tH$y60`c 2U` i)MZL'֡Tm>|T u~g
v?3s~;uҽ|oAKJyjYee *8Ώb
p>ZXG8}NWޝf?(jS:9 Ŵ V^蹶xk>i=B7B ={$ K&|v5PVÇ+^ Gbٳ=sA> xnx-(]^Z16Ȩ_i 4bD6{nH qxO :8'2ܙ5)|+(|hU8q }ƪ>"=k3s OKPm1o
d&Ř⌒36?-%OºvjRWN+ *yF:23D%̿Aǻ#T /&qQ2vnP:
efM~zS eۃ-L eiɋt5@Q: Xv21&0eEJCm/n-X ?)m^g<rKl{"?,H 0; 0
Y1M
i'i6lc1t66 G֙}fb$ v!'Trnl[ mP8Z[RP>aIK O#xx-iEC~MߦI(#N#1X]hߥ FRmm^>$[u׆,y);\CVު>J'dX K&7z+-Ezij ,?bmI =4c\iehmT
~Gl]5b;H(mU̦F+ G̥v mf[Ҳ>$@%OE?KgOFhLX
|>@l hk]~
d Y~dLؒb) X/OC!}B]y<˯(G+s0c6s֜/&?76C^5ޘ꧒Yb)NC{㨟f3?Sm?bx,W_g[ԗ}^ qKKb+_r9l4;
̝LMb]A"JsE>X!JC>$6\ς:Wֹ{otQ
藩 [9Lje QR(/| 8" +yLf]OeOrsQ=BzyY+Ri8EŢ!v1
t2VKi^~"#\gPQH#-ui؇q ]u!}4O4F ߡ߫4}u {{qL:)3
ByZ} +YA (ޡEؿ#!~Dl@ zE.w&ri.Z"Ρ] V_;؋zfyƉц9#Pr OQNF9brE||ɜ+ً\o E_:ݮ}z}' hNLFm
4Z7c'&QʔGH
H! 6b6
ze@3xݪK<=;KmiPV _h * wMܼDf~s{}˶k$ߙMmX;(ϟ8e惖PM:Zl~Vd`mwĖhT5 fyyIȏO~
:;6 S}P(wU"%g
v;2$%U$ /S;fh>kJ: +/y˖ٶ8oKmɌ`Y1 J*eM\A v#
ߔSUZg\ՐW^1EHe䇇t9 {"㈳#Ïl^>!e(UӤF0r??V F;EX8]*e "*{A 1fRͫl/s32q>&Pj 7闽\T`~vhv\or4ȥFrnbSy\Xmp d$.<(KUx9.ȮT.=[ \s\WI}Iįk(X(qE5'+VR&fnW =ɌaMͻ6wLa+mN%~
}r5fJ쟤8_FE
20[-ҳp#{)ޓBQi7E7ɰI;䛨 N/|\"|gξ4Zқ
7p4V籋ToCa˥ dU-DR < 1RMlsSuvsh1 "! ΖĪH@`̚p9Y*Է& ]_ItTPtA2F=֒?ϳ-F SFꨴu>E29=-0_慿=u2={ 6bgX;A:X 55"p%zT#]õgG_ѾGwX1b '_2?>k6zlZk9쑩yz8֓Xb=kuj[XƩZk+ҶYWgկv鼥u6VNiށ-ud-wSU&JT+-Oik2Ԙ& ^ #t)tv8}ߊ1#ZᄎȘJmcqT~صo{:bpGX_4V0d?s\גdޓyL%d_v |8; fу=^ /Y4ng.]^V '[5,ZD$a۵B9?Pt`|dG^ y]Ib_K8@ <9|%/㝌18F2 ?(w:^vI{|Y?z+\r|ۆ/}m % ?-r ͖S(߁G= ;i;> )F˛϶AjG h_B ghԱT)_G ]aNa_w+bp xnSb [==
y]zڠ:JʱK`te,}y0ˬ®\Yza j&#/~V^dE+2"%X.!#JY71$ZΆn>}ʐ`ɫ{dlx VJ? ncP`jR)So{nzޙo:koQ? UZ9ˊw(^5Гum[DΟTUԕsNZ.Z}o/>˻$ nਂ{TGj*g+q$%s?\ܵ DMNX.-խ~.
