%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:22:31-04:00
2021-06-24T15:22:30-04:00
2021-06-24T15:22:31-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-13934.a1
uuid:7123c0e6-d3a9-4854-b62b-ef0762d47d75
uuid:7cf0b5d6-b016-48d0-8e2c-d82246de4d06
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-13934.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-13934.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:22:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 17, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-13934)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.431 -2.2 Td
(Cathy Steele, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(February 17, 2004, which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(stated the reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classif\
ied information for)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline H)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Drug Involvement\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge Philip S. Howe issued an unfavorable security clear\
ance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.575 0 Td
(decision dated November 9, 2004.)Tj
-31.575 -2.125 Td
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1\
992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge's conclusion that Applicant had)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not mitigated his drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.055 0 Td
(involvement was arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law; \(2\) whether \
the Administrative Judge)Tj
-9.055 -1.125 Td
(erred in finding that Applicant falsified his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.356 0 Td
(Security Clearance Application \(SF-86\); and \(3\) whether the Administ\
rative)Tj
-17.356 -1.125 Td
(Judge's conclusion that Applicant had not mitigated the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.398 0 Td
(falsifications in his SF-86 is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to)Tj
-22.398 -1.125 Td
(law. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.188 0 Td
(Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-7.503 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.191 0 Td
(whether there is factual or legal error. )Tj
15.326 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.801 0 Td
(specificity and identify how the Administrative Judge committed factual \
or legal)Tj
-14.801 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.186 0 Td
(E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-22.186 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.355 0 Td
(specificity\).)Tj
-26.355 -2.125 Td
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
T*
(\(1\) arbitrary or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.191 0 Td
(capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
13.689 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.899 0 Td
(conclusions are arbitrary or capricious, the Board will review the Judge\
's)Tj
-15.899 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.131 0 Td
(evidence; it fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
-24.131 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.019 0 Td
(choice made; it does not consider)Tj
-32.019 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect of the case; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.316 0 Td
(offers an)Tj
-42.316 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(Dmu A0)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CIi9 t1NzOJ3$ٲϟ>֮!yipw64ނAw*fW 74PnTE%9,z*yCﮰ5$Ͱv@Hb٦eC5;>y*bhqк+bKLT|zKg۠7o+$|"?E
F@,:w{=̹p|>0˽G#hЬAQE.s֜gYO.R`e;kB ckl}?z*ԯ IX
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\ؘ;3p-;kL%(*%*FTv4ػXPް(8}z+9k>gs9(X0;}]N~X9cd Cb:?2gTǐν
qKGv>eh;WDX{#g
zɉҵ=BeHb%/4:
? C^aTذhXW֛EEt lpԑz9-ZNMKܐ@U)uQb߁Si$`PXu.la].Em_te7]ÏBB=GDd^@Ac~2t?2r17~BĄILM6}Y$ϝ.JYd+RWZ[a[n۞cg{f۟y G;~8s/UZN.DE$䯺`6t1c?Cy4'$^̧(%:)5oeLU+}|=[hmZdz|ZG;UQmղsM{
=S'nD,Jb-cVj֪0kϢC7%uw[/Wz==Hqz>I/t}OWA-ZD
PctO`TKik"lr6stqv*+|SXX|fR0Xֳ?R|QZ+.J2QLS'f`5i5^~!Dնk5s9ƜdN` Ys*XM8Z{s0}{$˒C"H,jMOݘ HrhllW`.PxK^t>(]|1^ʨT..!.\~s