%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:21:59-04:00
2021-06-24T15:21:58-04:00
2021-06-24T15:21:59-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-13096.a1
uuid:917af8d7-9c89-4820-a3e2-0be86b243380
uuid:4dd322dd-4631-43fe-ad52-02314651ffa3
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-13096.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-13096.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:21:59 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 29, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-13096)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated June)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(3, 2004, which stated the reasons why )Tj
15.469 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classified informa\
tion.)Tj
-15.469 -1.125 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) and )Tj
28.162 0 Td
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
13.303 0 Td
(Administrative)Tj
-41.465 -1.125 Td
(Judge Jacqueline T. Williams issued an unfavorable security clearance de\
cision, dated June 13, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of )Tj
17.327 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-17.327 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by concluding that the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(security concerns raised by Applicant's )Tj
15.87 0 Td
(history of indebtedness had not been mitigated, and \(2\) whether the)Tj
-15.87 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge erred by finding the Applicant's falsification of h\
er security clearance )Tj
36.834 0 Td
(application was deliberate.)Tj
-36.834 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge'\
s decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court\
)Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(m#j)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <"ZJ(ҔRв=@
ND!o?U'
cmYY`4V{\Wg
QK8p83)s ~'=q荽WoW~pB#=2aB)lin)/gԬqqB?2Yh@h4/E;{LVrQ!n3deb2\]]}}:s9k%Z┙>/*1UGZd)[&1U먮S SRbՌ{g쀢d ƿ
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| TnC*)0=3D\Ę"**Q4Q0" 7W7ܗwG1x{S]>{F_X*?Ffm~ v4қ f #} , ӈIY> 8gG=h0^'/vBGFgqck
>f!>kƄD'~tǹ Ҕؘqyǎr
Z /fLA D`[Cy:>>V5Z˫ h8k 68?>ܬ+&u9;&1ZR4hȶS.͚h骖5ZQ+m~ծ}ޝ:vڭ_ݧo?|ݐ㰠1"rQcbbǎӄ&˔ ~4c)isf̛`K2.+VZf
7Q-[m߱s={?p#GK?Qz3g/]7Lϯ#`*
a(&RP5bb;1H%sc#(ѮG\K]k UgrU'C)NX KFI,j*ôӵE59dn.D&ٹiPb8).JK]itR(%QIR4eZU+~X9U)=<=z{{zDxi[ok7@cԸV֟,)&SNk-;Cq8G'9D֨AR?]d<@|!HNw%e\~M&N@Mf`94өqօs2,e{UΡ{8`/r;ud}jS{,WKҿFSǡMx}+Q3b\I[[Y
d+ wj5w6{;;ۛۙ?651{[=ʇfSSششƔ
`ʮ)w65mr773}FOdDClg]Ph8h糣~ކ^wΠ5o7#T0h|J7eK3mgZu0/ &>^*[/uvzgCT&6 T5 6{>3fșZ_7YkГۀK%XI0Cx>̄tHցpHaT3K x_z
+a#@.!2 J! 8',O`\p"!Tl#a4DC,`<q0&a2La
`*<E@5fR\P%W*ըBl
q
WPp=fspnMqn<܆qKwn=mq/`cC{tp ~lM1
A,Cx]`+a3lG[`KtE5m2jP:<I<;*gy ?V艭.KGh;vS>T@h?Cga*#TLGq:AtNi>PF<]t.JP)<#n-Mw.ݣQ= =JzF+Ji+M
;f,Jټrw.Uk,TMR
2`F1Y1k&1a
XCޡlYcfsdNxU ua>̗ua]Y7֝'bY֗c٧lU&u:KYz(=*j*I5C5S5KJQTsT骹6}>g``K I=X6ӳoB1#
ݙ3̿wiq"R5$wwB]pw@Km&Yn[6];.[{>_!s[v#<&<%O3GyV?ɟ5s˹ܔ_owS%yQ^yU^u5]]5u-][uu=]_7
u#X7Mu37UϪj%jjFjLjƩj
Qj
SdjfuRҭuV/+Zou{AwTnGU~u@TauDUquB=lOViUgBi9ylx!^Wx-ވ E(',RgR G.IR&CiD0Yt2PF$Qf"QvA9)<7U?sSO((M TR ~~:Q=
bTJPI*ErT^^x@!J)&d
)44fWzުwU>d>/`b%+fX4lsZN9gLpVf윃sr.y8/M3i]p>wƸnB\n b\KpI..s+R]ťrjw]WJ\pUչZ\p]7417܌snɭRK[sn=w܉;snS]у{r/}/<$`,5Q&ĘXCy