[ C'ZCm?#zjm =S2kϑi䳑fh"N' $9:L.ս/6Avi^u{BjL-!_; LPoӭ$76{fvHO2jCp?}l6ֽG%۟pk#hj4?At[
NKzF%٦ @U" ?e F[(CXt(+H1pHC3+yYJ{7T8䫴3v1J_,=nw ów-2؝K;y/H칛m{C&S^b^;uҙx9vmXܢk0 '$_}\'
֟$|'/ԏtO6 .k)#^鰾=%)h,3MG qO}8f=蹻%
ߋA k5/}* dFSɮq3 ?Ȼwmc\xc{YNއyv7
b/2e6??w{w3ΡJ'YW Kfg:ӥ.C@[0 9ʧɱw orO>
?<+EWzʓ ?( ]C 1ЫVmV9(xkU5Z`Z#A2S^ b`
+n~z8/
hhͯ
r h` F w)-m 'U\'oe6 TgkZ7[J$Y䂉Ԑ aJ7lj"Sb%tFn|%7uA̯7Y9j*'*g^CB,Nf\vDOE|D^I pGe`L"3{8?p}>MmػO]0@ OZm%d"8I*hڑZ#pz\YXr#Ӥ !j=H#T٬N?DFƶ 9\N"Oj2)ySV{֞7}djg;˾Sc2{IeCzG!rB>)BCs9,}q G)# _##3MLgp2"Q뚴 @? N= hd`Y냴OJNl*9w- ˎ͗Ex8ƺku^݇8G[$ bC
";V=+e7~j ڈLԽ.c̟q9 {iwTN?D*DTN)> "d!*zI06ж"fZsCj^ ,Ow/>t8sw! F@I`#$[Đx{C.w݅dB[j-mV*V/ZmGhu8 ˴Pf3IL&}gY{_7g Ir.ߨ) {nl U}+$xWuh/}?֩O(uNqYQq9f w|Xa827|L,%O8_G'_C0e̙q|Np}2q^z?wo"_0qpNw_Wx7Qx~όWz|Ǻ"}%V^ z oq(Aqy+eۓe4Wlef'. Kި~*:O[ 5p5 '¯Rk{eO:w4i`M-
w22P{8*K(Cy gqz2c}.jp'UVM swqew'Fzo)uQEPW[} 6 ɟ-uUGʂ G.%̈Ɖ%̦H$z6YhঊK)_ ϴ3ef9 Ȭ/fMωH3EA2Vg"W]Ljk +Ju |]" g hܴLE>>Md5k} 6u 0,} 7wnaXAm辸Kd}n~(}p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8 p8>F~):i"?JHTR%P Jor/G_
Z 2φ倴DDҾrI_ eS1Q -QiG# %k5K)MCԴI-Ҿ y[=7&e5)dM=㬤=H?~38r 9K]nl =6Y4{X9!f>R?ZS; ck2~Hu9> -{1ژX'TQR }6g5X%4Xw]j 0t¦ڟѨ<EyЃ4`h_K7֓Y3s0Xoa:ڲptG&)lzzi&bd&ݬR)ݝ\_n/6xf]]yC3{LNe&:n̙6t߲H6y;t<_LZ/ LH=ɼNLN'{Sx,0gsq0yz0r`ֱGLƽtZ=O{^"%t / %fvW%S+V-enOr
ugbU = To*3.b o [3}~`qw 1Wr}ύQ/o.:7٧J>h+ "/&Hz;}!OqG:Uh|N QsMV; CpBRi dK. To\}96/6](N(fIDQ -Nnk}+Ȝѣmy:*MV#Mm(
QSVY{^T?U
K6^)V×ճR!* 9/*myX !8!$= ;ZFX FPO0оtd`~M S#ݦvdϫ/| 4oo e_'7}(O!Ͽ~:CMA
v?߫ņƺ5Bڅ 2'4S);Qr6g^lhFM~ۄ6IQ|506 xQ/obY:Р{ So! {MI
KԺbS#lȕ%/>\ݪF.1^`"y[z#U6cFn$YQX!/ZQ*qsp , ԿU) z5_g\X|UI ;!jנj5/kjB*10ZjE[.~mdf?mjjkְc7PTMC1:R
]u-~ h?X&;ޝ}>rؤy ; $=G X(9Òs@(3$;1a+44mJغDULDtڷ iham٘Zmم"e~{|6i__flZv.<߅M#3szړOҳi~Vs>Fm_$s+0<O @ Px`O @ ^qY`Q3 0KLIx
;=ӌ>fʻu+<6Dk*79qQsӰ|oX~gX NNxOGL)!_Ișܕ!ۗPeWO1ӈ|7" _ȧ""62X_a; 02 ӡBqS\!{~zpŌf|cþ~_/kĠIl[DQDȉHlo6u]R<= ATh_CubʹNY
W'p{B:)˝0'Rꄕ-:w#d֒MKMkٴ֒jG VE
ohZ`[:"GGB/v\ Ӫ& @]݉u&M`4]G:7 7IJ=k2JEq6odv :c `0 5WZ3)%YZdԌ,zj\w==jٳ!*H'YTؑ̚ƺYcX0V ovSYWRRf9eAYQ8j +p+͙
HF-| M[g9'| 3|kb K%GZ>&| >aW0 L y}\ANK|P
K)H^VkTtA`"x ԨSg-z
r:}ZuЉo6ttj$Bn%WuG_ | ǒW{0WFe ô4f( kg눂nWXOw1
*.b2VE l
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-12862.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-12862.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:21:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 494.25 591.75 271.499 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge entered a formal finding against Applicant with\
respect to Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\),)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(rather than Guideline F \(Financial )Tj
13.857 0 Td
(Considerations\). )Tj
6.833 0 Td
(However, it is clear from the Judge's decision that he is finding)Tj
-20.689 -1.125 Td
(against Applicant with respect to Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\
\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
("The conditions that resulted in the behavior were largely beyond the pe\
rson's control \(e.g., loss of employment, a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(business downturn, unexpected medical )Tj
16.19 0 Td
(emergency, or a death, divorce or separation\)" \(Directive, Adjudicativ\
e)Tj
-16.19 -1.125 Td
(Guidelines, Item E2.A6.1.3.3\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
("The individual initiated a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors\
or otherwise resolve debts" \(Directive,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Adjudicative Guidelines, Item E2.A6.1.3.6\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
(Decision at pp. 3-4.)Tj
T*
(5. )Tj
("It was an isolated incident" \(Directive, Adjudicative Guidelines, Item\
E2.A6.1.3.2\).)Tj
T*
(6. )Tj
(Decision at p. 5.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
41 0 obj
[43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R]
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-12862.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-12862.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:21:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(In this case, the Judge found and the record supports Applicant had a pa\
ttern of procrastination and half measures with)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(regard to dealing with many years of )Tj
14.967 0 Td
(significant debts, including debts for unpaid taxes and student loans. )Tj
27.606 0 Td
(At the time)Tj
-42.573 -1.125 Td
(the case was submitted for decision, he still had significant delinquent\
debts )Tj
30.632 0 Td
(and had only recently filed for bankruptcy.)Tj
-30.632 -1.125 Td
(In light of the foregoing, the Judge could reasonably conclude that Appl\
icant's financial problems were ongoing and )Tj
46.723 0 Td
(that)Tj
-46.723 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's recent efforts to rectify his financial situation were not a\
substitute for a consistent record of timely remedial)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(action. )Tj
