%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:29:57-04:00
2021-06-24T15:29:57-04:00
2021-06-24T15:29:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-18242.a1
uuid:687c890a-a212-43e3-a4d9-c2c95b39d3ef
uuid:43f57318-e05b-4d8b-acf4-a077f1dcbc7e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-18242.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-18242.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:29:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 1, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-18242)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.846 -2.2 Td
(Michael J. Zimmar, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On November)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(16, 2004, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security conc\
erns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\), Guideline E \(Personal Co\
nduct\), and )Tj
33.852 0 Td
(Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\), of)Tj
-33.852 -1.125 Td
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\)\(Dir\
ective\). )Tj
32.127 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On July)Tj
-44.594 -1.125 Td
(22, )Tj
(2005, after the hearing, )Tj
11.052 0 Td
(Administrative Judge Michael J. Breslin denied Applicant's request for a\
security clearance.)Tj
-11.052 -1.125 Td
(Applicant timely appealed pursuant to the )Tj
16.995 0 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-16.995 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
T*
(concerns raised by Applicant's history of )Tj
16.565 0 Td
(drug involvement and the falsification of her security clearance applica\
tion had)Tj
-16.565 -1.125 Td
(not been mitigated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant contends the Judge should have concluded that the security con\
cerns raised by her prior drug use and the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(falsification of her security clearance )Tj
15.075 0 Td
(application had been mitigated because: \(1\) she has abstained from suc\
h drug use)Tj
-15.075 -1.125 Td
(for the last seven years, \(2\) her job performance and character refere\
nces are )Tj
30.871 0 Td
(excellent, \(3\) she has demonstrated that she)Tj
-30.871 -1.125 Td
(would not use drugs in the future, \(4\) she did not intend to falsify h\
er security clearance application, \(5\) the )Tj
43.154 0 Td
(information)Tj
-43.154 -1.125 Td
(has now been fully disclosed, and \(6\) she has had a clearance for over\
26 years with no security violations or)Tj
T*
(compromise of classified information. )Tj
15.524 0 Td
(Applicant also argues that the Judge erred in the application of the "wh\
ole)Tj
-15.524 -1.125 Td
(person" concept as evidenced by the fact that he did not give "full and \
complete )Tj
32.167 0 Td
(consideration [to] Applicant's numerous)Tj
-32.167 -1.125 Td
(exhibits \(other than being alphabetically named\) since no discussion w\
as made in the decision." )Tj
38.537 0 Td
(The Board does not )Tj
8.109 0 Td
(find)Tj
-46.646 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's contentions persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The application of disqualifying and mitigating conditions does not turn\
simply on a finding that one or more of them)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(applies to the particular facts of a case. )Tj
15.798 0 Td
(Rather, their application requires the exercise of sound discretion in l\
ight of the)Tj
-15.798 -1.125 Td
(record evidence as a whole. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
11.328 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 01-14740 at 7 \(App. Bd. )Tj
(Jan.15, 2003\). )Tj
(Thus, the presence of)Tj
-14.659 -1.125 Td
(some mitigating evidence does not alone compel the Judge to make a favor\
able security clearance decision. )Tj
43.234 0 Td
(As the trier)Tj
-43.234 -1.125 Td
(of )Tj
(fact, the Judge has to weigh the evidence as a whole and decide whether \
the favorable evidence outweighs the)Tj
T*
(unfavorable evidence or )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
9.912 0 Td
(vice versa)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.025 0 Td
(. )Tj
(An )Tj
(applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, or a\
n ability)Tj
-13.937 -1.125 Td
(to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficie\
nt to )Tj
29.044 0 Td
(demonstrate the Judge weighed the evidence or)Tj
-29.044 -1.125 Td
(reached conclusions in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious, or contra\
ry to law.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(x3,\\52,01)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cdi9e{V'='Yll%d)ccw?k9/~͓θUћ7{Wn!jv
s݈]c?,bCH=bdpvF2UALRh?(a^w^)q-\3OYh2Qe.5=Θ{B`>Gf!40b_pBȅ4)W_ֆqr7EV Th
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgve"M{w,(X`
I4_5"***Q`]XQ,("*6eWQ,OKw}|9sܹ} @2۲Medb 8o,p (F'C@ cEۜH{c#NX0+Z81qIY\8sI\xR|%kEE(ߜ1!NHhs;x`M~ȨMI<V# L@ߛ!ZኂB![d]gZ[Q}:_V @#ȟw6Ba7 JQXv.n{x6hبZ#iuz/oI͚ԧem|۶oߡc]>ڭ{>˯z:8|}C~i`hX83dظ #FJ=flҸ?2aɿNI:mzꌴ2fgΙ;o/˖^j7lDlݖ}]ݗC-.V44+4ϥzZ)I .P(g+Z.k+tuStzA_W絛oMAp}K'kβ)7r[9@9U)ϓWʛr|@.OC!f0D[LfsMQ/`Y]]=^*d+@SWl%o
9dj*JBB?!\!%B8XuZdM)i )=P)Y#IWDm6s ].E@y!LYAB>pȔ8s88Dra>i0ꍩcVXݬjk{!ګZk`˯D=~:pJTWAa~*:U}re-T;X-,6֖VO--,-M-M,Y7/[XtUi:@:NGP*
,-624;̾VfrttȔo:dcmn&oޤ3insJ7U0`\
jMDXx^a "' \]W_(/bg ;,Ujj @U
9z}sgEĚG8Z.܂/`5TX`d@:,
!C,XP3X%W
6 (-0" "8p
NxpA l% !A9̀0ApȆx 0FhH10,aȅ0 &n9؇q* V,\K7)Q.eW`6D:b-p5J\kqq=n 7܊0 o2a:ݸsq/A'܇yX]F7tx a}a<聞
r6ģX1QǰpZԡ