%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:26:23-04:00
2021-06-24T15:26:22-04:00
2021-06-24T15:26:23-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-16848.a1
uuid:8ad885d2-67ee-403f-9d41-9e38a5107fd8
uuid:099ba459-d616-4da4-b5d4-9e9d32676a42
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-16848.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-16848.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:26:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 30, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-16848)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.72 -2.2 Td
(Jennifer I. Campbell, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.498 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated May)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(10, 2004, which stated the reasons why )Tj
15.969 0 Td
(DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for)Tj
-15.969 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\). )Tj
22.995 0 Td
(Administrative )Tj
6.249 0 Td
(Judge Carol G. Ricciardello issued a)Tj
-33.687 -1.125 Td
(favorable security clearance decision, dated January 24, 2005.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel appealed the Administrative Judge's favorable decisio\
n. )Tj
31.032 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under)Tj
-31.032 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of )Tj
17.327 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-17.327 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge erred by imposing an improper)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(burden of proof on Department Counsel; )Tj
16.552 0 Td
(and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's favorable conclusions under\
)Tj
-16.552 -1.125 Td
(Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) are not supported by the record eviden\
ce. )Tj
29.934 0 Td
(For the )Tj
(reasons that follow, the Board)Tj
-29.934 -1.125 Td
(reverses the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3 )Tj
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\) )Tj
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious, )Tj
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its )Tj
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of )Tj
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
-16.879 -1.125 Td
(explanation for the decision that runs contrary to the record evidence; \
or it is so )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(implausible that it cannot be ascribed to)Tj
-32.018 -1.125 Td
(a mere difference of opinion. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
11.883 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(,)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(ISCR Case No. 97-0435 \(July 14, 1998\) at p. 3 \(citing Supreme Court )Tj
28.72 0 Td
(decision\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(8Kҝ,\(lMj=)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0l/J,)H[,'8E~U:!oHNXn=λpΫ]
}oF^ʷsH>hsg7\p0t
^CR{3l(aK4k#$Qw!߉eDH|'fpWTFFлi&KkoK$|"v))s&16c)2kjjYq]z/gYriΥGfٳ>Sr#
{6#{0p^#y)pRR'{ZE
wx90S ӥ
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| TnC*)@4
&@^YDE%+QqG+
:ywЧw{Nuݺw @"~۪meӜDb 8l
ep4خ3 (I 6FOtyd y?@kQ,7mCx\cNWx)zTX
Jy$&4>ysꑡ1)<6HSbG8> pdu?vLDdO:`: E_hJO)8("LT VTR%UA_[
/b@O}>p~|
|(b-&֜|hc+jծc_٥^}W
5vݤi-Z~Ӫuuةs>ޣg}˯:0|?ǁ?
!0$,<"rh#cF=flܯO8i ~4c)sK`Kf,[+VZf66mB[mߑs={?{#G/:qT3gϝ//]rnˀ]`%l`*Z0PFH)Rhab+{1X%cp܋- =dw<@A({Bɯjuz:MBLפjkF[W뤭mʹ-OS"(EqS+^JKD+JQ*k.%W9*gu偷ww0HޣZ&ittu9:˖h1n^jOKRsf24Ov HICd,Hl#C\qX"V^^/d7Y->p}r|E)_AS39k498r
8hk8CGJ#b#C\uZ].[W5 fg#`iSrW?o{%\|֜+`6?TT.|Q^2LLM6֦VL-M-LLMM&U3=o(*[b\b\kL0nGy`5zz
~_CkC3b@S}ޤc}K_s~~Kk9FH7(+uZnvmF+ׁ# @/#8Oa[Kk>X,2T!qͪ U5O{vf!J=-8O5y{ZݸTu3'LHTX `=8@
4B<g
6Kx`-lP`A:C1D 84"C)̇KP
!
A9̆0F@DHȄQ0ba_!x0A