2.943 0 Td
(Therefore, the Judge was )Tj
10.301 0 Td
(not required as a matter of law to conclude Applicant's efforts to addre\
ss his financial)Tj
-13.245 -1.125 Td
(difficulties warranted application of Financial Considerations Mitigatin\
g )Tj
29.298 0 Td
(Conditions 6.)Tj
-29.298 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge did not make any findings with respect to Appli\
cant's divorce, the medical condition of)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Applicant's child, or the relation of either of )Tj
17.813 0 Td
(those circumstances to Applicant's financial situation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 487.8555 636.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 487.8555 636 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 501.6616 632.25 Tm
( )Tj
(In his conclusion,)Tj
-40.472 -1.375 Td
(the Judge confused Financial Consideration Mitigating Conditions 2)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 344.2949 620.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 344.2949 619.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 358.1011 615.75 Tm
( and 3, stating: )Tj
6.138 0 Td
("No Mitigating Conditions \(MC\))Tj
-34.647 -1.375 Td
(have been established . . . it is not an isolated incident \(MC 3\); . .\
.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 338.834 603.75 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 338.834 603 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 352.6401 599.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Given the facial significance of Applicant's)Tj
-28.053 -1.125 Td
(divorce and )Tj
4.942 0 Td
(his child's medical condition to his case in mitigation, the Judge erred\
in not making pertinent findings of)Tj
-4.942 -1.125 Td
(fact and conclusions as required by the Directive. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.02 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.25.)Tj
-20.02 -1.125 Td
(However, because the Judge's ultimate adverse decision is sustainable on\
other grounds \(Guideline )Tj
39.78 0 Td
(E\), remand to the)Tj
-39.78 -1.125 Td
(Judge has no significant chance of changing the outcome of the case, and\
is therefore inappropriate. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
40.152 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No.)Tj
-40.152 -1.125 Td
(02-17276 \(March 15, )Tj
(2005\) at p.4.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by finding Applicant's falsificat\
ion of his security clearance application was)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 28 505.5 cm
0 0 m
559.975 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 492.75 Tm
(deliberate)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 492 cm
0 0 m
47.303 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 63.3027 492.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant contends that he )Tj
11.441 0 Td
(did not deliberately falsify his security clearance application by faili\
ng to disclose)Tj
-15.383 -1.125 Td
(his Federal Income Tax liens. )Tj
12.107 0 Td
(Rather, he contends the omission of the )Tj
16.052 0 Td
(information in question was the result of an)Tj
-28.16 -1.125 Td
(oversight. )Tj
(Applicant's argument does not persuade us that the Judge erred.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge had the opportunity to consider Applicant's exp\
lanation for why he failed to disclose the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(information in question. )Tj
9.888 0 Td
(The Judge was not )Tj
(bound--as a matter of law--to accept or reject Applicant's explanation.)Tj
-9.888 -1.125 Td
(Rather, the Judge had to consider Applicant's explanation in light of th\
e record )Tj
31.727 0 Td
(evidence as a whole. )Tj
8.524 0 Td
(Considering the)Tj
-40.251 -1.125 Td
(record as a whole, the Judge had a sufficient basis to find that Applica\
nt's omissions were deliberate and intentional.)Tj
T*
(Accordingly, the Judge's finding of falsification is sustainable. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.23 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
-25.23 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.32.1.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate error below which would change the o\
utcome of the case. )Tj
37.82 0 Td
(Therefore, the Board)Tj
-37.82 -1.125 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's adverse )Tj
17.314 0 Td
(security clearance decision.)Tj
-17.314 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 282 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 257.25 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael D. Hipple)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 180 cm
0 0 m
129.311 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 155.25 Tm
(Michael D. Hipple)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: William S. Fields)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 78 cm
0 0 m
