%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:29:58-04:00
2021-06-24T15:29:58-04:00
2021-06-24T15:29:58-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-18254.a1
uuid:6431d8d8-1387-48b4-963c-7f58c03f1511
uuid:aa8a3b56-8c09-47cb-a77c-9d3e9dff747e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-18254.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-18254.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:29:58 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 16, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-18254)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant Ap\
plicant a security clearance. )Tj
41.649 0 Td
(On January 29,)Tj
-41.649 -1.125 Td
(2004, DOHA issued a statement of )Tj
(reasons \(SOR\) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--secur\
ity concerns)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(raised under Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) and Guideline E )Tj
27.799 0 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\), of Department of Defense)Tj
-27.799 -1.125 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Jan. 2, 1992, as amended\)\(Directive\). )Tj
22.548 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing. )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(On June 27, 2005, after )Tj
(the)Tj
-35.015 -1.125 Td
(hearing, )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(Administrative Judge John Grattan Metz, Jr. denied Applicant's request f\
or a security clearance. )Tj
38.612 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-42.11 -1.125 Td
(timely appealed pursuant to the )Tj
12.802 0 Td
(Directive \266\266 E3.1.28 and E3.1.30.)Tj
-12.802 -2.125 Td
(Applicant raised the following issue on appeal: whether the Administrati\
ve Judge erred by concluding that the security)Tj
T*
(concerns raised by Applicant's history of )Tj
16.565 0 Td
(indebtedness had not been mitigated.)Tj
-16.565 -2.125 Td
(Applicant contends the Administrative Judge should have concluded that t\
he security concerns raised by her history of)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(indebtedness were mitigated by )Tj
12.885 0 Td
(application of Financial Considerations Mitigating Conditions 1,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 480.9238 275.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 480.9238 274.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 494.73 270.75 Tm
( 3,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 506.73 275.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 506.73 274.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 520.5361 270.75 Tm
( and 6.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 552.8623 275.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 552.8623 274.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 566.6685 270.75 Tm
( )Tj
(In)Tj
-45.889 -1.125 Td
(support of that contention, Applicant argues that: \(a\) the Judge erred\
with )Tj
29.63 0 Td
(respect to several findings as to the nature and)Tj
-29.63 -1.125 Td
(circumstances of several of Applicant's debts, \(b\) the debts resulted \
form medical problems and marital )Tj
41.556 0 Td
(difficulties, \(c\))Tj
-41.556 -1.125 Td
(the debts are old, she is current on her recent debts, and all but three\
of the debts are paid off and she is making inquiries)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and arrangements to )Tj
8.358 0 Td
(pay the remaining valid debts. )Tj
12.33 0 Td
(Applicant also cites to a Hearing Office decision in which a different)Tj
-20.688 -1.125 Td
(Judge found in favor of an Applicant with an arguably )Tj
21.994 0 Td
(worst history of financial difficulties.)Tj
-21.994 -2.125 Td
(The factual findings which Applicant challenges reflect permissible inte\
rpretations of the record evidence by the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge. )Tj
9.082 0 Td
(Applicant has not met )Tj
9.054 0 Td
(her burden of demonstrating that the Judge's material findings with resp\
ect)Tj
-18.136 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's history of financial difficulties do not reflect a reasonabl\
e or plausible )Tj
32.947 0 Td
(interpretation of the record evidence.)Tj
-32.947 -1.125 Td
(Considering the record evidence as a whole, the Judge's findings about A\
pplicant's history of indebtedness are)Tj
T*
(sustainable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The decision in another DOHA Hearing Office case does not demonstrate er\
ror by the Administrative Judge in this case.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(A decision by a Hearing Office Judge )Tj
15.356 0 Td
(is not legally binding precedent on that Judge's colleagues in other cas\
es.)Tj
-15.356 -1.125 Td
(Likewise, the cited case is not legally binding precedent on the Board. \
)Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
28.325 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR )Tj
(Case No. 01-22606 at 3-5 \(App. Bd.)Tj
-28.325 -1.125 Td
(Jun. 30, 2003\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(y%0v1U)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <""MY'-p2!T4KeSgM1h5('cٱmTEVߖsgGDŽ A%
v
g-hNj=~g*h8G/ҿg١Ӕ7q;K3i\TL0_\Tèe`Noq[M|-|%>=d&%*b>ZCIyc`<*+ {
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H|TT=\
ܙ;ņ]b1FĘ bAEE@Ćh,X;
{bOcЧﭷ־gSY[bMz/fEx
cR_vs"{Du!ghVF@*116FʁuK8ZQ1C @#g~aY>|>i>Z[Y6i]{=MMMɦ9LcsWXsyy`qThjPKϬC7uOK֫zMc8=^OҧU}S?O;@kk+k5amWsT
Z̶ 5[grsUp5tZڸ:)((3̆
k؟xIɼ()Jg%TLR(cH}|77歙Z;ZE;]ЮjO&"L1S s9ΜCiɡK"Cx!Kr$94}!KrZ
6-re.Wcɡ]CM$JaoD~ϢBzեrtsqv&ͱxl0米