124.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 53.25 Tm
(William S. Fields)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
43 0 obj
<>/BS<
>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[488.0 634.0 502.0 645.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[344.0 618.0 358.0 629.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[339.0 601.0 353.0 612.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
[48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-12862.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-12862.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:21:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(In deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are contrary to l\
aw, the Board will consider whether they are)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(contrary to provisions of )Tj
10.109 0 Td
(Executive Order 10865, the Directive, or other applicable federal law. )Tj
28.238 0 Td
(Compliance with state)Tj
-38.347 -1.125 Td
(or local law is not required because security clearance )Tj
21.851 0 Td
(adjudications are conducted by the Department of Defense)Tj
-21.851 -1.125 Td
(pursuant to federal law. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
9.691 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 2 \(Supremacy Clause\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.828 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-35.519 -1.125 Td
(0423 \(June 8, 2001\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court decisions\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported )Tj
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
-21.425 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence i\
n the same record. )Tj
35.516 0 Td
(In )Tj
(making this review, the)Tj
-35.516 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Board shall give deference to the credibility determinations of t\
he Administrative Judge." )Tj
39.174 0 Td
(Directive, Additional)Tj
-39.174 -1.125 Td
(Procedural )Tj
4.582 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's findings, but also whether there is evidence )Tj
20.758 0 Td
(that fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-20.758 -1.125 Td
(findings, and whether the Judge's findings reflect a reasonable interpre\
tation of the record )Tj
36.112 0 Td
(evidence as a whole.)Tj
-36.112 -1.125 Td
(Although a Judge's credibility determination is not immune from review, \
the party challenging a Judge's credibility)Tj
T*
(determination has a )Tj
8.081 0 Td
(heavy burden on appeal.)Tj
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(When an appeal issue raises a question of law, the Board's scope of revi\
ew is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
34.558 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. 87-2107)Tj
-34.558 -1.125 Td
(\(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing )Tj
15.857 0 Td
(federal cases\).)Tj
-15.857 -2.125 Td
(If an appealing party demonstrates factual or legal error, then the Boar\
d must consider the following questions:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Is the error harmful or harmless? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.384 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0250 \(July 11, 2001\) at p. 6 \(discussing harmless \
error)Tj
-16.715 -1.125 Td
(doctrine\);)Tj
T*
(Has the nonappealing party made a persuasive argument for how the Admini\
strative Judge's decision can be affirmed on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(alternate grounds? )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.608 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 99-0454 \(October 17, 2000\) at p. 6 \(citing federal cases\); \
and)Tj
-10.939 -2.125 Td
(If the Administrative Judge's decision cannot be affirmed, should the ca\
se be reversed or remanded? )Tj
40.333 0 Td
(\(Directive,)Tj
-40.333 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Items )Tj
15.912 0 Td
(E3.1.33.2 and E3.1.33.3\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
5.313 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant's history\
of financial difficulties was not extenuated)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 334.5 cm
0 0 m
565.33 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 318.75 Tm
(or mitigated)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 318 cm
0 0 m
58.318 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 74.3184 318.75 Tm
(.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 77.3184 323.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 77.3184 322.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 91.1245 318.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant contends the )Tj
9.72 0 Td
(Administrative Judge should have concluded that the security concerns ra\
ised by)Tj
-15.98 -1.375 Td
(his substantial indebtedness were mitigated by application of Financial \
)Tj
28.577 0 Td
(Considerations Mitigating Conditions 3)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 549.2559 306.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 549.2559 306 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 563.062 302.25 Tm
( and 6.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 290.25 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 289.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 27.3687 285.75 Tm
( )Tj
(In support of that contention Applicant argues that: \(1\) he had either\
paid off, was making payments on, or )Tj
43.155 0 Td
(had)Tj
-44.103 -1.125 Td
(contacted creditors to make settlement arrangements with respect to, man\
y of the debts, \(2\) subsequent to the hearing,)Tj
T*
(but before the closing of the record in )Tj
15.328 0 Td
(the case, he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and \(3\) his financial sit\
uation was)Tj
-15.328 -1.125 Td
(adversely impacted by his divorce and his child's medical condition. )Tj
27.534 0 Td
(Applicant )Tj
4.193 0 Td
(also cites to several decisions by DOHA)Tj
-31.728 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judges in which security clearances were granted to appli\
cants with financial histories similar to)Tj
T*
(Applicant's. )Tj
(Applicant's claims have mixed merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The decision in another DOHA case cited by Applicant on appeal does not \
demonstrate error by the Administrative)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge in this case. )Tj
7.526 0 Td
(A decision by a Hearing )Tj
9.969 0 Td
(Office Judge is not legally binding precedent on that Judge's colleagues\
in)Tj
-17.496 -1.125 Td
(other cases. )Tj
(The cited cases are not legally binding precedent on the Board in this o\
r )Tj
33.905 0 Td
(any other appeal. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.108 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(No. 01-22606 \(June 30, 2003\) at pp. 3-5 \(discussing in detail the pre\
cedential value of decisions by Hearing Office)Tj
T*
(Judges\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The application of a disqualifying or mitigating condition by an Adminis\
trative Judge requires the exercise of sound)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(discretion in light of the record evidence as )Tj
17.549 0 Td
(a whole. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
6.969 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 \(January 15, 2003\) at p. 7.)Tj
-24.519 -1.125 Td
(Accordingly, even if Applicant's financial difficulties arose from circu\
mstances )Tj
32.058 0 Td
(beyond his control, the Judge)Tj
-32.058 -1.125 Td
(reasonably could consider whether Applicant acted in a reasonable manner\
more recently when dealing with those)Tj
T*
(financial )Tj
3.748 0 Td
(difficulties.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[77.0 321.0 91.0 332.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[549.0 304.0 563.0 315.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[16.0 288.0 27.0 299.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
59 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/03-12862.a1.html)
endobj
58 0 obj
<>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>
endobj
52 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 714.0 null]
endobj
53 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 662.0 null]
endobj
54 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 609.0 null]
endobj
55 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 570.0 null]
endobj
56 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 545.0 null]
endobj
57 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 519.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 61
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000135777 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003731 00000 n
0000003758 00000 n
0000134860 00000 n
0000135080 00000 n
0000135122 00000 n
0000134670 00000 n
0000004394 00000 n
0000126241 00000 n
0000119077 00000 n
0000117016 00000 n
0000003861 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003956 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004605 00000 n
0000010031 00000 n
0000010080 00000 n
0000010115 00000 n
0000010621 00000 n
0000011044 00000 n
0000064069 00000 n
0000064336 00000 n
0000032598 00000 n
0000032871 00000 n
0000011431 00000 n
0000011707 00000 n
0000012067 00000 n
0000033310 00000 n
0000064946 00000 n
0000117205 00000 n
0000119302 00000 n
0000119341 00000 n
0000125257 00000 n
0000125585 00000 n
0000125913 00000 n
0000126466 00000 n
0000126505 00000 n
0000133690 00000 n
0000134016 00000 n
0000134344 00000 n
0000134755 00000 n
0000135525 00000 n
0000135567 00000 n
0000135609 00000 n
0000135651 00000 n
0000135693 00000 n
0000135735 00000 n
0000135330 00000 n
0000135164 00000 n
0000135472 00000 n
trailer
<<8E1288807330364D8FC48CC66C93AFAC>]>>
startxref
135950
%%EOF